Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual entrepreneurial orientation and intrapreneurship in the public sector

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Municipalities and Cities are facing a strong pressure to digitalize and develop themselves into Smart Cities. This article investigates the relationship of Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation (IEO) and individual-level exploration and exploitation activities to analyze a municipality’s ability to discover potentially important technologies and innovations. Moreover, the influence of self-regulatory modes is used to provide more insights into this relationship. For this, an online survey with 266 municipality and city employees in the German-speaking realm has been carried out. Our results show that employees with a high level of IEO are more likely to work on explorative activities which are the foundation for every intrapreneurial process ,whereas IEO does not seem to have an influence on exploitative activities. Locomotion as a moderating variable has a positive effect on the IEO exploration relationship. Therefore, employees with a high level of IEO and locomotion are more likely to discover new opportunities as they are working on explorative activities. Furthermore, our results show that the self-regulatory mode assessment affects the exploitative activities positively. The final findings suggest that municipalities that want to engage in intrapreneurial activities should start hiring people with a high level of IEO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amato, C., Baron, R. A., Barbieri, B., Bélanger, J. J., & Pierro, A. (2017). Regulatory modes and entrepreneurship: The mediational role of alertness in small business success. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(S1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. S., Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Eshima, Y. (2015). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1579–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69, 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 525–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, D. L. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: Further investigation of a measurement instrument. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(1), 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, D. L., & Lane, M. D. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: Development of a measurement instrument. Education + Training, 54(2/3), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008). The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 460–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1985). Managing the new venture division: Research findings and implications for strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 6(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, R. (1734). Essai Sur la nature du commerce en general [essay on the nature of general commerce]. (Henry Higgs, Trans. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. (1996). Intrapreneurship in small businesses: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Miller, D. (2014). International entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual considerations, research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 11–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2019). Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation-sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(1), 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croonen, E. P., Brand, M. J., & Huizingh, E. K. (2016). To be entrepreneurial, or not to be entrepreneurial? Explaining differences in franchisee entrepreneurial behavior within a franchise system. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 531–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. L. (1994). Raising radicals: Different processes for championing innovative corporate ventures. Organization Science, 5(2), 148–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, F., Niemand, T., Kraus, S., & Breier, M. (2019). Developing a scale for entrepreneurial marketing: Revealing its inner frame and prediction of performance. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.051.

  • Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Kraus, S. (2019). Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Review of Managerial Science,13(1), 181-205

  • Furtner, M., & Sachse, P. (2017). Selbstregulation und Führungsverhalten. Beziehungen zwischen For-men der Selbstregulation, transformationaler, transaktionaler und Laissez-faire-Führung. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 1(2017), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, W. D., & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. (1980). Theories of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H. A., & Rao, H. (1997). Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1606–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, J., & Toivonen, J. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurs or silent followers? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(7), 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, K. L., & Weber, K. (2016). Toward organizational pluralism: Institutional intrapreneurship in integrative medicine. Organization Science, 27(1), 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Pierro, A. (2003). Regulatory mode: Locomotion and assessment as distinct orientations. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R.D. & Peters, M.P. (1984). Internal venturing in large corporations. In: J.A. Hornaday, et al., eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson college.

  • Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2007). Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as re-sourcing. Organization Science, 18(4), 560–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., & Mustafa, M. (2017). Antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship in SMEs: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(S1), 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Rigtering, J. C. P., Covin, J. G., Bouncken, R., & Kraus, S. (2018). Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 750–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1984). The change masters. New York, NY: Touchstone, Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M., & Richardson, L. (1991). Engines of progress: Designing and running entrepreneurial vehicles in established companies-The Enter-prize program at Ohio Bell, 1985–1990. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(3), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. A. (1997). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (Sage publications) (pp. 243–261). CA: Thousand Oaks.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Kallmuenzer, A., Stieger, D., Peters, M., & Calabrò, A. (2018a). Entrepreneurial paths to family firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 88, 382–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Niemand, T., Besler, M., Stieg, P., & Martinez-Ciment, C. (2018b). The influence of leadership styles on the internationalisation of ‘born-global’firms and traditionally globalexpanding firms. European Journal of International Management, 12(5/6), 554–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanksi, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). Regulatory mode and the joys of doing: Effects of ‘locomotion’ and ‘assessment’ on intrinsic and extrinsic task-motivation. European Journal of Personality, 20, 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., & Spiegel, S. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1983). Motivation, Konflikt und Handlungskontrolle. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediation of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behaviour (pp. 101–128). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Morris, M. H., & Covin, J. G. (2011). Corporate innovation and entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial development within organizations (3rd ed.). Ohio, South-Western Cengage Learning: Mason.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakopoulos, K., Hughes, M., & Hughes, P. (2016). The role of marketing resources in radical innovation activity: Antecedents and payoffs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(4), 398–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I.C., Block, Z. & Narasimha, P.N.S. (1984). Obstacles and experience in corporate ventures. In: J.A. Hornaday et al., eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson college.

  • McKinney, G., & McKinney, M. (1989). Forget the corporate umbrella—Entrepreneurs shine in the rain. Sloan Management Review, 30(4), 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D. E., & Scully, M. A. (1995). Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6(5), 585–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24(9), 921–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mom, T. J. M., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 812–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, October 2003.

  • Mustafa, M., Martin, L., & Hughes, M. (2016). Psychological ownership, job satisfaction, and middle manager entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(3), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, M., Gavin, F., & Hughes, M. (2018). Contextual determinants of employee entrepreneurial behavior in support of corporate entrepreneurship: A systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 26(3), 285–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzyka, D., Koning, A. D., & Churchill, N. (1995). On transformation and adaptation: Building the entrepreneurial corporation. European Management Journal, 13(4), 346–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). Regulatory mode and the joys of doing: Effects of ‘locomotion’ and ‘assessment’ on intrinsic and extrinsic task-motivation. European Journal of Personality, 20, 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why you don’t to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rule, E. G., & Irwin, D. W. (1988). Fostering intrapreneurship: The new competitive edge. The Journal of Business Strategy, 9(3), 44–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. D. (1999). Developing a process model of intrapreneurial systems: A cognition mapping approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schollhammer, H. (1981). The efficacy of internal corporate entrepreneurship strategies. In K. H. Ves-per (Ed.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Babson College: Wellesley, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schollhammer, H. (1982). Internal corporate entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellin, I., Schütz, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Erfassung von Dimensionen der Selbstregulation (Der locomotion-assessment-Fragebogen (L-A-F)). TU Chemnitz: Forschungsbericht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1994). Are champions different from non-champions? Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 397–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sine, W. D., & David, R. J. (2003). Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Research Policy, 32, 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sok, K. M., Sok, P., & De Luca, L. M. (2016). The effect of ‘can do’ and ‘reason to’ motivations on service–sales ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing Management, 55, 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. W. F. (1994). Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journa, 48, 450–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, K.H. (1984). Three faces of corporate entrepreneurship: A pilot study. In: Livesay, H.C. (Hrsg.), Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms. Aldershot, 495-521.

  • Wales, W., Monsen, E., & McKelvie, A. (2011). The organizational pervasiveness of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 895–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K., Heinze, K. L., & DeSoucey, M. (2008). Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 529–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1993). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior: A critique and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(4), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampetakis, L. A., & Moustakis, V. (2007). Entrepreneurial behaviour in the Greek public sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 13(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampetakis, L. A., & Moustakis, V. S. (2010). An exploratory research on the factors stimulating corporate entrepreneurship in the Greek public sector. International Journal of Manpower, 31(8), 871–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 189–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ESCE International Business School, École Supérieure du Commerce Extérieur, 10 rue Sextius Michel, 75015, Paris, France

    Sascha Kraus

  2. School of Business, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Skinnarilankatu 34, 53850, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Matthias Breier

  3. Swansea School of Management, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Swansea, UK

    Paul Jones

  4. School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK

    Mathew Hughes

Authors
  1. Sascha Kraus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Breier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mathew Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sascha Kraus.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Constructs, subdimensions, items and sources of the online survey
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kraus, S., Breier, M., Jones, P. et al. Individual entrepreneurial orientation and intrapreneurship in the public sector. Int Entrep Manag J 15, 1247–1268 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00593-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00593-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation