Abstract
Spatial visualization is a well-established topic of education research that has allowed improving science and engineering students’ skills on spatial relations. Connections have been established between visualization as a comprehension tool and instruction in several scientific fields. Learning about dynamic processes mainly relies upon static spatial representations or images. Visualization of time is inherently problematic because time can be conceptualized in terms of two opposite conceptual metaphors based on spatial relations as inferred from conventional linguistic patterns. The situation is particularly demanding when time-varying signals are recorded using displaying electronic instruments, and the image should be properly interpreted. This work deals with the interplay between linguistic metaphors, visual thinking and scientific instrument mediation in the process of interpreting time-varying signals displayed by electronic instruments. The analysis draws on a simplified version of a communication system as example of practical signal recording and image visualization in a physics and engineering laboratory experience. Instrumentation delivers meaningful signal representations because it is designed to incorporate a specific and culturally favored time view. It is suggested that difficulties in interpreting time-varying signals are linked with the existing dual perception of conflicting time metaphors. The activation of specific space–time conceptual mapping might allow for a proper signal interpretation. Instruments play then a central role as visualization mediators by yielding an image that matches specific perception abilities and practical purposes. Here I have identified two ways of understanding time as used in different trajectories through which students are located. Interestingly specific displaying instruments belonging to different cultural traditions incorporate contrasting time views. One of them sees time in terms of a dynamic metaphor consisting of a static observer looking at passing events. This is a general and widespread practice common in the contemporary mass culture, which lies behind the process of making sense to moving images usually visualized by means of movie shots. In contrast scientific culture favored another way of time conceptualization (static time metaphor) that historically fostered the construction of graphs and the incorporation of time-dependent functions, as represented on the Cartesian plane, into displaying instruments. Both types of cultures, scientific and mass, are considered highly technological in the sense that complex instruments, apparatus or machines participate in their visual practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, L., Juersivich, N., Hammond, T. C., & Bell, R. L. (2012). The TPACK of dynamic representations. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes, & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches. IGI Global: Hershay, PA. doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-750-0.ch005.
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and english speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.
Burke, P. (1978). Popular culture in early modern Europe. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Burke, P. (2009). Cultural hybridity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Candela, A. (2010). Time and space: Undergraduate Mexican physics in motion. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 701–727. doi:10.1007/s11422-010-9259-5.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–170. doi:10.1007/BF01320076.
Contero, M., Naya, F., Company, P., Saorín, J. L., & Conesa, J. (2005). Improving visualization skills in engineering education. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. doi:10.1109/MCG.2005.107.
Crosby, A. W. (1997). The measure of reality: Quantification and western society, 1250–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dias Pereira, J. M. (2006). The history and technology of oscilloscopes: An overview of its primary characteristics and working principles. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Magazine. doi:10.1109/MIM.2006.250640.
Doane, M. A. (2002). The emergence of the cinematic time: Modernity, contingency, the archive. Cambirdge: Harvard University Press.
Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35, 1305–1328. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01193.x.
Gale, R. (Ed.). (1967). The philosphy of time. New York: Doubleday.
Gale, R. (1968). The language of time. London: Routledge.
Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
Gell, A. (1992). The anthropology of time. Providence: Berg Publishers Ltd.
Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space-time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 537–565. doi:10.1080/01690960143000317.
Giaquinto, M. (2007). Visual thinking in mathematics: An epistemology study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285945.001.0001.
Gilbert, J. K. (2007a). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gilbert, J. K. (Ed.). (2007b). Visualization in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gilbert, J. K., Reiner, M., & Nakhleh, M. (Eds.). (2008). Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (Vol. 3). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5.
Granet, M. (1968). La Pensée Chinoise. Paris: Albin Michel.
Graves-Brown, P. M. (Ed.). (2000). Matter, materiality and modern culture. London: Routledge.
Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspective in student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropiate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1316–1325. doi:10.1119/1.18376.
Headrick, D. N. (2000). When information come of age: Technologies of knowledge in the age of reason and revolution, 1700–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Idhe, D. (1991). Instrumental realism: The interface between philosophy of science and philosophy of technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lindberg, D. C. (1992). The beginnings of Western science: The European scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context, 600 B.C. to 1450. Chicago: The University of Chigaco Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226482064.001.0001.
Lowe, R. K., & Schnotz, W. (Eds.). (2007). Learning with animation: Research implications for design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Malley, C., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., & Wieman, C. E. (2008). Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 76, 406–417. doi:10.1119/1.2885199.
Munn, N. D. (1992). The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 93–123. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.000521.
Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London, New York: Routledge Farmer.
Nespor, J. (2004). Educational scale-making. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12, 309–326. doi:10.1080/14681360400200205.
Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62.
Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. S. (2010). Visualization in mathematics, reading and science education. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8816-1.
Rapp, D. N. (2007). Mentals models: Theoretical issues for visualizations in science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rapp, D. N., & Kurby, C. A. (2008). The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of learning: Internal representations and external visualizations. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_2.
Roth, W.-M., Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Han, J. Y. (2005). Critical graphicacy: Understanding visual representation practices in school science. New York: Springer.
Sahlins, M. (1985). Islands of history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schiffer, M. B. (1999). The material life of human beings. London: Routledge.
Sewell, W. H, Jr. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture (pp. 35–61). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745–757. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_67.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Systems, 57, 247–262. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.
Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88, 465–492. doi:10.1002/sce.10126.
Acknowledgments
I would like to acknowledge Dr. F. X. Garcia Belmonte for fruitful discussions on the cultural tradition concept, and its relation to scientific practices.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: A. Brady.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garcia-Belmonte, G. Visualizing time: how linguistic metaphors are incorporated into displaying instruments in the process of interpreting time-varying signals. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 12, 369–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9686-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9686-4