Abstract
During the total solar eclipse on July 22, 2009 in Wuhan, the joint observation test of Na layer and ionosphere was conducted by using the daytime observation atmospheric lidar and the GPS ionosphere detector. The results show that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Na layer density slightly narrowed during the total solar eclipse and broadened after the eclipse, while the height of Na peak slightly decreased in the eclipse and increased after the eclipse. These implying that Na layer changes reflect the rapid process of sunrise and sunset. The ionosphere total electron content (TEC) and the sky background light noise also presented an obvious fluctuation characteristic with the changes of solar irradiation during the process of total solar eclipse. The difference lies in that the changes of FWHM of Na layer atoms are much slower than that of ionosphere, the reason for this might be that the Na layer, after being disturbed by the total solar eclipse, will generate a series of complicated photochemical reactions and momentum transport processes, and then recombine the Na atoms. The Na atoms to be detected by the lidar need a lag process, which rightly conforms to the theoretical simulated results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amiridis V, Melas D, Balis DS, et al. 2007. Aerosol lidar observations and model calculations of the Planetary Boundary Layer evolution over Greece, during the March 2006 Total Solar Eclipse. Atmos Chem Phys, 7: 6181–6189
Chen G, Zhao Z, Yang G, et al. 2010. Enhancement and HF Doppler observations of sporadic-E during the solar eclipse of 22 July 2009. J Geophys Res, 115: A 09325, doi: 10.1029/2010JA015530
Cheng X W, Gong S S, Li F Q, et al. 2007. 24 h Continuous sodium layer observation by lidar over Wuhan. Sci China Ser G: Phys, Mech Astron, 37: 196–201
Founda D, Melas D, Lykoudis S, et al. 2007. The effect of the total solar eclipse of 29 March 2006 on meteorological variable sin Greece. Atmos Chem Phys, 7: 5543–5553
Fricke B C, Alpers M, Höffner J. 2002. Daylight rejection with a new receiver for potassium resonance temperature lidars. Opt Lett, 27: 1932–1934
John M C P. 1991. The chemistry of meteoric metals in the Earth’s upper atmosphere. Int Rev Phys Chem, 10: 55–106
Le H, Liu L, Yue X, et al. 2008. The midlatitude F2 layer during solar eclipses: Observations and modeling. J Geophys Res, 113: A 08309, doi: 10.1029/2007JA013012
Muller-Wodarg I C F, Aylward A D, Lockwood M. 1998. Eects of a midlatitude Solar Eclipse on the thermosphere and ionosphere: A modelling study. Geohpys Res Lett, 25: 3787–3790
Pershin S M, Alekseev V A, Alekseeva N G, et al. 2008. Lidar monitoring of an aerosol precursor of seismic activity during the total solar eclipse of March 29, 2006. Phys Wave Phenom, 16: 159–166
Robert J S, Chester S G. 1999. Structure of the mesospheric Na layer at 40°N latitude: Seasonal and diurnal variations. J Geophys Res, 104: 11783–11798
Sharma S K, Mandal T K, Arya B C, et al. 2010. Effects of the solar eclipse on 15 January 2010 on the surface O3, NO, NO2, NH3, CO mixing ratio and the meteorological parameters, at Thiruvanathapuram, India. Ann Geophys, 28: 1199–1205
Shu F C, Guo L, Liu M, et al. 2009. Ionospheric TEC measurement with VLBI and GPS during the Total Solar Eclipse of 22 July 2009. Sci Technol Rev, 27: 19–24
Xu J, Smith A K. 2003. Perturbations of the sodium layer: Controlled by chemistry or dynamics. Geohpys Res Lett, 30: 2056, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018040
Xu J, Smith A K. 2004. Studies of gravity wave-induced fluctuations of the sodium layer using linear and nonlinear models. J Geophys Res, 109, doi: 10.1029/2003JD004038
Xu J, Smith A K. 2005. Evaluation of processes that affect the photochemical timescale of the sodium layer. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phy, 67: 1216–1225
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, X., Yang, Y., Wang, Z. et al. Joint observation results of Na layer and ionosphere in Wuhan during the Total Solar Eclipse. Sci. China Earth Sci. 59, 418–424 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5126-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5126-2