Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-regional observations and validation of the M3 ocean tide

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improved determinations of the oft-ignored third-degree ocean tides can yield better accuracy for tidal predictions, numerical model solutions, and geodesy. While only a small part of tidal range, these components can be larger at certain coastal locations due to shelf resonances and other effects. Here, we discuss observations of the M3 lunar terdiurnal tide using 9-year windowed tidal harmonic analyses at 157 tide gauges compares to a global assimilation model (TPXO9v5a), with a focus on the Western Pacific and the European Shelf. TPXO9v5a does well in estimating the observed M3 amplitudes and phase lags in most regions, though determinations in coastal zones and in morphologically complex areas are coarse and often inaccurate. We also employ a shallow-water model (MARS) on the European Shelf, which can yield localized improvement over TPXO. In five subregions of the European Shelf, regional root-mean-squared-errors (RMSEs) are lower (and thus a better fit) at three locations for TPXO for amplitudes, and three for phase lags, with MARS simulations being a better fit in the other subregions. We also show that some locations have experienced significant long-term increases and/or decreases in the M3 amplitude over time, likely related to resonance changes under sea level rise (SLR) which can modulate the oceanic response to astronomical forcing. This hypothesis is explored for Europe using the MARS model by applying various sea level rise scenarios, showing that the directionality (positive or negative) of the long-term changes in M3 amplitudes over time match the model results for more than half of our validation stations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boon J D. 2012. Evidence of sea level acceleration at US and Canadian tide stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. J Coast Res, 285: 1437–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell P C, Merrifield M A, Thompson P R. 2015. Sea level measured by tide gauges from global oceans–the Joint Archive for Sea Level holdings (NCEI Accession 0019568). Version 5.5, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Dataset

  • Cartwright D E, Edden A C, Spencer R, Vassie J M. 1980. The tides of the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Philos Trans Royal Soc, 298: 87–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright D E, Tayler R J. 1971. New computations of the tide-generating potential. Geophys J R Astron Soc, 23: 45–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Andersen O B. 2017. Towards further improving DTU global ocean tide model in shallow waters and Polar Seas. Proceedings of the Ocean Surface Topography Science Team (OSTST) Meeting. 23–27

  • Devlin A T, Jay D A, Talke S A, Zaron E D, Pan J, Lin H. 2017a. Coupling of sea level and tidal range changes, with implications for future water levels. Sci Rep, 7: 17021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin A T, Jay D A, Zaron E D, Talke S A, Pan J, Lin H. 2017b. Tidal variability related to sea level variability in the Pacific Ocean. J Geophys Res-Oceans, 122: 8445–8463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin A T, Pan J, Lin H. 2021. Extended water level trends at long-record tide gauges via moving window averaging and implications for future coastal flooding. J Geophys Res-Oceans, 126: e2021JC017730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbert G D, Erofeeva S Y. 2002. Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 19: 183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbert G D, Erofeeva S Y. 2010. OTIS (OSU Tidal Inversion Software) TPXO7.2. College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. http://volkov.oce.orst.edu/tides/otis.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Familkhalili R, Talke S A. 2016. The effect of channel deepening on tides and storm surge: A case study of Wilmington, NC. Geophys Res Lett, 43: 9138–9147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh I D, Marcos M, Talke S A, Woodworth P L, Hunter J R, Hague B S, Arns A, Bradshaw E, Thompson P. 2021. GESLA Version 3: A major update to the global higher-frequency sea-level dataset. Geosci Data J, 10: 293–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart-Davis M G, Sulzbach R, Dettmering D, Thomas M, Seitz F. 2022. TICON-td: Third-degree tidal constants based on GESLA sea-level records from globally distributed tide gauges (data). Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland P W, Welsch R E. 1977. Robust regression using iteratively re-weighted least-squares. Commun Stat-Theor Methods, 6: 813–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson P A. 1988. The physical characteristics of terdiurnal shelf resonance along the eastern Great Australian Bight. Flinders University of South Australia, School of Earth Sciences

  • Huthnance J M. 1980. On shelf-sea ‘resonance’ with application to Brazilian M3 tides. Deep Sea Res Part A Oceanographic Res Papers, 27: 347–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idier D, Bertin X, Thompson P, Pickering M D. 2019. Interactions between mean sea level, tide, surge, waves and flooding: Mechanisms and contributions to sea level variations at the coast. Surv Geophys, 40: 1603–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idier D, Paris F, Cozannet G L, Boulahya F, Dumas F. 2017. Sea-level rise impacts on the tides of the European Shelf. Cont Shelf Res, 137: 56–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazure P, Dumas F. 2008. An external-internal mode coupling for a 3D hydrodynamical model for applications at regional scale (MARS). Adv Water Resour, 31: 233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y. 2014. Coastal planning strategies for adaptation to sea level rise: A case study of Mokpo, Korea. J Buid Constr Plan Res, 2: 74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Leffler K E, Jay D A. 2009. Enhancing tidal harmonic analysis: Robust (hybrid L1/L2) solutions. Cont Shelf Res, 29: 78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker B B. 2007. Tidal analysis and prediction. Silver Spring, MD, NOAA NOS Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services, 378pp (NOAA Special Publication NOS CO-OPS 3). https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-191

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowicz R, Beardsley B, Lentz S. 2002. Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using T_TIDE. Comput Geoscis, 28: 929–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccioni G, Dettmering D, Bosch W, Seitz F. 2019. TICON: TIdal CONstants based on GESLA sea-level records from globally located tide gauges. Geosci Data J, 6: 97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray R D. 2020. First global observations of third-degree ocean tides. Sci Adv, 6: eabd4744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray R D. 2013. Precise comparisons of bottom-pressure and altimetric ocean tides. J Geophys Res-Oceans, 118: 4570–4584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray R D. 2006. Secular changes of the M tide in the Gulf of Maine. Cont Shelf Res, 26: 422–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson I S. 1979. The tidal dynamics of the Irish and Celtic Seas. Geophys J Int, 56: 159–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzbach R, Wziontek H, Hart-Davis M, Dobslaw H, Scherneck H G, Van Camp M, Omang O C D, Antokoletz E D, Voigt C, Dettmering D, Thomas M. 2022. Modeling gravimetric signatures of third-degree ocean tides and their detection in superconducting gravimeter records. J Geod, 96: 35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth P L, Hunter J R, Marcos M, Caldwell P, Menéndez M, Haigh I. 2017. Towards a global higher-frequency sea level dataset. Geosci Data J, 3: 50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie X H, Chen G Y, Shang X D, Fang W D. 2008. Evolution of the semidiurnal (M2) internal tide on the continental slope of the northern South China Sea. Geophys Res Lett, 35: L13604

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data used in this study is acquired freely from multiple sources: the University of Hawai’i Sea Level Center (UHI; http://uhslc.soest.hawaii.edu/data/; Caldwell et al., 2015); the Global Extreme Sea Level Analysis project version 3 (GESLA v3; https://gesla787883612.wordpress.com/downloads/; Woodworth et al., 2017; Haigh et al., 2021); the Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency (KHOA; http://www.khoa.go.kr/oceangrid/koofs/kor/observation/obs_real.do/); the Japanese Oceanographic Data Center (JODC; https://jdoss1.jodc.go.jp/vpage/tide.html/); the Service Hydrographique et Océanographique de la Marine of France (SHOM; https://data.shom.fr/); the British Oceanographic Data Centre of the National Oceanography Centre (NOC; https://www.bodc.ac.uk/data/hosted_data_systems/sea_level/uk_tide_gauge_network//); and Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Marine Environmental Data Section (MEDS; https://www.tides.gc.ca/en/tide-and-water-level-station-data). All hourly tide gauge data are deposited in an online repository of the Harvard Dataverse at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/7QTLPS. This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2021YFB3900400). Contributions to this work from Déborah Idier were supported by BRGM. IFREMER is also acknowledged for its permission to use the MARS code.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiayi Pan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Devlin, A.T., Pan, J. & Idier, D. Multi-regional observations and validation of the M3 ocean tide. Sci. China Earth Sci. 66, 2265–2277 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-022-1151-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-022-1151-0

Keywords

Navigation