Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forwarding a ‘science-ethics nexus’ to critique and reorient science education pedagogy toward greater social and ecological justice

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I engage with arguments put forth by Blue Mahy in his article “A speculative-posthumanist examination of the ‘science-ethics nexus’ in Australian secondary schools.” Mahy argues that by using relational posthumanist concepts as a diffractive lens, his critiques of Australian school science standards find the underlying hegemonies of masculine, Euro-Western ideologies that infuse the stance on ethics in science education. He uses a ‘plug in process’ of posthumanist concepts to generate a ‘speculative fiction’. This is a method used to reclaim ethics and science by creating narratives produced by the diffracted projections of posthumanist concepts. In my own research on science teacher education, I explore Mahy's use of diffraction for both critiquing science curriculum and providing projections for future ethical commitments in school science education. I utilize data from my science methods course which is situated in Central California’s agricultural region at a largely Hispanic-Serving Institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, M. R., Dube, O. P., Solecki, W., Aragón-Durand, F., Cramer, S., Humphreys, M., Zickfeld, K. (2018). Framing and context. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, & T. Waterfield (Eds.), Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (pp. 49–91). Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15.

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, D.C.: AAAS. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769001000206.

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822388128.

  • Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In D. Banerji & M. R. Paranjape (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures (pp. 13–32). New Delhi, India: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • California Commission for Teacher Credentialing. (2016). California teaching performance expectations. Retrieved from http://www.ctc.ca.gov.

  • Devitt, A. (2018). Critical and transformative approaches towards science teaching and teacher educator development in a science pedagogy course: using heuristics, radical listening, and contribution. (Publication No. 10814984) [Doctoral dissertation, New York University]. Retrieved from Proquest Digital Dissertations.

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373780.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K., Sithole, A., & Kibirige, J. (2017). A needs assessment for the adoption of next generation science standards (NGSS) in K-12 education in the United States. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(9), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i9.2576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D. Jr., Kett, J. F., & Trefil, J. (Eds.). (2002). The new dictionary of cultural literacy: What every American needs to know (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Retrieved from https://link-gale-com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/apps/doc/A177454045/AONE?u=monash&sid=AONE&xid=1efcc93b.

  • Milne, C., Scantlebury, K. Hennnessey Elliott, C., & Devitt, A. (in press). Learning from Flint: how matter imposes itself in the Anthropocene and what that means for education. In J. Bazzul, M. Wallace, M. Higgins, & S. Tolbert (Eds.) Science x education x anthropocene. New York: Pargrave Publishing.

  • Mueller, M. P. (2015). Alaskan salmon and Gen R: Hunting, fishing to cultivate ecological mindfulness. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9645-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, K., & Kirch, S. A. (2016). Candidates use a new teacher development process, transformative reflection, to identify and address teaching and learning problems in their work with children. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(5), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116653659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. W. (2005). Place and pedagogy. In M. Stone & Z. Barlow (Eds.), Ecological literacy: Educating our children for a sustainable world. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweinsberg, S., Darcy, S., & Beirman, D. (2020). ‘Climate crisis’ and ‘bushfire disaster’: Implications for tourism from the involvement of social media in the 2019–2020 Australian bushfires. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43, 294–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoville-Simonds, M., Jamali, H., & Hufty, M. (2020). The hazards of mainstreaming: Climate change adaptation politics in three dimensions. World Development, 125, 104683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State of California. (2020). https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2020/.

  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521.

  • The White House. (2020). https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-briefing-wildfires-mcclellan-park-ca/.

  • U.S. Global Change Research Program. (2016). The impacts of climate change on human health in the United States: A scientific assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program. Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.7930/j0vx0dfw.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Devitt.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lead Editor: K. Scantlebury.

This review essay addresses issues raised in Blue Mahy’s article, “A speculative-posthumanist examination of the ‘science-ethics nexus’ in Australian secondary schools.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Devitt, A. Forwarding a ‘science-ethics nexus’ to critique and reorient science education pedagogy toward greater social and ecological justice. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 17, 1039–1046 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10069-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10069-1

Keywords

Navigation