Skip to main content
Log in

Immigrants` Entrepreneurial Networks and Export: A Comparative Study

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the differential impacts of networking in the public and private spheres on the export performance of first- and second-generation immigrant entrepreneurs, as well as native-born entrepreneurs. We apply transnational and ethnic theories to elaborate hypotheses using data collected by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor on 26,591 native-born entrepreneurs, first-generation immigrant entrepreneurs, and second-generation immigrant entrepreneurs. In examining this fairly global representation of entrepreneurs, we found that such networking had a significant impact on the exporting of second-generation immigrant entrepreneurs. More specifically, we show that although they benefited the least from private-sphere networking, compared to first-generation immigrant and native-born entrepreneurs, they derived more benefits from public-sphere networking than the other two groups. This study contributes to the theory in this field by accounting for the skewness of dual-embeddedness among immigrant entrepreneurs and its effect upon networking and export performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba R, & Nee V. 2003. Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge,MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

  • Aleksynska, M., & Peri, G. (2014). Isolating the network effect of immigrants on trade. The World Economy, 37(3), 434–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amorós, J. E., & Bosma, N. (2014). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2013 global report. Retrieved from www.gemconsortium.org

  • Anderson, A. R., Jack, S. L., & Dodd, S. D. (2005). The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: Beyond the boundaries of the family firm. Family Business Review, 18(2), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L., & Hammarstedt, M. (2015). Ethnic enclaves, networks and self-employment among middle eastern immigrants in Sweden. International Migration, 53(6), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashourizadeh, S., Schøtt, T., Şengüler, E. P., & Wang, Y. (2016). Exporting by migrants and indigenous entrepreneurs: Contingent on gender and education. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 16(3), 264–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahn, S., Greco, S. M., Farsi, J. Y., Rastrigina, O., & Schøtt, T. (2011). Entrepreneurs’ expected returns affected by their networks: A cross-national study using global entrepreneurship monitor data. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Social capital by design: Structures, strategies, and institutional context. In corporate social capital and liability (pp. 88-105): Springer.Gibb.

  • Baklanov, N., S. Rezaei, J. Vang, & and L.-P. Dana. (2014). Migrant entrepreneurship, economic activity and export performance: Mapping the Danish trends. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 23 (1/2), 63–93.

  • Bates, T. (2011). Minority entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 7(3–4), 151–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, M., Schwens, C., & Kabst, R. (2013). International as opposed to domestic new venturing: The moderating role of perceived barriers to internationalization. International Small Business Journal, 31(5), 536–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckers, P., & Blumberg, B. F. (2013). Immigrant entrepreneurship on the move: A longitudinal analysis of first-and second-generation immigrant entrepreneurship in the Netherlands. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(7–8), 654–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belot, M., & Ederveen, S. (2012). Cultural barriers in migration between OECD countries. Journal of Population Economics, 25(3), 1077–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (1986). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolzani, D., & Boari, C. (2018). Evaluations of export feasibility by immigrant and non-immigrant entrepreneurs in new technology-based firms. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 176–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Coduras, A., Litovsky, Y., & Seaman, J. (2012). GEM Manual: A report on the design, data and quality control of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. www.gemconsortium.org

  • Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network support and the success of a newly founded business. Small Business Economics, 10, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. (2009). Born global firms: A new international enterprise. NewYork, United States of America: Business expert press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, S., & Holm, D. (2000). Internationalisation of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: A network approach. International Business Review, 9(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, P., & Kim, D. Y. (2019). The ethnic migrant inventor effect: Codification and recombination of knowledge across borders. Strategic Management Journal, 40(2), 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysostome, E. (2010). The success factors of necessity immigrant entrepreneurs: In search of a model. Thunderbird International Business Review., 52(2), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coduras, A., Levie, J. D., Kelley, D., Sæmundsson, R. J., & Schøtt, T. (2010). A global perspective on entrepreneurship education and training. GERA/GEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E. (2006). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 713–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N., & Cox, M. (2006). The resource dynamics of international new venture networks. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 4(2–3), 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desiderio, V., & Mestres-Domènech, J. (2011). Migrant entrepreneurship in OECD countries. In: OECD www.oecd.org/migration/imo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1001–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drouhot, L. G., & Nee, V. (2019). Assimilation and the second generation in Europe and America: Blending and segregating social dynamics between immigrants and natives. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubini, P., & Aldrich, H. E. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(5), 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efendic, N., Andersson, F. W., & Wennberg, K. (2015). Growth in first-and second-generation immigrant firms in Sweden. International Small Business Journal, 34(8), 1028–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2007). Networking by entrepreneurs: Patterns of tie—Formation in emerging organizations. Organization Studies, 28(12), 1849–1872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, M. (2016). Typology of diaspora entrepreneurship: Case studies in Uzbekistan. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 121–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, M., Sandberg, S., Servais, P., Basco, R., Cruz, A. D., Riddle, L., & Täube, F. (2018). Advancing the views on migrant and diaspora entrepreneurs in international entrepreneurship. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, T., Samnani, A.-K., Novicevic, M. M., & Bing, M. N. (2013). Liability-of-foreignness effects on job success of immigrant job seekers. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire-Gibb, L. C., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Entrepreneurship within urban and rural areas: Creative people and social networks. Regional Studies, 48(1), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., Honig, B., Moore, C. B., Payne, G. T., & Wright, M. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A Schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 455–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genc, M., Gheasi, M., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2012). 9. The impact of immigration on international trade: a meta-analysis. Migration impact assessment: New horizons, 301.

  • Global Entrepreneurship Research Association. (2011). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. http://www.gemconsortium.org.

  • González-Pernía, J. L., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2015). Export-oriented entrepreneurship and regional economic growth. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 505–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henn, S. (2012). Transnational entrepreneurs, global pipelines and shifting production patterns: The example of the Palanpuris in the diamond sector. In R. Grynberg & L. Mbayi (Eds.), The global diamond industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herander, M. G., & Saavedra, L. A. (2005). Exports and the structure of immigrant-based networks: The role of geographic proximity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessels, J., & van Stel, A. (2011). Entrepreneurship, export orientation, and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 37(2), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, J. M. (2005). Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 113–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hormiga, E., & Bolívar-Cruz, A. (2014). The relationship between the migration experience and risk perception: A factor in the decision to become an entrepreneur. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IOM. (2020). World migration report 2018. Geneva: IOM https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean, R.-J. B., Tan, D., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2011). Ethnic ties, location choice, and firm performance in foreign direct investment: A study of Taiwanese business groups FDI in China. International Business Review, 20(6), 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K. W., & Schøtt, T. (2015). Start-up firms’ networks for innovation and export. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 5(48), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K. W., Liu, Y., & Schøtt, T. (2017). Entrepreneurs innovation bringing job satisfaction, work-family balance, and life satisfaction: In China and around the world. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(4), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, G., Kotabe, M., Hamilton, R. D., & Smith, S. W. (2016). Early internationalization and the role of immigration in new venture survival. International Business Review, 25(6), 1285–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B. (2000). Networking and entrepreneurial growth. In D. L. Sexton & H. Landström (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. P., Muñoz, J. M., & Alon, I. (2007). Filipino ethnic entrepreneurship: An integrated review and propositions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 3(1), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., Ram, M., Edwards, P., Kiselinchev, A., & Muchenje, L. (2014). Mixed embeddedness and new migrant enterprise in the UK. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5–6), 500–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D., Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Litovsky, Y. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2010 women’s report. Babson Park: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. A., & Liesch, P. W. (2016). Internationalization: From incremental to born global. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P. (2009). Roots and routes: Understanding the lives of the second generation transnationally. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(7), 1225–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P., & Jaworsky, B. N. (2007). Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., Isidor, R., Dau, L. A., & Kabst, R. (2018). The more the merrier? Immigrant share and entrepreneurial activities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(5), 698–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, I. (1972). Ethnic enterprise in America: Business and welfare among Chinese, Japanese, and blacks. United States of America: Univ of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Light, I., & Shahlapour, P. (2016). Transnational Iranian entrepreneurs in the import/export industry of Los Angeles. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 16(3), 304–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Schøtt, T. (2019). Life-satisfaction of entrepreneurs in the diaspora: Embedded in transnational networks and international business, In diaspora networks in international business (pp. 257–275). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Namatovu, R., Karadeniz, E. E., Schøtt, T., & Minto-Coy, I. D. (2019). Entrepreneurs’ transnational networks channelling exports: Diasporas from Central & South America, sub-Sahara Africa, Middle East & North Africa, Asia, and the European culture region. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1560002.

  • Majocchi, A., Bacchiocchi, E., & Mayrhofer, U. (2005). Firm size, business experience and export intensity in SMEs: A longitudinal approach to complex relationships. International Business Review, 14(6), 719–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Montaner, J., Serrano-Domingo, G., & Requena-Silvente, F. (2017). Networks and self-employed migrants. Small Business Economics, 51(3), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1990). The social and economic origins of immigration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 510(1), 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & España, F. G. (1987). The social process of international migration. Science, 237(4816), 733–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., Benton, R. A., & Warner, D. F. (2012). Dual embeddedness: Informal job matching and labor market institutions in the United States and Germany. Social Forces, 91(1), 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michailova, S., McCarthy, D. J., Puffer, S. M., Chadee, D., & Roxas, B. (2013). Institutional environment, innovation capacity and firm performance in Russia. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 9(1/2), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, M., & Chen, S. (2010). The strength of family networks in transnational immigrant entrepreneurship. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(2), 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W., Siegel, M., & Marchand, K. (2015). Migration, entrepreneurship and development, A Critical Review. (IZA DP no. 9284).

  • Ndofor, H., & Priem, R. L. (2011). Immigrant entrepreneurs, the ethnic enclave strategy, and venture performance. Journal of Management, 37(3), 790–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, F., Orser, B., Riding, A., & Jung, O. (2014). Do young firms owned by recent immigrants outperform other young firms? Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkongolo-Bakenda, J.-M., & Chrysostome, E. V. (2013). Engaging diasporas as international entrepreneurs in developing countries: In search of determinants. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 11(30), 64–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0098-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H., & Berge, J. M. T. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. C., & Conklin, B. (2009). The balancing act: The role of transnational habitus and social networks in balancing transnational entrepreneurial activities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1045–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peroni, C., Riillo, C. A., & Sarracino, F. (2016). Entrepreneurship and immigration: Evidence from GEM Luxembourg. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 639–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. New York, United States of America: Univ of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pries, L. (2004). Determining the causes and durability of transnational labour migration between Mexico and the United States: Some empirical findings. International Migration, 42(3), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J. E. (1999). Networks versus markets in international trade. Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage. London.

  • Renzulli, L. A., & Aldrich, H. (2005). Who can you turn to? Tie activation within core business discussion networks. Social Forces, 84(1), 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, M. J., Romero, I., & Yu, Z. (2019). Guanxi and risk-taking propensity in Chinese immigrants’ businesses. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-21.

  • Rueda-Armengot, C., & Peris-Ortiz, M. (2012). The emigrant entrepreneur: A theoretical framework and empirical approximation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(1), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusinovic, K. (2008). Transnational embeddedness: Transnational activities and networks among first-and second-generation immigrant entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(3), 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schøtt, T. (2014). Components of the network around an actor. In Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining (pp. 241-250): Springer.

  • Semrau, T., & Werner, A. (2014). How exactly do network relationships pay off? The effects of network size and relationship quality on access to start-up resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 501–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepulveda, L., Syrett, S., & Lyon, F. (2011). Population Superdiversity and new migrant Enterprise: The case of London. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(7–8), 469–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schøtt, T., & Sedaghat, M. (2014). Innovation embedded in entrepreneurs’ networks and national educational systems. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smans, M., Freeman, S., & Thomas, J. (2014). Immigrant entrepreneurs: The identification of foreign market opportunities. International Migration, 52(4), 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soydas, Y., & Aleti, T. (2015). Immigrant and second-generation Turkish entrepreneurs in Melbourne Australia. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(2), 154–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steier, L., & Greenwood, R. (2000). Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financial networks. Organization Studies, 21(1), 163–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stine, R. A. (1995). Graphical interpretation of variance inflation factors. The American Statistician, 49(1), 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, R., Cachon, G. P., & Netessine, S. (2011). Capacity investment timing by start-ups and established firms in new markets. Management Science, 57(4), 763–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Hessels, J., & Li, D. (2016). Comparative international entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(1), 299–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Global Migration Dataset (UNGMD). (2015). World Population Policies, 2015 Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/poppolicy/wpp_datasets.aspx.

  • Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: What has been learned? Small Business Economics, 53(1), 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vissak, T., & Zhang, X. (2014). Chinese immigrant entrepreneurs’ involvement in internationalization and innovation: Three Canadian cases. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2002). The causal effects of exports on firm size and labor productivity: First evidence from a matching approach. Economics Letters, 77(2), 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, R., & Perlmann, J. (1997). Second generation decline? Children of immigrants, past and present--a reconsideration. International Migration Review, 31(4), 893–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Liu, C. Y. (2015). Transnational activities of immigrant-owned firms and their performances in the USA. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9595-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, (2011), http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.CD

  • Yeung, H. W. C. (2002). Entrepreneurship in international business: An institutional perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(1), 29–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). International entrepreneurship: The current status of the field and future research agenda. Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset, 255-288.

  • Zhou, L., Wu, W.-P., & Luo, X. (2007). Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: The mediating role of social networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Tsinghua University-INDITEX Sustainable Development Fund (Project No. TISD201904) and China MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities (Project No. 16JJD630005). Data were collected by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). The responsibility for analysis and interpretation rests with the authors. The authors acknowledge the helpful comments from Pekka Stenholm, Thomas Schøtt and anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shayegheh Ashourizadeh.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashourizadeh, S., Li, J. & Wickstrøm, K.A. Immigrants` Entrepreneurial Networks and Export: A Comparative Study. Int Entrep Manag J 18, 1291–1318 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00665-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00665-y

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation