Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Digital infrastructure construction, diversified environmental regulation, and dual control of urban carbon emissions—quasi-natural experiment from “broadband China” strategy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used three batches of “broadband China” strategies (BCS) implemented from 2014 to 2016 as quasi-natural experiments (QE) to distinguish the level of urban digital infrastructure construction (DIC). Using 231 prefecture-level cities in China from 2011 to 2019 as research samples, a progressive differences-in-differences (DID) model was used to empirically test the relationship characteristics between DIC and urban carbon emission (CE) total and intensity. The results show that (1) DIC has a significant negative correlation with total carbon emissions (TCE) and carbon emission intensity (CI), which is conducive to the “dual control” of urban CE, which is still valid after the five robustness tests. (2) The mechanism test shows that the DIC is conducive to improving the level of formal environmental regulation (FER) and informal environmental regulation (IER) and strengthening the synergy between formal and informal environmental regulation (ER), so as to achieve “dual control” of carbon emissions, of which the synergy is the most significant, followed by FER. (3) In heterogeneity research findings, only the third batch of pilot projects can achieve “dual control” of CE, which has the advantage of latecomers. The “dual control” effect of carbon emissions in DIC is more significant in cities with higher levels of marketization and eastern cities. Therefore, DIC plays the role of “icing on the cake,” not “providing charcoal in the snow.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali U, Guo Q, Kartal MT, Nurgazina Z, Khan ZA, Sharif A (2022) The impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on carbon emission intensity in China: fresh evidence from novel dynamic ARDL simulations. J Environ Manag 320:115782

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bi S, Shao L, Tu C, Lai W, Cao Y, Hu J (2023) Achieving carbon neutrality: the effect of China pilot Free Trade Zone policy on green technology innovation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(17):50234–50247

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum BS, Goldfarb A (2006) Does the internet defy the law of gravity? J Int Econ 70(2):384–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Che S, Wang J (2022) Can environmental regulation solve the carbon curse of natural resource dependence: evidence from China. Resour Policy 79:103100

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Liu X, Xu Z (2022) Impact of carbon emission trading market on regional urbanization: an empirical study based on a difference-in-differences model. Econ Anal Lett 1:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Li Y, Qin C, Zhang X, Chen Y, Zhao X, Wang C (2022) Information infrastructure and greenhouse gas emission performance in urban China: a difference-in-differences analysis. J Environ Manag 316:115252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du W, Li M (2020) Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on pollution abatement and collaborative emissions reduction: micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Environ Impact Assess Rev 82:106382

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Zhou J, Bai J, Cao Y (2023) Breaking the resource curse: the perspective of improving carbon emission efficiency based on digital infrastructure construction. Resour Policy 85:103842

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan G, Wang X, Ma G (2011) Contribution of marketization to China’s economic growth. Econ Res J 46(09):4–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan M, Yang P, Li Q (2022) Impact of environmental regulation on green total factor productivity: a new perspective of green technological innovation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(35):53785–53800

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Chen Z, Nie C (2023) The effect of broadband infrastructure construction on urban green innovation: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Econ Anal Policy 77:581–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron A (1962) Economic backwardness in historical perspective: a book of essays, vol 584. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Granell C, Havlik D, Schade S, Sabeur Z, Delaney C, Pielorz J ... Mon JL (2016) Future Internet technologies for environmental applications. Environ Model Softw 78:1–15

  • Gu Y, Ho KC, Yan C, Gozgor G (2021) Public environmental concern, CEO turnover, and green investment: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Econ 100:105379

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Wang H (2022) Innovative choice of emissions-reduction strategy under digital empowerment: quasi-natural experiment based on the“Broadband China”pilot policy. Ind Econ Res 04:101–113+142

  • Guo M, Kuai Y, Liu X (2020) Stock market response to environmental policies: evidence from heavily polluting firms in China. Econ Model 86:306–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Haini H (2021) Examining the impact of ICT, human capital and carbon emissions: evidence from the ASEAN economies. Int Econ 166:116–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton SE, Strasser CA, Tewksbury JJ, Gram WK, Budden AE, Batcheller AL ... Porter JH (2013) Big data and the future of ecology. Front Ecol Environ 11(3):156–162

  • Hao X, Li Y, Ren S, Wu H, Hao Y (2023) The role of digitalization on green economic growth: does industrial structure optimization and green innovation matter? J Environ Manag 325:116504

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou S, Yu K, Fei R (2023) How does environmental regulation affect carbon productivity? The role of green technology progress and pollution transfer. J Environ Manag 345:118587

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J (2023) Synergistic effect of pollution reduction and carbon emission mitigation in the digital economy. J Environ Manag 337:117755

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Zhang H (2023) Has green finance optimized the industrial structure in China? Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(12):32926–32941

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Zhang H, Irfan M (2023) How does digital infrastructure construction affect low-carbon development? A multidimensional interpretation of evidence from China. J Clean Prod 396(10):136467

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Yi M (2023) Impacts and mechanisms of heterogeneous environmental regulations on carbon emissions: an empirical research based on DID method. Environ Impact Assess Rev 99:107039

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson LS, LaLonde RJ, Sullivan DG (1993) Earnings Losses of Displaced Workers. Am Econ Rev 83(4):685–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatzas K, Kukkonen J, Cost AE (2009) Quality of life information services towards a sustainable society for the atmospheric environment. Sofia Publishers, Thessaloniki

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JW, Brahmasrene T (2014) ICT, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence from a panel of ASEAN. Glob Econ Rev 43(2):93–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Wang J (2022) The dynamic impact of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: evidence city-level empirical data in China. J Clean Prod 351:131570

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Bai T, Tang C (2022) How does the low-carbon city pilot policy affect the synergistic governance efficiency of carbon and smog? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. J Clean Prod 373:133809

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Hu J, Liu P, Chen J (2023) How can digital finance boost enterprises’ high-quality development?: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:88876–88890

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Xu H (2022) Does low-carbon pilot city policy induce low-carbon choices in residents’ living: holistic and single dual perspective. J Environ Manag 324:116353

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, She Y, Liu S, Lan H (2022) Supply-shock, demand-induced or superposition effect? The impacts of formal and informal environmental regulations on total factor productivity of Chinese agricultural enterprises. J Clean Prod 380:135052

    Google Scholar 

  • Long F, Liu J, Zheng L (2022) The effects of public environmental concern on urban-rural environmental inequality: evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Sustain Cities Soc 80:103787

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Wu H, Yang S, Tu YP (2022) Effect of environmental regulation policy synergy on carbon emissions in China under consideration of the mediating role of industrial structure. J Environ Manag 322:116053

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Q, Hu H, Feng D, He X (2022) How does broadband infrastructure promote entrepreneurship in China: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Telecommun Policy 46(10):102440

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo G, Guo J, Yang F, Wang C (2023) Environmental regulation, green innovation and high-quality development of enterprise: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 418:138112

  • Marmura S (2008) A net advantage? The internet, grassroots activism and American Middle-Eastern policy. New Media Soc 10(2):247–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Martynenko TS, Vershinina IA (2018) Digital economy: the possibility of sustainable development and overcoming social and environmental inequality in Russia. Revista Espacios 39(44):12

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya-Torres J, Akizu-Gardoki O, Alejandre C, Iturriondobeita M (2023) Towards sustainable passenger transport: carbon emission reduction scenarios for a medium-sized city. J Clean Prod 418:138149

  • Pan M, Zhao X, Rosak-Szyrocka J, Mentel G, Truskolaski T (2023) Internet development and carbon emission-reduction in the era of digitalization: where will resource-based cities go? Resour Policy 81:103345

    Google Scholar 

  • Pei Y, Zhu Y, Liu S, Wang X, Cao J (2019) Environmental regulation and carbon emission: the mediation effect of technical efficiency. J Clean Prod 236:117599

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren S, Liu Z, Zhanbayev R, Du M (2022) Does the internet development put pressure on energy-saving potential for environmental sustainability? Evidence from China. J Econ Anal 1(1):49–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabalov MY, Zhukovskiy YL, Buldysko AD, Gil B, Starshaia VV (2021) The influence of technological changes in energy efficiency on the infrastructure deterioration in the energy sector. Energy Rep 7:2664–2680

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Zheng Y, Lei Y, Xue W, Yan G, Liu X ... Wang J (2021) Air quality benefits of achieving carbon neutrality in China. Sci Total Environ 795:148784

  • Shi K, Liu G, Cui Y, Wu Y (2023) What urban spatial structure is more conducive to reducing carbon emissions? A conditional effect of population size. Appl Geogr 151:102855

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin DH, Choi MJ (2015) Ecological views of big data: perspectives and issues. Telematics Inform 32(2):311–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu Y, Deng N, Wu Y, Bao S, Bie A (2023) Urban governance and sustainable development: the effect of smart city on carbon emission in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 193:122643

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn HW (2008) Public policies against global warming: a supply side approach. Int Tax Public Financ 15:360–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Chen X, Li Z, Zeng Z, Zhang M (2022) Exploring the effect of a low-carbon city pilot policies on carbon dioxide emission intensity: based on the PSM-DID method. Chin J Popul Resour Environ 20(3):209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Li W (2021) Has the opening of high-speed rail reduced urban carbon emissions? Empirical analysis based on panel data of cities in China. J Clean Prod 321:128958

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun N, Kong D, Tao Y (2023) Does broadband infrastructure affect corporate mergers and acquisitions? Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Int Rev Financ Anal 85:102461

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang K, Yang G (2023) Does digital infrastructure cut carbon emissions in Chinese cities? Sustain Prod Consump 35:431–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian X, Chang M, Shi F, Tanikawa H (2014) How does industrial structure change impact carbon dioxide emissions? A comparative analysis focusing on nine provincial regions in China. Environ Sci Policy 37:243–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong Y, Wang K, Liu J, Zhang Y, Gao J, Dan M ... Zhao Z (2023) Refined assessment and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions in high-energy intensive industrial sectors in China. Sci Total Environ 872:162161

  • Wang Y, Tao W (2021) Influence and effect of China’s pilot low-carbon city initiative on urban green total factor productivity growth. China Popul Resour Environ 31(06):78–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Huang Y, Zhou Y (2019) Spatial spillover effect and driving forces of carbon emission intensity at the city level in China. J Geog Sci 29:231–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Hu D, Sami F, Uktamov KF (2023) Revisiting China’s natural resources-growth-emissions nexus: education expenditures and renewable energy innovation. Resour Policy 85:103923

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Hong D (2015) On China’s environmental policy making and public participation in decision-making: a case study on policy making in haze governance. J Nanjing Tech Univ (Soc Sci Ed) 2:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Xue Y, Hao Y, Ren S (2021a) How does internet development affect energy-saving and emission reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Econ 103:105577

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Wang W, Zhang L, Wang Q, Wang L, Zhang M (2021b) Does the public haze pollution concern expressed on online platforms promoted pollution control?–evidence from Chinese online platforms. J Clean Prod 318:128477

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie B, Yang C, Song W, Song L, Wang H (2023) The impact of environmental regulation on capacity utilization of China’s manufacturing industry: an empirical research based on the sector level. Ecol Ind 148:110085

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin L, Sun H, Xia X (2022) Renewable energy technology innovation and inclusive low-carbon development from the perspective of spatiotemporal consistency. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(8):20490–20513

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin L, Sun H, Xia X (2023) Spatial–temporal differentiation and dynamic spatial convergence of inclusive low-carbon development: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(2):5197–5215

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue W, Lei Y, Liu X, Shi X, Liu Z, Xu Y ... Yan G (2023) Synergistic assessment of air pollution and carbon emissions from the economic perspective in China. Sci Total Environ 858:159736

  • Yang X, Wu H, Ren S, Ran Q, Zhang J (2021) Does the development of the internet contribute to air pollution control in China? Mechanism discussion and empirical test. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 56:207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Gao W, Han Q, Qi L, Cui Y, Chen Y (2022) Digitalization and carbon emissions: how does digital city construction affect China’s carbon emission reduction? Sustain Cities Soc 87:104201

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi Z (2022) The impact of Internet communication on urban residents’ environmental demands and the government response path. J Southwest Minzu Univ (Hum Soc Sci) 41(12):149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Zheng M, Chen J (2015) The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: an evidence from China. Energy Policy 77:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin X, Chen D, Ji J (2023) How does environmental regulation influence green technological innovation? Moderating effect of green finance. J Environ Manag 342:118112

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng W, Li L, Huang Y (2021) Industrial collaborative agglomeration, marketization, and green innovation: evidence from China’s provincial panel data. J Clean Prod 279:123598

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Bi J, Yuan Z, Ge J, Liu B, Bu M (2008) Why do firms engage in environmental management? An empirical study in China. J Clean Prod 16(10):1036–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YJ, Liu Z, Zhang H, Tan TD (2014) The impact of economic growth, industrial structure and urbanization on carbon emission intensity in China. Nat Hazards 73:579–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Sun X, Wang W (2020) Study on the effect of environmental regulations and industrial structure on haze pollution in China from the dual perspective of independence and linkage. J Clean Prod 256:120748

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Mu R, Zhan Y, Yu J, Liu L, Yu Y, Zhang J (2022a) Digital economy, energy efficiency, and carbon emissions: evidence from provincial panel data in China. Sci Total Environ 852:158403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Liu X, Wang D, Zhou J (2022b) Digital economy and carbon emission performance: evidence at China’s city level. Energy Policy 165:112927

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Tao Y, Nie C (2022c) Does broadband infrastructure boost firm productivity? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Financ Res Lett 48:102886

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Feng C, Zhou X (2022d) Going carbon-neutral in China: does the low-carbon city pilot policy improve carbon emission efficiency? Sustain Prod Consump 33:312–329

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, Dou Y, Tong L (2022) Effect of fiscal decentralization and dual environmental regulation on green poverty reduction: the case of China. Resour Policy 79:102990

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Shang Y, Magazzino C, Madaleno M, Mallek S (2023) Multi-step impacts of environmental regulations on green economic growth: evidence in the lens of natural resource dependence. Resour Policy 85:103919

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Lan H, Zhao C, Wang W (2022a) The employment effects of digital infrastructure: firm-level evidence from the ‘Broadband China’strategy. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 1–15

  • Zhou F, Wen H, Lee CC (2022b) Broadband infrastructure and export growth. Telecommun Policy 46(5):102347

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from the project the third Xinjiang comprehensive scientific research project, “Investigation of clean energy and ecological environment assessment of energy and mineral development in the Tuha Basin,” project 5, “Investigation of national energy base construction and assessment of carbon emission reduction potential in the Tuha Basin” (SQ2021xjkk01800); Xinjiang University’s 2022 excellent doctoral student innovation project: carbon reduction and reduction in resource-based cities; research on the coordinated promotion mechanism of pollution, green expansion and growth (XJU2022BS006); Xinjiang University’s 2022 excellent doctoral student innovation project: analysis of spatiotemporal differentiation and driving factors of coupling synergy of pollution reduction, carbon reduction and green expansion (XJU2022BS007); Xinjiang University’s 2022 excellent doctoral student innovation project: research on the impact of carbon financial policy tools on the combined effects of economy and environment (XJU2022BS015); and Xinjiang University’s 2022 excellent doctoral student innovation project: scaling law of carbon reduction, pollution reduction and green expansion growth and its influencing factors (XJU2022BS010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dianyuan Ma: conceptualization, project administration, writing, review, editing, writing original draft, formal analysis, data curation, software, and visualization. Hui Sun: writing original draft, writing, review, editing, formal analysis, validation, methodology, conceptualization, funding acquisition, and supervision. XueChao Xia: writing original draft, writing, review, and editing. Yan Zhao and Zedong Yang: document proofreading.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This is an original article that did not use other information that requires ethical approval.

Consent to participate

All authors participated in this article.

Consent for publication

All authors have given consent to the publication of this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: V.V.S.S. Sarma

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• DIC can help achieve dual control of urban CE.

• The strength and synergy of diversified ER are important mechanism variables.

• DIC has the characteristics of a latecomer advantage.

• Analyzed the heterogeneity of geographical location and level of marketization.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, D., Sun, H., Xia, X. et al. Digital infrastructure construction, diversified environmental regulation, and dual control of urban carbon emissions—quasi-natural experiment from “broadband China” strategy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 101280–101295 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29484-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29484-8

Keywords

Navigation