Abstract
Complex problem solving is an effective means to engage students in disciplinary content while also furnishing critical non-cognitive and life skills. Despite increased adoption of complex problem-solving methods in K-12 classrooms today (e.g., case-, project-, or problem-based learning), we know little about how to make these approaches accessible to linguistically and culturally diverse (LCD) students. In this paper, we promote a conceptual framework, based on an ethos of intentionality, that supports culturally responsive teaching (CRT). We provide specific questions to guide teachers’ implementation of an ethos of intentionality, through critical reflection and meaningful action, and discuss a framework for culturally relevant practice that operationalizes key central tenets (e.g., high expectations, cultural competence, and critical consciousness). Finally, we include strategies that can help teachers and designers translate the principles of the CRT framework into action with a specific focus on complex problem solving in classrooms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2015). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research,86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066.
Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal,26(2), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2002.10668709.
Baker, B. D., & Corcoran, S. P. (2012). The stealth inequalities of school funding: How local tax systems and state aid formulas undermine equality. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved March 14, 2020 from http://www.americanprogress.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/09/StealthInequities.pdf.
Barton, K. C., & McCully, A. W. (2012). Trying to see things differently: Northern Ireland students struggle to understand alternative historical perspectives. Theory and Research in Social Education,40(4), 371–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.710928.
Bell, P., Van Horne, K., & Cheng, B. H. (2017). Special issue: Designing learning environments for equitable disciplinary identification. Journal of the Learning Sciences,26, 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336021.
Belland, B. R. (2010). Portraits of middle school students constructing evidence-based arguments during problem-based learning: The impact of computer-based scaffolds. Educational Technology Research and Development,58(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9139-4.
Belland, B. R., Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Perceptions of the value of problem-based learning among students with special needs and their teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,1(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1024.
Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2009). Inclusion and problem-based learning: Roles of students in mixed-ability groups. Research on Middle Level Education, 32(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2009.11462062.
Bilgin, I., Karakuyu, Y., & Ay, Y. (2015). The effects of project-based learning on undergraduate students’ achievement and self-efficacy beliefs towards science teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,11(3), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1015a.
Birr Moje, E., McIntosh Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly,39(1), 38–70. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.39.1.4.
Blasco, M. (2015). Making the tacit explicit: Rethinking culturally inclusive pedagogy in international student academic adaptation. Pedagogy, Culture and Society,23(1), 85–106.
Bogard, T., Liu, M., & Chiang, Y.-H. V. (2018). Thresholds of knowledge development in complex problem solving: A multiple case-study of advanced learners' cognitive processes. Educational Technology Research and Development,61, 465–503.
Bonner, E. P. (2014). Investigating practices of highly successful mathematics teachers of traditionally underserved students. Educational Studies in Mathematics,86(3), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9533-7.
Brown, B. A. (2006). “It isn’t no slang that can be said about this stuff”: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,43(1), 96–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20096.
Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education,89(5), 779–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20069.
Brown, J. C., Ring-Whalen, E. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Ellis, J. (2018). Advancing culturally responsive science education in secondary classrooms through an induction course. International Journal of Designs for Learning,9(1), 14–33.
Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be Burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences,19(2), 187–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044.
Danowitz, M. A., & Tuitt, F. (2011). Enacting inclusivity through engaged pedagogy: A higher education perspective. Equity and Excellence in Education,44(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.539474.
Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Nagarajan, A., Chernobilsky, E., & Beitzel, B. (2006). Cognitive transfer revisited: Can we exploit new media to solve old problems on a large scale? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.2190/0576-R724-T149-5432.
Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science,332(6031), 862–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783.
Dolan, J. E. (2016). Splicing the divide: A review of research on the evolving digital divide among K-12 students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,48(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1103147.
Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R. S., Platt, T., Varma-Nelson, P., et al. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science: A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education,36(4), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20204.
Ertmer, P. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2018). Problem-based learning: Essential design considerations. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (Vol. 4, pp. 286–295). New York: Pearson.
Ertmer, P. A., & Glazewski, K. (2019). Scaffolding in PBL environments: Structuring and problematizing relevant task features. In N. Dabbah, W. Hung, & M. Moallem (Eds.), Handbook of problem-based learning (pp. 321–342). Hoboken, NY: Wiley Publishing.
Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K-12 teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005.
Esteban-Guitart, M., & Moll, L. C. (2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on the Funds of Knowledge approach. Culture & Psychology,20(1), 31–48.
Gallagher, S. A. (2005). Adapting problem-based learning for gifted students. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 285–311). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Gallagher, S. A., & Gallagher, J. J. (2013). Using problem-based learning to explore unseen academic potential. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,7(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1322.
Gay, G. (2001). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education,53(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487104267587.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry,43(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12002.
Glazewski, K. D., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2019). Scaffolding and supporting use of information for ambitious learning practices. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(1/2), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-08-2018-0087.
Goldberg, T. (2013). It’s in my veins: Identity and disciplinary practice in students’ discussions of a historical issue. Theory and Research in Social Education,41(1), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.757265.
Goldman, S. R. (2003). Learning in complex domains: When and why do multiple representations help? Learning and Instruction,13(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00023-3.
González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gorski, P. C. (2008). Insisting on digital equity: Reframing the dominant discourse on multicultural education and technology. Urban Education,44, 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085908318712.
Gray, C. M., & Boling, E. (2016). Inscribing ethics and values in designs for learning: A problematic. Educational Technology Research and Development,64, 969–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9478-x.
Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly,43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.43.2.3.
Gutierrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tegeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity,6, 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733.
Hanney, R., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). The problem of projects: Understanding the theoretical underpinnings of project-led PBL. London Review of Education,11(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2012.761816.
Hartman, P., Renguette, C., & Seig, M. T. (2018). Problem-based teacher-mentor education: Fostering literacy acquisition in multicultural classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1659.
Haruehansawasin, S., & Kiattikomol, P. (2018). Scaffolding in problem-based learning for low-achieving learners. The Journal of Educational Research,111(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1287045.
Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletête, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M. C., & Dumais, N. (2016). Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education,52(2), 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review,16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Creating a learning space in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1334.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & DeSimone, C. (2013). Problem-based learning: An instructional model of collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 382–398). New York: Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist,42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368.
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
Howard, T. C. (2003). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Ingredients for critical teacher reflection. Theory into Practice,42(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4203_5.
Hung, W. (2013). Problem-based learning: A learning environment for enhancing learning transfer. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,137, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.
Hwang, G. J., Chiu, L. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2015). A contextual game-based learning approach to improving students’ inquiry-based learning performance in social studies courses. Computers and Education,81, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.006.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development,86(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500.
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of engineering education,95(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x.
Johnson, C. C. (2011). The road to culturally relevant science: Exploring how teachers navigate change in pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,48(2), 170–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20405.
Kim, H. (2016). Inquiry-based science and technology enrichment program for middle school-aged female students. Journal of Science Education and Technology,25, 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9584-2.
Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., Lefler, M., Andreasen, L., Walker, A., & Axelrod, D. (2019). Computer-based scaffolding targeting individual versus groups in problem-centered instruction for STEM education: Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09502-3.
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, J. G., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences,12, 495–547. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2.
Komis, V., Romero, M., & Misirli, A. (2016). A scenario-based approach for designing educational robotics activities for co-creative problem solving. In International Conference EduRobotics 2016 (pp. 158–169). Cham: Springer.
Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education,33(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal,32(3), 465–491.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). Liberatory consequences of literacy: A case of culturally relevant instruction for African American students. The Journal of Negro Education, 61(3), 378–391. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2295255.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2007). Pushing past the achievement gap: An essay on the language of deficit. Journal of Negro Education,76(3), 316–323.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2015). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a the Remix. Harvard Educational Review,84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research,86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366.
Lee, O. (2001). Culture and language in science education: What do we know and what do we need to know? Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(5), 499–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1015.
Lee, O. (2004). Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10125.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2013). Integrating science and English proficiency for English Language Learners. Theory into Practice,52, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9478-x.
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,43(7), 607–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20141.
Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher,27(4), 12–21.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher,42(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524.
Liu, M., Hsieh, P., Cho, Y., & Schallert, D. L. (2006). Middle school students’ self-efficacy, attitudes, and achievement in a computer-enhanced problem-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research,17(3), 225–242.
Liu, M., Liu, S., Pan, Z., Zou, W., & Li, C. (2019). Examining science learning and attitude by at-risk students after they used a multimedia-enriched problem-based learning environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1752.
Llosa, L., Lee, O., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., Van Booven, C. D., et al. (2016). Impact of a large-scale science intervention focused on English Language Learners. American Educational Research Journal,53(2), 395–424. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216637348.
Lopez, A. E. (2011). Culturally relevant pedagogy and critical literacy in diverse English classrooms: A case study of a secondary English teacher’s activism and agency. English Teaching: Practice and Critique,10(4), 75–93.
Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(8), 912–946. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20080.
Maker, C. J., & Zimmerman, R. (2008). Problem solving in a complex world: Integrating DISCOVER, TASC, and PBL in a teacher education project. Gifted Education International,24, 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940802400305.
Milner, H. R., IV. (2010). What does teacher education have to do with teaching? Implications for diversity studies. Journal of Teacher Education,61(1–2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347670.
Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(4), 469–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1014.
Morgan, K., & Brooks, D. W. (2012). Investigating a method of scaffolding student-designed experiments. Journal of Science Education and Technology,21(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9343-y.
Morrison, K. A., Robbins, H. H., & Rose, D. G. (2008). Operationalizing culturally relevant pedagogy: A synthesis of classroom-based research. Equity & Excellence in Education,41, 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680802400006.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019a). Fast facts: Back to school statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019b). Fast facts: English language learners. https://nces.ed.gov/FastFacts/display.asp?id=96.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2004). Fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education: A two-tiered education system. Washington, DC: Author.
National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for Social Studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K- 12 civics, economics, geography, and history. https://www.socialstudies.org/system/files/c3/C3-Framework-for-Social-Studies.pdf.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. www.nextgenscience.org.
Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher,41(3), 93–97.
Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2002). The transfer of problem-solving skills from a problem-based learning environment: The effect of modeling an expert’s cognitive processes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,35(2), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782388.
Piaget, J. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Ritzhaupt, A. D., Liu, F., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2014). Differences in student information and communication technology literacy based on socio-economic status, ethnicity, and gender. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,45, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782607.
Saleh, A., Hmelo-Silver, C., Glazewski, K., Chen, Y., Mott, B., Rowe, J. P., & Lester, J. C. (2019). Collaborative inquiry play: A design case to frame integration of collaborative problem solving with story-centric games. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(7/8), 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-03-2019-0024.
Savin-Baden, M. (2016). The impact of transdisciplinary threshold concepts on student engagement in Problem-Based Learning: A conceptual synthesis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,10(2), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1588.
Schmidt, H. G., van der Molen, H. T., te Winkel, W. W. R., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2009). Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: A meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school. Educational Psychologist,44(4), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213592.
Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science,35(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research,95(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607.
Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research,57(3), 293–336. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057003293.
Sorge, C. (2007). What happens? Relationship of age and gender with science attitudes from elementary to middle school. Science Educator,16(2), 33–37.
Souto-Manning, M. (2009). Negotiating culturally responsive pedagogy through multicultural children’s literature: Towards critical democratic literacy practices in a first grade classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy,9(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798408101105.
Spector, J. M. (2008). A modeling methodology for assessing learning in complex domains. In P. Blumschein, W. Hung, & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Model-based approaches to learning: Using systems, models, and simulations to improve understanding and problem solving in complex domains (pp. 163–177). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
Spratt, J., & Florian, L. (2015). Inclusive pedagogy: From learning to action. Supporting each individual in the context of “everybody”. Teaching and Teacher Education,49, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.006.
Tawfik, A., & Kolodner, J. L. (2016). Systematizing scaffolding for problem-based learning: A view from case-based reasoning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,10(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1608.
Ushomirsky, N., & Williams, D. (2015). Funding gaps 2015: Too many states still spend less on educating students who need the most. Washington, DC.
Van Horne, K., & Bell, P. (2017). Youth disciplinary identification during participation in contemporary project-based science investigations in school. Journal of the Learning Sciences,26(3), 437–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1330689.
Wallace, S., Banks, T., Sedas, M., Glazewski, K., Brush, T. A., & McKay, C. (2017). What will keep the fish alive? Exploring the intersections of designing, making, and inquiry among middle school learners. International Journal of Designs for Learning,8(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v8i1.22668.
Warschauer, M. (2011). A literacy approach to the digital divide. Cadernos de Letras,28, 5–19.
Watson, W. E., Johnson, L., & Zgourides, G. D. (2002). The influence of ethnic diversity on leadership, group process, and performance: An examination of learning teams. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(01)00032-3.
Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K–12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal,48(5), 1157–1186. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211419491.
Woods, D. R. (2014). Problem-oriented learning, problem-based learning, problem-based synthesis, process oriented guided inquiry learning, peer-led team learning, model-eliciting activities, and project-based learning: What is best for you? Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,53(13), 5337–5354. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie401202k.
Zwiep, S. G., & Straits, W. J. (2013). Inquiry science: The gateway to English language proficiency. Journal of Science Teacher Education,24(8), 1315–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9357-9.
Funding
There was no funding for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glazewski, K.D., Ertmer, P.A. Fostering complex problem solving for diverse learners: engaging an ethos of intentionality toward equitable access. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 679–702 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09762-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09762-9