Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The place of practical wisdom in science education: what can be learned from Aristotelian ethics and a virtue-based theory of knowledge

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This conceptual paper aims to characterize science teachers’ practical knowledge utilizing a virtue-based theory of knowledge and the Aristotelian notion of phronesis/practical wisdom. The article argues that a greater understanding of the concept of phronesis and its relevance to science education would enrich our understandings of teacher knowledge, its development, and consequently models of teacher education. Views of teacher knowledge presented in this paper are informed by philosophical literature that questions normative views of knowledge and argues for a virtue-based epistemology rather than a belief-based one. The paper first outlines general features of phronesis/practical wisdom. Later, a virtue-based view of knowledge is described. A virtue-based view binds knowledge with moral concepts and suggests that knowledge development is motivated by intellectual virtues such as intellectual sobriety, perseverance, fairness, and humility. A virtue-based theory of knowledge gives prominence to the virtue of phronesis/practical wisdom, whose primary function is to mediate among virtues and theoretical knowledge into a line of action that serves human goods. The role of phronesis and its relevance to teaching science are explained accordingly. I also discuss differences among various characterizations of practical knowledge in science education and a virtue-based characterization. Finally, implications and further questions for teacher education are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International journal of science education, 30, 1405–1416. doi:10.1080/09500690802187041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2008). Objectivity: The opiate of the academic? Cultural Studies in Science Education, 3, 581–585. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9126-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, S., Bencze, L., & Pedretti, E. (2004). Analyzing exemplary science teaching. Berkshire, GBR: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1976). The Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. J. A. K. Thomson, London: Penguin.

  • Aristotle. (2002). The Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. J. Sachs, New York: Riverhead Books.

  • Atkins, J. M. (2007). What role for the humanities in science education research? Studies in Science Education, 43, 62–87. doi:10.1080/03057260708560227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breier, M., & Ralphs, A. (2009). In search of phronesis: Recognizing practical wisdom in the recognition (assessment) of prior learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30, 479–493. doi:10.1080/01425690902954646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2007). Character in teaching. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 369–389. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00386.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J. (1993). Back to the rough ground: ‘Phronesis’ and ‘techne’ in modern philosophy and Aristotle. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J. (2005). An intricate fabric: Understanding the fabric of practice. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 13, 367–389. doi:10.1080/14681360500200234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikeland, O. (2006). Phronesis, Aristotle, and action research. International Journal of Action Research, 2, 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A. (2002). Multiple perspectives for the study of teaching: Knowledge, reason, understanding, and being. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 1032–1055. doi:10.1002/tea.10051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd Rev. ed.) (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans).. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2010). What is to be done? The place of action research. Educational Action Research, 18, 417–427. doi:10.1080/09650792.2010.524745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020–1041. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2002). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In R. Harrison, F. Reeve, A. Hanson, & J. Clarke (Eds.), Supporting life long learning (pp. 111–126). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916:AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296:AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2008). Computer, change, craft, and complexity: Exploration into science teacher knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 44, 41–62. doi:10.1080/03057260701828135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, J. (1999). On the varieties of phronesis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31, 273–289. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.1999.tb00466.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendlebury, S. (1995). Reason and story in wise practice. In H. McEwan & K. Egan (Eds.), Narrative in teaching, learning and research (pp. 50–65). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salloum, S. (2013). Multiple perspectives for the study of teaching: A conceptual framework for characterizing and accessing science teachers’ practical-moral knowledge. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), Approaches and strategies in next generation science learning (pp. 27–51). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2809-0.ch002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salloum, S., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2010). Practical knowledge in teaching: Case studies from physical science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 929–951. doi:10.1002/tea.20361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salloum, S., Jennings, M., Arrabito, N., Schmidt, M., McCall, C., Frederick, T., Cross, U-K, & Benn-Scantlebury, A. (2010, February). Novice urban teachers engaging in practitioner inquiry: Lessons learned, rewards, and challenges. Practitioner Inquiry Group Session presented at Annual Ethnography in Education Research Forum, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of Science teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development. Review of Educational Research, 81, 530–565. doi:10.3102/0034654311423382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (2005). On modeling our understanding of the practice fields. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 13, 313–332. doi:10.1080/14681360500200231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (2008). Personal communication.

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2007). Response to comments: Practical wisdom in the service of professional practice. Educational Researcher, 36, 560–563. doi:10.3102/0013189X09334207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 396–423. doi:10.1002/tea.20165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (1996). Issues and trends in the teaching of science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 129–151). London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Implementing coteaching and cogenerative dialoguing in urban science education. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 313–322. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18132.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turri, J., & Sosa, E. (2013). Virtue epistemology. In B. Kaldis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy and the social sciences (Vol. 21, pp. 1041–1043). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137–158. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137:AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673:AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, L. T. (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Balamand, Balamand, Lebanon

    Sara Salloum

Authors
  1. Sara Salloum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Salloum.

Additional information

Lead Editor: L. Bencze.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salloum, S. The place of practical wisdom in science education: what can be learned from Aristotelian ethics and a virtue-based theory of knowledge. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 12, 355–367 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9710-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9710-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation