Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Edible packaging as sustainable alternative to synthetic plastic: a comprehensive review

  • Addressing the Nexus: "Revolutionizing the Food Processing Technology: Cutting-edge Innovations to Reduce Environmental Impact"
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The choice of an appropriate packaging materials enhances the shelf life and improves quality of food during transportation, storage, and distribution. Development and innovations in food packaging systems have become essential in the food industry. Most widely used packaging materials are non-biodegradable plastics and are harmful to environment and human health. Thus, food industry is replacing non-biodegradable plastics with biodegradable plastics to reduce environmental pollution, health hazards, and food waste. Edible packaging may reduce food waste and keep perishables fresh. This review article compares edible packaging materials to synthetic ones and discusses their pollution-reducing effects. The several types of food packaging discussed in the review include those produced from polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and composite films. The various characteristics of edible packaging are reviewed, including its barrier qualities, carrier properties, mechanical capabilities, and edibility. The carrier properties describe the capacity to transport and manage the release of active substances, and the edibility indicates acceptance of these items by the customers. Plasticizers, antimicrobials, antioxidants, and emulsifiers were included in the edible packaging to enhance the characteristics of the film. The development and implementation of edible packaging on food products from the laboratory to large-scale industrial levels, as well as their potential industrial applications in the dairy, meat, confectionary, poultry, fish, fruit, and vegetable processing sectors are addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Department of Food Technology and Nutrition, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India, and Department of Food Processing Technology, Ghani Khan Choudhury Institute of Engineering and Technology, Narayanpur, Malda, West Bengal, for conducting this review. No public, commercial, or nonprofit funding organization provided a specific grant for conducting this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: RS, KKD. Writing–original draft: SFA, RS, KKD. Writing review and editing: SFA, RS, KKD. Supervision: RS, KKD. All authors were involved in the preparation of the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kshirod Kumar Dash.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

Corresponding and all the co-authors are willing to participate in this manuscript.

Consent for publication

All authors are willing for publication of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdulla, S.F., Shams, R. & Dash, K.K. Edible packaging as sustainable alternative to synthetic plastic: a comprehensive review. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32806-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32806-z

Keywords

Navigation