Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptualizing social entrepreneurship in the context of emerging economies: an integrative review of past research from BRIICS

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 28 April 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship is well practiced and talked about in emerging economies. However, till date, no dedicated review and conceptual framework exists, synthesizing and integrating past social entrepreneurship research in the fast growing emerging economies, commonly known as BRIICS (Brazil, Russia, India, Indonesia, China, and South Africa). The purpose of this article is to bridge that gap by conducting an integrative review of 123 most relevant peer-reviewed scholarly articles, filtered out of 1779 search results in six different research databases. Country-specific conceptual perspectives have been extracted and integrated to formulate a novel social entrepreneurship framework that is inclusive of five key social entrepreneurship dimensions emerging from these economies: (a) Social Welfare, (b) Social Capital, (c) Social Entrepreneur, (d) Economic Value Creation, and (e) Collective Endurance. This exercise was an initiative to facilitate the global community of social entrepreneurship researchers and practitioners in understanding the diversity, meaning, and evolution of the social entrepreneurship phenomenon in the context of emerging economies. They can advance research in this domain with the aid of the proposed framework and the research questions proposed for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 28 April 2018

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained two mistakes.

References

  • Agrawal, A., & Sahasranamam, S. (2016). Corporate social entrepreneurship in India. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 5(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJGBR-12-2014-0098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2008). Venture capital in emerging economies: Networks and institutional change. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 299-320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcantara, L. L., & Kshetri, N. (2013). The link between societal motivation and new venture performance: Evidence from entrepreneurs in Japan. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 26(6), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2014.892311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., Letts, C. W., et al. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation an exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886304266847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amijo, L. E. (2007). The Brics countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) as analytical category: Mirage or insight ? Asian Perspective, 31(4), 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. R., & Obeng, B. A. (2017). Enterprise as socially situated in a rural poor fishing community. Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., & Ronteau, S. (2017). Towards an entrepreneurial theory of practice; emerging ideas for emerging economies. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies., 9(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-12-2016-0054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardrey, W. J., Pecotich, A., Shultz, C. J., et al. (2006). Entrepreneurial women as catalysts for socioeconomic development in transitioning Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 9(4), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253860600921811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. J., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). New strategies in emerging economies. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., Wei-Skillern, J., et al. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different or both ?. Entrepreneurship theory. Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional. Development, 23(5–6), 373–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basargekar, P., & Rawat, P. (2015). Role of diversity in triggering social innovations: Analysis of divergent backgrounds of social entrepreneurs in India in stimulating social innovations in the field of education. Journal of Asia entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 11(2), 81–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastos, M. F., Scheiber, L., Teodosio, A. S. S., et al. (2016). Mapping the field of social businesses in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 294–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, D. C., Radulovich, L. P., Javalgi, R. G., Scherer, R. F., Taylor, J., et al. (2016). Performance of professional service firms from emerging markets: Role of innovative services and firm capabilities. Journal of World Business, 51(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj, B. R. (2014). Impact of education and training on performance of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 6(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-05-2013-0014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, P., & Altinay, L. (2013). How social capital is leveraged in social innovations under resource constraints? Management Decision, 51(9), 1772–1792. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2013-0041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo, A., Ribeiro, D., & Roig, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship: Concepts, theory and perspective. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, T. (2011). ‘Newness’ in Social Entrepreneurship Discourses: The Concept of ‘Danwei’ in the Chinese Experience. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2):198–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, P. B., & Gailey, R. (2012). Empowering women through social entrepreneurship: Case study of a Women’s cooperative in India. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00505.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daya, S. (2014). Saving the other: Exploring the social in social enterprise. Geoforum, 57, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2011). Emerging models of social enterprise in eastern Asia: A cross-country analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), 86–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111130176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distelhorst, G. (2015). The power of empty promises: Quasidemocratic institutions and activism in China”. Comparative political studies, forthcoming; MIT political science department research paper no. 2014-19; Rotman School of Management Working Paper no. 2491744. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2491744 or doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2491744.

  • Doherty, B., Haugh, H., Lyon, F., et al. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. UK: Routeledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaiger, L. I., Ferrarini, A., Veronese, M. et al. (2015). Social Enterprise in Brazil: An overview of solidarity economy enterprises. ICSEM working papers, no. 10, Liege: The international comparative social Enterprise models (ICSEM) project.

  • Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawell, M. (2013). Social entrepreneurship – Innovative challengers or adjustable followers? Social Enterprise Journal, 9(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-01-2013-0004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, N. M., Parida, V., Lahti, T., Wincent, J., et al. (2016). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: Insights on influencing factors. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0347-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, G., & Ganesh, N. P. (2003). Developmental financial institutions as technology policy instruments: Implications for innovation and entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Research Policy, 32, 89–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri, P. N., Tasavori, M., Zaefarian, R., et al. (2014). Internationalisation of service firms through corporate social entrepreneurship and networking. International Marketing Review, 31(6), 576–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2013-0196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godói-de-Sousa, E., & Fischer, R. M. (2012). The succession process at social enterprises in Brazil. Revista de Administração (São Paulo), 47(3), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordin, V., & Dedova, M. (2015). Social entrepreneurship in the informal economy: A case study of re-enactment festivals. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 9(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2013-0008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S., & Sergi, B. S. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and sustainability – Understanding the context and key characteristics. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 4(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.4.3(7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S., Sergi, B. S., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2016). Understanding the challenges and strategic actions of social entrepreneurship at base of the pyramid. Management Decision, 54(12), 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2014-0662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (2017). Democrats and Dissenters. Penguin-UK.

  • Gunawan, A. A. (2014). Preliminary study of classifying Indonesian entrepreneurs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hati, S. R. H., & Idris, A. (2014). Antecedents of customers’ intention to support Islamic social enterprises in Indonesia: The role of socioeconomic status, religiosity, and organizational credibility. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(5), 707–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2014-0126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatta, M. (1954). Principles of economics. Jakarta: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2016). Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2449-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmsing, A. H. J. (2015). Conditions for social entrepreneurship. International Journal of Social Quality, 5(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T. L., Kothari, T. H., Shea, M., et al. (2010). Patterns of meaning in the social entrepreneurship literature: A research platform. Journal of social entrepreneurship, 1(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Ming Lau, C., Wright, M., et al. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, S., Saleh, M. A., & Drennan, J. (2016). A critical appraisal of the social entrepreneurship paradigm in an international setting: A proposed conceptual framework. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0400-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idris, A., & Hati, R. H. (2013). Social entrepreneurship in Indonesia: Lessons from the past. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship., 4(3), 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2013.820778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, H. (2011). A conceptual model for social entrepreneurship directed toward social impact on society. Social Enterprise Journal., 7(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111156600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M. (2016). Mitigating South Africa’s HIV. Epidemic: The Interplay of Social Entrepreneurship and the Innovation System. Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9293-x.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karanda, C., & Toledano, N. (2012). Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: A different narrative for a different context. Social Enterprise Journal, 8(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611211280755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, K. H., & Garcia, R. A. (2016). Exploring human rights-based activism as a social determinant of health: Insights from Brazil and South Africa. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 8(2), 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huw008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N., McLean, G., and Wang, J. (2012). HRD for Societal Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(3):305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, A. N., Danis, W. M., Cavusgil, S. T., et al. (2012). International entrepreneurship research in emerging economies: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittilaksanawong, W., Hu, C. S., Shou, Y. Y., Chen, X. D., et al. (2012). Institutionalization in organizational form of social entrepreneurship: Cases from China and Bangladesh in management of innovation and technology (ICMIT). IEEE International Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2012.6225776.

  • Kuria, D. (2011). Social enterprise solution for water and sanitation facilities in Kenya’s slums. In World Economic Forum (Ed.), Water Security: The Water-Food-Energy-Climate Nexus, World Economic Forum, Washington, DC.

  • Laine, J. (2013). Something old, new, borrowed, and blue: towards a bottom-up agenda of the Finnish-Russian relations. Fennia-International Journal of Geography, 192(1), 65-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, H., Zhu, Y., Ness, D., Xing, K., Schneider, K., et al. (2014). The role and characteristics of social entrepreneurs in contemporary rural cooperative development in China: Case studies of rural social entrepreneurship. Asia Pacific Business Review, 20(3), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2014.929300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtimaki, H., & Karintaus, K. (2012). Social Capital for Strategic Sensitivity in global business. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases., 1(2), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. S., Oh, C. H., & De Clercq, D. (2016). Engagement in entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Interactive effects of individual-level factors and institutional conditions. International Business Review, 25(4), 933-945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., et al. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makhlouf, H. H. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: Generating solutions to global challenges. International journal of management and. Information Systems, 15(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandyoli, B., Iwu, C. G., Nxopo, Z., et al. (2017). Is there a nexus between social entrepreneurship and the employability of graduates? Foundations of Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2017-0005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manimala, M., & Wasdani, K. P. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystem. Perspectives from emerging economies. Springer: India.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, S., Kannothra, C. G., Weber, W. W., et al. (2017). The strategic potential of community based hybrid models: The case of global business services in Africa. Global Strategy Journal, 7(1), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marabelli, M., & Newell, S. (2014). Knowing, power and materiality: A critical review and reconceptualization of absorptive capacity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masendeke, A., & Mugova, A. (2009). Zimbabwe and Zambia. In J. A. Kerlin (Ed.), Social Enterprise: A global perspective. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massetti, B. L. (2008). The social entrepreneurship matrix as a "tipping point" for economic change. Emergence. Complexity and Organization, 10(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1996). The Embeddedness of corporate strategy: Isomorphism vs. differentiation. In J. A. C. Baum & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (p. 13). Greenwich CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., Vogus, T. J., et al. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616–640. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mort, G. S., Weerawardena, J., Carnegie, K., et al. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualization. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherji, S. (2014). Affordable housing: In conversation with Ramesh Ramanathan, chairman, Janalakshmi social services and Janaadhar. IIMB Management Review, 26(3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2014.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munshi, P. (2009). Making breakthrough innovation happen: How 11 Indians pulled off the impossible. India: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murta, J. C. D., Willetts, J. R. M., Triwahyudi, W., et al. (2016). Sanitation entrepreneurship in rural Indonesia: A closer look. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9883-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. G., & Nielsen, K. B. (2016). Social movements, state formation and democracy in India. In A. G. Nielsen & K. B. Nielsen (Eds.), Social movements and the state in India (pp. 1–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59133-3_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. (2001). Building better global economic BRICs. Global Economics Paper No: 66, Goldman Sachs Financial Workbench, 30th November. http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/archive-pdfs/build-better-brics.pdf. Accessed 21 Sept 2017.

  • Page, A., & Katz, R. A. (2010). Freezing out Ben & Jerry: Corporate law and the sale of a social enterprise icon. Vermont Law Review, 35, 211–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, P., & Mitra, J. (2015). Social entrepreneurship: An activist approach. Innovation in Emerging Economies, 1(1), 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polman, A. (2011). Women and nationalism in Indonesia. Int. J History of Education, 12(1), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, M. (2003). The business of social entrepreneurship in a down economy, In Business, 25 (3), 25–30.

  • Poon, P. S., Zhou, L., Chan, T. S., et al. (2009). Social entrepreneurship in a transitional economy: A critical assessment of rural Chinese entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management Development, 28(2), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710910932061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratono, A. H., & Sutanti, A. (2016). The ecosystem of social enterprise: Social culture, legal framework, and policy review in Indonesia. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramani, S.V., SadreGhazi, S., and Gupta, S. (2017). Catalysing innovation for social impact: The role of social enterprises in the Indian sanitation sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121:216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, V. K. (2004). Lofty missions, down-to-earth plans. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 112–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S. (2014). Nurturing entrepreneurial women: Insights from a developing country. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 6(3), 268–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-04-2014-0014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratten, V., Ferreira, J., Fernandes, C., et al. (2016). Entrepreneurial and network knowledge in emerging economies. Review of International Business and Strategy, 26(3), 392–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, J., Scheepers, P., & Grotenhuis, M. T. (2006). Dimensions of individual religiosity and charity: Cross-national effect differences in European countries? Review of Religious Research, 47(4), 347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostoani, R., Paramita, W., Audita, H., Virgosita, R., Budiarto, T., Purnomo, B. R., et al. (2014). Understanding social enterprises in Indonesia: Drivers and challenges. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 29(2), 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K., & Karna, A. (2015). Doing social good on a sustainable basis: Competitive advantage of social businesses. Management Decision, 53(6), 1355–1374. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2014-0561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rwigema, H., Urban, B., & Venter, R. (2008). Entrepreneurship: Theory in practice. Oxford University Press Southern Africa.

  • Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satar, M. S., & John, S. (2016). A conceptual model of critical success factors for Indian social enterprises. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-09-2015-0042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiber, L. A. (2014). Social capital and the target population. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-05-2013-0023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, P. (2007). Ashoka’s big idea: Transforming the world through social entrepreneurship. Futures, 39(5), 534–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, S., & Sahay, A. (2017). Social entrepreneurship research in Asia-Pacific: Perspectives and opportunities. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-11-2016-0050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servon, L. J., & Doshna, J. P. (2000). Microenterprise and the economic development toolkit: A small part of the big picture. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sesan, G. (2006). Social enterprise in Africa: An emerging concept in an emerging economy. International NGO Journal, 1(1), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siqueira, A. C. O., Mariano, S. R. H., Moraes, J., et al. (2014). Supporting innovation ecosystems with microfinance: Evidence from Brazil and implications for social entrepreneurship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.927388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, P., Legrand, W., & Simons-Kaufmann, C. (2014). A survey of social entrepreneurial community-based hospitality and tourism initiatives in developing economies: a new business approach for industry. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 6(1), 51-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone, D., Welter, F., Ateljevic, et al. (2014). Entrepreneurship in emerging market economies: Contemporary issues and perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 32(2), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613511479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., Besharov, M. L., et al. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407–442. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201323327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, M.S., and Tang, C.S. (2011). Social enterprises as supply-chain enablers for the poor. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45(4):146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzeck, H., Boechat, C., Leão, S. F., et al. (2013). Sustainability as a driver for innovation – Towards a model of corporate social entrepreneurship at Odebrecht in Brazil. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunduramurthy, C., Zheng, C., Musteen, M., Francis, J., Ryne, L., et al. (2016). Doing more with less, systematically? Bricolage and ingenieuring in successful social ventures. Journal of World Business, 51(5), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. A., & Di Zhang, D. (2010). The social entrepreneurship zone. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22(2), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495140903550726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, W. L., Williams, J., Tan, T. M., et al. (2005). Defining the ‘social’ in ‘social entrepreneurship’: Altruism and entrepreneurship. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(3), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-2600-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, A. (2014). Investigating learning in social enterprises: A boundary perspective. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-05-2013-0022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F., et al. (2007). Conceptualizing sustainability entrepreneurship. Summary of a talk delivered at the first world symposium on sustainable entrepreneurship. UK: University of Leeds 15-17 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, B. (2013). Social entrepreneurship in an emerging economy: A focus on the institutional environment and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Managing Global Transitions, 11(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, B. (2015). Evaluation of social enterprise outcomes and self-efficacy. International Journal of Social Economics, 42(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2013-0071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, B., & Kujinga, L. (2017). The institutional environment and social entrepreneurship intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(4), 638–655. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2016-0218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M., Seth, A., Gau, R., Chaturvedi, A., et al. (2007). Doing well by doing good: Pursuing commercial success by internalizing social good in subsistence markets. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Xu, B., Wu, Y., and Zhou, X. (2015). Link prediction in social networks: the state-of-the-art. Science China Information Sciences, 58(1):1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, 13–23.

  • Welter, F., Brush, C., De Bruin, A. et al. (2014). The gendering of entrepreneurship context. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2557272 accessed 8 July 2017.

  • Williams, C. C., & Nadin, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship in the informal economy: Commercial or social entrepreneurs? The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0169-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witsoe, J. (2016). The politics of caste and the deepening of India’s democracy: The case of the backward caste movement in Bihar. In A. G. Nielsen & K. B. Nielsen (Eds.), Social movements and the state in India (pp. 53–74). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59133-3_3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L., & Tang, J. (2007). Dilemmas confronting social entrepreneurs: Care homes for elderly people in Chinese cities. Pacific Affairs, 79(4), 623–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D.W., Wan, W.P., Ng, F.W., Chen, X., and Su, J. (2014). Sentimental Drivers of Social Entrepreneurship: A Study of China's Guangcai (Glorious) Program. Management and Organization Review, 10(1):55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, X. (2011). Social Enterprise in China: Driving forces, development patterns and legal framework. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111130130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, X. (2016). Social entrepreneurship in China’s non-profit sector. China Perspectives, 3, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., Lehmann-Ortega, L., et al. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., Shulman, J. M., et al. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., and Miao, X. (2011). Comparative study of social enterprise and social entrepreneur among European countries, United States and China. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 1(2):1799–2702.

  • Zhao, M. (2012). The social enterprise emerges in China. Stanford social innovation review. Spring, 30–35.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the past researchers/authors whose published works (articles, books) were reviewed for writing this paper; without their work, this article would have not come to existence. We also thank the anonymous reviewers whose valuable insights and comments have a significant role to play in finally making this paper a valuable read for future researchers, practitioners, and policy makers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Birla Institute of Management Technology, Plot No. 5, Knowledge Park-II, Greater Noida, (NCR), Uttar Pradesh, 201306, India

    Subhanjan Sengupta & Arunaditya Sahay

  2. Université Laval, 2325 Rue de l’Université, Ville de Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada

    Francesca Croce

Authors
  1. Subhanjan Sengupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arunaditya Sahay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesca Croce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhanjan Sengupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sengupta, S., Sahay, A. & Croce, F. Conceptualizing social entrepreneurship in the context of emerging economies: an integrative review of past research from BRIICS. Int Entrep Manag J 14, 771–803 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0483-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0483-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation