Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of land use planning under multi-objective demand—the case of Changchun City, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling and scenario analysis are the core elements of land use change research, and in the face of the increasingly serious ecological and environmental problems in urbanization, it is important to carry out land use simulation studies under different protection constraints for scientific planning and policy formulation. Taking Changchun City, the capital of Jilin Province, a pilot national eco-province, as an example, a CLUE-S model with coupled landscape ecological security patterns was constructed to predict and simulate the land use structure and layout under multi-objective optimization scenarios in the planning target year (2030), and the results were analyzed based on landscape index evaluation. The study found the following: (i) the proportion of ecological land area under low, medium, and high security levels in the study area was 8.7%, 64.8%, and 26.5%, respectively; (ii) under the current development trend scenario, the trend of increasing fragmentation of cultivated land patches in Changchun in 2030 will remain unchanged, with construction land spreading along the periphery in a compact and continuous pattern, while ecological land will be seriously encroached upon; and (iii) in the 2030 multi-objective optimization scenario, land use patches of all types will begin to show a tendency to cluster, with less landscape fragmentation and more connectivity, while cultivated land and construction land will also begin to converge and do not deteriorate as a result of spatial conflicts over ecological land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Aburas MM, Ahamad MSS, Omar NQ (2019) Spatio-temporal simulation and prediction of land-use change using conventional and machine learning models: a review. Environ Monit Assess 191(4):205

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydın A, Eker R (2022) Future land use/land cover scenarios considering natural hazards using Dyna-CLUE in Uzungöl Nature Conservation Area (Trabzon-NE Türkiye). Nat Hazards 114(3):2683–2707

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacău S, Domingo D, Palka G, Pellissier L, Kienast F (2022) Integrating strategic planning intentions into land-change simulations: designing and assessing scenarios for Bucharest. Sustain Cities Soc 76:103446

  • Bai L, Xiu C, Feng X, Liu D (2019) Influence of urbanization on regional habitat quality: a case study of Changchun City. Habitat Int 93:102042

  • Bullock A, King B (2011) Evaluating China’s slope land conversion program as sustainable management in Tianquan and Wuqi Counties. J Environ Manage 92(8):1916–1922

    Google Scholar 

  • Charif O, Omrani H, Abdallah F, Pijanowski B (2017) A multi-label cellular automata model for land change simulation. Transactions in GIS 21(6):1298–1320

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Lu X, Hu W, Zhang C, Lin Y (2021) How urban sprawl influences eco-environmental quality: empirical research in China by using the Spatial Durbin model. Ecol Indic 131:108113

  • Chen P, Shi X (2022) Dynamic evaluation of China's ecological civilization construction based on target correlation degree and coupling coordination degree. Environ Impact Assess Rev 93:106734

  • Chen SY, Guo QX, Li LA (2022) Sustainable land use dynamic planning based on GIS and symmetric algorithm. Adv Civ Eng 2022:4087230

  • Deng H, Shao J, Wang J, Gao M, Wei C (2016) Land use driving forces and its future scenario simulation in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area using CLUE-S model. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica 71(11):1979–1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Du J, King C (2018) China’s government finance and food security nexus: a regime switching analysis. Appl Econ 50(41):4470–4487

    Google Scholar 

  • Duh J-D, Brown DG (2007) Knowledge-informed Pareto simulated annealing for multi-objective spatial allocation. Comput Environ Urban Syst 31(3):253–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Bergsten A, Dorresteijn I et al (2021) A social-ecological assessment of food security and biodiversity conservation in Ethiopia. Ecosyst People (Abingdon) 17(1):400–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan L, Yang XY, Chen L, Lev B, Lv YM (2022) Optimization path of Economy-Society-Ecology system orienting industrial structure Adjustment: evidence from Sichuan Province in China. Ecol Indic 144:109479

  • Ghosh S, Das Chatterjee N, Dinda S (2021) Urban ecological security assessment and forecasting using integrated DEMATEL-ANP and CA-Markov models: a case study on Kolkata Metropolitan Area, India. Sustain Cities Soc 68:102773

  • Gilani H, Ahmad A, Younes I, Abbas S (2021) Impact assessment of land cover and land use changes on soil erosion changes (2005–2015) in Pakistan. Land Degrad Dev 33(1):204–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Glamann J, Hanspach J, Abson DJ, Collier N, Fischer J (2015) The intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation: a review. Reg Environ Change 17(5):1303–1313

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong H, Meng D, Li X, Zhu F (2013) Soil degradation and food security coupled with global climate change in northeastern China. Chin Geogr Sci 23(5):562–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanaček K, Rodríguez-Labajos B (2018) Impacts of land-use and management changes on cultural agroecosystem services and environmental conflicts—a global review. Glob Environ Chang 50:41–59

    Google Scholar 

  • He Q, Xa D, Chen S (2020) Assessing the effects of vegetation and precipitation on soil erosion in the Three-River Headwaters Region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. J Arid Land 12(5):865–886

    Google Scholar 

  • He W, Wen YL, Xiong ZQ (2021) Spatial-temporal dynamics and scenario simulation of land ecological security: a case study of Deyang, Sichuan Province, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(16):20209–20221

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry RC, Arneth A, Jung M et al (2022) Global and regional health and food security under strict conservation scenarios. Nat Sustain 5(4):303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang D, Guo Y, Liu J, Zhu H, Qi Z, Chen Y (2021) Spatiotemporal assessment of water conservation function for ecosystem service management using a GIS-based data-fusion analysis framework. Water Resour Manag 35(13):4309–4323

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao X, Liu GQ, Tu XN (2014) Estimat on of water resources carrying capacity for revegetation in the Loess Plateau. Shuili Xuebao/J Hydraul Eng 45(11):1344–1351

    Google Scholar 

  • Jucker Riva M, Daliakopoulos IN, Eckert S, Hodel E, Liniger H (2017) Assessment of land degradation in Mediterranean forests and grazing lands using a landscape unit approach and the normalized difference vegetation index. Appl Geogr 86:8–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang D, Tian M, Gao J, Bai S, Li S (2021) Characteristics of actual evapotranspiration and water consumption of forest and grassland ecosystems under vegetation restoration projects based on the SEBAL model in Chifeng City, China. Res Environ Sci 34(2):399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi Y, Okada K-i, Mori AS (2019) Reconsidering biodiversity hotspots based on the rate of historical land-use change. Biol Conserv 233:268–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuang W (2020) National urban land-use/cover change since the beginning of the 21st century and its policy implications in China. Land Use Policy 97:104747

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Wang W, Chen J, Zhang Z (2022) Assessing effects of the returning farmland to forest program on vegetation cover changes at multiple spatial scales: the case of northwest Yunnan, China. J Environ Manage 304:114303

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Jin X, Ren J, Gu Z, Zhou Y (2020) A research framework of land use transition in Suzhou City coupled with land use structure and landscape multifunctionality. Sci Total Environ 737:139932

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Liu H, Qi Y (2015) Construction land expansion and cultivated land protection in urbanizing China: insights from national land surveys, 1996–2006. Habitat Int 46:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Zhang Y, Zou Y (2021) Evaluation the effect of cultivated land protection policies based on the cloud model: a case study of Xingning, China. Ecol Indic 131:108247

  • Luo H, Huang B (2023) A probabilistic framework with the gradient-based method for multi-objective land use optimization. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 37(5):1128–1156

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma R, Zhou W, Ren J, Huang Y, Wang H (2023) Multi-scenario simulation and optimization control of ecological security based on GeoSOS-FLUS model in ecological fragile area in northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Ecol Indic 151:110324

  • Marcucci DJ, Jordan LM (2013) Benefits and challenges of linking green infrastructure and highway planning in the United States. Environ Manag 51(1):182–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt P, Roy Chowdhury R, de Bremond A et al (2018) Middle-range theories of land system change. Glob Environ Chang 53:52–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Moarrab Y, Salehi E, Amiri MJ, Hovidi H (2022) Spatial–temporal assessment and modeling of ecological security based on land-use/cover changes (case study: Lavasanat watershed). Int J Environ Sci Technol 19(5):3991–4006

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora O, Le Mouel C, de Lattre-Gasquet M et al (2020) Exploring the future of land use and food security: a new set of global scenarios. PloS One 15(7):e0235597

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nie W, Xu B, Yang F et al (2023a) Simulating future land use by coupling ecological security patterns and multiple scenarios. Sci Total Environ 859:160262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nie W, Xu B, Yang F et al (2023b) Simulating future land use by coupling ecological security patterns and multiple scenarios. Sci Total Environ 859(Pt 1):160262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nwilo PC, Olayinka DN, Okolie CJ, Emmanuel EI, Orji MJ, Daramola OE (2020) Impacts of land cover changes on desertification in northern Nigeria and implications on the Lake Chad Basin. J Arid Environ 181:104190

  • Oberlack C, Giger M, Anseeuw W et al (2021) Why do large-scale agricultural investments induce different socio-economic, food security, and environmental impacts? Evidence from Kenya, Madagascar, and Mozambique. Ecol Soc 26(4):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng K, Jiang W, Wang X, Hou P, Wu Z, Cui T (2023) Evaluation of future wetland changes under optimal scenarios and land degradation neutrality analysis in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Sci Total Environ 879:163111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao JM, Cao Q, Zhang ZT, Cao Z, Liu HM (2022) Spatiotemporal changes in the state of food security across mainland china during 1990–2015: a multi-scale analysis. Food Energy Secur 11(1):e318

  • Qingming W, Shan J, Jiaqi Z et al (2022) Effects of vegetation restoration on evapotranspiration water consumption in mountainous areas and assessment of its remaining restoration space. J Hydrol 605:127259

  • Rahman MM, Szabó G (2021) Multi-objective urban land use optimization using spatial data: a systematic review. Sustain Cities Soc 74:103214

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Lü Y, Comber A, Fu B, Harris P, Wu L (2019) Spatially explicit simulation of land use/land cover changes: current coverage and future prospects. Earth Sci Rev 190:398–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi M, Wu H, Jiang P et al (2023) Food-water-land-ecosystem nexus in typical Chinese dryland under different future scenarios. Sci Total Environ 880:163183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi P, Qin YL, Li P, Li ZB, Cui LZ (2022) Development of a landscape index to link landscape pattern to runoff and sediment. J Mt Sci 19(10):2905–2919

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Feng X, Fu B, Ma S (2023a) Desertification vulnerability under accelerated dryland expansion. Land Degrad Dev 34(7):1991–2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Li X, Liu Y, Zheng J, Ma J, Ran Y (2022) Dynamic changes on desertification risk assessment and driving force analysis in Turpan City. Arid Land Geography 45(2):401–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Xiang P, Cong K (2023b) Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security. Land Use Policy 128:106601

  • Sunny G, Mohammad Fadhli A (2022) Perlis state soil series: plant available water, field capacity, permanent wilting point, and its uncertainty. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci 95(2):137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadese M, Kumar L, Koech R (2020) Long-term variability in potential evapotranspiration, water availability and drought under climate change scenarios in the Awash River Basin. Ethiopia. Atmosphere 11(9):883

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente-Serrano SM, Quiring SM, Peña-Gallardo M, Yuan S, Domínguez-Castro F (2020) A review of environmental droughts: increased risk under global warming? Earth Sci Rev 201:102953

  • Waiyasusri K, Yumuang S, Chotpantarat S (2016) Monitoring and predicting land use changes in the Huai Thap Salao Watershed area, Uthaithani Province, Thailand, using the CLUE-s model. Environ Earth Sci 75(6):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Xiao C, Qi Z, Liang X, Meng F, Sun Y (2020) Water resource carrying capacity based on water demand prediction in Chang-Ji Economic Circle. Water 13(1):16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Xiao C, Qi Z, Meng F, Liang X (2021) Development tendency analysis for the water resource carrying capacity based on system dynamics model and the improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in the Changchun city, China. Ecol Indic 122:107232

  • Wang H, Zhang C, Yao X et al (2022) Scenario simulation of the tradeoff between ecological land and farmland in black soil region of Northeast China. Land Use Policy 114:105991

  • Wang X, Wang D, Wu S, Yan Z, Han J (2023) Cultivated land multifunctionality in undeveloped peri-urban agriculture areas in China: Implications for sustainable land management. J Environ Manage 325(Pt A):116500

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb NP, Herrick JE, Duniway MC (2014) Ecological site-based assessments of wind and water erosion: informing accelerated soil erosion management in rangelands. Ecol Appl 24(6):1405–1420

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei X, Eboy OV, Cao G, Xu L (2023) Spatio-temporal variation of water conservation and its impact factors on the southern slope of Qilian Mountains. Reg Sustain 4(1):54–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooster EIF, Fleck R, Torpy F, Ramp D, Irga PJ (2022) Urban green roofs promote metropolitan biodiversity: a comparative case study. Build Environ 207:108458

  • Wu B, Bao Y, Wang Z, Chen X, Wei W (2023a) Multi-temporal evaluation and optimization of ecological network in multi-mountainous city. Ecol Indic 146:109794

  • Wu S, Wang D, Yan Z, Wang X, Han J (2023b) Spatiotemporal dynamics of urban green space in Changchun: changes, transformations, landscape patterns, and drivers. Ecol Indic 147:109958

  • Wu S, Yu M, Chen L (2017) Nonmonotonic and spatial-temporal dynamic slope effects on soil erosion during rainfall-runoff processes. Water Resour Res 53(2):1369–1389

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, You H, Li D, Yu K (2016) Urban green spaces, their spatial pattern, and ecosystem service value: the case of Beijing. Habitat Int 56:84–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue J, Li Z, Feng Q, Li Z, Gui J, Li Y (2023) Ecological conservation pattern based on ecosystem services in the Qilian Mountains, northwest China. Environ Dev 46:100834

  • Xue S, Wang C, Wu Y, Zhou Q, Song Z, Wu Y (2021) Revised zoning method for environmental fragility evaluation to desertification in arid–semiarid areas: a case of Dousitu river basin. Environ Earth Sci 80(17):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Chen R, Zheng XQ (2015) Simulating land use change by integrating ANN-CA model and landscape pattern indices. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 7(3):918–932

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Chen X, Qiao F, Che L, Pu L (2022) Layout optimization and multi-scenarios for land use: an empirical study of production-living-ecological space in the Lanzhou-Xining City Cluster, China. Ecol Indic 145:109577

  • Yin G, Liu L, Jiang X (2017) The sustainable arable land use pattern under the tradeoff of agricultural production, economic development, and ecological protection-an analysis of Dongting Lake basin, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(32):25329–25345

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Liu D, Feng R, Tang Q, Guo C (2021) Construction of ecological security pattern in Northeast China based on MCR model. Shengtai Xuebao 41(1):290–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu K (1996) Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning. Landsc Urban Plan 36(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HB, Zhang XH (2011) Land use structural optimization of Lilin based on GMOP-ESV. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc Chin 21:S738–S742

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HH, Zeng YNA, Jin XB, Shu BR, Zhou YK, Yang XH (2016) Simulating multi-objective land use optimization allocation using multi-agent system-a case study in Changsha, China. Ecol Model 320:334–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Yu X, Jia G, Liu Z (2021) Determination of optimum vegetation type and layout for soil wind erosion control in desertified land in North China. Ecol Eng 171:106383

  • Zhang J, Zhou Y, Li R et al (2009) Accuracy assessments and uncertainty analysis of spatially explicit modeling for land use/cover change and urbanization: a case in Beijing metropolitan area. Sci China Earth Sci 53(2):173–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SS, Zhang LC, Dong YW, Yang YK (2017) Selecting industries based on evaluation of the water environment’s carrying capacity: a case study of the Northern Lakeside Region of Yangzhou City. Shengtai Xuebao 37(17):5853–5860

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zheng M, Qin B (2023) Optimization of spatial layout based on ESV-FLUS model from the perspective of “Production-Living-Ecological”: a case study of Wuhan City. Ecol Model 481:110356

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YL, Liu PX, Wang Y (2015) Temporal and spatial variations of the drought in Ningxia based on aridity index and Morlet wavelet analysis. Chin J Ecol 34(8):2373–2380

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Huisingh D (2018) Combating desertification in China: Monitoring, control, management and revegetation. J Clean Prod 182:765–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JS, Yuan L, Zhang M (2016) A study of the system dynamics coupling model of the driving factors for multi-scale land use change. Environ Earth Sci 75(6):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng F, Hu Y (2018) Assessing temporal-spatial land use simulation effects with CLUE-S and Markov-CA models in Beijing. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(32):32231–32245

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu M-J, Hoctor TS, Volk M et al (2015) Spatial conservation prioritization to conserve biodiversity in response to sea level rise and land use change in the Matanzas River Basin, Northeast Florida. Landsc Urban Plan 144:103–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (2018YFD1100103), the 111 project, China (B17024), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71774085, 72174089).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Wenjun Wu and Xinyi Qiu. The inspiration and framework were provided by Minghao OU, who is the only corresponding author, and funding for the research was provided by Jie Guo. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Wenjun Wu, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minghao Ou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The author confirms that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors; and that its publication has been approved (tacitly or explicitly) by the responsible authorities at the institution where the work is carried out. The author transfers to the Founder of the journal (Environmental Science and Pollution Research) the exclusive right to the presented paper. The copyright is transferred when the article is accepted for publication. The author warrants that his contribution is original and that he has full power to make this consent. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Rongrong Wan

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, W., Qiu, X., Ou, M. et al. Optimization of land use planning under multi-objective demand—the case of Changchun City, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 9512–9534 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31763-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31763-3

Keywords

Navigation