Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle assessment of renewable diesel production from lignocellulosic biomass

  • LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Governments around the world encourage the use of biofuels through fuel standard policies that require the addition of renewable diesel in diesel fuel from fossil fuels. Environmental impact studies of the conversion of biomass to renewable diesel have been conducted, and life cycle assessments (LCA) of the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrogenation-derived renewable diesel (HDRD) are limited, especially for countries with cold climates like Canada.

Methods

In this study, an LCA was conducted on converting lignocellulosic biomass to HDRD by estimating the well-to-wheel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fossil fuel energy input of the production of biomass and its conversion to HDRD. The approach to conduct this LCA includes defining the goal and scope, compiling a life cycle inventory, conducting a life cycle impact assessment, and executing a life cycle interpretation. All GHG emissions and fossil fuel energy inputs were based on a fast pyrolysis plant capacity of 2000 dry tonnes biomass/day. A functional unit of 1 MJ of HDRD produced was adopted as a common unit for data inputs of the life cycle inventory. To interpret the results, a sensitivity analysis was performed to measure the impact of variables involved, and an uncertainty analysis was performed to assess the confidence of the results.

Results and discussion

The GHG emissions of three feedstocks studied—whole tree (i.e., chips from cutting the whole tree), forest residues (i.e., chips from branches and tops generated from logging operations), and agricultural residues (i.e., straw from wheat and barley)—range from 35.4 to 42.3 g CO2,eq/MJ of HDRD (i.e., lowest for agricultural residue- and highest for forest residue-based HDRD); this is 53.4–61.1 % lower than fossil-based diesel. The net energy ratios range from 1.55 to 1.90 MJ/MJ (i.e., lowest for forest residue- and highest for agricultural residue-based HDRD) for HDRD production. The difference in results among feedstocks is due to differing energy requirements to harvest and pretreat biomass. The energy-intensive hydroprocessing stage is responsible for most of the GHG emissions produced for the entire conversion pathway.

Conclusions

Comparing feedstocks showed the significance of the efficiency in the equipment used and the physical properties of biomass in the production of HDRD. The overall results show the importance of efficiency at the hydroprocessing stage. These findings indicate significant GHG mitigation benefits for the oil refining industry using available lignocellulosic biomass to produce HDRD for transportation fuel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agriculture Financial Services Corporation (2013) Alberta crop report Oct 2013. Agriculture Financial Services Corporation, Lacombe

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development (2014) Agriculture statistics yearbook 2013. Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development - Information Management, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (2010) Forest industry competitiveness - current facts and statistics. Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (2012) Sustainable forest management - 2012 facts and statistics. Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Government (2014) Technical guidance for completing specified gas compliance reports. Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development - Air and Climate Change Policy Branch, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Baquero G, Esteban B, Riba JR, Rius A, Puig R (2011) An evaluation of the life cycle cost of rapeseed oil as a straight vegetable oil fuel to replace petroleum diesel in agriculture. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3687–3697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D, Fisher R (2012) Ecology and management of forest soils. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjesson P (2000) Economic valuation of the environmental impact of logging residue recovery and nutrient compensation. Biomass Bioenergy 19:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgwater AV (2012) Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy 38:68–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgwater AV, Peacocke GV (2000) Fast pyrolysis processes for biomass. Renew Sust Energ Rev 4:1–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgwater A, Meier D, Radlein D (1999) An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass. Org Geochem 30:1479–1493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:434–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini F, Peters GP, Berntsen T, Stromman AH, Hertwich E (2011a) CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy 3:413–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini F, Stromman AH, Ulgiati S (2011b) Influence of allocation methods on the environmental performance of biorefinery products - a case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:1070–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary TV, Phillips CB (2011) Renewable fuels via catalytic hydrodeoxygenation. Appl Catal A Gen 397(1–2):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Couhert C, Commandre JM, Salvador S (2009) Is it possible to predict gas yields of any biomass after rapid pyrolysis at high temperature from its composition in cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin? Fuel 88:408–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dang Q, Yu C, Luo Z (2014) Environmental life cycle assessment of bio-fuel production via fast pyrolysis of corn stover and hydroprocessing. Fuel 131:36–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Transport (2007) The renewable transport fuel obligations order 2007. Retrieved July 12, 2015, from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/3072/pdfs/uksi_20073072_en.pdf

  • Diego I, Almudena H, Maria TM, Gumersindo F (2011) Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through co-efficiency criteria for dairy farms. Sci Total Environ 409:1786–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diego I, Jens P, Javier D (2012) Life cycle assessment of transportation fuels from biomass pyrolysis. Fuel 97:812–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott DC, Hart TR, Neuenschwander GG, Rotness LJ, Zacher AH (2009) Catalytic hydroprocessing of biomass fast pyrolysis bio-oil to produce hydrocarbon products. Environ Prog 28(3):441–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2015) Renewable fuels regulations. (Government of Canada) Retrieved July 15, 2015, from http://ec.gc.ca/energie-energy/default.asp?lang=En&n=0AA71ED2-1

  • Environment Canada (2012) National Inventory Report 1990–2010: greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada part 3. Ministry of Environment, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2015) EPA Proposes Renewable Fuel Standards for 2014, 2015, and 2016, and the Biomass-Based Diesel Volume for 2017. Retrieved July 12, 2015, from http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/documents/420f15028.pdf

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Emission factors for greenhouse gas inventories. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson E, Gillespie AR, Gustavasson L, Langvall O, Olsson M, Sathre R, Stendahl J (2007) Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution. Can J Forest Res 37:671–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Biomass Association (2007) European Biomass Statistics 2007 - a statistical report on the contribution of biomass to the energy system in the EU 27. Brussels

  • Furuholt E (1995) Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel. Resour Conserv Recycl 14:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Alberta (2008) Renewable fuels standard. (Alberta Energy Regulator) Retrieved December 7, 2013, from http://www.energy.alberta.ca/BioEnergy/1516.asp

  • Government of Alberta (2013a) 2013 municipal affairs population list. Government of Alberta - Municipal Services Branch, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Alberta (2013b) Sustainable forest management 2012 facts and statistics. Retrieved December 9, 2013, from http://esrd.alberta.ca/lands-forests/forest-management/forest-management-facts-statistics/default.aspx

  • Government of Canada (2011) Energy supply and demand, by fuel type. (Statistics Canada) Retrieved December 9, 2013, from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/prim72-eng.htm

  • Government of Canada (2014) Sales of fuel used for road motor vehicles, by province and territory. Retrieved November 12, 2014, from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/trade37c-eng.htm

  • Han J, Elgowainy A, Dunn JB, Wang MQ (2013) Life cycle analysis of fuel production from fast pyrolysis of biomass. Bioresour Technol 133:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, Beerling D, Berner R, Masson-Delmotte V et al (2008) Target atmospheric CO2: where should humanity aim? Open Atmos Sci J 2:217–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman M (2008) Direct seeding - estimating the value of crop residues Agdex 519-25. Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Helin T, Sokka L, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K, Pajula T (2013) Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment—a review. GCB Bioenergy 5:475–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu DD (2012) Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel produced via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing. Biomass Bioenergy 45:41–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MA, Norris G, Bretz R, Ciroth A, Maurice B et al (2001) Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(3):127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA Bioenergy Task 34 (2007) Biomass pyrolysis. IEA Bioenergy, Richland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (2006) ISO 14010:2006 Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework. Geneva

  • IPCC (2006) N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Working Group I contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013, New York

  • Iribarren D, Peters JF, Dufour J (2012) Life cycle assessment of transportation fuels from biomass pyrolysis. Fuel 97:812–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir MR, Kumar A (2011) Development of net energy ratio and emission factor for biohydrogen production pathways. Bioresour Technol 102(19):8972–8985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir MR, Kumar A (2012) Comparison of the energy and environmental performances of nine biomass/coal co-firing pathways. Bioresour Technol 124:394–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knothe G (2010) Biodiesel and renewable diesel: a comparison. Prog Energ Combust 36:364–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Cameron JB, Flynn PC (2003) Biomass power cost and optimum plant size in Western Canada. Biomass Bioenergy 24(6):445–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2005) World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ Int 31:575–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2008) Promise and limitations of soils to minimize climate change. J Soil Water Conserv 63(4):113A–118A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larson ED (2006) A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector. Energy Sustain Dev 10(2):109–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahendrappa MK, Salonius PO (1982) Nutrient dynamics and growth response in a fertilized black spruce stand. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46(1):127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S (2004) Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 27:339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann MK, Spath PL (1997) Life cycle assessment of a biomass gasification combined-cycle system. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller P, Kumar A (2013) Development of emission parameters and net energy ratio for renewable diesel from Canola and Camelina. Energy 58:426–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment (2014) B.C. Best practices methodology for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

  • Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH (2006) Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuel 20:848–889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Canada (2012) Study of hydrogenation derived renewable diesel as a renewable fuel option in North America. Ecoressources Consultants, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1994) Energy in synthetic fertilizers and pesticides: revisited. Environmental Sciences Division, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Overend RP (1982) The average haul distance and transportation work factors for biomass delivered to a central plant. Biomass 2:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papong S, Chom-In T, Noksa-nga S, Malakul P (2010) Life cycle energy efficiency and potentials of biodiesel production from palm oil in Thailand. Energ Policy 38:226–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Garcia J, Lippke B, Comnick J, Manriquez C (2005) An assessment of carbon pools, storage, and wood products market subsitution using life-cycle analysis results. Wood and Fiber Science: 140–148

  • Peters JF, Iribarren D, Dufour J (2015) Simulation and life cycle assessment of biofuel production via fast pyrolysis and hydroupgrading. Fuel 139:441–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piringer G, Steinberg LJ (2006) Reevaluation of energy use in wheat production in the United States. J Ind Ecol 10(1–2):149–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymer AK (2006) A comparison of avoided greenhouse gas emissions when using different kinds of wood energy. Biomass Bioenergy 30:605–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ric H, Edward S, Andre F (2010) Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:1661–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringer M, Putsche V, Scahill J (2006) Large-scale pyrolysis oil production: a technology assessment and economic analysis. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development (2008) Direct seeding: estimating the value of crop residues. Retrieved September 3, 2014, from http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex2512

  • Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development (2012) Alberta crop production statistics. Retrieved May 17, 2014, from http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/sdd12061

  • Stripple H (2001) Life cycle assessment of road: a pilot study for inventory analysis. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultana A, Kumar A (2011) Development of energy and emission parameters for densified form of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy 36:2716–2732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sultana A, Kumar A, Harfield D (2010) Development of agri-pellet production cost and optimum size. Bioresour Technol 101:5609–5621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2009) Production of gasoline and diesel from biomass via fast pyrolysis, hydrotreating and hydrocracking. A design case. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Oak Ridge

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2012) Stabilization of fast pyrolysis oil: post processing. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Oak Ridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M (2011) GREET 1_2011. version 1.8c. Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm WW, Johnson JM, Hatfield JL, Voorhees WB, Linden DR (2004) Crop and soil productivity response to corn residue removal: a literature review. Agron J 96:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright MM, Daugaard DE, Satrio JA, Brown RC (2010) Techno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels. Fuel 89:S2–S10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the North West Upgrading Redwater Partnership for their financial support of this research. The author acknowledges Madhumita Patel for feedback on biomass transportation modeling and Astrid Blodgett for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 10-203 Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211 116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1H9, Canada

    Alain Wong, Hao Zhang & Amit Kumar

Authors
  1. Alain Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amit Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Rainer Zah

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, A., Zhang, H. & Kumar, A. Life cycle assessment of renewable diesel production from lignocellulosic biomass. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21, 1404–1424 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1107-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1107-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation