Abstract
Most ocean-atmosphere coupled models have difficulty in predicting the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) when starting from the boreal spring season. However, the cause of this spring predictability barrier (SPB) phenomenon remains elusive. We investigated the spatial characteristics of optimal initial errors that cause a significant SPB for El Niño events by using the monthly mean data of the pre-industrial (PI) control runs from several models in CMIP5 experiments. The results indicated that the SPB-related optimal initial errors often present an SST pattern with positive errors in the central-eastern equatorial Pacific, and a subsurface temperature pattern with positive errors in the upper layers of the eastern equatorial Pacific, and negative errors in the lower layers of the western equatorial Pacific. The SPB-related optimal initial errors exhibit a typical La Niña-like evolving mode, ultimately causing a large but negative prediction error of the Niño-3.4 SST anomalies for El Niño events. The negative prediction errors were found to originate from the lower layers of the western equatorial Pacific and then grow to be large in the eastern equatorial Pacific. It is therefore reasonable to suggest that the El Niño predictions may be most sensitive to the initial errors of temperature in the subsurface layers of the western equatorial Pacific and the Niño-3.4 region, thus possibly representing sensitive areas for adaptive observation. That is, if additional observations were to be preferentially deployed in these two regions, it might be possible to avoid large prediction errors for El Niño and generate a better forecast than one based on additional observations targeted elsewhere. Moreover, we also confirmed that the SPB-related optimal initial errors bear a strong resemblance to the optimal precursory disturbance for El Niño and La Niña events. This indicated that improvement of the observation network by additional observations in the identified sensitive areas would also be helpful in detecting the signals provided by the precursory disturbance, which may greatly improve the ENSO prediction skill.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bjerknes J. 1969. Atmospheric teleconnections from the tropical Pacific. Mon Wea Rev, 97: 163–172
Chen D, Cane M A, Kaplan A, et al. 2004. Predictability of El Niño over the past 148 years. Nature, 428: 733–736
Duan W S, Liu X, Zhu K Y, et al. 2009. Exploring initial errors that cause a significant spring predictability barrier for El Niño events. J Geophys Res, doi: 10.1029/2008JC004925
Duan W S, Wei C. 2012. The “spring predictability barrier” for ENSO predictions and its possible mechanism: Results from a fully coupled model. Int J Clim, doi:10.1002/joc.3513
Duan W S, Yu Y Y, Xu H, et al. 2012. Behaviors of nonlinearities modulating El Niño events induced by optimal precursory disturbance. Clim Dyn, 40: 1399–1413
Jin E K, Kinter III J L, Wang B, et al. 2008. Current status of ENSO prediction skill in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. Clim Dyn, 31: 647–664
Lau K M, Yang S. 1996. The Asian monsoon and predictability of the tropical ocean-atmosphere system. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 122: 945–957
Latif M, Barnett T P, Cane M A, et al. 1994. A review of ENSO prediction studies. Clim Dyn, 9: 167–179
Luo J J, Masson S, Behera S, et al. 2008. Extended ENSO predictions using a fully coupled ocean-atmosphere model. J Clim, 21: 84–93
Moore A M, Kleeman R. 1996. The dynamics of error growth and predictability in a coupled model of ENSO. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 122: 1405–1446
Mc Phaden M J. 2003. Tropical Pacific Ocean heat content variations and ENSO persistence barriers. Geophys Res Lett, doi:10.1029/2003GL016872
Mu M, Duan W S, Wang B. 2007a. Season-dependent dynamics of nonlinear optimal error growth and El Niño-Southern Oscillation predictability in a theoretical model. J Geophys Res, doi:10.1029/2005JD006981
Mu M, Xu H, Duan W S. 2007b. A kind of initial errors related to “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events in Zebiak-Cane model. Geophys Res Lett, doi:10.1029/2006GL-27412
Mu M. 2013. Methods, current status, and prospect of targeted observation. Sci China Earth Sci, 56: 1997–2005
Mu M, Yu Y S, Xu H, et al. 2013. Similarities between optimal precursors for ENSO events and optimally growing initial errors in El Niño predictions. Theor Appl Climatol, doi: 10.1007/s00704-013-0909-x
Power S, Casey T, Folland C, et al. 1999. Inter-decadal modulation of the impact of ENSO on Australia. Clim Dyn, 15: 319–324
Snyder C. 1996. Summary of an informal workshop on adaptive observations and FASTEX. Bull Am Meteor Soc, 77: 953–961
Taylor K E, Stouffer R J, Meehl G A. 2012. Overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteor Soc, 93: 485–498
Torrence C, Webster P J. 1998. The annual cycle of persistence in the El Niño Southern Oscillation. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 124: 1985–2004
Torrence C, Webster P J. 1999. Interdecadal changes in the ENSO-monsoon system. J Clim, 12: 2679–2690
Wang B, Fang Z. 1996. Chaotic oscillations of tropical climate: A dynamic system for ENSO. J Atmos Sci, 53: 2786–2802
Webster P J, Yang S. 1992. Monsoon and ENSO: Selectively interactive systems. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 118: 877–926
Webster P J. 1995. The annual cycle and the predictability of the tropical coupled ocean-atmosphere system. Meteor Atmos Phys, 56: 33–55
Yu Y S, Duan W S, Mu M. 2009. Dynamics of nonlinear error growth and season-dependent predictability of El Niño events in the Zebiak-Cane model. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 135: 2146–2160
Yu Y S, Mu M, Duan W S, et al. 2012. Contribution of the location and spatial pattern of initial error to uncertainties in El Niño predictions. J Geophys Res-Ocean, doi:10.1029/2011JC007758
Zebiak S E, Cane A. 1987. A model El Niño-Southern Oscillation. Mon Weather Rev, 115: 2262–2278
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Duan, W. & Zhi, X. Using CMIP5 model outputs to investigate the initial errors that cause the “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events. Sci. China Earth Sci. 58, 685–696 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4994-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4994-1