Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phosphate fertilizer enhancing soil erosion: effects and mechanisms in a variably charged soil

  • Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The extensive application of phosphate fertilizers could produce a series of environmental problems by adsorbing on the surface of soil particle and migrating into water during soil erosion. Therefore, this study is to explore the effects of phosphate on soil aggregate stability and soil erosion and to analyze the mechanisms of phosphate enhancing soil erosion from the scope of soil charge density, electric field, and particle interaction.

Materials and methods

A variable charged soil (0–20 cm) was pre-treated firstly by KCl, K2HPO4, and KH2PO4, respectively. Under the conditions of KCl, K2HPO4, and KH2PO4 solutions with concentrations of 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mol L−1, (1) the amounts of soil particle transport and erosion intensities were measured using rainfall simulation with electrolyte solutions instead of rainwater; (2) the aggregate stabilities were measured by weighing the particles and micro-aggregates of <2, 5, and 10 μm after soil aggregate breakdown in electrolyte solutions; and (3) the zeta potentials of soil particles were measured in electrolyte solutions.

Results and discussion

The application of K2HPO4 and KH2PO4 in soil strongly enhanced soil aggregate breakdown and soil erosion, while in KCl application, soil aggregates were stable and erosion did not occur. Moreover, the intensities of soil aggregate breakdown and soil erosion for K2HPO4 application were much stronger than that for KH2PO4 application. Phosphate, especially K2HPO4, strongly increased surface negative charge density of soil particles and thus increased the electrostatic repulsive pressure between adjacent soil particles in aggregates, and as a result, the soil erosion intensity increased. However, the surface charge density was not increased by the increased pH, specific adsorption, and dispersion force adsorption but possibly attributed to a non-classic induction force adsorption arising from the anionic non-classic polarization in the strong electric field around soil particle surface.

Conclusions

The application of phosphate decreased aggregate stability and stimulated soil erosion through increasing charge density of particle surface by a new non-classic induction adsorption of phosphate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angers DA, Mehuys GR (1989) Effects of cropping on carbohydrate content and water-stable aggregation of a clay soil. Can J Soil Sci 69(2):373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appel C, Ma L (2002) Concentration, pH, and surface charge effects on cadmium and lead sorption in three tropical soils. J Environ Qual 31(2):581–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ (1983) A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil. J Soil Sci 34(4):733–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boström M, Williams DRM, Ninham BW (2001) Specific ion effects: why DLVO theory fails for biology and colloid systems. Phys Rev Lett 87(16):168103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celi L, Barberis E, Marsan FA (2000) Sorption of phosphate on goethite at high concentrations. Soil Sci 165(8):657–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chitrakar R, Tezuka S, Sonoda A, Sakane K, Ooi K, Hirotsu T (2006) Phosphate adsorption on synthetic goethite and akaganeite. J Colloid Interface Sci 298(2):602–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deviren SS, Cornelis WM, Erpul G, Gabriels D (2012) Comparison of different aggregate stability approaches for loamy sand soils. Appl Soil Ecol 54:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du W, Li R, Liu XM, Tian R, Li H (2016) Specific ion effects on ion exchange kinetics in charged clay. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 509:427–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekwue EI, Stone RJ (1994) Effect of peat on the compactibility of some trinidadian soils. J Agr Eng Res 57(2):129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S, Lebron I, Suarez DL (2000) Soil colloidal behavior. In: Sumner ME (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, pp B195–B235

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant CD, Dexter AR (1990) Air entrapment and differential swelling as factors in the mellowing of molded soil during rapid wetting. Aust J Soil Res 28(3):361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horányi G, Kálmán E (2004) Anion specific adsorption on Fe2O3 and AlOOH nanoparticles in aqueous solutions: comparison with hematite and γ-Al2O3. J Colloid Interface Sci 269(2):315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu FN, Li H, Liu XM, Li S, Ding WQ, Xu CY, Li Y, Zhu LH (2015a) Quantitative characterization of non-classic polarization of cations on clay aggregate stability. Plos One 10(4):e0122460

  • Hu FN, Xu CY, Li H, Li S, Yu ZH, Li Y, He XH (2015b) Particles interaction forces and their effects on soil aggregates breakdown. Soil Till Res 147:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilg K, Dominik P, Kaupenjohan MN, Siemens J (2008) Phosphorus-induced mobilization of colloids: model systems and soils. Eur J Soil Sci 59(2):233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israelachvili JN (2011) Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic press, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Israelachvili JN, Adams GE (1978) Measurement of forces between two mica surfaces in aqueous electrolyte solutions in the range 0–100 nm. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1(74):975–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J, Xu R, Wang Y, Zhao A (2008) The mechanism of chromate sorption by three variable charge soils. Chemosphere 71(8):1469–1475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keesstra SD, Bouma J, Walling J, Tittonell P, Smith P, Cerdà A, Montanarella L, Quinton JN, Pachepsky Y, van der Putten WH, Bardgett RD, Moolenaar S, Mol G, Jansen B, Fresco LO (2016a) The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations sustainable development goals. Soil 2:111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keesstra SD, Pereira P, Novara A, Brevik EC, Azorin-Molina C, Parras-Alcántara L, Jordán J, Cerdà A (2016b) Effects of soil management techniques on soil water erosion in apricot orchards. Sci Total Environ 551–552:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnell PIA (2005) Raindrop-impact-induced erosion processes and prediction: a review. Hydrol Process 19(14):2815–2844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagaly G, Ziesmer S (2003) Colloid chemistry of clay minerals: the coagulation of montmorillonite dispersions. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 100:105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bissonnais Y (1996) Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: I. Theory and methodology. Eur J Soil Sci 47(4):425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Hou J, Liu XM, Li R, Zhu HL, Wu LS (2011) Combined determination of specific surface area and surface charge properties of charged particles from a single experiment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75(6):2128–2135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Li H, Xu CY, Huang XR, Xie DT, Ni JP (2013) Particle interaction forces induce soil particle transport during rainfall. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77(5):1563–1571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Li H, Hu FN, Huang XR, Xie DT, Ni JP (2015) Effects of strong ionic polarization in the soil electric field on soil particle transport during rainfall. Eur J Soil Sci 66(5):921–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima JM, Anderson SJ, Curi N (2000) Phosphate-induced clay dispersion as related to aggregate size and composition in hapludoxs. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(3):892–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XM, Li H, Li R, Xie DT, Wu LS (2014) Strong non-classical induction force in ion-surface interactions: general origin of Hofmeister effects. Sci Rep 4:5047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naidu R, Kookana RS, Sumner ME, Harter RD, Tiller KG (1997) Cadmium sorption and transport in variable charge soils: a review. J Environ Qual 26(3):602–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Bradford JM, Holtz RD (1987) Measurement of waterdrop impact pressures on soil surfaces. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51(5):1302–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ninham BW, Yaminsky V (1997) Ion binding and ion specificity: the Hofmeister effect and Onsager and Lifshitz theories. Langmuir 13:2097–2108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons DF, Ninham BW (2009) Importance of accurate dynamic polarizabilities for the ionic dispersion interactions of alkali halides. Langmuir 26(3):1816–1823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons DF, Boström M, Lo Nostro P, Ninham BW (2011) Hofmeister effects: interplay of hydration, nonelectrostatic potentials, and ion size. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13(27):12352–12367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pashley RM (1981) Hydration forces between mica surfaces in aqueous-electrolyte solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 80(1):153–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pashley RM (1982) Hydration forces between mica surfaces in electrolyte-solutions. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 16(1):57–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pham DV, Ishiguro M, Tran HTT, Sato T (2014) Influence of phosphate sorption on dispersion of a Ferralsol. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 60(3):356–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryden JC, Mclaughlin JR, Syers JK (1977) Mechanisms of phosphate sorption by soils and hydrous ferric-oxide gel. J Soil Sci 28(1):72–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shainberg I (1992) Chemical and mineralogical components of crusting. In: Sumner ME, Stewart BA (eds) Soil crusting: chemical and physical processes. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 33–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens J, Ilg K, Lang F, Kaupenjohann M (2004) Adsorption controls mobilization of colloids and leaching of dissolved phosphorus. Eur J Soil Sci 55(2):253–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sposito G (1984) The surface chemistry of soils. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo J, Liew W, Leong Y (2009) Clay, phosphate adsorption, dispersion, and rheology. Water, Air, Soil Pollut Focus 9(5–6):403–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uehara G, Gillman GP (1980) Charge characteristics of soils with variable and permanent charge minerals: I. Theory. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(2):250–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu CY, Li H, Hu FN, Li S, Liu XM, Li Y (2015) Non-classical polarization of cations increases the stability of clay aggregates: specific ion effects on the stability of aggregates. Eur J Soil Sci 66(3):615–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41530855 and 41371249).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hang Li.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhenli He

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Li, Y., Huang, X. et al. Phosphate fertilizer enhancing soil erosion: effects and mechanisms in a variably charged soil. J Soils Sediments 18, 863–873 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1794-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1794-1

Keywords

Navigation