Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Like, comment, and share”—professional development through social media in higher education: A systematic review

  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, professional learning networks (PLNs) and online learning communities of practices (CoPs) enabled by social media have emerged as a conduit and communal space for faculty members to engage in professional learning. This systematic review provides a current synthesis of research surrounding social media and professional development in higher education. Articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed and 23 articles that met our selection criteria were included for further analysis and synthesis in this review. Findings suggest that research and practice on social media-supported professional learning is still in its infancy stage. Despite that social media-supported PLNs and CoPs show potential for contributing to faculty professional learning, challenges exist in sustaining faculty participation and engagement, as well as effectively navigating the social media space, especially for novice social media users. Practical implications and future research recommendations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, E. A., & Dexter, S. (2020). Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, L. A., & Rossow, K. A. (2017). Facilitating professional learning communities among higher education faculty: The Walden Junto Model. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 20, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bombaci, S. P., Farr, C. M., Gallo, H. T., Mangan, A. M., Stinson, L. T., Kaushik, M., et al. (2016). Using Twitter to communicate conservation science from a professional conference. Conservation Biology, 30(1), 216–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. A., & Lockee, B. B. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of faculty inquiry groups as communities of practice for faculty professional development. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-018-0015-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowser, A., Davis, K., Singleton, J., & Small, T. (2017). Professional learning: A collaborative model for online teaching and development. SRATE Journal, 26(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancato, V. C. (2003). Professional development in higher education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(98), 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, T. P., Assemi, M., Corelli, R. L., El-Ibiary, S. Y., Kavookjian, J., Martin, B. A., et al. (2014). A nontraditional faculty development initiative using a social media platform. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(5), 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchill, K. P., & Anderson, D. (2019). A study of novice faculty members' experiences during the mentoring process. In Y. Inoue-Smith (Ed.), Faculty roles and changing expectations in the new age (pp. 217–231). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, P. S., Benjamin, E. J., & Shanahan, C. W. (2013). ‘Uncrunching’time: Medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development. Medical Education Online, 18(1), 20995. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.20995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, J., Scott, D. R., Tiemeier, A. M., Akers, P., & Metzger, A. H. (2013). Social media use by pharmacy faculty: Student friending, e-professionalism, and professional use. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisco. (2019). Cisco visual networking index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update 2010–2015. Technical Report, Cisco Systems Inc.

  • Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108327554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donelan, H. (2016). Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 706–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornisch, M. (2013). The digital divide in classrooms: Teacher technology comfort and evaluations. Computers in the Schools, 30(3), 210–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M., Rhoades, N., Jackson, C. M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Professional development: Designing initiatives to meet the needs of online faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 160–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallahi, M. (2019). Assessment of learning in higher education. In M. Fallahi (Ed.), Outcome-based strategies for adult learning (pp. 196–217). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. (2018). Professional development in 140 characters? Analyzing Twitter as a professional learning platform for science teachers. American Educational Research Association (pp. 1–44). Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10067590

  • Gao, F., & Li, L. (2017). Examining a one-hour synchronous chat in a microblogging-based professional development community. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 332–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, F., & Li, L. (2019). Predicting educators’ use of Twitter for professional learning and development. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2311–2327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein, J. (2011). The use of Twitter for professional growth and development. International Journal on E-Learning, 10(3), 273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M. M. (2015). Using mobile devices to support formal, informal and semi-formal learning. Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M., & Hsu, Y. C. (2014). Making personal and professional learning mobile: Blending mobile devices, social media, social networks, and mobile apps to support PLEs, PLNs, & ProLNs. In A. V. Stavros (Ed.), Advances in communications and media research series (Vol. 10, pp. 27–46). New York: Nova Science Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., Campbell, D., Galvin, S., & Askari, E. (2018, March). Social media in teacher professional development: A literature review. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2256–2264). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Greenhow, C., Galvin, S. M., & Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019a). What should be the role of social media in Education? Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219865290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., & Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., Li, J., & Mai, M. (2019b). From tweeting to meeting: Expansive professional learning and the academic conference backchannel. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1656–1672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2340–2350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon, E., Barczyk, C., Buckenmeyer, J., & Feldman, L. (2011). Mentoring university faculty to become high quality online educators: A program evaluation. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(5), 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jippes, E., Steinert, Y., Pols, J., Achterkamp, M. C., van Engelen, J. M., & Brand, P. L. (2013). How do social networks and faculty development courses affect clinical supervisors’ adoption of a medical education innovation? An exploratory study. Academic Medicine, 88(3), 398–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition (pp. 1–50). Austin: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. H. (1998). Task analysis methods for instructional design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. M., & Dexter, S. (2014). How teachers learn: The roles of formal, informal, and independent learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(3), 367–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, H. (2004). Continuing professional development in higher education: What do academics do? Planet, 13(1), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2004.00130026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M., Niebuhr, V., & D'Alessandro, D. (2013). Innovative online faculty development utilizing the power of social media. Academic Pediatrics, 13(6), 564–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2017). Enriching professional learning networks: A framework for identification, reflection, and intention. TechTrends, 61(3), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0141-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1999). Learning and pedagogy in communities of practice. In J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2001). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In J. Clarke, A. Hanson, R. Harrison, & F. Reeve (Eds.), Supporting lifelong learning (pp. 121–136). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Greenhow, C. (2015). Scholars and social media: Tweeting in the conference backchannel for professional learning. Educational Media International, 52(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, S., West, M., Herman, G. L., Tomkin, J., & Mestre, J. (2016). Studying faculty communities of practice through social network analysis. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  • Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marek, K. (2009). Learning to teach online: Creating a culture of support for faculty. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meishar-Tal, H., & Pieterse, E. (2017). Why do academics use academic social networking sites? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. A. (2014). An analysis of the research on faculty development for online teaching and identification of new directions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(4), 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., et al. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. A. (2013). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, G. (2014). Professional development in higher education: New dimensions and directions. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehaus, E., & O’Meara, K. (2015). Invisible but essential: The role of professional networks in promoting faculty agency in career advancement. Innovative Higher Education, 40(2), 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, C. (2019). Virtual learning environment faculty continuing professional development-networked learning communities: A critical literature review. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v4i1.50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, P. E. (2005). Embracing the aesthetics of instructional design. Educational Technology, 45(2), 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, P. E. (2009). Aesthetic principles for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, P. E., Wilson, B. G., & Dunlap, J. C. (2011). Learning experience as transaction: A framework for instructional design. Educational Technology, 51(2), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragan, L. C., Bigatel, P. M., Kennan, S. S., & Dillon, J. M. (2012). From research to practice: Towards the development of an integrated and comprehensive faculty development program. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 16(5), 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British journal of educational technology, 43(5), 754–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranieri, M., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Pezzati, F. (2018a). Building cases for faculty development in e-learning: a design-based approach. Form@ re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 18(1), 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranieri, M., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Pezzati, F. (2018b). Digital resources for faculty development in e-learning: A self-paced approach for professional learning. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 104–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieffer, L. (2016). The benefits and barriers of virtual collaboration among online adjuncts. Journal of Instructional Research, 5, 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, R., Neu, V., & Yang, F. (2018). Faculty development to promote effective instructional technology integration: A qualitative examination of reflections in an online community. Online Learning, 22(4), 341–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, C., Carpenter, R., & Blythe, H. (2018). Reaching those faculty not easily reached: How CTLs can improve participation in faculty programming through faculty innovators and online instruction. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 9, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Using Twitter for education: Beneficial or simply a waste of time? Computers & Education, 106, 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trust, T., Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2017). Moving beyond silos: Professional learning networks in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trust, T., Krutka, D., & Carpenter, J. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaill, A. L., & Testori, P. A. (2012). Orientation, mentoring and ongoing support: A three-tiered approach to online faculty development. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(1), 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasily, A. (2016). Using social media for professional development. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 87(6), 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G. (2012). Higher education scholars' participation and practices on Twitter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 336–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2013). Scholars and faculty members' lived experiences in online social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2016). Scholars in an increasingly open and digital world: How do education professors and students use Twitter? The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velsamy, A., & Karthikeyan, P. (2016). Social Media in the professional development of B-school faculty. International Journal of Innovative Research in Management Studies, 1(10), 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. 1–7. Retrieved from https://www.ewenger.com/theory/

  • Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. The Netherlands: Ruud de Moor Centrum. Retrieved from https://www.leerarchitectuur.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Value-creation-Wenger-De-Laat-Trayner.pdf

  • Wynants, S., & Dennis, J. (2018). Professional development in an online context: Opportunities and challenges from the voices of college faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Q., & Luo, T. (2019). Examining user participation and network structure via an analysis of a twitter-supported conference backchannel. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(5), 1160–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, W., & Gao, F. (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Computers & Education, 126, 388–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded by any agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian Luo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human rights

This research project does not involve human subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Author and Year

Title

Bombaci et al. (2016)

Using Twitter to Communicate Conservation Science from a Professional Conference

Brock et al. (2014)

A Nontraditional Faculty Development Initiative Using a Social Media Platform

Cahn et al. (2013)

Uncrunching'Time: Medical Schools' Use of Social Media for Faculty Development

Cain et al. (2013)

Social Media Use by Pharmacy Faculty: Student Friending, E-professionalism, and professional use

Donelan (2016)

Social Media for Professional Development and Networking Opportunities in Academia

Gao and Li (2017)

Examining a One-hour Synchronous Chat in a Microblogging-based Professional Development Community

Gao and Li (2019)

Predicting Educators' Use of Twitter for Professional Learning and Development

Greenhow, Li & Mai (2019a, b)

From Tweeting to Meeting: Expansive Professional Learning and the Academic Conference Backchannel

Gruzd et al. (2012)

Connected Scholars: Examining the Role of Social Media in Research Practices of Faculty Using the UTAUT Model

Jippes et al. (2013)

How DO Social Networks and Faculty Development Courses Affect Clinical Supervisors' Adoption of a Medical Education Innovation? An Exploratory Study

Klein et al. (2013)

Innovative Online Faculty Development Utilizing the Power of Social Media

Li and Greenhow (2015)

Scholars and Sovial Media: Tweeting in the Conference Backchannel for Professional Learning

Meisher-Tal and Pierterse (2017)

Why Do Academics Use Academic Social Networking Sites?

Ranieri et al. (2018a, b)

Building Cases for Faculty Development in e-learning: A Design-Based Approach

Schieffer (2016)

The Benefits and Barriers of Virtual Collaboration Among Online Adjuncts

Sullivan et al. (2018)

Faculty Development to Promote Effective Instructional Technology Integration: A Qualitative Examination of Reflections in an Online Community

Trust et al. (2017)

Moving Beyond Silos: Professional Learning Networks in Higher Education

Veletsianos (2012)

Higher Education Scholars’ Participation and Practices on Twitter

Veletsianos and Kimmons (2013)

Scholars and Faculty Members' Lived Experiences in Online Social Networks

Veletsianos and Kimmons (2016)

Scholars in an Increasingly Open and Digital World: How Do Education Professors and Students Use Twitter?

Velsamy and Karthikeyan (2016)

Social Media in the Professional Development of B-School Faculty

Xie and Luo (2019)

Examining User Participation and Network Structure via an Analysis of a Twitter-Supported Conference Backchannel

Xing and Gao (2018)

Exploring the Relationship Between Online Discourse and Commitment in Twitter Professional Learning Communities

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, T., Freeman, C. & Stefaniak, J. “Like, comment, and share”—professional development through social media in higher education: A systematic review. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 1659–1683 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09790-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09790-5

Keywords

Navigation