Abstract
In this conceptual paper, we argue that social justice, morality, and healing must be at the core of an equity agenda for science education. When we view equity through this lens, teachers’ and researchers’ historically informed moral stances become just as important as the equitable distribution of teaching and learning resources and the achievement of excellent learning outcomes for all students. Without looking back to the history of science and its prejudices, we miss the reasons why equity in science education continues to be so hard to attain. Incorporating insights from critical race theory, we see ideas of social justice and morality overlapping as well as supporting our understanding of a new direction for equity in science education. We do not frame moral decisions as autonomous actions carried out on the basis of universal a priori principles; rather, we believe they are dialogically informed by culture and context. We therefore place emphasis on responsibilities rather than rules. In this article, we first describe equity through the lens of social justice and present an overview of recent equity research in science education. We next examine the idea of collective morality as we have conceptualized it as science educators and researchers. Then we discuss how morality and social justice intersect with histories of science and offer a different way to consider equity in science education. Finally, we propose some historical case studies that might be of use to the science education community to illustrate how morality and social justice could be a part of rethinking equity-oriented science education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this article, whenever possible we (the authors) try to qualify our pronouns by specifying whom we are talking about. We recognize that the inclusivity implied in a collective pronoun cannot be taken for granted.
References
Albrecht, N. (2015). Views of science teaching and learning by immigrant Somali elders: Perceptions of conflict and acceptance. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/177080.
Apple, M. (1988). What reform talk does: Creating new inequalities in education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X88024003006.
Applebaum, B. (2005). In the name of morality: Moral responsibility, whiteness and social justice education. Journal of Moral Education, 34(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240500206089.
Atwater, M. M. (2012). Significant science education research on multicultural science education, equity, and social justice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), O1–O5.
Barton, A. C. (1998). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Barton, A. C. (2001). Capitalism, critical pedagogy, and urban teacher education: An interview with Peter McLaren. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1035.
Bencze, L., & Alsop, S. (2014). Activist science and technology education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bianchini, J., Akerson, V., Calabrese Barton, A., Lee, O., & Rodriguez, A. (Eds.). (2013). Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice, and policy in science education. Rotterdam: Springer. ISBN: 978-94-007-4466-0 (Print) 978-94-007-4467-7 (Online).
Brickhouse, N. (2013). Conceptions of inequality in the era of Bush/Obama. In J. Bianchini, V. Akerson, A. Calabrese Barton, O. Lee, & A. Rodriguez (Eds.), Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice, and policy in science education (pp. 39–51). Rotterdam: Springer.
Bronowski, J. (1972). Science and human values. New York: Harper and Row.
Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20413.
Carr, D. (2007). Moralized psychology or psychologized morality? Ethics and psychology in recent theorizing about moral and character education. Educational Theory, 57(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00264.x.
Carter, P. L., & Welner, K. G. (2016). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give all children an even chance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cobern, W. W. (1991). World view theory and science education research. Scientific literacy and cultural studies project, Paper 44. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/science_slcsp/44. Accessed Feb 2019.
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. New York: Rowan & Littlefield.
Gonzalez, L. (2009). Teaching mathematics for social justice: Reflections on a community of practice for urban high school mathematics teachers. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 2(1), 22–51.
González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practice in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer. New York: Peter Lang.
Korver-Glenn, E., Chan, E., & Ecklund, E. H. (2015). Perceptions of science education among African American and White Evangelicals: A Texas case study. Review of Religious Research, 57, 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-014-0194-x.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2013). “Stakes is high”: Educating new century students. Journal of Negro Education, 82(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.82.2.0105.
Ladson-Billings, G., & Donnor, J. (2005). The moral activist role of critical race theory scholarship. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3, 279–301.
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–67.
Lynch, S. (2000). Equity and science education reform. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
McCright, A., Dentzman, K., Charters, M., & Dietz, T. (2013). The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044029.
Medin, D., & Bang, M. (2014). Who’s asking? Native science, Western science, and science education. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16633182.
NARST. (2017). A message to the NARST community. NARST. http://www.narst.org/docs/NARST_Board_message_020917.pdf. 9 February 2017.
Nasir, N., Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Lee, C. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12984.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
Pew Research Center. (2015a). Americans, politics and science issues. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/07/01/americans-politics-and-science-issues/. 1 July 2015.
Pew Research Center. (2015b). Public and scientists’ views on science and society. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/. 29 January 2015.
Planas, N., & Civil, M. (2009). Working with mathematics teachers and immigrant students: An empowerment perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9116-1.
Powell, D. (2016). Trump’s first 100 days: Science education and schools. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trumps-first-100-days-science-education-and-schools/. 5 December 2016.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Rodriguez, A. J. (2015). What about a dimension of engagement, equity, and diversity practices? A critique of the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21232.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101.
Skloot, R. (2010). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown Publishers.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800103.
Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78(4), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780405.
Stirling, J., & McGloin, C. (2015). Critical pedagogy and social inclusion policy in Australian higher education: Identifying the disjunctions. Radical Pedagogy, 12(2), 1–15.
Taylor, P. C. (2011). Counter-storying the grand narrative of science (teacher) education: Towards culturally responsive teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9368-9.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40. http://decolonization.org/index.php/des/article/view/18630/15554.
United States Department of Education. (2009). Race to the top program executive summary. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf. Accessed Feb 2019.
Upadhyay, B. (2010). Middle school science teachers’ perceptions of social justice: A study of two elementary teachers. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903492704.
Walls, L. (2012). Third grade African American students’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20450.
Walls, L. (2015). Awakening a dialogue: A critical race theory analysis of US nature of science research from 1967 to 2013. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21266.
Wessel, L. (2017). Hundreds rally for science at demonstration near AAAS meeting. Science (news). http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/hundreds-rally-science-demonstration-near-aaas-meeting. 19 February 2017.
World Medical Association. (2015). Medical ethics manual (3rd ed.). https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Ethics_manual_3rd_Nov2015_en.pdf. Accessed Feb 2019.
Zeidler, D. L. (1984). Moral issues and social policy in science education: Closing the literacy gap. Science Education, 68(4), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730680406.
Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lead Editors: B. Fortney and A. J. Rodriguez.
This manuscript is part of the special issue Equity in Science Teacher Education: Toward an Expanded Definition, guest edited by Brian Fortney, Deb Morrison, Alberto J. Rodriguez, and Bhaskar Upadhyay.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Szostkowski, A., Upadhyay, B. Looking forward by looking back: equity in science education as socially just and morally healing action. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 14, 335–353 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09916-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09916-z