Abstract
Environmental economics theory suggests that the technological effects of increased innovation capacity can drive stable economic growth and act as a major means to mitigate regional environmental pollution levels. Therefore, science and technology innovation is the key to achieving low-carbon and green development. This study examined the influence of China’s Pilot Policy for Innovative Cities on greenhouse gas emissions and its operational mechanism. By employing both quantitative and qualitative approaches, we successfully examined the impact of the policy on the nation’s carbon emissions peaks. The findings indicated that adopting an urban pilot policy can effectively decelerate the increase of carbon emissions in cities. Additionally, the policy had a more pronounced impact on emission reduction in major urban areas and provinces. A mechanism test revealed that the policy could help reduce urban carbon emissions by implementing various technological innovations and spatial intensification. The results of this research offer significant theoretical support for adopting urban pilot policies and encourage the advancement of eco-friendly growth in Chinese urban areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aghion P, Dechezleprêtre A, Hemous D et al (2016) Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: evidence from the auto industry. J Polit Econ 124:1–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/684581
Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A (2010) Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. J Financ 65:1637–1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x
Bento AM, Franco SF, Kaffine D (2006) The efficiency and distributional impacts of alternative anti-sprawl policies. J Urban Econ 59:121–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.09.004
Borghesi S, Cainelli G, Mazzanti M (2015) Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Res Policy 44:669–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.014
Caloghirou Y, Giotopoulos I, Kontolaimou A et al (2021) Industry-university knowledge flows and product innovation: how do knowledge stocks and crisis matter? Res Policy 50:104195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104195
Chen C, Li W-B, Zheng L, Guan C (2023) Exploring the impacts of spatial regulation on environmentally sustainable development: a new perspective of quasi–experimental evaluation based on the National Key Ecological Function Zones in China. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2667
Chen J (2023) Mitigating nitrogen dioxide air pollution: the roles and effect of national smart city pilots in China. Energy 263:125652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125652
Cheng X, Yao D, Qian Y et al (2023) How does fintech influence carbon emissions: evidence from China’s prefecture-level cities. Int Rev Financ Anal 87:102655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102655
Ding J, Liu B, Shao X (2022) Spatial effects of industrial synergistic agglomeration and regional green development efficiency: evidence from China. Energy Econ 112:106156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106156
Du G, Li W (2022) Does innovative city building promote green logistics efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment with 285 cities. Energy Econ 114:106320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106320
Feng G-F, Niu P, Wang J-Z, Liu J (2022) Capital market liberalization and green innovation for sustainability: evidence from China. Econ Anal Policy 75:610–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.06.009
Feng Y, Wang X (2020) Effects of urban sprawl on haze pollution in China based on dynamic spatial Durbin model during 2003–2016. J Clean Prod 242:118368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118368
Feng Y, Wang X, Du W et al (2019) Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 235:210–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.184
Fisch-Romito V, Guivarch C (2019) Transportation infrastructures in a low carbon world: an evaluation of investment needs and their determinants. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 72:203–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.014
Florida R, Adler P, Mellander C (2017) The city as innovation machine. Reg Stud 51:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1255324
Gao K, Yuan Y (2021) The effect of innovation-driven development on pollution reduction: empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 172:121047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121047
Gao K, Yuan Y (2022) Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China. Technol Soc 70:102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102035
Guo Q, Zhong J (2022) The effect of urban innovation performance of smart city construction policies: evaluate by using a multiple period difference-in-differences model. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 184:122003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122003
Howell ST (2017) Financing innovation: evidence from R&D grants. Am Econ Rev 107:1136–1164. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150808
Hu J (2023) Synergistic effect of pollution reduction and carbon emission mitigation in the digital economy. J Environ Manag 337:117755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117755
Hu J, Zhang H, Irfan M (2023) How does digital infrastructure construction affect low-carbon development? A multidimensional interpretation of evidence from China. J Clean Prod 396:136467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136467
Huang C, Zhang X, Liu K (2021) Effects of human capital structural evolution on carbon emissions intensity in China: a dual perspective of spatial heterogeneity and nonlinear linkages. Renew Sust Energ Rev 135:110258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110258
Huang P, Westman L (2021) China’s imaginary of ecological civilization: a resonance between the state-led discourse and sociocultural dynamics. Energy Res Soc Sci 81:102253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102253
Li J, Li S (2020) Energy investment, economic growth and carbon emissions in China—empirical analysis based on spatial Durbin model. Energy Policy 140:111425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111425
Li L, Li M, Ma S et al (2022a) Does the construction of innovative cities promote urban green innovation? J Environ Manag 318:115605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115605
Li X, Zhou X, Yan K (2022b) Technological progress for sustainable development: an empirical analysis from China. Econ Anal Policy 76:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.08.002
Li Y, Zhang J, Yang X et al (2021) The impact of innovative city construction on ecological efficiency: a quasi-natural experiment from China. Sustain Prod Consum 28:1724–1735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.012
Lin B, Ma R (2022) Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China: fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 176:121434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121434
Liu B, Ding CJ, Hu J et al (2023a) Carbon trading and regional carbon productivity. J Clean Prod 420:138395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138395
Liu X, Cifuentes-Faura J, Zhao S, Wang L (2023b) Government environmental attention and carbon emissions governance: firm-level evidence from China. Econ Anal Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.07.016
MacDonald K, Rudel TK (2005) Sprawl and forest cover: what is the relationship? Appl Geogr 25:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2004.07.001
Milesi C, Elvidge CD, Nemani RR, Running SW (2003) Assessing the impact of urban land development on net primary productivity in the southeastern United States. Remote Sens Environ 86:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00081-6
Popp D (2019) Environmental policy and innovation: a decade of research. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ:265–337. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000111
Rodríguez-Pose A, Wilkie C, Zhang M (2021) Innovating in “lagging” cities: a comparative exploration of the dynamics of innovation in Chinese cities. Appl Geogr 132:102475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102475
Shahbaz M, Destek MA, Dong K, Jiao Z (2021) Time-varying impact of financial development on carbon emissions in G-7 countries: evidence from the long history. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 171:120966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120966
Wang C, Liu X, Li H, Yang C (2023) Analyzing the impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on enterprises’ labor demand: evidence from China. Energy Econ 124:106676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106676
Wang F, Wu M (2021) Does air pollution affect the accumulation of technological innovative human capital? Empirical evidence from China and India. J Clean Prod 285:124818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124818
Wang H, Cui H, Zhao Q (2021) Effect of green technology innovation on green total factor productivity in China: evidence from spatial Durbin model analysis. J Clean Prod 288:125624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125624
Wang J, Dong K, Sha Y, Yan C (2022a) Envisaging the carbon emissions efficiency of digitalization: the case of the internet economy for China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 184:121965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121965
Wang Y, Yan Q, Zhang Q (2022b) Carbon mitigation performance of top-down administrative and fiscal decentralizations: evidence from quasi-natural experiments in China’s pilot counties. Sci Total Environ 852:158404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158404
Wen H, Lee C-C, Zhou F (2022) How does fiscal policy uncertainty affect corporate innovation investment? Evidence from China’s new energy industry. Energy Econ 105:105767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105767
Yang J, Xiong G, Shi D (2022) Innovation and sustainable: can innovative city improve energy efficiency? Sustain Cities Soc 80:103761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103761
Yuan M, Huang Y, Shen H, Li T (2018) Effects of urban form on haze pollution in China: spatial regression analysis based on PM2. 5 remote sensing data. Appl Geogr 98:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.018
Zeng D-Z, Zhao L (2009) Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. J Environ Econ Manag 58:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.09.003
Zhang M, Hong Y, Zhu B (2022) Does national innovative city pilot policy promote green technology progress? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 363:132461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132461
Zhang R-L, Liu X-H (2021) Evaluating ecological efficiency of Chinese industrial enterprise. Renew Energy 178:679–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.119
Zhang S, Wang X (2022) Does innovative city construction improve the industry–university–research knowledge flow in urban China? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 174:121200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121200
Zhang X, Du S, Du S, Liu B (2020) How do land-use patterns influence residential environment quality? A multiscale geographic survey in Beijing. Remote Sens Environ 249:112014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112014
Zhang Y-J, Peng Y-L, Ma C-Q, Shen B (2017) Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 100:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.005
Zhou K, Luo H, Qu Z (2023) What can the environmental rule of law do for environmental innovation? Evidence from environmental tribunals in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 189:122377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122377
Zhou Z, Liu J, Zhou N et al (2021) Does the" 10-Point Water Plan" reduce the intensity of industrial water pollution? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. J Environ Manag 295:113048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113048
Zou C, Huang Y, Wu S, Hu S (2022) Does “low-carbon city” accelerate urban innovation? Evidence from China. Sustain Cities Soc 83:103954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103954
Funding
This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 21BGL016), the Major Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (No. 2021SJZDA027).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors of this manuscript have contributed to the article, and there is no conflict of interest. Ye Z designed the study and proposed the methodology. Huang YC and Zou C found the data and analyzed it and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
I have not submitted my manuscript to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
This study has not been made public.
Results are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication or inappropriate data manipulation. Authors adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting, and processing data.
No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the plagiarism.
Consent to participate
All authors agree with the content of the submission, and all agree to continue to support the follow-up work.
Consent for publication
This manuscript has not been submitted or published in other journals, and the authors agree to consent to publish.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: V.V.S.S. Sarma
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, Y., Zou, C. & Ye, Z. Carbon emission reduction effect of innovative city pilot policies in China: based on the staggered difference-in-difference model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 110812–110825 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29984-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29984-7