Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the influences of organisational culture and teachers’ perception of the importance of policy on teachers’ technology acceptance in China. A total of 502 teachers from 30 Chinese universities filled in the questionnaire designed for the cross-sectional study, which measured teachers’ perceptions of the organisational culture in the universities in which they work, their perception of the importance of school policy regarding technology use, and their intention to use technology in teaching. The results of the structural equation modelling indicated that perceived usefulness, attitude towards using technology, organisational culture, and teacher perceptions of the importance of school policy on technology use were significant antecedents to teachers’ behavioural intention to use technology. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use significantly influenced attitude, and perceived ease of use significantly influenced perceived usefulness. In addition, organisational culture significantly influenced the perceived importance of school policy. The findings enriched the understanding of technology acceptance theories by empirically proving the role of organisational culture and the perceived importance of policy on teachers’ technology acceptance in the Chinese context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(2), 179–211.
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education,125, 389–412.
Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin,103, 411–423.
Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K–12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the National Technology Standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,35(4), 489–507.
Becker, H. (2001). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the 2001 meeting of the American Educational Research Association. WA: Seattle.
Birch, D., & Burnett, B. (2009). Bringing academics on board: Encouraging institution-wide diffusion of e-learning environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,25(1), 117–134.
Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2009). A study of the relationship between institutional policy, organisational culture and e-learning use in four South African universities. Computers & Education,53(1), 121–131.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly,13(3), 319–340.
Dawes, L. (2001). What stops teachers using new technology? In M. Leask (Ed.), Issues in teaching using ICT (pp. 61–79). London: Routledge.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Devos, G., Bouckenooghe, D., Engels, N., Hotton, G., & Aelterman, A. (2007). An assessment of well-being of principals in Flemish primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration,45, 33–61.
Du, R., Liu, L., Straub, D. W., & Knight, M. B. (2017). The impact of espoused national cultural values on innovative behaviour: An empirical study in the Chinese IT-enabled global service industry. Asia Pacific Business Review,23(3), 354–372.
DuFour, R., & Berkey, T. (1995). The principal as staff developer. Journal of Staff Development,16(4), 2–6.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,42(3), 255–284.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics,5(1), 1–4.
Fan, X., Miller, B. C., Park, K. E., Winward, B. W., Christensen, M., Grotevant, H. D., et al. (2006). An exploratory study about inaccuracy and invalidity in adolescent self-report surveys. Field Methods,18(3), 223–244.
Farrel, J. P. (2000). Why is educational reform so difficult? Similar descriptions, different prescriptions, failed explanations. Curriculum Inquiry,30(1), 83–103.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975a). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975b). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research,18(1), 39–50.
Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies,37, 155–192.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Hofstede, G. (2008). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (1997). The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook for change (Elementary ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hu, Z., & McGrath, I. (2011). Innovation in higher education in China: Are teachers ready to integrate ICT in English language teaching? Technology, Pedagogy and Education,20(1), 41–59.
Huang, H. M., & Liaw, S. S. (2005). Exploring users’ attitudes and intentions toward the Web as a survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior,21(5), 729–743.
Huang, F., Teo, T., Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Olmos-Migueláñez, S. (2019a). Cultural values and technology adoption: A model comparison with university teachers from China and Spain. Computers & Education,133, 69–81.
Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2019b). Factors affecting Chinese English as a foreign language teachers’ technology acceptance: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research,57(1), 83–105.
Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2019c). Chinese students’ intentions to use the Internet for learning. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09695-y.
Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,21(3), 48–59.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Leem, J., & Sung, E. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs and technology acceptance concerning smart mobile devices for SMART education in South Korea. British Journal of Educational Technology,50(2), 601–613.
Li, L. (2014). Understanding language teachers’ practice with educational technology: A case from China. System,46, 105–119.
Lim, C. P., & Khine, M. S. (2006). Managing teachers’ barriers to ICT integration in Singapore schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,14(1), 97–125.
Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (2004). The effect of organizational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Management Development,23(4), 321–338.
Lund, D. B. (2003). Organizational culture and job satisfaction. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,18, 219–236.
Ma, W. W. K., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,21(6), 387–395.
Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management,6, 64–74.
Maslowski, R. (2001). School culture and school performance: An explorative study into the organizational culture of secondary schools and their effects. Twente: Twente University Press.
McCoy, S., Galletta, D. F., & King, W. R. (2007). Applying TAM across cultures: The need for caution. European Journal of Information Systems,16(1), 81–90.
Nistor, N., Lerche, T., Weinberger, A., Ceobanu, C., & Heymann, O. (2014). Towards the integration of culture into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology,45(1), 36–55.
O’Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review,31, 9–25.
Peterson, P., McCarthey, S., & Elmore, R. (1996). Learning from school restructuring. American Educational Research Journal,33, 119–153.
Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers’ intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics,71(3), 299–317.
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. London: Routledge.
Ritter, N. L. (2017). Technology acceptance model of online learning management systems in higher education: A meta-analytic structural equation model. International Journal of Learning Management Systems,5, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18576/ijlms/050101.
Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior,24(4), 1585–1604.
Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Zhu, C. (2011). Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacher-related variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,27, 160–172.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education,128, 13–35.
Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 449–460). New York: Springer.
Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly,30(3), 679–704.
Staessens, K. (1990). The professional culture in elementary schools in Flanders: An empirical study in reformed primary education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Leuven, Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Straub, D., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management,33(1), 1–11.
Straub, D., Loch, K., Evaristo, R., Karahanna, E., & Srite, M. (2002). Toward a theory-based measurement of culture. Human Factors in Information Systems,10(1), 61–65.
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of e-learning in developing countries: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments,25(3), 306–328.
Tearle, P. (2003). ICT implementation: What makes the difference? British Journal of Educational Technology,34(5), 567–583.
Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education,52, 302–312.
Teo, T. (2011). Influence of user characteristics on teachers’ intention to use technology: Some research evidence. International Journal of Instructional Media,38(2), 115–124.
Teo, T., & Huang, F. (2019). Investigating the influence of individually espoused cultural values on teachers’ intentions to use educational technologies in Chinese universities. Interactive Learning Environments,27(5–6), 813–829.
Teo, T., Huang, F., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2018). Explicating the influences that explain intention to use technology among English teachers in China. Interactive Learning Environments,26(4), 460–475.
Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2017). The influence of teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments,25(4), 513–527.
Teo, T., Zhou, M., Fan, A. C. W., & Huang, F. (2019). Factors that influence university students’ intention to use Moodle: A study in Macau. Educational Technology Research and Development,67(3), 749–766.
Tsai, Y. R. (2015). Applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) to explore the effects of a Course Management System (CMS)-assisted EFL writing instruction. CALICO,32(1), 153–171.
Tuan, L. T., & Venkatesh, S. (2010). Organizational culture and technological innovation adoption in private hospitals. International Business Research,3(3), 144–153.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences,39(2), 273–315.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science,46, 186–204.
Wang, S. R. (2016). Interpretation of the guidelines on college English teaching. Foreign Language World,3, 2–10.
Wong, G. K. (2015). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers of primary mathematics in Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,31(6), 713–735.
Wong, G. K. (2016). The behavioral intentions of Hong Kong primary teachers in adopting educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development,64(2), 313–338.
Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2012). Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1190–1207.
Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Computers & Education,59(3), 937–945.
Yang, S. C., & Huang, Y. F. (2008). A study of high school English teachers’ behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior,24, 1085–1103.
Yue, X. (2006). Teaching-researching culture and teachers’ individuality development. Teacher Education Research,18(2), 27–32.
Zhu, C. (2015). Organizational culture and technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education,24(1), 65–79.
Zhu, C., Devos, G., & Li, Y. (2011). Teacher perceptions of school culture and their organizational commitment and well-being in a Chinese school. Asia Pacific Education Review,12(2), 319–328.
Acknowledgement
We thank for teachers who provided help in this study.
Funding
This study was supported by a project titled “Theme-based Teaching of Intercultural College English” (14CWYJ20), funded by Social Science Planning Office of Shandong Province, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A: Constructs and corresponding items
Appendix A: Constructs and corresponding items
Perceived usefulness (adapted from Davis 1989)
- PU1:
-
Using technology enables me to efficiently use limited class time.
- PU2:
-
Using technology enhances my teaching effectiveness.
- PU3:
-
Using technology enriches my teaching materials.
- PU4:
-
Using technology is useful in my job.
Perceived ease of use (adapted from Davis 1989)
- PEU1:
-
I find it easy to get technology to do what I want to do
- PEU2:
-
I find computers easy to use.
- PEU3:
-
I find technology easy to learn.
- PEU4:
-
I find it easy to become skilful at using technology.
Attitude towards use (adapted from Davis 1989)
- AT1:
-
Technology makes work more interesting.
- AT2:
-
Using technology in teaching is a good idea.
- AT3:
-
Using technology in teaching is a wise choice.
Behavioural intention (adapted from Davis 1989)
- BI1:
-
I will use technology in the future.
- BI2:
-
I plan to use technology often.
- BI3:
-
I will continue using technology.
- BI4:
-
I expect that I will use technology in the future.
- BI5:
-
I am sure I will use technology in the future.
Perceived importance of school technology-related policy (self-written)
- PIOP1:
-
I believe it is important to know about technology-related policy requirements
- PIOP2:
-
I believe it is necessary to know about technology-related policy requirements.
- PIOP3:
-
I believe it is important to do what technology-related policy requires.
Dimensions of organisational culture
Goal orientation (adapted from Staessens 1990)
- GO1:
-
In my university, teachers work together to accomplish common goals
- GO2:
-
Our school team is enthusiastic
- GO3:
-
Teachers support common goals
Leadership (adapted from Hoy and Tarter 1997)
- LS1:
-
My school leaders help teachers use technology in teaching
- LS2:
-
My school leaders praise teachers who use technology in teaching
- LS3:
-
My school leaders explain their reasons for supporting teachers in using technology in teaching
- LS4:
-
My school leaders encourage teachers to use technology in teaching
- LS5:
-
My school leaders support teachers in using technology in teaching
Participative decision making (adapted from Devos et al. 2007)
- PDM1:
-
In my university, leaders confer with teachers before important decisions are made
- PDM2:
-
In my university, teachers can be involved in the decision-making process
- PDM3:
-
In my university, teachers give suggestions for policy proposals
- PDM4:
-
In my university, leaders encourage teachers to take the initiative to give suggestions
- PDM5:
-
In my university, teachers’ opinions are considered in the decision-making process
Formal relationships (adapted from Hoy and Tarter 1997; Staessens 1990)
- FR1:
-
Colleagues work together to find and share good teaching methods
- FR2:
-
Consulting with colleagues provides great support for me
- FR3:
-
To do better in my work, I often work together with colleagues
- FR4:
-
My colleagues ask me what I am currently teaching and how I teach
- FR5:
-
My colleagues share teaching experiences with me
Innovation orientation (adapted from Maslowski 2001)
- IO1:
-
In my university, teachers have a positive attitude towards innovations
- IO2:
-
In my university, teachers have a positive attitude towards new teaching tools and strategies
- IO3:
-
In my university, teachers are expected to have an innovative attitude
- IO4:
-
In my university, teachers are expected to try new teaching methods
- IO5:
-
In my university, teachers are expected to have flexible attitudes towards change and innovations
Shared vision (self-written)
- SV1:
-
In my university, teachers know a great deal about university plans
- SV2:
-
In my university, teachers know what the university is striving for
- SV3:
-
In my university, teachers know what the school aspires to be
- SV4:
-
In my university, teachers are provided with specific suggestions or instructions to achieve their goals
- SV5:
-
In my university, teachers are making joint efforts to realize a shared vision
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, F., Teo, T. Influence of teacher-perceived organisational culture and school policy on Chinese teachers’ intention to use technology: an extension of technology acceptance model. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 1547–1567 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09722-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09722-y