Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ownership and the cyclicality of firms’ R&D investment

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we analyse the effect of ownership on the response of firms’ R&D expenditures to the business cycle, using a panel dataset of Spanish manufacturing firms for the period 1990–2006. Following Aghion et al. (2012, Journal of the European Economic Association), we allow the impact of the business cycle on firms’ R&D expenditures to depend upon credit constraints, but we extend their analysis by considering the moderating effect of different firms’ ownership types. We find that firms’ R&D spending is countercyclical but that credit constraints may reverse this counter cyclicality, in line with previous results in the literature. However, our findings indicate that these results are moderated by firms’ ownership. In particular, in the case of firms that are family owned and firms that are group affiliated, the responsiveness of R&D to the business cycle is considerably less dependent on being credit constrained, especially during recessions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For instance, Barlevy (2007), and Comin and Gertler (2006), among others, examine aggregate data and find that R&D expenditures show a procyclical pattern with respect to aggregate output in the US and other G7 countries.

  2. The sampling procedure of the ESEE is the following. Firms with less than 10 employees were excluded from the survey. Firms with 10 to 200 employees were randomly sampled, holding around 5% of the population in 1990. All firms with more than 200 employees were requested to participate, obtaining a participation rate of 70% in 1990. Important efforts are made to minimize attrition and to incorporate annually new firms, so that the sample remains representative over time. See http://www.fundacionsepi.es/esee/sp/spresentacion.asp for further details.

  3. For instance, both Reeb et al. (2001) and Anderson et al. (2003) use credit ratings from Moody’s and S&P to measure the firms’ default risk premium as a proxy for the cost of debt financing. Credit constraints have also been measured by the degree of the firm’s exposure to external finance, such as debt ratios or financial burden (see, e.g., Bernanke et al. 1996). Others, such as Aghion et al. (2012), rely on data on firms’ defaults on trade credits (or payments incidents) reported by French banks.

  4. We consider SMEs as those firms with less than 200 employees and large firms as those with 200 or more employees, to be consistent with the sampling procedure followed by the ESEE, as explained in footnote 3. The reported values of the variables used in the analysis have been weighted to Spanish manufacturing population proportions according to the sampling procedure.

  5. Notice that, in this latter case, the estimated coefficients for the variables interacted with the dummies of ownership have to be interpreted as differential effects with respect to the estimates for the category of ‘other’ firms (the reference category), that is, the estimates of β and γ in equation (1) above.

References

  • Aghion, P., & Saint-Paul, G. (1998). Virtues of bad times: interaction between productivity growth and economic fluctuations”. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2, 322–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., Askenazy, P., Berman, N., Cette, G., & Eymard, L. (2012). Credit constraints and the cyclicality of R&D investments: evidence from France”. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 1001–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firms-performance: evidence from the S&P 500”. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlevy, G. (2007). On the cyclicality of research and development”. American Economic Review, 97, 1134–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1996). The financial accelerator and the flight to quality”. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions”. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 429–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comin, D., & Gertler, M. (2006). Medium-term business cycles”. American Economic Review, 96, 523–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R., & Petersen, B. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 141–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertner, R. H., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1994). Internal versus external capital markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 1211–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., (1991), “Recessions and reorganizations”, NBER Macroeconomic Annual

  • Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation”. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyytinen, A., & Toivanen, O. (2005). Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth? evidence on the role of public policy”. Research Policy, 34, 1385–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan-Benedict, E., Steenkamp, M., & Fang, E. (2011). The impact of economic contractions on the effectiveness of R&D and advertising: evidence from US companies spanning three decades”. Marketing Science, 30, 628–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure”. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Kim, H., & Lee, P. M. (2008). “Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: evidence from Korean firms”. Organizational Science, 19(3), 404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochhar, R., & David, P. (1996). Institutional investors and firm innovation: a test of competing hypotheses”. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N. (1978). Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: the economic groups”. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26, 661–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-García, P., Montero, J.M., and Moreal-Benito, E., (2012), “Business cycles and investment in intangibles: evidence from Spanish firms”, Banco de España, Documentos de Trabajo, no. 1219

  • Máñez-Castillejo, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis-Llopis, A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2009). The role of sunk costs in the decision to invest in R&D’. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57, 712–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, C. D., & McConaughy, A. (1999). “Founding family control and capital structure: the risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt”. Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice, 23, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, M. (2011). On the cyclicality of R&D”. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 542–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeb, D., Mansi, S., & Allee, J. (2001). Firm internationalization and the cost of debt financing: evidence from non-provisional publicly traded debt”. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36, 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank comments from participants at the Workshop Good Times, Bad Times: Entrepreneurship and the Cycle (Valencia, 2011), the 40th Annual Conference of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics (Evora, Portugal, 2013), and the XXVIII Jornadas de Economía Industrial (Segovia, 2013). We are also grateful to the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project numbers ECO2011-25033 and ECO2011-30323-C03-02), and from the Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO/2009-2013/068) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amparo Sanchis-Llopis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beneito, P., Rochina-Barrachina, M.E. & Sanchis-Llopis, A. Ownership and the cyclicality of firms’ R&D investment. Int Entrep Manag J 11, 343–359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0320-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0320-9

Keywords

Navigation