Skip to main content
Log in

University teachers’ design work: implications for an urgent shift to digital

  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a response to Bennett et al.’s (2016) “The Process of Designing for Learning: Understanding University Teachers’ Design Work.” We examine this study of faculty approaches to course design in order to connect the authors’ findings to implications for course design practices in the current context of shifting courses online. The design processes of experienced faculty are the primary subjects of the study, which may have implications for how institutions approach supporting faculty efforts to design courses under time constraints. However, research shows that less experienced faculty may be unprepared to effectively redesigning courses under time constraints. The primary approaches to course design are the individual approach, where a faculty designer follows his or her own design process and the centralized or team approach, where a subject matter expert joins an instructional designer and/or additional educational design or technology specialists to develop courses. Institutions need to consider how much of their faculty have 10 years or more of experience in order to determine which approach would work best.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

They have received no funding in support of this manuscript nor do they have personal affiliations with the authors’ whose research is the subject of this paper. They are also not affiliated with the Association for Educational Communications & Technology other than holding standard membership to the organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrey Antee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Kanjanapongpaisal and Dr. Antee declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

As this manuscript is a response to an article previously published in Educational Technology Research & Development, Dr. Kanjanapongpaisal and Dr. Antee did not engage in a direct study of human participants, and therefore had no subjects from whom to gain informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanjanapongpaisal, .G., Antee, A. University teachers’ design work: implications for an urgent shift to digital. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 273–276 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09881-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09881-3

Keywords

Navigation