Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Green development in BRICS: unraveling the effects of environmental technology, R&D spending, and green investment in the context of COP21

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The BRICS countries are renowned for their rapidly developing economies and growing populations. However, the environmental challenges associated with their economic growth have raised concerns about sustainability and the need for green growth strategies. In recent times, empirics have started to analyze the determinants of green growth, but very few have focused on environmental technological capital, R&D, and green investment. This study examines the impact of environmental technological capital, R&D, and green investment on green growth in BRICS economies from 1995 to 2020 using a panel ARDL model. The study found that green investment, environmental technology, and R&D positively facilitate green growth in the BRICS economies in the long run. The long-run country-wise estimate of green investment is positively significant in Brazil and Russia. On the other side, the estimated coefficient of environmental technology is positive in Brazil, India, and China. However, the estimated coefficient of R&D is positive in China only. In the short run, the results are a mix, whether group-wise or country-wise. Based on the results, the study will recommend policy suggestions for green R&D, development of environmental technology, and green investment that help in enhancing green growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2012) The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev 102(1):131–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) A Schumpeterian perspective on growth and competition. In New theories in growth and development. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 9–49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Umar M, Khan Z, Muhammad S (2020) The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: an advanced panel data estimation. Resources Policy 69:101817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed N, Areche FO, Nieto DDC, Borda RFC, Gonzales BC, Senkus P, ... Skrzypek A (2022) Nexus between cyclical innovation in green technologies and CO2 emissions in nordic countries: Consent toward environmental sustainability. Sustainability 14(18):11768

  • Ahmed M, Hafeez M, Kaium MA, Ullah S, Ahmad H (2023) Do environmental technology and banking sector development matter for green growth? Evidence from top-polluted economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(6):14760–14769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade D (2022) Neoliberal extractivism: Brazil in the twenty-first century. J Peasant Stud 49(4):793–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asteriou D, Pilbeam K, Pratiwi CE (2021) Public debt and economic growth: panel data evidence for Asian countries. J Econ Finance 45:270–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao S, Nie L, Sun H, Sun W, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2021) Digital finance, green technological innovation and energy-environmental performance: Evidence from China’s regional economies. J Clean Prod 327

  • Chen R, Ramzan M, Hafeez M, Ullah S (2023) Green innovation-green growth nexus in BRICS: does financial globalization matter? J Innov Knowl 8(1):100286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng B, Qiu B, Chan KC, Zhang H (2022) Does a green tax impact a heavy-polluting firm’s green investments? Appl Econ 54(2):189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desalegn G, Tangl A (2022) Enhancing green finance for inclusive green growth: a systematic approach. Sustainability 14(12):7416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Z, Ullah S (2023) Towards a green economy in China? Examining the impact of the internet of things and environmental regulation on green growth. Sustainability 15(16):12528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (2002) Economic growth and environmental sustainability: the prospects for green growth. Routledge

  • Eren BM, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) The impact of financial development and economic growth on renewable energy consumption: empirical analysis of India. Sci Total Environ 663:189–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fu F, Ullah S (2023) Toward green growth in China: the role of green finance investment, technological capital, and renewable energy consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–11

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao LN, Umar M, Khan Z, Ali W (2021) Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: how critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Sci Total Environ 752:141853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan A, Yang J, Usman A, Bilal A, Ullah S (2023) Green growth as a determinant of ecological footprint: do ICT diffusion, environmental innovation, and natural resources matter? PLoS One 18(9):e0287715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Zhang L, Zhong Z, Wang D, Wang F (2019) Green credit, renewable energy investment and green economy development: empirical analysis based on 150 listed companies of China. J Clean Prod 208:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henri PAO (2019) Natural resources curse: a reality in Africa. Resour Policy 63:101406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyigun M (2006) Clusters of invention, life cycle of technologies and endogenous growth. J Econ Dyn Control 30(4):687–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke M (2012) “Green growth”: from a growing eco-industry to economic sustainability. Energy Policy 48:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CI (1995) R & D-based models of economic growth. J Polit Econ 103(4):759–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Ullah S (2022) Research and development intensity and its influence on renewable energy consumption: evidence from selected Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(36):54448–54455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Dong K, Dong X (2022a) Green energy as a new determinant of green growth in China: the role of green technological innovation. Energy Econ 114:106260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ozturk I, Ullah S, Andlib Z, Hafeez M (2022c) Can top-pollutant economies shift some burden through insurance sector development for sustainable development? Econ Anal Policy 74:326–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Wang J, Chen R, Xi Y, Liu SQ, Wu F, ... Wu X (2019) Innovation-driven industrial green development: the moderating role of regional factors. J Clean Prod 222:344–354

  • Li L, Li G, Ozturk I, Ullah S (2022b) Green innovation and environmental sustainability: do clean energy investment and education matter?. Energy Environ 0958305X221115096

  • Li X, Shaikh PA, Ullah S (2022d) Exploring the potential role of higher education and ICT in China on green growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(43):64560–64567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Zhu J (2019) Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint. J Environ Manag 247:662–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Hu R, Ullah S (2023) Energy technology innovation through the lens of the financial deepening: financial institutions and markets perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–10

  • Luukkanen J, Kaivo-Oja J, Vähäkari N, O’Mahony T, Korkeakoski M, Panula-Ontto J, ... Hogarth N (2019) Green economic development in Lao PDR: a sustainability window analysis of green growth productivity and the efficiency gap. J Clean Prod 211:818–829

  • Machiba T (2011) Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: development of an analytical framework and preliminary analysis of industry and policy practices. In: International economics of resource efficiency. Physica-Verlag HD, pp. 371–394

  • Makarov I, Chen H, Paltsev S (2020) Impacts of climate change policies worldwide on the Russian economy. Clim Policy 20(10):1242–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah CN, Long X, Dauda L, Boamah KB, Salman M, Appiah-Twum F, Tachie AK (2019) Technological innovation and green growth in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development economies. J Clean Prod 240:118204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao N, Sharif A, Ozturk I, Razzaq A (2023) How do the exploitation of natural resources and fiscal policy affect green growth? Moderating role of ecological governance in G7 countries. Resour Policy 85:103911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo Y, Ullah S, Ozturk I (2023) Green investment and its influence on green growth in high polluted Asian economies: Do financial markets and institutions matter? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(2):2140302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Ullah S (2022) Does digital financial inclusion matter for economic growth and environmental sustainability in OBRI economies? An empirical analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 185:106489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):621–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Linde CVD (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu W, Zhang J, Wu H, Irfan M, Ahmad M (2022) The role of innovation investment and institutional quality on green total factor productivity: evidence from 46 countries along the “Belt and Road.” Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(11):16597–16611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaq A, Sharif A, Ozturk I, Afshan S (2023a) Dynamic and threshold effects of energy transition and environmental governance on green growth in COP26 framework. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 179:113296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaq A, Sharif A, Ozturk I, Skare M (2023b) Asymmetric influence of digital finance, and renewable energy technology innovation on green growth in China. Renew Energy 202:310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect 8(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5, Part 2):S71–S102

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Shah MI, AbdulKareem HK, Abbas S (2022) Examining the agriculture induced environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in BRICS economies: the role of renewable energy as a moderator. Renew Energy 198:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohail MT, Ullah S, Majeed MT (2022) Effect of policy uncertainty on green growth in high-polluting economies. J Clean Prod 380:135043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohail MT (2023) Evaluating policy-driven capital for renewable energy investments in the presence of cross-sectional dependence: perspectives from financial institutions and markets. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–10

  • Su Y, Gao X (2022) Revealing the effectiveness of green technological progress and financial innovation on green economic growth: the role of environmental regulation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(48):72991–73000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebzadehhosseini S, Garibay I (2022) The interaction effects of technological innovation and path-dependent economic growth on countries overall green growth performance. J Clean Prod 333:130134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong L, Jabbour CJC, Najam H, Abbas J (2022) Role of environmental regulations, green finance, and investment in green technologies in green total factor productivity: empirical evidence from Asian region. J Clean Prod 380:134930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication – a synthesis for policy makers. UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah S, Ozturk I, Majeed MT, Ahmad W (2021) Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 316:128239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah S, Usman A, Imran M (2019) The past, present, and future of FDI: Towards a better global economics. J Qual Methods 3(2):28–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Cui H, Zhao Q (2021) Effect of green technology innovation on green total factor productivity in China: evidence from spatial Durbin model analysis. J Clean Prod 288:125624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Yeung G, Li X, Wang L (2022) Does inter-regional investment by publicly listed companies promote local green total factor productivity? A study of the mediation effects of green patents in China. J Clean Prod 339:130582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Chen Z, Mahmood MT, Mehdi MNJ, Ullah S, Nazam M, Hafeez M (2023) Do transportation taxes promote pro-environmental behaviour? An empirical investigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(13):35545–35553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei X, Ren H, Ullah S, Bozkurt C (2023) Does environmental entrepreneurship play a role in sustainable green development? Evidence from emerging Asian economies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(1):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu D, Li X, Yu J, Li H (2021) The impact of the spatial agglomeration of foreign direct investment on green total factor productivity of Chinese cities. J Environ Manag 290:112666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, Zhong R, Sohail S, Majeed MT, Ullah S (2021) Geopolitical risks, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions in BRICS: an asymmetric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(29):39668–39679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang L, Chen F (2021) R&D subsidies, executive background and innovation of Chinese listed companies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 34(1):484–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Ahmed D, Xie Y, Majeed MT, Hafeez M (2023) Green growth and carbon neutrality targets in China: do financial integration and ICT matter?. J Clean Prod 136923

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MTS: idea, software, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, reviewing, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Tayyab Sohail.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

I am free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sohail, M.T. Green development in BRICS: unraveling the effects of environmental technology, R&D spending, and green investment in the context of COP21. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 120000–120009 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30696-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30696-1

Keywords

Navigation