Abstract
Dissociative chemisorption of methane on a nickel surface is a prototypical system for studying mode-specific chemistry in gas-surface reactions. We recently developed a fifteen-dimensional potential energy surface for this system which has proven to be chemically accurate in reproducing the measured absolute dissociative sticking probabilities of CHD3 in thermal conditions and with vibrational excitation on Ni(111) at high incident energies. Here, using this new potential energy surface, we explored mode specificity and bond selectivity for CHD3 and CH2D2 dissociative chemisorption at low incidence energies down to ~50 kJ/mol via a quasi-classical trajectory method. Our calculated dissociation probabilities are consistent with previous theoretical and experimental ones with an average shift in translational energy of ~8 kJ/mol. Our results very well reproduce the C–H/C–D branching ratio upon the C–H local mode excitation, which can be rationalized by the sudden vector projection model. Quantitatively, however, the calculated dissociative sticking probabilities are systematically larger than experimental ones, due presumably to the artificial zero point energy leakage into reaction coordinate. Further high-dimensional quantum dynamics calculations are necessary for acquiring a chemically accurate description of methane dissociative chemisorption at low incident energies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chorkendorff I, Niemantsverdriet JW. Concepts of Modern Catalysis and Kinetics. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2003
Larsen JH, Chorkendorff I. Surf Sci Rep, 1999, 35: 163–222
Beck RD, Maroni P, Papageorgopoulos DC, Dang TT, Schmid MP, Rizzo TR. Science, 2003, 302: 98–100
Bisson R, Sacchi M, Beck RD. Phys Rev B, 2010, 82: 121404
Hundt PM, van Reijzen ME, Ueta H, Beck RD. J Phys Chem Lett, 2014, 5: 1963–1967
Juurlink LBF, Smith RR, Killelea DR, Utz AL. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 94: 208303
Chen N, Huang Y, Utz AL. J Phys Chem A, 2013, 117: 6250–6255
Bisson R, Sacchi M, Dang TT, Yoder B, Maroni P, Beck RD. J Phys Chem A, 2007, 111: 12679–12683
Smith RR, Killelea DR, DelSesto DF, Utz AL. Science, 2004, 304: 992–995
Ueta H, Chen L, Beck RD, Colón-Dìaz I, Jackson B. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013, 15: 20526–20535
Killelea DR, Campbell VL, Shuman NS, Utz AL. Science, 2008, 319: 790–793
Chen L, Ueta H, Bisson R, Beck RD. Faraday Discuss, 2012, 157: 285–295
Hundt PM, Ueta H, van Reijzen ME, Jiang B, Guo H, Beck RD. J Phys Chem A, 2015, 119: 12442–12448
Yoder BL, Bisson R, Beck RD. Science, 2010, 329: 553–556
Yoder BL, Bisson R, Morten Hundt P, Beck RD. J Chem Phys, 2011, 135: 224703
Maroni P, Papageorgopoulos DC, Sacchi M, Dang TT, Beck RD, Rizzo TR. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 94: 246104
Juurlink LBF, Killelea DR, Utz AL. Prog Surf Sci, 2009, 84: 69–134
Chadwick H, Beck RD. Annu Rev Phys Chem, 2017, 68: 39–61
Chadwick H, Beck RD. Chem Soc Rev, 2016, 45: 3576–3594
Hundt PM, Jiang B, van Reijzen ME, Guo H, Beck RD. Science, 2014, 344: 504–507
Jiang B, Guo H. J Chem Phys, 2016, 144: 091101
Jiang B. Chem Sci, 2017, 8: 6662–6669
Zhang Z, Liu T, Fu B, Yang X, Zhang DH. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 11953
Liu T, Zhang Z, Fu B, Yang X, Zhang DH. Chem Sci, 2016, 7: 1840–1845
Liu T, Fu B, Zhang DH. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19: 11960–11967
Liu T, Zhang Z, Fu B, Yang X, Zhang DH. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2016, 18: 8537–8544
Liu T, Zhang Z, Chen J, Fu B, Zhang DH. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2016, 18: 26358–26364
Jiang B, Liu R, Li J, Xie D, Yang M, Guo H. Chem Sci, 2013, 4: 3249–3254
Shen X, Chen J, Zhang Z, Shao K, Zhang DH. J Chem Phys, 2015, 143: 144701
Shen X, Zhang Z, Zhang DH. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2015, 17: 25499–25504
Shen X, Zhang Z, Zhang DH. J Chem Phys, 2016, 144: 101101
Shen X, Zhang Z, Zhang DH. J Chem Phys, 2017, 147: 024702
Palma J, Clary DC. J Chem Phys, 2000, 112: 1859–1867
Jiang B, Guo H. J Phys Chem C, 2013, 117: 16127–16135
Shen XJ, Lozano A, Dong W, Busnengo HF, Yan XH. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 112: 046101
Jiang B, Guo H. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120: 8220–8226
Luo X, Jiang B, Juaristi JI, Alducin M, Guo H. J Chem Phys, 2016, 145: 044704
Füchsel G, Thomas PS, den Uyl J, Öztürk Y, Nattino F, Meyer HD, Kroes GJ. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2016, 18: 8174–8185
Nattino F, Ueta H, Chadwick H, van Reijzen ME, Beck RD, Jackson B, van Hemert MC, Kroes GJ. J Phys Chem Lett, 2014, 5: 1294–1299
Jackson B, Nave S. J Chem Phys, 2011, 135: 114701
Jackson B, Nave S. J Chem Phys, 2013, 138: 174705
Nave S, Tiwari AK, Jackson B. J Phys Chem A, 2014, 118: 9615–9631
Guo H, Farjamnia A, Jackson B. J Phys Chem Lett, 2016, 7: 4576–4584
Guo H, Jackson B. J Chem Phys, 2016, 144: 184709
Guo H, Jackson B. J Phys Chem C, 2015, 119: 14769–14779
Nave S, Jackson B. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 98: 173003
Tiwari AK, Nave S, Jackson B. J Chem Phys, 2010, 132: 134702
Jiang B, Guo H. J Chem Phys, 2013, 138: 234104–234110
Guo H, Jiang B. Acc Chem Res, 2014, 47: 3679–3685
Perdew JP, Wang Y. Phys Rev B, 1992, 45: 13244–13249
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 3865–3868
Hammer B, Hansen LB, Nørskov JK. Phys Rev B, 1999, 59: 7413–7421
Díaz C, Pijper E, Olsen RA, Busnengo HF, Auerbach DJ, Kroes GJ. Science, 2009, 326: 832–834
Dion M, Rydberg H, Schröder E, Langreth DC, Lundqvist BI. Phys Rev Lett, 2004, 92: 246401
Nattino F, Migliorini D, Kroes GJ, Dombrowski E, High EA, Killelea DR, Utz AL. J Phys Chem Lett, 2016, 7: 2402–2406
Migliorini D, Chadwick H, Nattino F, Gutiérrez-González A, Dombrowski E, High EA, Guo H, Utz AL, Jackson B, Beck RD, Kroes GJ. J Phys Chem Lett, 2017, 8: 4177–4182
Chadwick H, Guo H, Gutiérrez-González A, Menzel JP, Jackson B, Beck RD. J Chem Phys, 2018, 148: 014701
Ensing B, De Vivo M, Liu Z, Moore P, Klein ML. Acc Chem Res, 2006, 39: 73–81
Zhou X, Nattino F, Zhang Y, Chen J, Kroes GJ, Guo H, Jiang B. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19: 30540–30550
Blöchl PE. Phys Rev B, 1994, 50: 17953–17979
Kresse G, Joubert D. Phys Rev B, 1999, 59: 1758–1775
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 11169–11186
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Comput Mater Sci, 1996, 6: 15–50
Jiang B, Li J, Guo H. Int Rev Phys Chem, 2016, 35: 479–506
Jiang B, Guo H. J Chem Phys, 2014, 141: 034109
Hu X, Hase WL, Pirraglia T. J Comput Chem, 1991, 12: 1014–1024
Hand M, Harris J. J Chem Phys, 1990, 92: 7610–7617
Wang XG, Sibert Iii EL. J Chem Phys, 1999, 111: 4510–4522
Mastromatteo M, Jackson B. J Chem Phys, 2013, 139: 194701
Nour Ghassemi E, Wijzenbroek M, Somers MF, Kroes GJ. Chem Phys Lett, 2017, 683: 329–335
Nave S, Tiwari AK, Jackson B. J Chem Phys, 2010, 132: 054705
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0303500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91645202, 21722306, 21573203), Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies, and partially supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2060190082, WK2340000078). We thank Supercomputing Center of USTC and AMHPC for offering us high-performance computing services.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, X., Jiang, B. Mode-specific and bond-selective dissociative chemisorption of CHD3 and CH2D2 on Ni(111) revisited using a new potential energy surface. Sci. China Chem. 61, 1134–1142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-018-9343-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-018-9343-0