Abstract
Purpose
Mining of raw materials have both positive (e.g., creation of values and jobs along their supply chains and the supply chains they enter) and negative social impacts (e.g., affecting safe and healthy living conditions of the local community or through the risk of corruption). A new mining paradigm, small-scale “switch-on switch-off” (SOSO) mining, is based on the design of a flexible and modular mining plant (MMP) and aims at exploiting quickly and safely European small high grade deposits of raw materials, including critical. The goal of this study is to assess the social implications of this new mining paradigm on the value chain of the MMP.
Methods
A social hotspot assessment is conducted on pilot-scale operations of an MMP led in Bosnia and Herzegovina for the production of lead concentrate. The assessment is conducted using the performance reference point method. The background system is modeled through the PSILCA v2.0 database, while the foreground system is modeled using on-site data completed with PSILCA information.
Results
The assessment reveals six main hotspots induced by both the foreground and the background systems and occurring mainly in Bosnia and Herzegovina. These hotspots can be divided into three groups: (1) local preoccupations within the community: “contribution to environmental load” and “public sector corruption,” (2) measures that can be put in place by the MMP operator: “social responsibility along the supply chain” and “certified environmental management,” and (3) the conditions prevailing in the country: “sanitation coverage” and “workers affected by natural disasters.” Two sensitivity assessments are conducted in order to test the operating conditions of the MMP: switching from a diesel generator to a renewable source of energy supply and switching the country of operation to Greece, host of a similar deposit that could be potentially exploited thanks to the MMP. Switching the electricity supply system increases the overall risk due to the increase in potential impacts occurring on the renewable energy supply chain (e.g., battery manufacturing). When switching the country of operation to Greece, the overall potential impacts are predicted to decrease.
Conclusions
This study performed on pilot-scale operations provides information on potential social and socio-economic impacts and recommendations to limit these impacts in case of widespread use of the SOSO approach. In a broader perspective, having better knowledge of social implications linked to the mining and metals sector will help better understanding their implications in the various value chains they enter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
adapted from Beylot et al. (2020). The different acronyms state for the following: T, throughput; E, energy consumption; W, water consumption; LT, equipment lifetime
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
http://minerals4eu.brgm-rec.fr/minerals4EU/; one data layer of the database specifically identify small-scale complex deposits.
References
Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2016) Cenzus of population, households and dwellings in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2013 final results. Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/wphc/BIH/BIH-2016-06-30.pdf
Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2018) Labour forcce survey 2018. Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Available at: http://www.bhas.ba/tematskibilteni/LAB_00_2018_Y1_0_HR.pdf.
Andrews ES et al (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Available at: http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf
Bainton N, Holcombe S (2018) A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure. Resour Policy 59:468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.08.020
Balanay RM, Halog A (2016) Promoting life cycle thinking for sustainability in the mining sector of the Philippines, Int J Life Cycle Assess 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1105-x
Benoît C et al (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):156–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0147-8
Bergerson J, Cucurachi S, Seager TP (2020) Bringing a life cycle perspective to emerging technology development. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12990,24,1,(6-10)
Beylot A et al (2020) Switch-on - switch-off small scale mining: environmental performance in a life cycle perspective. J Cleaner Prod Submitted
Bodin J, Bertrand G (2020) Legacy deposits: can small-scale mining paradigm contribute to re-process Mining wastes to supply critical raw materials?, in IMPACT final conference. Redruth, Cornwall
Broadhurst JL, Petrie JG (2010) Ranking and scoring potential environmental risks from solid mineral wastes. Miner Eng 23(3):182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2009.09.008
Bureau of International Labor Affairs (2018) Findings in the worst forms of child labor - Bosnia and Herzegovina. Available at: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2018/BosniaandHerzegovina.pdf
do Carmo BBT, Margni M, Baptiste P (2017) Addressing uncertain scoring and weighting factors in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1275-1
Cassard D et al (2015) ProMine Mineral Databases: New Tools to Assess Primary and Secondary Mineral Resources in Europe, in Weihed, P. (ed.) 3D, 4D and predictive modelling of major mineral belts in Europe. Mineral Re. Switzerland: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17428-0_2
Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2015) `Socializing’ sustainbility: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(3):579–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0841-5
CRED/UCLouvain (2020) EM-DAT, the International Disaster Database. Available at: https://public.emdat.be/.
CoastMaine (2019) CostMine Mine and Mill Equipment costs, an estimator’s guide, published by InfoMine USA Inc., CostMine Division in cooperation with Aventurine Engineering Inc., ISSN 1536–7282
Devenin V, Bianchi C (2018) Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd 25(5):866–879. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1503
Dewulf J et al (2015) Toward an overall analytical framework for the integrated sustainability assessment of the production and supply of raw materials and primary energy carriers. J Ind Ecol 19(6):963–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12289
Di Noi C, Ciroth A (2018) Environmental and social pressures in mining. Results from a sustainability hotspots screening, Resources. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 7(4):80. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7040080.
Doyle K (2020a) Analytical tools for assessing best H&S practice in SOSO mining - Delivrable 5.5 of the IMPaCT project
Doyle K (2020b) Policy statement, standards and H&S best practice for SOSO mining operations - Project IMPaCT - Delivrabme 5.5
Eisfeldt F, Ciroth A (2017) PSILCA – a Product Social Impact Life Cycle Assessment database - Database version 2. Berlin, Germany
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2017) ERBD extractive mining industries strategy
European Commision (2019) The European Green Deal. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf
European Commission (2008) The raw materials initiative - meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0699:FIN:en:PDF
European Commission (2014) Non financial reporting directive. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj
Farooki M, Hinde C, Lof A (2018) Supporting the EU Mineral Sector - capitalising on EU strengths through an Investment promotion strategy. Available at: https://www.stradeproject.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/STRADE_EU_Mining_Sector_Support_Sept2018.pdf.
Fonseca A, McAllister ML, Fitzpatrick P (2013) Measuring what? A comparative anatomy of five mining sustainability frameworks, Miner Eng. Pergamon 46–47:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MINENG.2013.04.008
Global reporting initiative (2010) G4 sector disclosures - mining and metals. Available at: https://www.globalreporting.org/Documents/ResourceArchives/GRI-G4-Mining-and-Metals-Sector-Disclosures.pdf
Hinde C, Farooki M (2018) Promoting investor interest in the EU Mining Sector. Available at: https://www.stradeproject.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/STRADE_Report_02_2018_Promoting_Mining_in_the_EU.pdf
Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0658-1
IFG (2019) Background document - legal framework of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in the Mining Sector. Available at: https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/igf-esia-background-en.pdf
International Labour Organisation (2020) Employment by sex and age — ILO modelled estimates., ILOSTAT database. Available at: https://ilostat.ilo.org/data (Accessed: 18 August 2020)
Kossoff D et al (2014) Mine tailings dams: characteristics, failure, environmental impacts, and remediation. Appl Geochem 51:229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.09.010
Kutschke L (2020) Social Life-Cycle Assessment for Building Materials. In: Brownell BE (ed) Examining the Environmental Impacts of Materials and Buildings, IGI Global. pp 217–250
Lacey J, Moffat K (2012) A framework for technology assessment in the minerals down under flagship: integrating life cycle assessment and social analysis of mining technologies. Australia
Lee-Jones K (2018) Bosnia and Herzegovina: overview of corruption and anti-corruption. Norway. Available at: https://www.u4.no/publications/bosnia-and-herzegovina-overview-of-corruption-and-anti-corruption.pdf
Lenzen M et al (2013) Building Eora: A Global Multi-Region Input-Output Database At High Country And Sector Resolution. Econ Syst Res Routledge 25(1):20–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2013.769938
Macombe C et al (2011) 2nd International Seminar in Social Life Cycle Assessment–-recent developments in assessing the social impacts of product life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(9):940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0331-5
Mancini L et al (2018) Social assessment of raw materials supply chains. A life-cycle-based analysis. Edited by JRC11262. Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/470881
Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Moran D, Geschke A (2012) Mapping the Structure of the World Economy. Environ Sci Technol 46:8374–8381. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300171x
Mancini L et al (2019) Mapping the role of raw materials in sustainable development goals. A preliminary analysis of links, monitoring indicators, and related policy initiatives EUR 29595 EN. Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/026725JRC112892
Mancini L, Sala S (2018) Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks Resour Policy. Pergamon 57:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2018.02.002
MMSDP, IIED and WBCSD (2002) Breaking new ground : mining, minerals, and sustainable development : the report of the MMSD Project. London; Sterling, VA: Earthscan
Moore K (2018) IMPaCT, Integrated Modular Plant and Containerised Tools for selective, low-impact mining of small high-grade deposits, Horizon 2020, Impact (8). https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2018.8.27
Moore K et al (2018) The emerging niche for ethical small-scale mining, in Mines of the future. AIMS. Aachen, Germany
Moore KR, Whyte N, Roberts D, et al (2020) The re-direction of small deposit mining: Technological solutions for raw materials supply security in a whole systems context. Resour Conserv Recycl X 7:100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100040
Mutti D et al (2012) Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Perspectives from stakeholder groups in Argentina. Resour Policy 37(2):212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.05.001
Paneri A (2019) Renewable energy study for IMPACT project. Available at: Confidential report
Paneri A, Yan X (2020) Renewable energy study for the IMP@CT project, in IMPACT final conference. Redruth, Cornwall
Prno J, Scott Slocombe D (2012) Exploring the origins of “social license to operate” in the mining sector: perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resour Policy Pergamon 37(3):346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2012.04.002
Rafiaani P et al (2020) A critical view on social performance assessment at company level: social life cycle analysis of an algae case. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(2):363–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01702-x
Roethe R (2020) Personal communication
Russo Garrido S et al (2018) A literature review of type I SLCA–-making the logic underlying methodological choices explicit. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):432–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1067-z
Sairinen R, Sidorenko O, Tiainen H (2021) A research framework for studying social impacts: Application to the field of mining. Environ Impact Assess Rev 86:106490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106490
Schmid D (2018) Bosnia-Herzegovina: mining and quarrying sector employees 2011–2016, Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/602612/number-of-employees-mining-quarying-sector-bosnia-and-herzegovina/ (Accessed: 17 April 2020).
Schmid D (2019) Mining and quarrying sector: production value in Bosnia-Herzegovina 2011–2016, Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/916889/production-value-mining-quarrying-sector-bosnia-and-herzegovina/ (Accessed: 17 April 2020)
Sidorenko O, Sairinen R, Moore K (2020) Rethinking the concept of small-scale mining for technologically advanced raw materials production, Resources Policy, 68, 101712
Sidorenko O, Sairinen R et al (2020) Policy agenda towards socially responsible small-scale mining in Europe. UEF publications, 2020. Available at: https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/121833/Sidorenko%20et%20al%202020.pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed: 20 October 2020)
Sydd O, Orenius O et al (2020) Local perceptions towards metal mining development in post-conflict countries: the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Geoforum, Submitted
Sydd O, Sairinen R et al (2021) Social impacts of modern small-scale mining: case-studies from Bosnia & Herzegovina and Serbia. Society and Natural Resources, Submitted
Teah HY, Onuki M (2017) Support phosphorus recycling policy with social life cycle assessment: a case of Japan. Sustain Multidisciplin Digital Publish Ins 9(7):1223. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071223
Trading Economics (2020) Bosnia and Herzegovina - GDP from mining. Available at: https://tradingeconomics.com/bosnia-and-herzegovina/gdp-from-mining (Accessed: 5 April 2020)
UNDP (2019) Human development report 2019 - beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century. New York, United States. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019.pdf
UNEP (2009) Mining and environment in the Western Balkans. Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.unep.at/documents_unep/Balkan_Feasibility_Studies/Mining_Western_Balkans_2001_01_11.pdf
UNEP (2020) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations 2020. In: Benoît Norris, C., Traverso, M., Neugebauer, S., Ekener, E., Schaubroeck, T., Russo Garrido, S., Berger, M., Valdivia, S., Lehmann, A., Finkbeiner, M., Arcese, G. (eds.). United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
UNODC (2013) Business, corruption and crime in Bosnia and Herzegovina: the impact of bribery and other crime on private enterprise. Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/corruption/UNODC_BiH_Business_corruption_report_2013.pdf
Vicanovic J, Vilic-Svraka A (2016) Sanitation in Bosnia and Herzegovina; Situation and Challenges, in Meeting of the Parties, Protocol on Water and Health. Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/documents/2016/wat/11Nov_14-16_MOP4_PWH/Side_events/5._Jelena_Vacanovic_2_BiH__Side_event_MoP_2016.pdf
Vintro C, Comajuncosa J (2010) Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: criteria and indicators, DYNA. 2006, Revista DYNA. Available at: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0012-73532010000100003&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en (Accessed: 16 April 2020)
Weldegiorgis FS, Franks DM (2014) Social dimensions of energy supply alternatives in steelmaking: comparison of biomass and coal production scenarios in Australia. J Cleaner Prod Elsevier 84:281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.09.056
Werker J et al (2019) Social LCA for rare earth NdFeB permanent magnets, Sustainable Prod Consumption. Elsevier 19:257–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2019.07.006
Acknowledgements
The authors want to thank all partners of the project for their implication in this study. Finally, the authors thank the two anonymous reviewers whose comments help clarify the overall manuscript.
Funding
The study was performed in the frame of the IMPaCT project which received funding by the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant Agreement 730411.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Marzia Traverso.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muller, S., Beylot, A., Sydd, O. et al. Applying social life cycle assessment in the early stages of a project development — an example from the mining sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26, 2436–2456 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01995-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01995-x