Abstract
As a decay product of uranium series, 210Pb spreads widely in the nature and imposes strong radiological and chemical toxicity. It is vital to establish reliable and efficient radioanalytical methods for 210Pb determination to support environment and food radioactivity monitoring programs. This article critically reviews analytical methods developed for determining 210Pb in environmental and biological samples, especially new development in recent years. Techniques applied throughout different analytical steps including sample pretreatment, separation, purification, and detection are summarized and their pros and cons are discussed to provide a holistic overview for 210Pb environmental and biological assay.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
210Pb is a radionuclide with 82 protons, 128 neutrons, and a half-life of 22.3 a. It is an important daughter of 222Rn in the 238U decay series as shown in Fig. 1 (Biggin et al. 2002). 210Pb decays into short-lived 210Bi (t½ = 5 days) by beta decay, and then decays into 210Po (t½ = 138.5 days) by beta emission. 210Pb is considered a highly toxic radionuclide (El Afifi and Borai 2006). It releases low-energy beta particles with energies of 61 keV (19%) and 20 keV (81%) (Blanco et al. 2004; Schayer et al. 2010; Yamamoto et al. 2009), and gamma rays with energies of 46.5 keV.
The decay chain of 238U (Biggin et al. 2002)
There are three main sources of 210Pb in the environment (Carvalho 1995; Moore et al. 1976): (1) the decay of natural uranium system; (2) the production of nuclear fuel, including mining and smelting of uranium mines; (3) other industrial activities, such as phosphorus mining, phosphate fertilizer production, and coal mining and processing. 222Rn and its daughters are important intermediate products in the decay chain of 238U, and they are also the main source of 210Pb in the atmosphere. During the utilization of minerals, 210Pb produced by the decay of 222Rn in minerals will be released into the atmosphere. Due to its particle reactive properties, 210Pb will be absorbed to sub-micron aerosols and stay in the air for several weeks. The scavenge of 210Pb from the atmosphere is mainly through atmospheric convection, sedimentation, rain, and snow, and thereafter, it enters the soil, water system, or deposits on the surface of plants (Kanai 2013; Melieres et al. 2003).
From a radiological point of view, ingestion of radionuclides has a long-term health effect on the human body (UNSCEAR 1993). 210Pb in the environment can enter the human body through inhalation, ingestion, or contact through the skin or wound, causing internal radiation exposure hazards (Sha 2004). 210Pb that is inhaled into the respiratory tract through the mouth or nose may deposit in various areas of the respiratory system. When ingested, 210Pb will enter the gastrointestinal tract through the throat. About 20% of the ingested 210Pb can be absorbed and enter into systemic metabolism, which tends to accumulate at a relatively higher extent in specific organs such as the kidney, liver, and bone. 210Pb is eliminated from the body through various pathways over time, including feces, sweat, urine, and other channels (e.g., hair, dander), while a small amount of 210Pb accumulates in bones with a long biological half-life (Castellino and Aloj 1964; Leggett 1993).
210Pb is a bone-seeking radionuclide, and its affinity to bone tissues makes it useful for forensic scientists to estimate post-mortem interval (PMI), which refers to the time that has elapsed since a person or animal has died (Schrag et al. 2012). In addition, 210Pb has been widely used as a tracer in sediment dating (Yang et al. 2010), assessment of tobacco and radon exposure (Li et al. 2008; Schayer et al. 2010), soil erosion/disturbance (Matisoff 2014; Porto et al. 2016), and atmospheric, land, and river transport activities (Baskaran 2011; Diaz-Asencio et al. 2017; Teramage et al. 2015).
In short, determination of 210Pb in environmental and biological samples is of great significance to protect the environment and human health. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic review on the methodology development for 210Pb environmental and biological assays, as most of the existing reviews are about its application for environmental tracing, dating, and metabolism (Cohen and Howells 1969; Matisoff 2014; Zhang and Xu 2023). This article provides a holistic review of the research progress made for 210Pb determination in environmental and biological samples, especially new developments in recent years. The review focuses on analytical techniques applied in different steps, including sample pretreatment, separation and purification, source preparation, and measurement as illustrated in Fig. 2.
In general, the existing methods for the determination of 210Pb are classified into direct and indirect measurement methods. The direct method includes counting the low-energy gamma rays (Eγ = 46.5 keV) of 210Pb by gamma (γ) spectrometry (Barba-Lobo et al. 2021), or measuring the beta activity of 210Pb by liquid scintillation counting (LSC) (Stojkovic et al. 2020), or counting 210Pb atoms by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Lariviere et al. 2005). The indirect method can be performed through the measurement of its daughter product 210Bi with, e.g., gas flow beta (β) counter (Franklin et al. 2016) or granddaughter 210Po using alpha (α) spectrometry (Akozcan 2013). Table 1 complies the progress made in the literature in the past decade regarding analytical methods and their performance for 210Pb environmental and biological assays. The subsequent discussion delves into these advancements in detail.
Sample pretreatment
Because of the low-level concentrations of 210Pb in the environment, in most cases, it is difficult to measure it straightforward without sample preparation and obtain accurate results. In order to improve the detection efficiency, the samples need to be homogenized and pre-concentrated to remove the bulk matrix, followed by separation from interferences and purification of the analyte 210Pb. Therefore, sample pre-treatment is a key initial step in the 210Pb radiochemical analysis process. The specific pre-treatment procedure varies depending on the sample type, with the primary objective to achieve a homogenous sample (mostly in aqueous phase) containing enriched 210Pb and eliminated matrix content.
Pretreatment of solid samples
For environmental solid samples (Bao et al. 2015; Bonotto and Vergotti 2015; Krmar et al. 2014), including soil, sediment, rock, and aerosol, the pretreatment methods used are typically drying and ashing, followed by acid digestion with or without microwave assistance. Lead readily dissolves in warm diluted HNO3, while it slowly evolves hydrogen when treated with hot concentrated HCl. Therefore, for effectively leaching 210Pb from most soil or sediment samples, a mixture of acids including HNO3, HF, HClO4, and HCl is widely adopted in various studies (Blanco Rodriguez et al. 2014; Jia and Torri 2007; Sussa et al. 2013). The use of microwave in acid digestion accelerates the speed and completeness for the dissolution of target analyte, allowing for higher sample throughput. For example, Kılıç et al. (2014) utilized a microwave digestion system to pretreat 0.25 g of samples with a mixture of 7 mL of 37% HCl and 3 mL of 65% HNO3 when analyzing 210Pb in sediments from Golden Horn Bay. The digestion was completed within 35 min.
Because 210Pb is highly particle reactive, 210Pb can be enriched in aerosols from the atmosphere (Baskaran et al. 1993). To minimize 210Pb loss during the analysis of aerosol samples, which are typically collected with silica or glass fiber filters, a fractional ashing method can be employed as a pre-treatment technique in addition to the digestion with concentrated HNO3 and HClO4 (Persson and Holm 2014). This method effectively prevents the evaporation of lead at temperatures above 500 ℃ as shown in Table 2 (Mao et al. 2018). By adding an appropriate amount of HNO3 and HClO4 and repeating the operation until complete ashing, this technique ensures thorough sample processing. Additionally, the use of boric acid can help in reducing the ashing time. The advantages of this method are evident in its simplicity, minimal acid consumption, and relatively low laboratory background. However, it may not be suitable for handling a large number of samples (Dai et al. 2015).
The above-mentioned drying, ashing, and acid digestion approach also applies to pretreat biological samples including bone, lichen, mosses, and food. Differently, specific efforts should be given to the decomposition of organic matters largely contained in biological samples. For this purposes, prolonged ashing, addition of oxidizing reagents such as H2O2, or the use of microwave digestion became necessary. For example, Wallova et al. (2012) monitored the radioactivity levels of deer bones in Austria, with ashing the bones at 450 °C for 17–22 h in a muffle furnace after slicing. Sert et al. (2011) dissolved lichen and moss samples, which readily absorb 210Pb from the atmosphere (Skuterud et al. 2005), with concentrated HNO3 and H2O2, and then treated by concentrated HCl. Kılıç et al. (2014) digested 0.6 g dried mussel sample with 10 mL of concentrated HNO3 in a microwave oven at a pressure of 30 bar. To prevent loss of samples and volatile analytes, the sample was placed in cold water immediately after microwave digestion (Henricsson et al. 2011).
Acid digestion method is simple to operate and can effectively decompose organic matter in the sample. However, acid digestion consumes a large amount of acids, and the experiment duration can be quite lengthy, which can be costly and environmental harmful (Huang and Zhu 1981). Microwave digestion technology has many advantages including simple experimental procedure, minimized acid consumption, fast and complete decomposition, and accurate temperature control, which is known as “green chemical reaction technology” (Zhou et al. 2004). However, this technique is not suitable for processing large quantities of samples and complex matrices.
For samples containing refractory fractions, Jia and Torri (2007) applied an alkaline fusion method with fluxes of Na2CO3 and Na2O2. Compared with the acid digestion with HNO3, HF, HClO4, and HCl, the alkaline fusion method delivered comparable results for 210Pb. In their study, they applied the alkaline fusion method to various types of solid samples, achieving average chemical yields of 90.0 ± 9.8% for 210Po and 88.4 ± 7.1% for 210Pb. These results demonstrate the wide applicability and reliability of the alkaline fusion method for solid sample pre-treatment. Compared to acid digestion, alkaline fusion features for much faster accomplishment as it usually operates at higher temperatures (typically 500–1000 °C in alkaline fusion vs. 100–200 °C in acid digestion).
Pretreatment of liquid samples
Environmental water samples including surface water, seawater, and drinking water are usually pre-concentrated by chemical treatment such as co-precipitation. After collection, the water sample is typically filtered with a filter membrane (0.4–0.45 μm) to remove particles and then acidified to pH 1–2 to avoid the growth of microorganisms. Fe(OH)3 or MnO2 co-precipitation is often used to pre-concentrate 210Pb prior to the subsequent separation and measurement (Kpeglo et al. 2015; Seiler et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2011; Zhong et al. 2020).
For surface water pre-treatment, Burnett et al. (2012) used MnO2 co-precipitation to pre-concentrate 210Pb. Potassium permanganate and manganese chloride were added to the water sample to generate manganese dioxide precipitation. This approach enabled swift pre-concentration of 210Pb from large volume of water samples.
Human urine has a relatively complex matrix with high total dissolved solids and salt content, which needs to be pretreated to reduce matrix effects before chemical separation (Kang et al. 2021). Muikku et al. (2011) determined 210Pb activity concentrations in urine by microwave-assisted acid digestion after adding concentrated HNO3 and 209Po to 90 mL of sample. The use of microwave digestion minimizes the operational time and consumption of reagents and energy (Mingote and Nogueira 2016). However, it cannot completely eliminate the influence of urine matrix; therefore, further separation and purification were followed.
Separation and purification
Chemical separation and purification are often necessary to remove interferences, and obtain purified and concentrated target analyte. As 210Pb can be measured directly for its gamma or beta decay activity, or indirectly via its decay product 210Po (α emitter) or 210Bi (β emitter) (see details in the “Measurement” section), therefore, the separation and purification methods were designed accordingly based on the target radionuclide in the detection. For example, interferences to the direct measurement of 210Pb beta activity are not only its two progenies but also all other beta emitters and its chemically similar stable elements, such as Ra and Sr. In the cases of indirect measurement through 210Po, interferes include all other alpha emitters, such as 212Bi, and some ions, such as Fe3+and Cr6+. And in the indirect measurement through 210Bi, interferes include all other high-energy beta emitters, such as 226Ra.
Conventional methods for 210Pb radiochemical separation include solvent extraction, solid phase extraction, precipitation, or ion exchange chromatography, which are usually applied in combined fashion. However, these separation methods require long time processing (Grate et al. 2020). Over the past decades, highly selective extraction chromatographic materials, such as Sr resin and PS rein (Gimenez et al. 2023; Mingote and Nogueira 2016), have been developed to simplify 210Pb separation, and new methods involving a degree of automated separation have also been explored. For example, 210Pb was separated from phosphogypsum using an on-line sequential injection (SI) system combined with an ion exchange column (Kim et al. 2008). With the development of flow technology, an advanced lab-on-valve (LOV)—multisyringe flow injection analysis (MSFIA) system was successfully applied to determine 90Sr and 210Pb (Mola et al. 2014). Flow analysis technology can shorten the analysis time, reduce the consumption of samples and reagents, and thus produce less radioactive waste.
Precipitation
Lead sulfate (PbSO4) precipitation is often used to remove most of the alkaline earth elements. Depending on the solubility, Pb can be separated from Ra(Ba) and Sr in their sulfate/carbonate precipitates (Wang et al. 2019).
As the nitrates of Pb(II) and alkaline earth elements are insoluble in highly concentrated nitric acid (Ostanova et al. 2002), Ra and Pb (precipitate) could be separated from the interfering radionuclides (e.g., U, Th radioisotopes) which are soluble in these media. For example, Lozano et al. (2010) utilized the insoluble properties of Pb(NO3)2(Ra) in 69% nitric acid medium, and separated Pb(Ra) from U and Th. However, due to the low selectivity of the precipitation method, it is often combined with other separation and purification methods, such as solvent extraction and/or chromatographic separation (Vasile et al. 2016).
Solvent extraction
Solvent extraction is a method of extracting radionuclides from aqueous phase with organic extractants (Deng and Lin 2022). Solvent extraction can be used to separate 210Pb (or 210Po, 210Bi) from other interfering elements based on their different solubilities in different solvents.
Uddin et al. (2015) used diethyldithiocarbamate diethylamine trichloromethane (DDTC) solution to extract 210Po for seawater analysis. Diammonium hydroxide citrate (DHC) also has the potential for lead extraction. Fons-Castells et al. (2017) proposed a procedure to simultaneously extract and measure 210Pb, 228Ra, and 226Ra in drinking water. 210Pb was selectively extracted from RAD disk with DHC at a pH of 5.75.
It is reported that 210Po can be extracted from HCl solution with tributyl phosphate (TBP) and trioctylamine (TOA) (Younes et al. 2017), or 5% (w/v) trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO) solution (Grabowski & Bem 2010). 210Bi was extracted with xylene with triiso-octylamine (TIOA) in 1 M HCl for air filter analysis, wherein 1 M HCl solution was used for leaching 210Bi from the filter (Dlugosz-Lisiecka 2019).
Chromatographic separation
MnO2 fiber-column adsorption for 210Pb
The adsorption rate of all types of MnO2 particles to Pb was reported higher than 85% (Burnett et al. 2012). Aviv et al. (2022) proposed a method for the determination of 210Pb in drinking water, in which the water sample was filtered through an acrylic fiber impregnated with MnO2. After drying in an oven, the fiber was directly measured by a low background γ spectrometer to obtain the activity of 210Pb. In the analysis of 210Pb in water samples, the combination of ferric hydroxide precipitation and chromatographic separation is also one of the common methods for separating 210Pb, and this method has been widely used in combination with various measurement techniques (e.g., LSC, ICP-MS) (Baskaran et al. 2018; Villa-Alfageme et al. 2016).
Ion exchange chromatography
Ion exchange chromatography is based on the different affinities of ions and polar molecules onto ion exchangers to separate the target analyte from interfering elements (Zhou et al. 2022). Ion exchange chromatography is one of the common methods for 210Pb, 210Po, and/or 210Bi separation and purification.
Huang et al. (2013) observed that compared with cation exchange resin, anion exchange resin is more effective to separate Pb and Bi from other interferences. The anion exchange resin exhibited the highest adsorption capacity and the best ability to separate impurities in the media of 1.0 mol/L HCl. The detailed separation procedure is outlined in Fig. 3. Dlugosz-Lisiecka and Bem (2012) reported the use of DOWEX anionic reins to separate 210Po, 210Pb, and 210Bi from each other, wherein 210Bi radionuclide was eluted by 100 mL of 1.8 M H2SO4 with an average chemical yield of 80 ± 10%.
Cation exchange resin, such as AG 50W × 8, can separate and purify Po in an acidic environment (< 0.2 M HCl). As the resin contains sulfonic acid functional groups, Po can be eluted first in 0.2 M HCl, followed by Bi in 0.4 M HCl and finally Pb in 2 M HCl. The chemical yield when using AG 50W × 8 cation exchange chromatography was 84.3 ± 0.6% for Pb, 87 ± 1% for Bi, and 92 ± 5% for Po, respectively (Kmak et al. 2017).
Extraction chromatography
Sr resin, which consists of 4,4′(5′)-di-t-butylcyclohexano 18-crown-6 in 1-octanol, is a recently developed material for the separation of various inorganic substances based on its different adsorption capacities and selectivity of different target ions (Kong et al. 2021). Since Vajda et al. (1997) proposed the use of Sr resin for the analysis of 210Pb and 210Po, it has become widely adopted for determination of 210Pb and/or 210Pb in sediment, biological, and water samples. Polonium can be eluted with 6 M HNO3, and lead is eluted with 6 M HCl (Kong et al. 2021; Rozmaric et al. 2013), as outlined in Fig. 4. In addition, DGA resin has also been used to separate and purify 210Po in acidic media (e.g., < 1.5 M HCl), eliminating potential alpha emitting interferences (Maxwell et al. 2019).
The recently developed plastic scintillation (PS) resin integrates chemical separation and source preparation into a single step. PS resin is made by fixing a radionuclide selective extractant in a plastic scintillation microsphere, which can be placed in a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge. The target radionuclide is retained in the SPE cartridge, and then measured directly by LSC (Gimenez et al. 2023). Martinez et al. (2023) employed PS resin in the analysis of sludge samples collected from drinking water treatment plants. The PS resin selectively retained three radionuclides (210Po, 210Pb, and 90Sr), and effectively separated 210Po from 210Pb and 90Sr, enabling the simultaneous determination of 210Pb and 90Sr. The procedure, as outlined in Fig. 4, involved loading the digested sample onto the PS resin, from which 210Po was eluted with 8 mol/L HNO3 separated from 210Pb and 90Sr solution.
Compared to traditional extraction chromatographic resin (e.g., Sr and DGA), PS resin offers advantages of reduced amounts of reagents and labor required for the analysis, preventing the generation of organic liquid wastes (Bagan et al. 2009, 2012; Barrera et al. 2016).
Source preparation
Source preparation for gamma spectrometry
Gamma spectrometry does not require complex chemical separation. For aerosol samples collected with a silica or glass fiber filter, they can be placed in a metal mold and compacted into a known geometry using a hydraulic press for direct gamma spectrometry measurement (Abe et al. 2010). However, direct measurement of 210Pb by γ spectrometry in water samples without pretreatment is usually not possible due to the low concentrations of 210Pb (Aviv et al. 2022). For water samples, co-precipitation with MnO2 (Yang and Appleby 2016) as mentioned in the pretreatment section is usually performed prior to the direct measurement of 210Pb by γ spectrometry. For samples of soil, sediment, ore, etc., the pre-treated samples are packed into suitable containers with known geometry for the γ spectrometry measurement (Charro and Pena 2013; Khater and Bakr 2011; Li et al. 2011).
Source preparation for LSC
The source preparation for 210Pb measurement by LSC can be performed following the two approaches: (1) Aqueous samples are counted directly for Cherenkov radiation without the addition of scintillation cocktail. Herein, 210Pb is measured indirectly through its daughter 210Bi (Stojkovic et al. 2022). (2) Samples are counted after mixing the purified 210Pb fraction with cocktail. Prior to mixing with cocktail, 210Pb fraction is typically concentrated as precipitation of lead oxalate, lead sulfate, or lead chromate, and then dissolved with diluted acid (e.g., HNO3 (Barlas Simsek and Cagatay 2014)) to reduce the quenching effect. Due to the color quenching effect of lead chromate on LSC, it is recommended to precipitate in the form of lead oxalate (Blanco et al. 2004).
Source preparation for α spectrometry
The polonium sources for alpha spectrometry measurement can be prepared using spontaneous deposition or microprecipitation (e.g., CuS (Guerin and Dai 2015) and tellurium (Song et al. 2017) microprecipitation). The spontaneous deposition is the most commonly used, in which polonium is deposited in a metal dish in an acidic environment with stirring and heating in a water bath (80–96 ℃) for 4–6 h (Guerin and Dai 2014; Narayana and Prakash 2010). Polonium can be deposited not only on Ag but also on Ni, stainless steel, and other metal surfaces. Silver proved to be a superior electroplating metal, as it can minimize the loss of polonium during the deposition (Henricsson et al. 2011). In addition, studies have shown that the highest deposition efficiency of Po was achieved when high purity (99.99%) of silver disks was applied (Lee and Chae 2023). The deposition time of Po on the silver disks should not be too long, because studies have shown that when the deposition time exceeded 3 h, measurement of 210Po was hindered as the silver disks were covered by oxides and other compounds, resulting in reduced peak resolution of 210Po (Szarlowicz 2019).
Source preparation for 210Bi
The primary source preparation method for 210Bi involves precipitation. PbSO4 precipitate obtained from the chemical separation and purification is left for 5 days on a metal plate to allow for the ingrowth of 210Bi. Subsequently, it is counted by gas-flow proportional counter (May et al. 2017). Alternatively, 210Bi can be precipitated as Bi2S3 and filtered, dried, and measured by low background β counter (Meli et al. 2011).
Measurement
To detect 210Pb, besides the approach of directly measuring the activity of 210Pb, alternative approaches involve deriving the activity concentration of 210Pb by detecting its two decay products, 210Po or 210Bi.
Indirect method
α spectrometry (via 210Po)
Alpha spectrometry is a detection method to quantify the activity concentration of 210Pb by measuring the α decay of its granddaughter 210Po. After chemical separation, the processed samples are placed in a semiconductor detector to measure the activity of 210Po after the spontaneous deposition on a metal surface (e.g., Ag) (Laureano-Perez et al. 2007; Stastna et al. 2010). Kilic et al. (2014) used an alpha spectrometer to measure the activity concentrations of 210Po deposited on a silver disk for at least 48 h. When 209Po or 208Po is used as an internal tracer for 210Po, spontaneous deposition may not be able to quantitatively remove all Po, and the residual Po (209Po or 208Po and 210Po) can possibly affect the analytical accuracy. In such cases, it is necessary to remove Po by ion exchange separation, such as with DOWEX (Baskaran 2011; Baskaran et al. 2013). After waiting for 6 months to allow the ingrowth of 210Po from 210Pb, the samples were re-plated and the activity concentrations of 210Pb can be calculated after the second self-deposition. Alpha spectrometry is featured for its low background, high counting efficiency. The main disadvantage of this method is that it takes 6–9 months to allow the ingrowth of 210Po from 210Pb, so it is not suitable for processing a large number of samples. In addition, polonium is easily adsorbed on the wall of the sample container, so it will suffer losses, resulting in poor repeatability (Cuesta et al. 2022; Vesterbacka and Ikäheimonen 2005). Finally, the recovery rate of Pb could not be evaluated by this method. To determine the recovery rate of 210Pb, it can be achieved by measuring stable Pb using ICP-MS (Walsh et al. 2023).
β counting (via 210Bi)
According to “Method for Analysis of Lead-120 in Water” (CNIC 1994) (industry standard EJ/T 859–1994), 210Pb was indirectly determined by measuring the radioactivity of its daughter 210Bi. Due to the relatively short half-life (5 days) of 210Bi, the equilibrium state between 210Pb and 210Bi is assumed to be reached and maintained throughout the analytical process, from sample collection to the actual measurement. In cases where 210Pb and 210Bi in the sample do not reach the radioactive equilibrium, the sample is left for about 1 month for the ingrowth of 210Bi. β counting is a widely used technique for measuring 210Bi (Jia 2018; Strok and Smodis 2011). The detection limit of this method is one order of magnitude higher than that of α spectrometry method, for example, LOD of ~ 8 mBq by β counting vs. 0.03–0.08 mBq by α spectrometry (Baskaran 2011).
Direct method
γ spectrometry
γ spectrometry was first proposed by F. Martinez-Ruiz et al. (2007). It can directly measure the γ photon with an energy of 46.5 keV generated by 210Pb (Hussain et al. 1996). With improved measurement efficiency of modern γ spectrometers, the technology is finding increasing applications in various fields. As it involves simple and non-destructive sample preparation, γ spectrometry becomes the first choice for the determination of 210Pb in many scenarios. For the analysis of small amount of samples with low activity of 210Pb, the well-type HPGe detector is commonly used due to its greater counting efficient in measuring the low-energy gamma rays of 210Pb (Sima 2000). However, due to the low γ ray energy of 210Pb, low branching ratio (4.25%), the self-absorption effect within the sample becomes significant, and in many cases results in insufficient detection limit for environmental and biological applications (Gogrewe et al. 1996; Hussain et al. 1996). Many factors such as sample composition and density need to be calibrated for the full-energy peak efficiency, among which the self-absorption correction for 210Pb measurement is particularly important (Hurtado et al. 2007). At present, semi-empirical methods and the Monte Carlo method are the most widely used methods to correct self-absorption effect (Bochud et al. 2006; Iurian et al. 2018).
LSC
LSC is a sensitive technique for the measurement of soft beta radiation, allowing for the direct quantification of 210Pb (Vajda et al. 1997). It exhibits reduced self-absorption and high counting efficiency. However, this method is sensitive to chemical or color quenching, and it is also necessary to correct the influence of 210Bi which requires repeated lengthy measurement (Hou and Roos 2008). The newly developed LSC calibration method by Strok et al. (2016) significantly improved the sensitivity of LSC for determining 210Pb in environmental samples, which led to a two-fold increase in detection efficiency. One of the key advantages of this method was its precise evaluation of the detection efficiency of 210Bi growth process. This allowed samples to be measured at any time after 210Pb radiochemical separation, offering greater flexibility while maintaining a high degree of accuracy.
Vranes et al. (2021) found that 3-methylpyridine-salicylate (3-MPS) increased the efficiency of LSC measurements, suggesting that ionic liquids similar to 3-MPS could replace commercial LSC cocktails. Stojkovic et al. (2022) investigated the effect of various ionic liquids on the detection efficiency of a LSC instrument. Among the tested ionic liquids, they observed that only those containing salicylic acid anions showed a wavelength shift effect, which led to increased detection efficiency.
ICP-MS method
It is proposed in the literature (Amr et al. 2010) that the ICP-MS method is a feasible method to detect 210Pb. Compared with the above-mentioned radiometric methods, the detection time of ICP-MS is significantly shortened to a few minutes for each sample. However, due to the interferences of 210Bi and other polyatomic ions, thorough chemical separation and purification are still necessary. ICP-MS has been used to detect 210Pb in a 1 L drinking water sample, and a detection limit of 90 mBqL−1 was reported (Lariviere et al. 2005). Due to such high detection limit for 210Pb, ICP-MS has rarely been used for 210Pb determination in environmental samples with low concentrations of 210Pb. Blanchet-Chouinard and Lariviere (2022) proposed a novel procedure based on sequential cloud point extraction (CPE) to reduce detection limits, as CPE could selectively separate/concentrate the analyte, and enable on-line detection. In this study, 210Pb isolated from the CPE system was analyzed by ICP-MS with an achieved detection limit of 13 mBqL−1 for a 0.35 L water sample. ICP-MS has only recently been applied for 210Pb measurement, further improvement in detection limit is still needed.
Outlook
Technical development for the determination of 210Pb in environmental and biological samples, incorporating pretreatment, separation, purification, and measurement, is reviewed in this article, and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed in detail, as shown in Tables 3 and 4. Both direct and indirect measurement methods have been applied for the determination of 210Pb, with each having its own analytical merits. The indirect method through measuring its daughter 210Bi or granddaughter 210Po takes longer time and requires complicated chemical treatment. The direct method overcomes the limitation of indirect methods that rely on the equilibrium of 210Pb and its decay products (210Po or 210Bi), whereas it still faces challenges related to self-absorption during γ spectrometry measurements and quenching effects in LSC. The on-going effort in scintillation cocktail development is useful to further improve the counting efficiency in LSC.
When the activity concentration of 210Pb in a sample is low, the sample needs to be chemically separated, and the activity concentration of 210Pb is typically determined through its daughter 210Bi or its granddaughter 210Po. However, this method is time-consuming. In situations where the 210Pb concentration needs to be measured within a short time, direct measurement of 210Pb by gamma spectrometry or liquid scintillation counting is a method of choice. In addition, ICP-MS can be selected depending on the experimental conditions to achieve rapid screening.
Considering the impact on the environment and the concept of sustainable development, in the process of chemical analysis, sample preparation is considered to be the main source of pollution (Cerutti et al. 2019; Lopez-Lorente et al. 2022). The concept of green sample preparation and green analytical chemistry is the main trend of analysis today. They all achieve sustainability by reducing the amounts of pollutants in the analysis process (Lopez-Lorente et al. 2022). Therefore, bearing this in mind, when acid digestion is used for sample pretreatment, microwave-induced digestion may be considered the first option to reduce the acid consumption and save energy (Bizzi et al. 2017). For separation and purification, solid phase microextraction (SPE) can be regarded as a solvent-free extraction technology, which provides possibilities for green environmental protection. Besides, it requires shorter processing time and simpler operation compared with conventional separation methods (Risticevic et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2011). Moreover, in recent years, the focus of research has shifted towards designing and developing highly selective new materials that can facilitate the efficient separation and enrichment of 210Pb.
With the new development of artificial intelligent (AI), the application automation in radiochemical analysis will undoubtedly reduce reagent consumption and labor intensity, as well as improve sample throughput and operational safety. By far, many automated methods have been developed, but mostly coupled offline with the measurement. Collaborations between material science and other disciplines will likely play a crucial role in shaping the future of 210Pb methodologies. We foresee improvement on this basis and integrate it into the analysis process to achieve online chemical separation and measurement.
Data Availability
Not applicable—no primary data was generated for this manuscript.
References
Abe T, Kosako T, Komura K (2010) Relationship between variations of Be-7, Pb-210 and Pb-212 concentrations and sub-regional atmospheric transport: simultaneous observation at distant locations. J Environ Radioact 101(2):113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.09.004
Akozcan S (2013) Levels of 210Po and 210Pb in mussel and sediments in Candarli Gulf and the related dose assessment to the coastal population. Mar Pollut Bull 73(1):11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.06.016
Al-Masri MS, Haddad K, Doubal AW, Awad I, Al-Khatib Y (2014) Assessment of soil contamination by (210)Po and (210)Pb around heavy oil and natural gas fired power plants. J Environ Radioact 132:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.01.018
Amr MA, Al-Saad KA, Helal AI (2010) Ultra-trace measurements of Pb in natural occurring radioactive materials by ICP-MS. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 615(2):237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.01.036
Aviv O, Vaknin D, Yungrais Z, Shonkor S, Haquin G, Datz H (2022) A rapid method for determining low concentrations of 210Pb in drinking water using MnO2 fibers. J Environ Radioact 253–254:107015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.107015
Bagan H, Hartvig S, Tarancon A, Rauret G, Garcia JF (2009) Plastic vs. liquid scintillation for 14C radiotracers determination in high salt matrices. Analytica Chimica Acta 631(2):229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.10.036
Bagan H, Tarancon A, Stavsetra L, Rauret G, Garcia JF (2012) Determination of oil reservoir radiotracer (S14CN-) in a single step using a plastic scintillator extractive resin. Anal Chim Acta 736:30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.05.045
Bao K, Shen J, Wang G, Gao C (2015) Anthropogenic black carbon emission increase during the last 150 years at Coastal Jiangsu. China Plos One 10(7):e0129680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129680
Barba-Lobo A, San Miguel EG, Lozano RL, Bolivar JP (2021) A general methodology to determine natural radionuclides by well-type HPGe detectors. Measurement 181:109561
Barlas Simsek F, Cagatay MN (2014) Geochronology of lake sediments using (210)Pb with double energetic window method by LSC: an application to Lake Van. Appl Radiat Isot 93:126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.01.028
Barrera J, Tarancon A, Bagan H, Garcia JF (2016) A new plastic scintillation resin for single-step separation, concentration and measurement of technetium-99. Anal Chim Acta 936:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.07.008
Baskaran KV, Blanchet-Chouinard G, Larivière D (2018) Attogram measurement of 210Pb in drinking water by ICP-MS/MS. J Anal at Spectrom 33(4):603–612. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ja00408g
Baskaran M (2011) Po-210 and Pb-210 as atmospheric tracers and global atmospheric Pb-210 fallout: a review (vol 102, pg 500, 2011). J Environ Radioact 102(12):1126–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.09.010
Baskaran M, Church T, Hong G, Kumar A, Qiang M, Choi H, Maiti K (2013) Effects of flow rates and composition of the filter, and decay/ingrowth correction factors involved with the determination of in situ particulate Po and Pb in seawater. Limnol Oceanogr Meth 11:126–138. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2013.11.126
Baskaran M, Coleman CH, Santschi PH (1993) Atmospheric depositional fluxes of Be-7 and Pb-210 at Galveston and College-Station Texas. J Geophys Res Atmos 98(D11):20555–20571. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jd02182
Biggin CD, Cook GT, MacKenzie AB, Pates JM (2002) Time-efficient method for the determination of 210Pb, 210Bi, and 210Po activities in seawater using liquid scintillation spectrometry. Anal Chem 74(3):671–677. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0107599
Bizzi CA, Pedrotti MF, Silva JS, Barin JS, Nobrega JA, Flores EMM (2017) Microwave-assisted digestion methods: towards greener approaches for plasma-based analytical techniques. J Anal Spectrom 32(8):1448–1466. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ja00108h
Blanchet-Chouinard G, Lariviere D (2022) Rapid determination of 210Pb and 210Po by sequential cloud point extraction for environmental monitoring. Anal Methods 14(2):199–202. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ay01862k
Blanco P, Lozano JC, Gomez Escobar V, Vera Tome F (2004) A simple method for 210Pb determination in geological samples by liquid scintillation counting. Appl Radiat Isot 60(1):83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2003.09.011
Blanco Rodriguez P, Vera Tome F, Lozano JC (2014) Assessment of the vertical distribution of natural radionuclides in a mineralized uranium area in south-west Spain. Chemosphere 95:527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.111
Bochud F, Bailat CJ, Buchillier T, Byrde F, Schmid E, Laedermann JP (2006) Simple Monte-Carlo method to calibrate well-type HPGe detectors. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 569(3):790–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.09.040
Bonotto DM, Vergotti M (2015) (210)Pb and compositional data of sediments from Rondonian lakes, Madeira River basin, Brazil. Appl Radiat Isot 99:5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.02.002
Burnett JL, Croudace IW, Warwick PE (2012) Pre-concentration of short-lived radionuclides using manganese dioxide precipitation from surface waters. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 292(1):25–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1392-4
Carvalho FP (1995) Origins and concentrations of Rn-222, Pb-210, Bi-210 and Po-210 in the surface air at Lisbon, Portugal, at the Atlantic edge of the European continental landmass. Atmos Environ 29(15):1809–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00076-B
Castellino N, Aloj S (1964) Kinetics of the distribution and excretion of lead in the rat. Br J Ind Med 21(4):308–314. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.21.4.308
Cerutti S, Pacheco PH, Gil R, Martinez LD (2019) Green sample preparation strategies for organic/inorganic compounds in environmental samples. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 19:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.08.007
Chandrashekara K, Somashekarappa HM (2016) Po-210 and Pb-210 in medicinal plants in the region of Karnataka, Southern India. J Environ Radioact 160:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.04.036
Charro E, Pena V (2013) Environmental impact of natural radionuclides from a coal-fired power plant in Spain. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 153(4):485–495. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs126
Chen J, Rennie MD, Sadi B, Zhang W, St-Amant N (2016) A study on the levels of radioactivity in fish samples from the experimental lakes area in Ontario, Canada. J Environ Radioact 153:222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.01.005
CNIC (1994) Method for analysis of lead-210 in water. EJ/T 859–1994:1994
Cohen N, Howells GP (1969) A brief review of 210Pb metabolism. HASL-204. HASL Rep I81–97. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4902859. Accessed 8 Oct 2023
Cuesta E, Barba-Lobo A, Lozano RL, San Miguel EG, Mosqueda F, Bolivar JP (2022) A comparative study of alternative methods for Pb-210 determination in environmental samples. Radiat Phys Chem 191:109840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109840
Dai Z, Yang Q, Ye Q (2015) A discussion about the three digestion methods for aluminum detection in food. Med J of Commun 29(03):312–314
Deng F, Lin F (2022) Measurement of 90Sr in marine biological samples. Molecules 27(12):3730. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123730
Diaz-Asencio M, Corcho-Alvarado JA, Cartas-Aguila H, Pulido-Caraballe A, Betancourt C, Smoak JM, Seisdedo-Losa M (2017) Pb-210 and Cs-137 as tracers of recent sedimentary processes in two water reservoirs in Cuba. J Environ Radioact 177:290–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.07.005
Dlugosz-Lisiecka M (2019) Chemometric methods for source apportionment of 210Pb, 210Bi and 210Po for 10 years of urban air radioactivity monitoring in Lodz city, Poland. Chemosphere 220:163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.042
Dlugosz-Lisiecka M, Bem H (2012) Determination of the mean aerosol residence times in the atmosphere and additional 210Po input on the base of simultaneous determination of 7Be, 22Na, 210Pb, 210Bi and 210Po in urban air. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 293(1):135–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1690-5
Eikenberg J, Beer H, Jaggi M (2014) Determination of (210)Pb and (226)Ra/(228)Ra in continental water using HIDEX 300SL LS-spectrometer with TDCR efficiency tracing and optimized alpha/beta-discrimination. Appl Radiat Isot 93:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.02.021
El Afifi EM, Borai EH (2006) Performance characteristics of sequential separation and quantification of lead-210 and polonium-210 by ion exchange chromatography and nuclear spectrometric measurements. J Environ Qual 35(2):568–574. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0223
Fernández PL, Gómez J, Ródenas C (2012) Evaluation of uncertainty and detection limits in Pb and Po measurement in water by alpha spectrometry using Po spontaneous deposition onto a silver disk. Appl Radiat Isot 70(4):758–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.12.044
Fons-Castells J, Oliva J, Tent-Petrus J, Llaurado M (2017) Simultaneous determination of 226Ra, 228Ra and 210Pb in drinking water using 3M Empore RAD disk by LSC-PLS. Appl Radiat Isot 124:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.03.016
Franklin RL, Fávaro DIT, Damatto SR (2016) Trace metal and rare earth elements in a sediment profile from the Rio Grande Reservoir, Sao Paulo, Brazil: determination of anthropogenic contamination, dating, and sedimentation rates. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307(1):99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4107-4
Gimenez I, Rotger J, Apellaniz E, Bagan H, Tent J, Rigol A, Tarancon A (2023) A new method based on selective fluorescent polymers (PSresin) for the analysis of 90Sr in presence of 210Pb in environmental samples. Appl Radiat Isot 199:110879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110879
Godoy JM, Siciliano S, de Carvalho ZL, Tavares DC, de Moura JF, Godoy ML (2014) (210)Polonium and (210)lead content of marine birds from Southeastern Brazil. J Environ Radioact 135:108–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.04.008
Gogrewe D, Putz M, Weber R, Siemon K, Esterlund RA, Patzelt P (1996) Determination of Pb-210 via Bi-210 using a hydride generation technique combined with beta-spectrometry. Radiochimica Acta 73(2):105–110
Grabowski P, Bem H (2010) Determination of (210)Po and uranium in high salinity water samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286(2):455–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0720-4
Grabowski P, Dlugosz M, Szajerski P, Bem H (2010) A comparison of selected natural radionuclide concentrations in the thermal groundwater of Mszczonow and Cieplice with deep well water from Lodz city Poland. Nukleonika 55(2):181–185
Grate JW, O’Hara MJ, Egorov OB (2020) Chapter 11 - Automated radiochemical separation, analysis, and sensing. In: L’Annunziata MF (ed) Handbook of radioactivity analysis, vol 2, 4th edn. Academic Press, pp 821–872
Guerin N, Dai X (2014) Determination of 210Po in drinking water and urine samples using copper sulfide microprecipitation. Anal Chem 86(12):6026–6031. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac501164f
Guerin N, Dai X (2015) An emergency bioassay method for 210Po in urine. Appl Radiat Isot 103:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.06.013
Henricsson F, Ranebo Y, Holm E, Roos P (2011) Aspects on the analysis of 210Po. J Environ Radioact 102(5):415–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.09.010
Hou X, Roos P (2008) Critical comparison of radiometric and mass spectrometric methods for the determination of radionuclides in environmental, biological and nuclear waste samples. Anal Chim Acta 608(2):105–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2007.12.012
Huang X, & Zhu X (1981). Methods for the analysis of lead-210 in environmental samples Foreign Medicine (Part of Radiology) (03), 137–142
Huang Z, Wu Q, Tang Z, Cao Z, Yu Y, Chen G (2013) Rapid analysis of 210Pb nuclide activity in environment water. Nucl Technol 36(07):49–56
Hurtado-Bermudez S, Jurado-Gonzalez JA, Santos JL, Diaz-Amigo CF, Aparicio I, Mas JL, Alonso E (2018) Baseline activity concentration of 210Po and 210Pb and dose assessment in bivalve molluscs at the Andalusian coast. Mar Pollut Bull 133:711–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.034
Hurtado S, Villa-Alfageme M, Manjón G, García-Tenorio R (2007) A self-sufficient and general method for self-absorption correction in gamma-ray spectrometry using GEANT4. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 580(1):234–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.090
Hussain N, Kim G, Church TM, Carey W (1996) A simplified technique for gamma-spectrometric analysis of Pb-210 in sediment samples. Appl Radiat Isot 47(4):473–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-8043(95)00319-3
Iurian AR, Millward GE, Sima O, Taylor A, Blake W (2018) Self-attenuation corrections for Pb-210 in gamma-ray spectrometry using well and coaxial HPGe detectors. Appl Radiat Isot 134:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.06.048
Jia G (2018) Simultaneous determination of 210Po and 210Pb in solid samples: a new method for 210Pb determination. Appl Radiat Isot 137:12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.02.019
Jia G, Torri G (2007) Determination of 210Pb and 210Po in soil or rock samples containing refractory matrices. Appl Radiat Isot 65(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.05.007
Kanai Y (2013) High activity concentrations of 210Pb and 7Be in sediments and their histories. J Environ Radioact 124:44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.03.009
Kang C, Lee J, Lee KS (2021) Validated measurement of uranium in a human urine standard reference material by ICP-MS with the standard addition method. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 194(2–3):153–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab091
Khater AE, Bakr WF (2011) Technologically enhanced 210Pb and 210Po in iron and steel industry. J Environ Radioact 102(5):527–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.02.002
Kilic O, Belivermis M, Cotuk Y, Topcuoglu S (2014) Radioactivity concentrations in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) of Turkish Sea coast and contribution of 210Po to the radiation dose. Mar Pollut Bull 80(1–2):325–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.037
Kılıç Ö, Belivermiş M, Gözel F, Carvalho FP (2014) Radioactivity levels in mussels and sediments of the Golden Horn by the Bosphorus Strait Marmara Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 86(1–2):555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.033
Kim CK, Kim CS, Sansone U, Martin P (2008) Development and application of an on-line sequential injection system for the separation of Pu, 210Po and 210Pb from environmental samples. Appl Radiat Isot 66(2):223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.08.006
Kmak KN, Despotopulos JD, Shaughnessy DA (2017) Separation of Pb, Bi and Po by cation exchange resin. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 314(2):985–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5487-4
Kong X, Yin L, Ji Y (2021) Simultaneous determination of 210Pb and 210Po in seafood samples using liquid scintillation counting. J Environ Radioact 231:106553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106553
Kpeglo DO, Mantero J, Darko EO, Emi-Reynolds G, Akaho EH, Faanu A, Garcia-Tenorio R (2015) Radiological exposure assessment from soil, underground and surface water in communities along the coast of a shallow water offshore oilfield in Ghana. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 163(3):341–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu197
Kristensen JT, Hou XL (2023) A rapid method for determination of Po in soil and sediments without the use of HF. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 332(4):953–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08667-6
Krmar M, Radnovic D, Hansman J (2014) Correlation of unsupported Pb-210 activity in soil and moss. J Environ Radioact 129:23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.11.009
Lariviere D, Reiber KM, Evans RD, Cornett RJ (2005) Determination of Pb-210 at ultra-trace levels in water by ICP-MS. Anal Chim Acta 549(1–2):188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.06.020
Laureano-Perez L, Colle R, Fitzgerald R, Outola I, Pibida L (2007) A liquid-scintillation-based primary standardization of 210Pb. Appl Radiat Isot 65(12):1368–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.06.012
Lee HW, Chae JS (2023) Experimental optimization of physicochemical factors for spontaneous deposition of 210Po using newly designed deposition kit. Appl Radiat Isotopes 197:110835
Leggett RW (1993) An age-specific kinetic model of lead metabolism in humans. Environ Health Perspect 101(7):598–616. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.93101598
Li C, Feng Y, Chen J, Kiser S, Zhang W, Zhu J (2008) Pb-210 in home dust as a possible marker for radon exposure in indoor air. Health Phys 95(4):436–439. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000319040.06505.4a
Li Y, Geng XC, Yu HQ, Wan GJ (2011) Effects of the composition of standard reference material on the accuracy of determinations of 210Pb and 137Cs in soils with gamma spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot 69(2):516–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.10.023
Lluch E, Barrera J, Tarancon A, Bagan H, Garcia JF (2016) Analysis of Pb-210 in water samples with plastic scintillation resins. Anal Chim Acta 940:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.08.004
Lopez-Lorente AI, Pena-Pereira F, Pedersen-Bjergaard S, Zuin VG, Ozkan SA, Psillakis E (2022) The ten principles of green sample preparation. Trac-Trends Analyt Chem 148:116530
Lozano JC, Tome FV, Rodriguez PB, Prieto C (2010) A sequential method for the determination of 210Pb, 226Ra, and uranium and thorium radioisotopes by LSC and alpha-spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot 68(4–5):828–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.09.053
Mao W, Li B, Zhang L, Zhou W, Luo M (2018) Feasibility study about SPE analytical of 210Pb in aerosol. Admin Technique Environ Monit 30(04):50–53. https://doi.org/10.19501/j.cnki.1006-2009.20180715.004
Martinez-Ruiz F, Borrego E, Miguel EGS, Bolivar JP (2007) An efficiency calibration for Pb-210 and Be-7 measurements by gamma-ray spectrometry in atmospheric filters. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 580(1):663–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.117
Martinez J, de Los Cobos M, Penalver A, Tarancon A, Gimenez I, Bagan H, Borrull F (2023) Simultaneous determination of (210)Pb and (90)Sr and (210)Po isolation in sludge samples using a plastic scintillation resin. Appl Radiat Isot 192:110601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110601
Matisoff G (2014) Pb-210 as a tracer of soil erosion, sediment source area identification and particle transport in the terrestrial environment. J Environ Radioact 138:343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.03.008
Maxwell SL, McAlister DR, Sudowe R (2019) Novel rapid oxidizing fusion method to determine polonium-210 in air filters. Appl Radiat Isotopes 153:108833
May D, Nelson AN, Schultz MK (2017) Quantitation of lead-210 (210Pb) using lead-203 (203Pb) as a “Massless” yield tracer. J Environ Radioact 171:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.02.003
Meli MA, Cantaluppi C, Desideri D, Benedetti C, Feduzi L, Ceccotto F, Fasson A (2013) Radioactivity measurements and dosimetric evaluation in meat of wild and bred animals in central Italy. Food Control 30(1):272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.07.038
Meli MA, Desideri D, Roselli C, Feduzi L (2011) Analytical methods to determine Po-210 and Pb-210 in marine samples. Microchem J 99(2):273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2011.05.013
Melieres MA, Pourchet M, Richard S (2003) Surface air concentration and deposition of lead-210 in French Guiana: two years of continuous monitoring. J Environ Radioact 66(3):261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(02)00111-X
Mingote RM, Nogueira RA (2016) The use of statistical methods for censored data to evaluate the activity concentration of Pb-210 in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Environ Radioact 162:160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.05.018
Mola M, Avivar J, Nieto A, Penalver A, Aguilar C, Ferrer L, Borrull F (2014) Determination of 90Sr and 210Pb in sludge samples using a LOV-MSFIA system and liquid scintillation counting. Appl Radiat Isot 86:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.11.123
Moore HE, Martell EA, Poet SE (1976) Sources of polonium-210 in atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol 10(6):586–591. https://doi.org/10.1021/es60117a005
Muikku M, Heikkinen T, Solatie D, Vesterbacka P (2011) Natural variation in 210Po and 210Pb activity concentrations in the urine of Finnish population groups. Radiat Environ Biophys 50(4):531–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-011-0385-6
Narayana Y, Prakash V (2010) Enrichment and vertical profiles of 210Po and 210Pb in monazite areas of coastal Karnataka. Appl Radiat Isot 68(6):1137–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.01.018
Ostanova SV, Chubarov AV, Drozdov SV, Patrushev VV, Tatarenko AA (2002) Solubility of lead nitrate in aqueous solutions of nitric acid and zinc nitrate. Russ J Appl Chem 75(6):1024–1025. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020325821837
Pan LJ, Yu GB, Chen Z, Sheng LS, Xu XG (2018) A modified sampling preparation method for rapid determination of Pb-210 radioactivity in plants in China using crown ether and liquid scintillation counting of beta particles. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 317(1):565–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-5919-9
Peck GA, Smith JD (2000) Determination of Po and Pb in rainwater using measurement of Po and Bi. Anal Chim Acta 422(1):113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01053-9
Persson BR, Holm E (2014) 7Be, 210Pb, and 210Po in the surface air from the Arctic to Antarctica. J Environ Radioact 138:364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.01.008
Porto P, Walling DE, Cogliandro V, Callegari G (2016) Exploring the potential for using 210Pbex measurements within a re-sampling approach to document recent changes in soil redistribution rates within a small catchment in southern Italy. J Environ Radioact 164:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.06.026
Risticevic S, Niri VH, Vuckovic D, Pawliszyn J (2009) Recent developments in solid-phase microextraction. Anal Bioanal Chem 393(3):781–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2375-3
Rozmaric M, Rogic M, Benedik L, Strok M, Barisic D (2013) Seasonal and spatial variations of 210Po and 210Pb activity concentrations in Mytilus galloprovincialis from Croatian coast of the Adriatic Sea. Chemosphere 93(9):2063–2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.039
Schayer SR, Qu Q, Wang Y, Cohen BS (2010) 210Pb: a predictive biomarker of retrospective cigarette smoke exposure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(2):338–350. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1008
Schrag B, Uldin T, Mangin P, Froidevaux P (2012) Dating human skeletal remains using a radiometric method: biogenic versus diagenetic 90Sr and 210Pb in vertebrae. Forensic Sci Int 220(1–3):271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.014
Seiler RL, Stillings LL, Cutler N, Salonen L, Outola I (2011) Biogeochemical factors affecting the presence of Po-210 in groundwater. Appl Geochem 26(4):526–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.01.011
Sert E, Ugur A, Ozden B, Sac MM, Camgoz B (2011) Biomonitoring of Po-210 and Pb-210 using lichens and mosses around coal-fired power plants in Western Turkey. J Environ Radioact 102(6):535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.02.005
Sha L (2004) 210Pb in the environment. Radiat Prot Bull 2:14–17
Sima O (2000) Accurate calculation of total efficiency of Ge well-type detectors suitable for efficiency calibration using common standard sources. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 450(1):98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(00)00254-0
Skuterud L, Gwynn JP, Gaare E, Steinnes E, Hove K (2005) Sr-90, Po-210 and Pb-210 in lichen and reindeer in Norway. J Environ Radioact 84(3):441–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2005.04.016
Song L, Ma Y, Wang Y, Yang Y, Luo M, Dai X (2017) Method of polonium source preparation using tellurium microprecipitation for alpha spectrometry. Anal Chem 89(24):13651–13657. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04422
Stastna K, Fiala V, John J (2010) Preparation of samples for alpha-spectrometry by direct evaporation of extracted species. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286(3):735–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0733-z
Stojkovic I, Todorovic N, Nikolov J, Tenjovic B, Gadzuric S, Tot A, Vranes M (2020) 210Pb/210Bi detection in waters by Cherenkov counting - perspectives and new possibilities. Radiat Phys Chem 166:108474
Stojkovic I, Vranes M, Borovic TT, Todorovic N, Nikolov J, Zecevic M, Mancini S (2022) In search for an ionic liquid with the best performance during 210Pb/210Bi Cherenkov counting in waters on an LS counter. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(24):16563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416563
Strok M, Smodis B (2011) Levels of Po-210 and Pb-210 in fish and molluscs in Slovenia and the related dose assessment to the population. Chemosphere 82(7):970–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.075
Strok M, Smodis B, Mazej D (2016) Bi-210-from interference to advantage in Pb-210 determination with liquid scintillation counter. Appl Radiat Isot 109:296–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.12.049
Sussa FV, Damatto SR, Alencar MM, Mazzilli BP, Silva PS (2013) Natural radioactivity determination in samples of Peperomia pellucida commonly used as a medicinal herb. J Environ Radioact 116:148–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.09.012
Szarlowicz K (2019) Optimization of the radiochemical procedure of Po determination in small amounts of sediment samples. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(10):5735–5740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2156-2
Teramage MT, Onda Y, Wakiyama Y, Kato H, Kanda T, Tamura K (2015) Atmospheric Pb-210 as a tracer for soil organic carbon transport in a coniferous forest. Environ Sci Process Impacts 17(1):110–119. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4em00402g
Uddin S, Aba A, Bebhehani M (2015) Baseline concentration of Po-210 and Pb-210 in Sargassum from the northern Gulf. Mar Pollut Bull 90(1–2):330–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.09.029
Uddin S, Bebhehani M, Sajid S, Karam Q (2019) Concentration of 210Po and 210Pb in macroalgae from the northern Gulf. Mar Pollut Bull 145:474–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.06.056
UNSCEAR (1993) Source and effects of ionizing radiation. New York
Vajda N, LaRosa J, Zeisler R, Danesi P, KisBenedek G (1997) A novel technique for the simultaneous determination of Pb-210 and Po-210 using a crown ether. J Environ Radioact 37(3):355–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931x(95)00059-J
Vasile M, Loots H, Jacobs K, Verheyen L, Sneyers L, Verrezen F, Bruggeman M (2016) Determination of 210Pb, 210Po, 226Ra, 228Ra and uranium isotopes in drinking water in order to comply with the requirements of the EU Drinking Water Directive. Appl Radiat Isot 109:465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.11.076
Vesterbacka P, Ikäheimonen TK (2005) Optimization of 210Pb determination via spontaneous deposition of 210Po on a silver disk. Anal Chim Acta 545(2):252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.04.074
Villa-Alfageme M, Mas JL, Hurtado-Bermudez S, Masque P (2016) Rapid determination of (210)Pb and (210)Po in water and application to marine samples. Talanta 160:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.06.051
Vranes M, Stojkovic I, Tot A, Todorovic N, Nikolov J, Gadzuric S (2021) Scintillating and wavelength shifting effect investigation of 3-methylpiridinium salicylate and its application in LSC measurements. Appl Radiat Isot 172:109697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109697
Wallova G, Kandler N, Wallner G (2012) Monitoring of radionuclides in soil and bone samples from Austria. J Environ Radioact 107:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.12.007
Walsh S, Bond MJ, Guérin N, Blais JM, Rowan DJ (2023) A sensitive method to determine Po and Pb in environmental samples by alpha spectrometry using CuS micro-precipitation. Sci Rep 13(1):19754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46230-9
Wang S, Oakes KD, Bragg LM, Pawliszyn J, Dixon G, Servos MR (2011) Validation and use of in vivo solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) for the detection of emerging contaminants in fish. Chemosphere 85(9):1472–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.08.035
Wang Y, Ma Y, Dai X (2019) Direct analysis of 210Pb in drinking water by liquid scintillation counting after sulfate precipitation. J Environ Radioact 201:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.018
Yamamoto M, Sakaguchi A, Tomita J, Imanaka T, Shiraishi K (2009) Measurements of Po-210 and Pb-210 in total diet samples: estimate of dietary intakes of Po-210 and Pb-210 for Japanese. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 279(1):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-007-7198-8
Yang H, Battarbee RW, Turner SD, Rose NL, Derwent RG, Wu G, Yang R (2010) Historical reconstruction of mercury pollution across the Tibetan Plateau using lake sediments. Environ Sci Technol 44(8):2918–2924. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9030408
Yang HD, Appleby PG (2016) Use of lead-210 as a novel tracer for lead (Pb) sources in plants. Sci Rep 6:21707. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21707
Yang WF, Huang YP, Chen M, Qiu YS, Li HB, Zhang L (2011) Carbon and nitrogen cycling in the Zhubi coral reef lagoon of the South China Sea as revealed by Po-210 and Pb-210. Mar Pollut Bull 62(5):905–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.02.058
Younes A, Alliot C, Mokili B, Deniaud D, Montavon G, Champion J (2017) Solvent extraction of polonium(IV) with tributylphosphate (TBP). Solvent Extr Ion Exch 35(2):77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2017.1279917
Zhang Y, Xu B (2023) Fidelity of the 210Pb dating method, a subaquatic sediment perspective. Sci Total Environ 871:161972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161972
Zhong Q, Wang X, Wang Q, Zhang F, Li L, Wang Y, Du J (2020) 222Rn, 210Pb and 210Po in coastal zone groundwater: activities, geochemical behaviors, consideration of seawater intrusion effect, and the potential radiation human-health risk. Appl Radiat Isot 166:109386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109386
Zhou Y, Gu X, Fan G, Ma Q, Guo Q, & Zou H (2004). Application of microwave digestion in analytical chemistry Metallurgical analysis (02), 30–36
Zhou Z, Ren H, Zhou L, Wang P, Lou X, Zou H, Cao Y (2022) Recent development on determination of low-level 90Sr in environmental and biological samples: a review. Molecules 28(1):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010090
Funding
This work was supported by the Zhejiang Health Science and Technology Plan (No. 2021KY613, 2022RC120, 2022KY130, 2022KY132, 2023KY643), Project of South Zhejiang Institute of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Technology (No. ZFY-2021-K-003, ZFY-2022-K-001, ZFY-2022-K-006), and Zhejiang Province Key Research and Development Project (No. 2024C03229).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Hong Ren: writing—original draft, investigation, funding acquisition. Xinyu Gong: writing—original draft, investigation. Lei Zhou: investigation, formal analysis. Peng Wang: funding acquisition, investigation. Yiyao Cao: writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors approved the final version of this manuscript for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Georg Steinhauser
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, H., Gong, X., Zhou, L. et al. Recent progresses in analytical method development for 210Pb in environmental and biological samples. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 31664–31678 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33272-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33272-3