Abstract
Research on science teaching and learning commonly makes use of reductionism to specify conditions of science learning. In my studies of academics’-of-science-teaching-&-learning (academics’-of-st&l) research practices and values, I discuss how philosophic inquiry shifted my research practices from reductionism to critical (or, “new”) materialism, where critical materialism is a research approach attuned to the materiality of social practices. Reading materiality as affectual, intellectual, and spatial components of practices turns my attention toward the logics informing academics’-of-st&l research practices as well as the comfortable and dangerous effects of particular practices on our connectible landscape. In this forum response, I briefly explore multiple logics informing academics’-of-st&l conference attendance choices, in addition to these choices’ alignment to communal definition rendered by governmental and conference entities. I also explore other modes of communal boundary-marking experienced by academics-of-st&l that do not make use of formal definitions, but suggest that it is in the minutiae of conference relating that academics-of-st&l construct their sensing of communal un/boundedness. With these explorations, I hope to generate awareness of the small shifts that re-configuring practices can make possible in academics’-of-st&l connectivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken, V., Fraser, D., & Price, G. (2007). Negotiating the spaces: Relational pedagogy and power in drama teaching. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 8(14), 1–19.
Akarsu, B. (2010). Science education research vs. physics education research: A structural comparison. European Journal of Physics Education, 1(1), 14–19.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
Bloch, M. (2004). A discourse that disciplines, governs, and regulates: The National Research Council’s report on scientific research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403259482.
Braidotti, R. (2012). Interview with Rosi Braidotti. New Materialism: Interviews & cartographies (pp. 19–37). Ann Arbor, Michigan: MPublishing, University of Michigan Library.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman (1st ed.). Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Bush, S. D., Pelaez, N. J., Rudd, J. A., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2008). Science faculty with education specialties. Science, 322(5909), 1795–1796. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162072.
Canguilhem, G. (1991). The Normal and the pathological. (C. R. Fawcett, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham NC; London: Duke University Press Books.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.) (1st ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1996). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, California: Routledge.
Dolan, E. L., Elliott, S. L., Henderson, C., Curran-Everett, D., John, K. S., & Ortiz, P. A. (2018). Evaluating discipline-based education research for promotion and tenure. Innovative Higher Education, 43(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9406-y.
Edwards, J. (2010). The materialism of historical materialism. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 281–298). Durham NC; London: Duke University Press Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. (C. Gordon, Ed.) (1st ed.). New York: New York.
Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader. (P. Rabinow, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (2009). Preface. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari, R. Hurley (Trans.), Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. New York, NY: Penguin Classics. (Original work published in 1977).
Godfrey, E., & Parker, L. (2013). Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01038.x.
Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Framing equity: Helping students “play the game” and “change the game.” Teaching for Excellence and Equity in Mathematics, 1(1), 4–8.
Henderson, C., Connolly, M., Dolan, E. L., Finkelstein, N., Franklin, S., Malcom, S., et al. (2017). Towards the STEM DBER Alliance: Why we need a discipline-based STEM education research community. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0076-1.
Howley, A., & Hartnett, R. (1992). Pastoral power and the contemporary university: A Foucauldian analysis. Educational Theory, 42(3), 271–283.
Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2004). On qualitative inquiry: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.
Kayumova, S., McGuire, C. J., & Cardello, S. (2018). From empowerment to response-ability: rethinking socio-spatial, environmental justice, and nature-culture binaries in the context of STEM education. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9861-5.
Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Ulmer, J. B. (2015). Vital illusions, images, and education. In G. S. Cannella, M. S. Perez, & P. A. Pasque (Eds.), Critical qualitative inquiry. Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781315431161/chapters/10.4324%2F9781315431178-17.
Kuntz, A. M. (2015). Logics of extraction. In The responsible methodologist: Inquiry, truth-telling, and social justice. Walnut Creek, California: Routledge.
Kuntz, A. M., & Guyotte, K. W. (2017). Inquiry on the sly: Playful intervention as philosophical action. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417734566.
Mulder, Y. G., Bollen, L., de Jong, T., & Lazonder, A. W. (2016). Scaffolding learning by modelling: The effects of partially worked-out models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 502–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21260.
National Research Council (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press.
Rutledge, M. (2013). “Biology education”—An emerging interdisciplinary area of research. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(3), 58–62.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Seidman, I. (1997). Interviewing as qualitative research (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Shipley, T. F., McConnell, D., McNeal, K. S., Petcovic, H. L., & John, K. E. S. (2017). Transdisciplinary science education research and practice: Opportunities for GER in a developing STEM discipline-based education research alliance (DBER-A). Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-65.4.354.
Slater, S. J., Slater, T. F., & Bailey, J. M. (2011). Discipline-based science education research: A scientist’s guide (1st ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M., & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 442–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1013.
Trauth-Nare, A. (2016). Re-envisioning scientific literacy as relational, participatory thinking and doing. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9676-6.
Ulmer, J. B. (2017). Writing slow ontology. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416643994.
Ulmer, J. B., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2014). Writing visually through (methodological) events and cartography. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414542706.
Walkerdine, V. (2013). Using the work of Felix Guattari to understand space, place, social justice, and education. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413502934.
Wallace, M. F. G. (2018). The paradox of un/making science people: practicing ethico-political hesitations in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9831-3.
Wooten, M. M. (2018). A cartographic approach to the study of academics’ of science teaching & learning (academics’-of-st&l) research practices and values. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Wooten, M. M., Coble, K., Puckett, A. W., & Rector, T. A. (in press). Investigating introductory astronomy students’ perceived impacts from participation in course-based undergraduate research experiences. Physical Review Physics Education Research.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.
Zeyer, A., Çetin-Dindar, A., Zain, A. N. M., Juriševič, M., Devetak, I., & Odermatt, F. (2013). Systemizing: A cross-cultural constant for motivation to learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1047–1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21101.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the University of Alabama College of Education’s William E. Sexton Endowed Scholarship and Dr. Brad S. Chissom Memorial Scholarship. I acknowledge Dr. Kelly Guyotte and MTSU’s Biology Education Association’s valuable input toward shaping my methodology’s phrasings and demonstration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead editor: J. Bazzul.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wooten, M.M. A critical materialist entry into the comforts and dangers in defining academics’ of science teaching and learning research communities. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 14, 231–247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9871-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9871-3