Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal site selection for construction and demolition waste disposal using GIS-FAHP: a case study from Kafr El Sheikh City, Egypt

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing number of building and demolition projects results in huge amounts of construction and demolition wastes (CDWs) that are illegally dumped. However, these wastes must be disposed of in appropriate legal sites to protect the environment and human health. After reviewing the literature, no prior research examined optimal site selection for dumping or recycling CDW in an Egyptian city. Furthermore, the absence of field surveys did not offer a holistic understanding of the specific criteria used in the model for this region, nor did it permit an assessment of the suitability of existing dumpsites, thereby revealing certain limitations in the final results. In this regard, this research aims to apply a multi-criteria geographic information system (GIS)-based framework to identify an optimal site for CDW disposal in Kafr El Sheikh City. The criteria affecting the site selection are identified and categorized from prior literature, which are further refined using field surveys and focus group to evaluate their applicability in the context of an Egyptian city. After conducting questionnaire surveys, the trapezoidal interval type II fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is applied to compute the weights of the identified criteria from the perspective of each group of experts. The entropy-based aggregation approach is employed to identify the compromise weights taking into account the preferences of different groups. GIS is a powerful tool for geoprocessing and analyzing spatial big data. The result is a scenario map for the optimal site locations with varying suitability scales (i.e., excellent, very good, good, average, poor, and very poor). The proposed methodology provides what-if scenarios based on a selected set of criteria. According to the results of the multi-criteria decision analysis models, the suitability varies based on the weights of the criteria. For the equal-weighted criteria model, the excellent category covers 5.96% of the study area, increasing to 6.48% for the weighted criteria model. These areas primarily lie in the northeast direction. Conversely, the majority of the study area, 41.80% under equal-weighted criteria and 32.39% under weighted criteria, falls within the average and poor suitability categories, respectively. In general, the most suitable areas are located on the outskirts of the city, and the suitability decreases near the central business district. To bridge the gap between research findings and practical applications, a land use analysis employing satellite imagery is conducted to pinpoint suitable locations for CDW disposal. Existing CDW dumpsites predominantly fall within the range of poor to very good for the equal-weighted criteria model, while the weighted criteria model categorizes them into the poor (16.66%) and average (83.33%) categories. The findings demonstrated the applicability of the proposed framework for CDW disposal management and planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abujayyab SK, Ahamad MSS, Yahya AS, Bashir MJ, Aziz HA (2016) GIS modelling for new landfill sites: critical review of employed criteria and methods of selection criteria. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (37, 1, 012053). IOP Publishing

  • Ali I, Islam A, Ali SM, Adnan S (2023) Identification and selection of suitable landfill sites using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis in the Peshawar District, Pakistan. Waste Manag Res 41(3):608–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkaradaghi K, Ali SS, Al-Ansari N, Laue J (2019) Landfill site selection using GIS and multi-criteria decision-making AHP and SAW methods: a case study in Sulaimaniyah Governorate, Iraq. In: Conference of the Arabian Journal of Geosciences. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 289–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Araiza-Aguilar JA, Gutiérrez-Palacios C, Rojas-Valencia MN, Nájera-Aguilar HA, Gutiérrez-Hernández RF, Aguilar-Vera RA (2019) Selection of sites for the treatment and the final disposal of construction and demolition waste, using two approaches: an analysis for Mexico City. Sustainability 11(15):4077

    Google Scholar 

  • Attia T, Elshaboury N, Hesham A, Elhadary M (2021) Quantifying construction and demolition waste using slam-based mobile mapping system: a case study from Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt. In: In 2021 International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI). IEEE, pp 459–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz R, Khodakarami L (2013) Application of GIS models in site selection of waste disposal in an urban area. WIT Trans State Art Sci Eng 77(9):27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • BC Ministry of Environment (2016) Landfill criteria for municipal solid waste. British Columbia, Canada. Available online: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/waste-management/garbage/landfill_criteria.pdf. Accessed on 12 November 2022

  • Biluca J, de Aguiar CR, Trojan F (2020) Sorting of suitable areas for disposal of construction and demolition waste using GIS and ELECTRE TRI. Waste Manag 114:307–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhoff T (2021) EGYPT: Administrative Division. Available online: https://www.citypopulation.de/en/egypt/admin/. Accessed on 6 October 2022

  • Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS) (2006) Arab Republic of Egypt - General Census of Population, Housing and Establishments 2006. Available online: https://censusinfo.capmas.gov.eg/Metadata-ar-v4.2/index.php/catalog/1337. Accessed on 11 October 2022

  • Cobos-Mora SL, Guamán-Aucapiña J, Zúñiga-Ruiz J (2022) Suitable site selection for transfer stations in a solid waste management system using analytical hierarchy process as a multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study in Azuay-Ecuador. Environ Dev Sustain 25:1944–1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Conoco Coral (1987) Geological map of Egypt 1:500000 NH 36 NW Cairo sheet. The Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent BB, Knight MJ (1998) Cemeteries: a special kind of landfill. The context of their sustainable management. In: Weaver TR, Lawrence CR (eds) Proc Int Groundwater Conf, 8–13th February, Melbourne. International Association of Hydrogeologists (Australian National Chapter), Indooroopilly, Australia, pp 451–456

  • Ding Z, Zhu M, Wang Y, Zhu J (2018b) An AHP-GIS based model of C&D waste landfill site selection: a triangulation of critical factors. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore, pp 163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z, Zhu M, Wu Z, Fu Y, Liu X (2018a) Combining AHP-entropy approach with GIS for construction waste landfill selection—a case study of Shenzhen. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(10):2254

    Google Scholar 

  • Duleba S, Alkharabsheh A, Gündoğdu FK (2021) Creating a common priority vector in intuitionistic fuzzy AHP: A comparison of entropy-based and distance-based models. Ann Oper Res 318:163–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Effat HA, Hegazy MN (2010) Cartographic modeling of land suitability for industrial development in the Egyptian desert. Int J Sustain Dev Plan 5(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Effat HA, Hegazy MN (2012) Mapping potential landfill sites for North Sinai cities using spatial multicriteria evaluation. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 15(2):125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Egyptian General Survey Authority (1997) Topographic map sheets (Kafr ash-shaykh tile), no. NH36M2B, scale 50,000. Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation, Cairo, Egypt

  • Egyptian Ministry of Environment (2008) Guide to procedures for privatizing solid waste management—chapter 9: construction and demolition waste management. Available online: https://www.eeaa.gov.eg/Topics/83/sub/163/index. Accessed on 2 November 2023

  • El Maguiri A, Kissi B, Idrissi L, Souabi S (2016) Landfill site selection using GIS, remote sensing and multicriteria decision analysis: case of the city of Mohammedia, Morocco. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:1301–1309

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshaboury N, Marzouk M (2021) Optimizing construction and demolition waste transportation for sustainable construction projects. Eng Constr Archit Manag 28(9):2411–2425

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshaboury N, Abdelhamid M, Marzouk M (2019) Framework for economic assessment of concrete waste management strategies. Waste Manag Res 37(3):268–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshaboury N, Al-Sakkaf A, Mohammed Abdelkader E, Alfalah G (2022) Construction and demolition waste management research: a science mapping analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(8):4496

    Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeilpour M (2023) Site selection for construction and demolition waste landfill using catastrophe theory: the case of Bonab city, Iran. Environ Monit Assess 195(12):1409

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2022) Chapter 3: land suitability classifications. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/x5310e/x5310e04.htm. Accessed on 6 October 2022

  • Gorsevski PV, Donevska KR, Mitrovski CD, Frizado JP (2012) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average. Waste Manag 32(2):287–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta N, Lee SH (2022) Trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy analytical hierarchy process technique for biophilic element/design selection in lodging industry. J Oper Res Soc 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2102943

  • Housing and Building National Research Center (HBRC) (2017) Egyptian code of practice of recycling of solid waste and reuse in construction—part 1: construction and demolition solid waste. Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Communities, Cairo, Egypt

  • Hussien K, Meaza H (2019) A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation approach location suitability modeling for solid waste disposal: Dire Dawa City, East Hararghe, Ethiopia. Pap Appl Geogr 5(3-4):272–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail ER, El-Mahdy GM, Ibrahim AH, Daoud AO (2023) Analysis of factors affecting construction and demolition waste safe disposal in Egypt. Alex Eng J 70:515–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordá Borrell RM, Ruiz Rodríguez F, Lucendo Monedero ÁL (2013) Factores territoriales de localización y caracterización de los vertederos incontrolados en Andalucía. Scripta Nova: Revista electrónica de geografía y ciencias sociales 17:425–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareem SL, Al-Mamoori SK, Al-Maliki LA, Al-Dulaimi MQ, Al-Ansari N (2021) Optimum location for landfills landfill site selection using GIS technique: Al-Naja city as a case study. Cogent Eng 8(1):1863171

    Google Scholar 

  • Khater ESG, Ali SA, Afify MT, Bayomy MA, Abbas RS (2022) Using of geographic information systems (GIS) to determine the suitable site for collecting agricultural residues. Sci Rep 12(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Liu J, Giordano A (2022b) Robust optimization of construction waste disposal facility location considering uncertain factors. J Clean Prod 353:131455

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Li M, Sang P (2022a) A bibliometric review of studies on construction and demolition waste management by using CiteSpace. Energy Build 258:111822

    Google Scholar 

  • Madi N, Srour I (2019) Managing emergency construction and demolition waste in Syria using GIS. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Majid M, Mir BA (2021) Landfill site selection using GIS based multi criteria evaluation technique. A case study of Srinagar city, India. Environ Chall 3:100031

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak TM, Iris KM, Wang L, Hsu SC, Tsang DC, Li CN et al (2019) Extended theory of planned behaviour for promoting construction waste recycling in Hong Kong. Waste Manage 83:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Marefa (2023) Kafr El-Sheikh governorate. Available online: https://www.marefa.org/%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%B8%D8%A9_%D9%83%D9%81%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%AE. Accessed on 7 September 2023

  • Motlagh ZK, Sayadi MH (2015) Siting MSW landfills using MCE methodology in GIS environment (case study: Birjand plain, Iran). Waste Manag 46:322–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi SM, Darvishi G, Mobarghaee Dinan N, Naghibi SA (2022) Optimal landfill site selection for solid waste of three municipalities based on boolean and fuzzy methods: a case study in Kermanshah Province, Iran. Land 11(10):1779

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa A, Suryabhagavan KV (2021) Solid waste dumping site selection using GIS-based multi-criteria spatial modeling: a case study in Logia town, Afar region, Ethiopia. Geol Ecol Landsc 5(3):186–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Gazette (2022) Prime minister’s decision No. 722 of 2022 - Executive regulations for the waste management law promulgated by law No. 202 of 2020. Issue 7 repeated C, chapter three, paragraph eight, Egypt. https://www.eeaa.gov.eg/Laws/56/index

  • Oluleye BI, Chan DW, Saka AB, Olawumi TO (2022) Circular economy research on building construction and demolition waste: a global review of current trends and future research directions. J Clean Prod 357:131927

  • Paul M, Bussemaker MJ (2020) A web-based geographic interface system to support decision making for municipal solid waste management in England. J Clean Prod 263:121461

    Google Scholar 

  • Robayo-Salazar RA, Valencia-Saavedra W, Mejía de Gutiérrez R (2020) Construction and demolition waste (CDW) recycling-as both binder and aggregates-in alkali-activated materials: A novel re-use concept. Sustainability 12(14):5775

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah B (2021) Sustainable landfill site selection for construction and demolition waste management using GIS and AHP. In: Advances in Energy and Environment. Springer, Singapore, pp 135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi H, Allahvirdiasl H, Ali Zadeh M (2012) Application of GIS models in site selection of waste disposal in urban area. IOSR J Appl Phys 1(6):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Simic V, Ebadi Torkayesh A, Ijadi Maghsoodi A (2022) Locating a disinfection facility for hazardous healthcare waste in the COVID-19 era: a novel approach based on Fermatean fuzzy ITARA-MARCOS and random forest recursive feature elimination algorithm. Ann Oper Res 328:1105–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (2019) Remote sensing and GIS applications for municipal waste management. J Environ Manage 243:22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Paz J, Hernandez A, Mejía-Parada CA, Mora-Ruiz V, Hernández W, Luna-Guevara F et al (2023) A hybrid decision tool for site selection of construction and demolition waste (CDW) facilities in developing countries. Environ Process 10(2):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • The Egyptian Government (2016) Sustainable development strategy: Egyptian vision 2030. Available online: http://sdsegypt2030.com/. Accessed on 6 October 2022

  • The World Bank (2022) Solid waste management. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/brief/solid-waste-management#:~:text=In%202020%2C%20the%20world%20was,kilograms%20per%20person%20per%20day. Accessed on 1 September 2022

  • Torabi-Kaveh M, Babazadeh R, Mohammadi SD, Zaresefat M (2016) Landfill site selection using combination of GIS and fuzzy AHP, a case study: Iranshahr, Iran. Waste Manage Res 34(5):438–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Waste Management Regulatory Authority (WMRA) (2021) National strategy for the management of construction and demolition waste. Project No. 18.2158.6-001.00 / 83376389

  • Young A (1972) Slopes. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawya (2022) Egypt’s construction sector resilient despite challenges. Available online: https://www.zawya.com/en/economy/north-africa/egypts-construction-sector-resilient-despite-challenges-bvqewd50. Accessed on 2 September 2022

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge that the data relevant to official and unofficial disposal sites was gathered as a part of a project entitled “Construction and demolition waste quantification, characterization, and composition in four governorates.” The project was conducted by the Housing and Building National Research Center in collaboration with the Egyptian Ministry of Environment, with funding provided by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, N.E.; methodology, N.E. and W.A.; formal analysis, N.E. and W.A.; data curation, N.E., A.H., and W.A.; investigation, N.E., A.H., and W.A.; writing—original draft preparation, N.E. and W.A.; writing—review and editing, N.E., A.H., and W.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nehal Elshaboury.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elshaboury, N., Hesham, A. & AlMetwaly, W.M. Optimal site selection for construction and demolition waste disposal using GIS-FAHP: a case study from Kafr El Sheikh City, Egypt. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 8223–8239 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31637-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31637-8

Keywords

Navigation