Abstract
In light of the integration of digitalization and the energy revolution, digitalization can be integrated into the energy industry to develop energy-saving technologies and improve resource allocation efficiency. On the basis of 2013–2019 Chinese provincial panel data, this paper measures the level of green energy efficiency based on the super-EBM-DEA model and analyzes the linear relationship, nonlinear relationship, and potential mechanism between digitalization and green energy efficiency. The findings indicate that (1) overall, both China’s digitalization and green energy efficiency formed a steady upward trajectory during the sample period. Digitalization showed a spatial characteristic of extending and spreading from the eastern region to the central and western regions. Green energy efficiency was characterized by obvious regional heterogeneity. (2) Progress in digitalization has a significant driving effect on green energy efficiency. Subdimensional analysis shows that this driving effect mainly comes from digital development and digital transactions. (3) The impact of digitalization on green energy efficiency presents a threshold effect of economic agglomeration (with a threshold of 0.0257 and a marginally increasing, positive driving trend) and population agglomeration (with a threshold of 4.2750 and a marginally decreasing, positive driving trend). (4) Decomposing changes in green energy efficiency into scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency, this study shows that pure technical efficiency gains due to digitalization are the main driver of green energy efficiency improvements. Finally, some specific policy recommendations are proposed.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-32577-7/MediaObjects/11356_2024_32577_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-32577-7/MediaObjects/11356_2024_32577_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-32577-7/MediaObjects/11356_2024_32577_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-32577-7/MediaObjects/11356_2024_32577_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-32577-7/MediaObjects/11356_2024_32577_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-32577-7/MediaObjects/11356_2024_32577_Fig6_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during the current study are presented in this article. Raw data will be accessible from the corresponding author if required.
References
Afonasova MA, Panfilova EE, Galichkina MA et al (2019) Digitalization in economy and innovation: the effect on social and economic processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies 19. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.02
Barefoot K, Curtis D, Jolliff W et al (2018) Defining and measuring the digital economy. US Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis 15.
Bastida L, Cohen JJ, Kollmann A et al (2019) Exploring the role of ICT on household behavioural energy efficiency to mitigate global warming. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 103:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.004
Borozan D (2018) Technical and total factor energy efficiency of European regions: a two-stage approach. Energy 152:521e32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.159
Chen X, Gong X, Li D et al (2019) Can information and communication technology reduce CO2 emission? A quantile regression analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(32):32977–32992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06380-8
Chen Z, Song P, Wang B (2021) Carbon emissions trading scheme, energy efficiency and rebound effect–evidence from China’s provincial data. Energy Policy 157:112507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112507
Cheng Z, Liu J, Li L et al (2020) Research on meta-frontier total-factor energy efficiency and its spatial convergence in Chinese provinces. Energy Economics 86:104702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104702
Cheng G, Qian Z (2011) An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA-An alternative method for the affinity index.
Czernich N, Falck O, Kretschmer T, Woessmann L (2011) Broadband infrastructure and economic growth. Econ J 121(552):505–532
Dakwale VA, Ralegaonkar RV, Mandavgane S (2011) Improving environmental performance of building through increased energy efficiency: a review. Sustain Cities Soc 1(4):211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2011.07.007
Ding Y, Zhang H, Tang S (2021) How does the digital economy affect the domestic value-added rate of Chinese exports? J Global Inform Manag 29(5):71–85
Dong F, Wang Y, Zheng L, Li J, Xie S (2020) Can industrial agglomeration promote pollution agglomeration? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 246:118960
Dou Q, Gao X (2022) The double-edged role of the digital economy in firm green innovation: micro-evidence from Chinese manufacturing industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20435-3
Fan Y, Liao H, Wei YM (2007) Can market oriented economic reforms contribute to energy efficiency improvement? Evid From China Energy Policy 35(4):2287–2295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.07.011
Farla JCM, Blok K (2000) Energy efficiency and structural change in the Netherlands, 1980–1995: influence of energy efficiency, dematerialization, and economic structure on national energy consumption. J Ind Ecol 4(1):93–117. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819800569203
Fujita M, Krugman P (2004) The new economic geography: past, present and the future. Fifty years of regional science 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07223-3_6
Gao C, Sun M, Shen B et al (2014) Optimization of China’s energy structure based on portfolio theory. Energy 77:890–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.075
Han F, Xie R, Fang J et al (2018) The effects of urban agglomeration economies on carbon emissions: evidence from Chinese cities. J Clean Prod 172:1096–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.273
Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. J Econ 93(2):345–368
Hao Y, Li Y, Guo Y, Chai J, Yang C, Wu H (2022) Digitalization and electricity consumption: does internet development contribute to the reduction in electricity intensity in China? Energy Policy 164:112912
Hermoso-Orzáez MJ, García-Alguacil M, Terrados-Cepeda J, Brito P (2020) Measurement of environmental efficiency in the countries of the European Union with the enhanced data envelopment analysis method (DEA) during the period 2005–2012. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:15691–15715
Hu X, Guo P (2022) A spatial effect study on digital economy affecting the green total factor productivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22168-9
Iqbal J, Khan M, Talha M, Farman H, Jan B, Muhammad A, Khattak HA (2018) A generic Internet of Things architecture for controlling electrical energy consumption in smart homes. Sustain Cities Soc 43:443–450
Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities [M]. Vintage
Jia P, Li K, Shao S (2018) Choice of technological change for China’s low-carbon development: evidence from three urban agglomerations. J Environ Manage 1:1308–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.052
Jiang H, Hua M, Zhang J et al (2020) Sustainability efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in China: a data envelopment analysis based on cluster benchmarking. J Clean Prod 244:118729
Kofi EB (2019) Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy 135:111002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111002
Konishi H (2000) Formation of hub cities: transportation cost advantage and population agglomeration. J Urban Econ 48(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1999.2150
Krugman P (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am Econ Rev 70(5):950–959
Li L (2015) Dynamic evolution, regional disparity and cause identification of energy performance in China: based on a new total factor energy productivity change index. Management World 11:40–52. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2015.11.008
Li G (2019a) Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecological total-factor energy efficiency and their drivers in China at the prefecture level. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(18):3480
Li H (2019) The theoretical mechanism, practical basis and policy choice of big data to promote the high quality development of China’s economy. Economist 03:52–59. https://doi.org/10.16158/j.cnki.51-1312/f.2019.03.007
Li X (2019c) New features and the formation mechanism of new growth drivers of digital economy. Reform 11:40–51
Li Z, Liu Y (2021) Research on the spatial distribution pattern and influencing factors of digital economy development in China. Ieee Access 9:63094–63106
Li P, Wang X (2022) Research on the impact of energy internet construction on energy efficiency in high energy-consuming industries: based on inter-provincial panel data from 2014 to 2018. Science and Technology Management Research 42(01):186–192
Li Y, Yang X, Ran Q, Wu H, Irfan M, Ahmad M (2021) Energy structure, digital economy, and carbon emissions: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:64606–64629
Li J, Chen L, Chen Y, He J (2022a) Digital economy, technological innovation, and green economic efficiency—empirical evidence from 277 cities in China. Manag Decis Econ 43(3):616–629
Li X, Li J, Yuan C, Guo S, Wang Z (2022) Digital talents. In: Development practice of digital business environment in China. Singapore:107–124.
Liang L, Yang F, Cook WD, Zhu J (2006) DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Ann Oper Res 145:35–49
Lin B, Wang X, Du Z (2021) Impact of environmental regulation on China’s industrial energy efficiency: an empirical study based on the data of micro-enterprises. Journal of Xiamen University (arts & Social Sciences) 04:30–42. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0438-0460.2021.04.004
Liu Y, Lu M, Xiang K (2018) Balance through agglomeration: a race between geography and policy in China’s regional development. Chin World Econ 26(6):72–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12262
Liu J, Yang Y, Zhang S (2020) Research on the measurement and driving factors of China’s digital economy. Shanghai J Econ 06:81–96. https://doi.org/10.19626/j.cnki.cn31-1163/f.2020.06.008
Liu H, Zhang Z, Zhang T, Wang L (2020b) Revisiting China’s provincial energy efficiency and its influencing factors. Energy 208:118361
Liu Y, Yang Y, Li H et al (2022) Digital economy development, industrial structure upgrading and green total factor productivity: empirical evidence from China’s cities. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(4):2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042414
Liu S, Miao Y, Lu G, Wang J (2023) How digital economy and technological innovation can achieve a virtuous cycle with the ecological environment? Environment, Development and Sustainability 1–25.
Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. MacMillan, London
Morikawa M (2012) Population density and efficiency in energy consumption: an empirical analysis of service establishments. Energy Economics 34(5):1617–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.01.004
Murtishaw S, Schipper L (2001) Disaggregated analysis of US energy consumption in the1990s: evidence of the effects of the internet and rapid economic growth. Energy Policy 29(15):1335–1356
Myovella G, Karacuka M, Haucap J (2020) Digitalization and economic growth: a comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy 44(2):101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856
Nachum L, Keeble D (1999) Neo-Marshallian nodes, global networks and firm competitiveness: the media cluster of central London. Department of Applied Economics 6373. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.443.6373&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Otsuka A (2018) Population agglomeration and residential energy consumption: evidence from Japan. Sustainability 10(2):469. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020469
Otsuka A (2020) How do population agglomeration and interregional networks improve energy efficiency? Asia-Pac J Regional Sci 4(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-019-00126-7
Pan X, Guo S, Han C et al (2020) Influence of FDI quality on energy efficiency in China based on seemingly unrelated regression method. Energy 192:116463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116463
Parrerson MG (1996) What is energy efficiency?: Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy 24(5):377–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(96)00017-1
Pei C, Ni J, Li Y (2018) Approach digital economy from the perspective of political economics. Finance Trade Econ 39(09):5–22. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-8102.2018.09.001
Porter ME (1997) Competitive strategy. Meas Bus Excell 1(2):12–17
Qiu Y, Jia S, Liao J, Yang X (2022) Evaluation of urban high quality development level based on entropy weight-TOPSIS two step method. J Econ Anal 1(2):50–65
Ren S, Hao Y, Xu L et al (2021) Digitalization and energy: how does internet development affect China’s energy consumption? Energy Econ 98:105220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105220
Ren S, Li L, Han Y, Hao Y, Wu H (2022) The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: does digital economy agglomeration work? Bus Strateg Environ 31(4):1656–1678
Şahin M (2021) A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy. Int J Environ Sci Technol 18(6):1591–1616
Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ling CH et al (2014) Causality between trade openness and energy consumption: what causes what in high, middle and low income countries. Energy Policy 70:126–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.029
Shan H (2008) Reestimating the capital stock of China: 1952–2006. J Quant Tech Econ 25(10):17–31
Smith M E (2019) Energized crowding and the generative role of settlement aggregation and urbanization. Albany: State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5acfw
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2012) DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models. Energy Econ 34(6):1854–1863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.008
Sun H, Edziah BK, Kporsu AK et al (2021) Energy efficiency: the role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 167:120659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120659
Sun X, Chen Z, Shi T, Yang G, Yang X (2022) Influence of digital economy on industrial wastewater discharge: evidence from 281 Chinese prefecture-level cities. J Water Clim Change 13(2):593–606
Tang J, Cui W (2021) Does urban agglomeration affect innovation convergence: evidence from China. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2021.1973896
Tone K, Tsutsui M (2010) An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA—a third pole of technical efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 207(3):1154–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.07.014
Tranos E, Kitsos T, Ortega-Argilés R (2021) Digital economy in the UK: regional productivity effects of early adoption. Reg Stud 55(12):1924–1938. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1826420
Wang H, Wang M (2020) Effects of technological innovation on energy efficiency in China: evidence from dynamic panel of 284 cities. Sci Total Environ 709:136172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136172
Wang J, Dong K, Dong X, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2022a) Assessing the digital economy and its carbon-mitigation effects: the case of China. Energy Economics 113:106198
Wang J, Dong X, Dong K (2022b) How digital industries affect China’s carbon emissions? Analysis of the direct and indirect structural effects. Technol Soc 68:101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101911
Wu H, Hao Y, Ren S et al (2021) Does internet development improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence China Energy Policy 153:112247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112247
Xin Y, Chang X, Zhu J (2022) How does the digital economy affect energy efficiency? Empirical research on Chinese cities. Energy Environ 0958305X221143411.
Xu M, Tan R, He X (2022a) How does economic agglomeration affect energy efficiency in China?: Evidence from endogenous stochastic frontier approach. Energy Econ 108:105901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.10590
Xu Q, Zhong M, Cao M (2022b) Does digital investment affect carbon efficiency? Spatial effect and mechanism discussion. Sci Total Environ 827:154321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154321
Xue Y, Tang C, Wu H, Liu J, Hao Y (2022) The emerging driving force of energy consumption in China: does digital economy development matter? Energy Policy 165:112997
Yan Y, Huang J (2022) The role of population agglomeration played in China’s carbon intensity: a city-level analysis. Energy Econ 106276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106276
Zafar S Z, Zhilin Q, Malik H et al (2021). Spatial spillover effects of technological innovation on total factor energy efficiency: taking government environment regulations into account for three continents. Business Process Management J 0550. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2020-0550
Zhang B (2000) A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25(12):1149–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00039-6
Zhang M, Su B (2016) Assessing China’s rural household energy sustainable development using improved grouped principal component method. Energy 113:509–514
Zhang J, Lyu Y, Li Y, Geng Y (2022) Digital economy: an innovation driving factor for low-carbon development. Environ Impact Assess Rev 96:106821
Zhao P et al (2021) China’s transportation sector carbon dioxide emissions efficiency and its influencing factors based on the EBM DEA model with undesirable outputs and spatial Durbin model. Energy 238:121934
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Econ 30(1):1–14
Funding
This work was supported by Xinjiang Key Research Project for Sustainable Development of History, Culture and Tourism (Grant number [LY2020-03]) and Xinjiang Department of Commerce Key Project (Grant number [XJSW2020-09]).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Bing Chen, Kun Wang, Yuhong Li, and Weilong Wang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Kun Wang, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This is an original article that did not use other information that requires ethical approval.
Consent to participate
All authors participated in this article.
Consent for publication
All authors have given consent to the publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, B., Wang, K., Li, Y. et al. Can digitalization effectively promote green energy efficiency? The linear and nonlinear relationship analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 23055–23076 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32577-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32577-7