Abstract
Most philosophers who advance an ethics of care do not claim that their theories are meant to account for all of morality, or that they can, or should, replace the traditional Western philosophical approaches to moral theory. However, one care ethicist, Michael Slote, holds that his theory can be used to understand all of individual and political morality. Moreover, while Kantianism, utilitarianism, and both ancient and contemporary Aristotelian ethics are all uncomfortable with supererogation and are typically committed to assumptions that rule out the possibility of someone acting beyond the call of duty, Slote claims that the way in which his theory accommodates supererogation constitutes a real advantage over other approaches to ethics. My aim in this paper is to cast doubt on the truth of this claim by showing that Slote’s theory has considerable difficulty accommodating supererogation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and Women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kagan, S. (1989). The limits of morality. Oxford: Clarendon.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Slote, M. (2007). The ethics of care and empathy. London and New York: Routledge.
Slote, M. (2010). Moral sentimentalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Urmson, J. O. (1958). Saints and heroes. In A. I. Melden (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy (pp. 198–216). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Warnock, B. (1995). moral sense. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy (p. 597). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, R.C. Supererogation in an Ethics of Care. Philosophia 42, 597–602 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-014-9537-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-014-9537-7