Skip to main content
Log in

Big History, Value, and the Art of Continued Existence

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has lately been substantial interest in scrutinizing our evaluative attitudes in light of our evolutionary history. However, these discussions have been hampered by an insufficiently expansive vantage. Our history did not begin ex nihilo a few million years ago with the appearance of hominins, or apes, or primates—those are very recent chapters of a much larger story that spans billions of years. This paper situates the mechanisms underlying normative thought within this broader context. I argue that this historical perspective creates difficulties for metaethical nonnaturalists. The expanded scope enables the story to be anchored in negative claims about value, making room for novel epistemological and metaphysical challenges that are more threatening than extant evolutionary debunking arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Helpful introductions to big history include: Allday 2017; Singh 2004; Christian 2011; Greene 2004; Hazen 2005; Ward and Kirschvink 2015; Lane 2015; Harari 2015; Dawkins 2004.

  2. Here, I have neglected bioenergetic constraints on plausible origin-of-life scenarios (e.g., Lane 2015). However, a discussion emphasizing pre-biotic metabolism would hardly challenge the continuity between living and non-living things, but would rather serve to illustrate it.

  3. Dennett (2017, ch. 3) explores a similar idea, but under the general heading of ‘reasons’. Since the normativity of biological reasons is in doubt, my terminology seems preferable for our purposes.

  4. Comparative discussions such as this require caution. Since contemporary animals have continued to evolve over millions of years, they are not identical to ancestral forms. Nevertheless, comparison with modern forms can be illuminating, since a trait’s conservation across lineages (e.g., nerve nets throughout cnidarians, neurons in both cnidarians and mammals) evinces that trait’s presence in their last common ancestor.

  5. Contra Bogardus (2016), the image of recognizable patterns of normative thought untainted by what I’m calling ‘mechanisms of biological valuation’ is not possible for humans.

  6. Enoch (2011, chs. 2-4) is a notable exception. I address his positive argument for nonnaturalism in [citation removed].

  7. I return to this issue in Section 10.4.

  8. Thanks to Jake Monaghan for suggesting this to me.

  9. Nonnaturalists might insist that their necessary, eternal normative principles are fundamental, and can’t be explained further. Perhaps we must tolerate some degree of fundamentality in some places. But the putative fact that the universe had embedded within it dormant principles to govern the conduct of intelligent creatures is striking, and seems to call out for an explanation. The incurious maneuver of instructing critics to cease asking questions is always available to those who want to sweep theoretical weaknesses under the rug.

  10. Thanks to Alex King for encouraging me to frame this point this way.

  11. This is an important difference between normativity and mathematics, because it appears that mathematical description has been apt at every moment in history. This makes it questionable whether mathematics is a helpful “partner in guilt” in this context.

  12. I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer for raising this objection.

  13. In some ways, views that construe normativity as fundamentally continuous with descriptive phenomena may have an easier time placing value in the context of big history, since they do not require an abrupt rift with everything that came before. Even still, it is possible to challenge views like these along the lines developed above. For example, the continuity between all living things and the continuity of living things with proto-organisms and abiotic chemistry makes it challenging to spell out a naturalistic position that does not slip into pan-normativism. (Thanks to an anonymous reviewer for pressing me to address this.)

    In this paper, I have focused on nonnaturalism because I believe it is most susceptible to the challenges I have raised, and doing so has also helped to (slightly) narrow the discussion. I am also persuaded by nonnaturalists’ arguments that naturalistic approaches fail to deliver accounts of genuine normativity (e.g., Parfit 2011, chs. 29–30). If normativity is not an illusion, then I believe it must be discontinuous in the way that nonnaturalists claim. That is why I think it is the view to beat. But these are matters for another occasion.

References

  • Allday, J. (2017). Quarks, leptons, and the big bang (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, N., André, J., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrends, J. (2013). Meta-normative realism, evolution, and our reasons to survive. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 94, 486–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, P. (2001). Moral reality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (2008). Purposive social selection and the evolution of human altruism. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 319–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (2012). Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogardus, T. (2016). Only all naturalists should worry about only one evolutionary debunking argument. Ethics, 126, 636–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brendan, Cline. (2015). Nativism and the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6, 231–253.

  • Brendan, Cline. (2017). Smith’s practicality requirement meets dual-process models of moral judgment. Philosophical Psychology 30 ,1043–106.

  • Brendan, Cline. (2017). Cognitivism, Motivation, and Dual-Process Approaches to Normative Judgment. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 4. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.020.

  • Brosnan, K. (2011). Do the evolutionary origins of our moral beliefs undermine moral knowledge? Biology and Philosophy, 26, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Laland, K. N. (2003). Social learning in fishes: A review. Fish and Fisheries, 4, 280–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I. A., Roberts, R. W., & Szostak, J. W. (2004). The emergence of competition between model protocells. Science, 305, 1474–1476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, D. (2011). Maps of time: An introduction to big history (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S. (2011). Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, D. (2008). Darwinian skepticism about moral realism. Philosophical Issues, Interdisciplinary Core Philosophy, 18, 186–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordain, L., Miller, J. B., Eaton, S. B., Mann, N., Hold, S. H. A., & Speth, J. D. (2000). Plant-animal subsistence ratios and macronutrient energy estimations in worldwide hunter-gatherer diets. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71, 682–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordoni, G., & Palagi, E. (2008). Reconciliation in wolves (Canis lupus): New evidence for a comparative perspective. Ethology, 114, 298–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, A. D. (2003). Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 500–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, D. (2016). A Plantingian pickle for a Darwinian dilemma: Evolutionary arguments against atheism and normative realism. Ratio, 29, 130–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuneo, T. (2007). Recent faces of moral nonnaturalism. Philosophy Compass, 2, 850–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuneo, T., & Shafer-Landau, R. (2014). The moral fixed points: New directions for moral nonnaturalism. Philosophical Studies, 171, 399–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, J. (2006). Nonnaturalism. In D. Copp (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of ethical theory (pp. 122–145). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, J. (2014). From thought to action. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in Metaethics (Vol. 9, pp. 1–17). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, R. (2016). Evolutionary debunking of morality: Epistemological or metaphysical? Philosophical Studies, 173, 417–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, S. A. (2012). On the intrinsic value of everything. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daw, N. D., & Doya, K. (2006). The computational neurobiology of learning and reward. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (2004). The ancestor’s tale: A pilgrimage to the dawn of evolution. New York: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (2013). Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York: W.W. Norton & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (2017). From bacteria to Bach and back: The evolution of minds. New York: W.W. Norton & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, D. A., McKinley, M. J., & Weisinger, R. S. (1996). Hypothalamic integration of body fluid regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 7397–7404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doya, K. (2007). Reinforcement learning: Computational theory and biological mechanisms. HFSP Journal, 1, 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droser, M. L., & Gehling, J. G. (2015). The advent of animals: The view from the Ediacaran. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 4865–4870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droser, M. L., Jensen, S., & Gehling, J. G. (2002). Trace fossils and substrates of the terminal Proterozoic-Cambrian transition: Implications for the record of early bilaterians and sediment mixing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 12572–12576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, D. (2010). The epistemological challenge to metanormative realism: How best to understand it, and how to cope with it. Philosophical Studies, 18, 413–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, D. (2011). Taking morality seriously: A defense of robust realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J., Egan, G. F., Zamarripa, F., Shade, R., Blair-West, J., Fox, P., & Denton, D. A. (2006). Unique, common, and interacting cortical correlates of thirst and pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 2416–2421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendt, M. (2006). Exposure to urine of canids and felids, but not of herbivores, induces defensive behavior in laboratory rats. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32, 2617–2627.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzPatrick, W. J. (2008). Robust ethical realism, non-naturalism, and normativity. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in Metaethics (Vol. 3, pp. 237–205). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzPatrick, W. J. (2014). Why there is no Darwinian dilemma for ethical realism. In M. Bergmann & P. Kain (Eds.), Challenges to moral and religious belief: Disagreement and evolution (pp. 237–255). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzPatrick, W. J. (2015). Debunking evolutionary debunking of ethical realism. Philosophical Studies, 172, 883–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flack, J. C., Krakauer, D. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Robustness mechanisms in primate societies: A perturbation study. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 1091–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galef, B. G., & Laland, K. N. (2005). Social learning in animals: Empirical studies and theoretical models. BioScience, 55, 489–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, B. (2004). The fabric of the cosmos: Space, time, and the texture of reality. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment and decision making. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences V. MIT Press.

  • Gu, X., Gao, Z., Wang, X., Liu, X., Knight, R. T., Hof, P. R., & Fan, J. (2012). Anterior insular cortex is necessary for empathetic pain perception. Brain, 135, 2726–2735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala, F. (2012). Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harari, Y. N. (2015). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, R. M. (2005). Genesis: The scientific quest for life’s origins. Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, M. (2005). Ethical intuitionism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, M. (2016). A liberal realist answer to debunking skeptics: The empirical case for realism. Philosophical Studies, 173, 1983–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford, F. A., & Wright, P. J. (1992). Inherited population differences in avoidance conditioning in three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behaviour, 122, 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jékely, G. (2009). Evolution of phototaxis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2795–2808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. R., & Rowland, W. J. (1996). Pavlovian conditioning of agonistic behavior in male threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 396–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. (2006). The evolution of morality. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

  • Katsuki, T., & Greenspan, R. J. (2013). Jellyfish nervous systems. Current Biology, 23, R592–R594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. (2011). Yuck!: The nature and moral significance of disgust. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. L., & Magurran, A. E. (2003). Learned predator recogniztion and antipredator responses in fishes. Fish and Fisheries, 4, 216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, T. S. (2006). The origin of mammalian endothermy: A paradigm for the evolution of complex biological structure. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 147, 473–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristal, M. B. (2009). The biopsychology of maternal behavior in nonhuman mammals. ILAR Journal, 50, 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, N. (2015). The vial question: Energy, evolution, and the orgins of complex life. New York: W.W. Norton & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Machery, E., & Mallon, R. (2010). Evolution of morality. In J. M. Doris & The Moral Psychology Research Group (Eds.), The moral psychology handbook (pp. 3–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E., & Seghers, B. H. (1991). Variation in schooling and aggression amongst guppy (Poecilia reticulate) populations in Trinidad. Behaviour, 118, 214–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., & Szathmáry, E. (1999). The origins of life: From the birth of life to the origins of language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, T. (2009). Moorean arguments and moral revisionism. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 3, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P. (2006). Going east: New genetic and archaeological perspectives on the modern human colonization of Eurasia. Science, 313, 796–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J. C., & Watts, D. P. (2001). Why do chimpanzees hunt and share meat? Animal Behaviour, 61, 915–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (2012). Mind & cosmos: Why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcutt, R. G. (2012). Evolution of centralized nervous systems: Two schools of evolutionary thought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(suppl. 1), 10626–10633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oderberg, D. S. (2014). Being and goodness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 51, 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (2011). On what matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. L., Young, A. W., Senior, C., Brammer, M., Andrews, C., Calder, A. J., Bullmore, E. T., Perrett, D. I., Rowland, D., Williams, S. C. R., Gray, J. A., & David, A. S. (1997). A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature, 389, 495–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pough, F. H., Taigen, T. L., Stewart, M. M., & Brussard, P. F. (1983). Behavioral modification of evaporative water loss by a Puerto Rican frog. Ecology, 64, 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pross, A. (2011). Toward a general theory of evolution: Extending Darwinian theory to inanimate matter. Journal of Systems Chemistry, 2, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P. (2014). The affective dog and its rational tale: Intuition and attunement. Ethics, 124, 813–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanovsky, A. A. (2007). Thermoregulation: Some concepts have changed. Functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory. Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 292, R37–R46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755–1758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, H. (2018). Debunking arguments in ethics. Cambridge University Press.

  • Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. (2014). Being realistic about reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, K. (2010). Evolution and normative skepticism. Australiasian Journal of Philosophy, 88, 471–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, G. E. (2014). Brain structure and its origins in development and in evolution of behavior and the mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., & Koenigs, M. (2017). Human lesion studies of ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 107, 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, T., Roskies, A. L., & Nichols, S. (2010). Moral motivation. In J. M. Doris & The Moral Psychology Research Group (Eds.), The moral psychology handbook (pp. 72–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). Moral realism: a defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer-Landau, R. (2005). Precis of Moral realism: A defense. Philosophical Studies, 126, 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer-Landau, R. (2012). Evolutionary debunking, moral realism, and moral knowledge. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, 7, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, D. G., Luo, H. L., Conway Morris, S., Zhang, X. L., Hu, S. X., Chen, L., Hand, J., Zhu, M., Li, Y., & Chen, L. Z. (1999). Lower Cambrian vertebrates from South China. Nature, 402, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. (2004). Big bang: The origin of the universe. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarsaune, K. O. (2011). Darwin and moral realism: Survival of the iffiest. Philosophical Studies, 152, 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. J., Anand, P., Benattayallah, A., & Hodgson, T. L. (2015). An fMRI investigation of moral cognition in healthcare decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 8, 116–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1986). Philosophical problems for environmentalism. In B. Norton (Ed.), The preservation of species (pp. 173–194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Baumard, N. (2012). Moral reputation: An evolutionary and cognitive perspective. Mind & Language, 27, 495–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sripada, C. S., & Stich, S. (2006). A framework for the psychology of norms. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Vol. 2 Culture and cognition (pp. 280–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, C., Grønlien, H. K., Allen, R. D., & Naitoh, Y. (2002). Osmoregulation in Paramecium: In situ ion gradients permit water to cascade through the cytosol to the contractile vacuole. Journal of Cell Science, 155, 2339–2348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, S. (2006). A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value. Philosophical Studies, 127, 109–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. W. (1981). The ethics of respect for nature. Environmental Ethics, 3, 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toner, C. (2011). Evolution, naturalism, and the worthwhile: A critique of Richard Joyce’s evolutionary debunking argument. Metaphilosophy, 42, 520–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 46, 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, E. J. C., Cronin, K. A., Haun, D. B. M., Mundry, R., & Bodamer, M. D. (2012). Neighbouring chimpanzee communities show different preferences in social grooming behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, 4362–4367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varner, G. (2002). Biocentric individualism. In D. Schmidtz & E. Willott (Eds.), Environmental ethics: What really matters, what really works (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavova, K. (2014). Debunking evolutionary debunking. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in Metaethics (Vol. 9, pp. 76–101). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavova, K. (2018). Irrelevant influences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96, 134–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Rohr, C. R., Koski, S. E., Burkart, J. M., Caws, C., Fraser, O. N., Ziltener, A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2012). Impartial third-party interventions in captive chimpanzees: A reflection of community concern. PLoS One, 7, e32484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voytek, S. B., & Joyce, G. F. (2009). Niche partitioning in the coevolution of 2 distinct RNA enzymes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 7780–7785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wächtershäuser, G. (1990). Evolution of the first metabolic cycles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87, 200–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P., & Kirschvink, J. (2015). A new history of life: The radical new discoveries about the origins and evolution of life on earth. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, H., Fujisawa, T., & Holstein, T. W. (2009). Cnidarians and the evolutionary origin of the nervous system. Development, Growth & Differentiation, 51, 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A., Horner, V., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature, 437, 737–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wielenberg, E. J. (2010). On the evolutionary debunking of morality. Ethics, 120, 441–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wielenberg, E. J. (2014). Robust ethics: The metaphysics and epistemology of godless normative realism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. M. (2011). Bacterial osmoregulation: A paradigm for the study of cellular homeostasis. Annual Review of Microbiology, 65, 215–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., He, G., Shapira, N. A., Goodman, W. K., & Liu, Y. (2004). Disgust and the insula: fMRI responses to pictures of mutilation and contamination. NeuroReport, 15, 2347–2351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, S., & Laflamme, M. (2009). On the eve of animal radiation: Phylogeny, ecology and evolution of the Ediacara biota. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Z., Zhu, M., Davidson, E., Bottjer, D. J., Zhao, F., & Tafforeau, P. (2015). Sponge grade body fossil with cellular resolution dating 60 myr before the Cambrian. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, E1453–E1460.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan Cline.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cline, B. Big History, Value, and the Art of Continued Existence. Philosophia 48, 901–930 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00124-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00124-1

Keywords

Navigation