Abstract
The paper examines how digital finance affects energy efficiency in China using a dynamic panel model and data from 282 cities between 2011 and 2019. The study is based on the hypothesis which is related with digital finance, environmental regulation, and energy efficiency. The results indicate that: (1) Digital finance significantly improves energy efficiency, and this finding is consistent after several tests; (2) Digital finance has a positive effect on energy efficiency in non-resource-based cities, recession and regeneration resource-based cities, and old industrial base cities, but no significant effect on energy efficiency in growth and maturity resource-based cities and non-old industrial base cities; (3) Environmental regulation positively influences how digital finance affects energy efficiency; (4) The impact of digital finance on energy efficiency depends on the degree and tools of environmental regulation. This research offers valuable insights to local governments in China for promoting financial digitization and enhancing energy efficiency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
Notes
Data source: World Bank https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?+locations=CN.
Data is obtained and calculated from the Statistical Review of World Energy 2023 published by the Energy Institute.
References
Bashir MA, Sheng B, Dogan B, Sarwar S, Shahzad U (2020) Export product diversification and energy efficiency: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Struct Change Econ Dynam 55:232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.09.002
Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econometrics 87:115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8
Bond SR (2002) Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice. Port Econ J 1:141–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9
Bu CQ, Zhang KX, Shi DQ, Wang SY (2022) Does environmental information disclosure improve energy efficiency? Energy Policy 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112919
Cao SP, Nie L, Sun HP, Sun WF, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2021) Digital finance, green technological innovation and energy-environmental performance: evidence from China’s regional economies. J Clean Prod 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129458
Chang JQ, Xu XH (2022) Network structure of urban digital financial technology and its impact on the risk of commercial banks. Electron Res Arch 30:4740–4762. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2022240
Chen B, Zhao CK (2021) Poverty reduction in rural China: does the digital finance matter? PloS One 16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261214
Chen YF, Liu YN (2021) How biased technological progress sustainably improve the energy efficiency: an empirical research of manufacturing industry in China. Energy 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120823
Chu LK, Ghosh S, Dogan B, Nguyen NH, Shahbaz M (2023) Energy security as new determinant of renewable energy: the role of economic complexity in top energy users. Energy 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125799
Cui SN, Wang YQ, Zhu ZW, Zhu ZH, Yu CY (2022) The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulation on the energy eco-efficiency of China’s energy-mineral cities. J Clean Prod 350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131553
Curtis EM, Lee JM (2019) When do environmental regulations backfire? Onsite industrial electricity generation, energy efficiency and policy instruments. J Environ Econ Manage 96:174–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.04.004
Dabbous A, Tarhini A (2021) Does sharing economy promote sustainable economic development and energy efficiency? Evidence from OECD countries. J Innov Knowl 6:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.11.001
Das S, Chatterjee A (2023) Impacts of ICT and digital finance on poverty and income inequality: a sub-national study from India. Inform Technol Dev 29:378–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2151556
Dirckinck-Holmfeld K (2015) The options of local authorities for addressing climate change and energy efficiency through environmental regulation of companies. J Clean Prod 98:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.067
Dogan B, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Nasir MA (2020) European commitment to COP21 and the role of energy consumption, FDI, trade and economic complexity in sustaining economic growth. J Environ Manage 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111146
Dogan B, Chu LK, Ghosh S, Truong HHD, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022a) How environmental taxes and carbon emissions are related in the G7 economies? Renew Energy 187:645–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.077
Dogan B, Ferraz D, Gupta M, Huynh TLD, Shahzadi I (2022b) Exploring the effects of import diversification on energy efficiency: evidence from the OECD economies. Renew Energy 189:639–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.018
Dogan B, Ghosh S, Hoang DP, Chu LK (2022c) Are economic complexity and eco-innovation mutually exclusive to control energy demand and environmental quality in E7 and G7 countries? Technology in Society 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101867
Dogan B, Trabelsi N, Tiwari AK, Ghosh S (2023) Dynamic dependence and causality between crude oil, green bonds, commodities, geopolitical risks, and policy uncertainty. Q Rev Econ Finance 89:36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2023.02.006
Du KR, Cheng YY, Yao X (2021) Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: the road to the green transformation of Chinese cities. Energy Econ 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105247
Feng SL, Chong Y, Li GX, Zhang SB (2022) Digital finance and innovation inequality: evidence from green technological innovation in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:87884–87900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21826-2
Friedrich RJ (1982) In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. Am J Polit Sci 26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110973
Fu ZT, Zhou YJ, Li WF, Zhong KY (2023) Impact of digital finance on energy efficiency: empirical findings from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:2813–2835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22320-5
Gao D, Li G, Li Y, Gao KX (2022a) Does FDI improve green total factor energy efficiency under heterogeneous environmental regulation? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:25665–25678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17771-1
Gao D, Li G, Yu JY (2022b) Does digitization improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from Chinese 213 cities. Energy 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123395
Ghosh S, Adebayo TS, Abbas S, Dogan B, Sarkodie SA (2023) Harnessing the roles of renewable energy, high tech industries, and financial globalization for environmental sustainability: evidence from newly industrialized economies. Natural Resources Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12356
Guo F, Wang J, Wang F, Kong T, Zhang X, Cheng Z (2020) Measuring China’s digital financial inclusion: index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly 19:1401–1418
Guo LL, Qu Y, Tseng ML (2017) The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. J Clean Prod 162:894–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.210
Guo R, Yuan YJ (2020) Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on energy efficiency in the industrial sector: evidence from Chinese provincial data. Energy Policy 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111747
Haini H (2021) The evolution of China’s modern economy and its implications on future growth. Post-Communist Economies 33:795–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1793610
Han F, Xie R, Fang JY (2018) Urban agglomeration economies and industrial energy efficiency. Energy 162:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.163
Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. J Econometrics 93:345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(99)00025-1
Hao Y, Guo YX, Wu HT (2022) The role of information and communication technology on green total factor energy efficiency: does environmental regulation work? Bus Strateg Environ 31:403–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2901
Honma S, Hu JL (2008) Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan. Energy Policy 36:821–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.026
Hui X (2021) Digital inclusive finance and urban green total factor productivity: an empirical evidence of 278 cities in China. South China Financ:20–31
Jiang YL, Guo C, Wu YY (2022) Does digital finance improve the green investment of Chinese listed heavily polluting companies? The perspective of corporate financialization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:71047–71063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20803-z
Kneller R, Manderson E (2012) Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. Resource Energy Econ 34:211–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.12.001
Kremer S, Bick A, Nautz D (2013) Inflation and growth: new evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis. Empirical Econ 44:861–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0553-9
Li B, Wu SS (2017) Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 153:342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.042
Li G, Wu H, Jiang J, Zong Q (2023) Digital finance and the low-carbon energy transition (LCET) from the perspective of capital-biased technical progress. Energy Econ 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106623
Li J, Wu Y, Xiao JJ (2020) The impact of digital finance on household consumption: evidence from China. Econ Modelling 86:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.027
Li K, Lin BQ (2018) How to promote energy efficiency through technological progress in China? Energy 143:812–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.047
Li R, Ramanathan R (2018) Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 196:1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.132
Li W, Pang W (2023) Digital inclusive finance, financial mismatch and the innovation capacity of small and medium-sized enterprises: evidence from Chinese listed companies. Heliyon 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13792
Lin XY, Zhu XP, Han YM, Geng ZQ, Liu L (2020) Economy and carbon dioxide emissions effects of energy structures in the world: evidence based on SBM-DEA model. Sci Total Environ 729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138947
Liu BL, Wang JX, Li RYM, Peng L, Mi LL (2022a) Achieving carbon neutrality - the role of heterogeneous environmental regulations on urban green innovation. Front Ecol Evol 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.923354
Liu LJ, Jiang JY, Bian JC, Liu YZ, Lin GH, Yin YK (2021a) Are environmental regulations holding back industrial growth? Evidence from China. J clean Prod 306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127007
Liu S, Koster S, Chen X (2022b) Digital divide or dividend? The impact of digital finance on the migrants’ entrepreneurship in less developed regions of China. Cities 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103896
Liu Y, Luan L, Wu WL, Zhang ZQ, Hsu Y (2021b) Can digital financial inclusion promote China’s economic growth? Int Rev Financ Anal 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101889
Liu Y, Xiong RC, Lv SG, Gao D (2022c) The impact of digital finance on green total factor energy efficiency: evidence at China’s city level. Energies 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155455
Lu L (2018) Promoting SME finance in the context of the fintech revolution: a case study of the UK’s practice and regulation. Bank Financ Law Rev 33:317–343
Lv YL, Chen W, Cheng JQ (2020) Effects of urbanization on energy efficiency in China: new evidence from short run and long run efficiency models. Energy Policy 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111858
Mardani A, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D, Jusoh A, Khoshnoudi M (2017) A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:1298–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.030
Meng M, Qu DL (2022) Understanding the green energy efficiencies of provinces in China: a super-SBM and GML analysis. Energy 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121912
Ozili PK (2018) Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Rev 18:329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003
Ozturk I, Ullah S (2022) Does digital financial inclusion matter for economic growth and environmental sustainability in OBRI economies? An empirical analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106489
Pan X, Ai B, Li C, Pan X, Yan Y (2019) Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China. Technol Forecast Soc Change 144:428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.012
Paramati SR, Shahzad U, Dogan B (2022) The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111735
Payne JE, Truong HHD, Chu LK, Dogan B, Ghosh S (2023) The effect of economic complexity and energy security on measures of energy efficiency: evidence from panel quantile analysis. Energy Policy 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113547
Proskuryakova L, Kovalev A (2015) Measuring energy efficiency: is energy intensity a good evidence base? Appl Energy 138:450–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.060
Qu F, Xu L, Chen YF (2022) Can market-based environmental regulation promote green technology innovation? Evidence from China. Front Env Sci-Switz 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.823536
Rao SY, Pan Y, He JN, Shangguan XM (2022) Digital finance and corporate green innovation: quantity or quality? Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:56772–56791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19785-9
Ren SG, Li XL, Yuan BL, Li DY, Chen XH (2018) The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency: a cross-region analysis in China. J Clean Prod 173:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.113
Roodman D (2009) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J 9:86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900106
Scott SV, Van Reenen J, Zachariadis M (2017) The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: an empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services. Research Policy 46:984–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.010
Stanko MA, Henard DH (2017) Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation. Research Policy 46:784–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.003
Sun HP, Edziah BK, Sun CW, Kporsu AK (2022a) Institutional quality and its spatial spillover effects on energy efficiency. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101023
Sun LL, Cui HJ, Ge QS (2022b) Will China achieve its 2060 carbon neutral commitment from the provincial perspective? Adv Clim Chang Res 13:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2022.02.002
Tang HL, Liu JM, Wu JG (2020) The impact of command-and-control environmental regulation on enterprise total factor productivity: a quasi-natural experiment based on China’s “Two Control Zone” policy. J Clean Prod 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120011
Wang G, Zhang K, Liu J (2021) Study on the impact and mechanism of different regulatory tools on green development efficiency. Ecol Econ 37:130–135
Wang M, Feng C (2021) The win-win ability of environmental protection and economic development during China’s transition. Technol Forecast Soc Change 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120617
Wei ZX, Han BT, Pan XZ, Shahbaz M, Zafar MW (2020) Effects of diversified openness channels on the total-factor energy efficiency in China’s manufacturing sub-sectors: evidence from trade and FDI spillovers. Energy Econ 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104836
Wu R, Lin B (2022) Environmental regulation and its influence on energy-environmental performance: evidence on the Porter hypothesis from China’s iron and steel industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105954
Wu Y, Liu Y, Zhang M (2023) How does digital finance affect energy efficiency?—Characteristics, mechanisms, and spatial effects. Sustainability 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097071
Wu YL, Huang SL (2022) The effects of digital finance and financial constraint on financial performance: firm-level evidence from China’s new energy enterprises. Energy Econ 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106158
Xiong SQ, Ma XM, Ji JP (2019) The impact of industrial structure efficiency on provincial industrial energy efficiency in China. J Clean Prod 215:952–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.095
Xu G, Liu Z, Jiang Z (2006) Decomposition model and empirical study of carbon emissions for China, 1995-2004. China Popul Resour Environ 16: 158-161.
Yang HC, Xu XZ, Zhang FM (2022) Industrial co-agglomeration, green technological innovation, and total factor energy efficiency. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:62475–62494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20078-4
Zhang XH, Bao KY, Liu ZB, Yang L (2022) Digital finance, industrial structure, and total factor energy efficiency: a study on moderated mediation model with resource dependence. Sustainability 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214718
Zhang Y, Xiong Y, Li F, Cheng J, Yue X (2020) Environmental regulation, capital output and energy efficiency in China: an empirical research based on integrated energy prices. Energy Policy 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111826
Zhang Y, Song Y (2021) Environmental regulations, energy and environment efficiency of China’s metal industries: a provincial panel data analysis. J Clean Prod 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124437
Zhao HL, Lin BQ (2020) Impact of foreign trade on energy efficiency in China’s textile industry. J Clean Prod 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118878
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YZ was responsible for the methodology, software, analysis, writing, review, and editing; MZ was responsible for the resources, investigation, data curation, and analysis. HH was responsible for the analysis, review, and editing. YL was responsible for the software and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhuang, Y., Zhang, M., Hou, H. et al. Impacts of digital finance on energy efficiency: does environmental regulation matter?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 23839–23857 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-31916-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-31916-y