Abstract
Digital inclusive finance eases credit constraints on innovative small and medium-sized enterprises which contributes to urban green technology innovation in China. Government intervention plays an essential role in the development of digital inclusive finance. Based on the panel data of 243 cities in China from 2011 to 2019, this paper empirically examines the relationship between digital inclusive finance and urban green technology innovation as well as the intrinsic mechanism of government intervention. The findings show that, even after a series of robustness tests, digital inclusive finance can promote the quantity and quality of green technology innovation. In terms of its mechanism, digital inclusive finance can empower green technology innovation by complementing traditional financial development and stimulating green consumption, both in terms of supply and demand. At the same time, in the dynamic process of digital financial inclusion from low to high, the development of traditional finance and green consumption level on the marginal promotion of green technology innovation continues to strengthen. The nonlinear relationship test reveals that there is a significant double threshold effect on the positive impact of digital inclusive finance on urban green technology innovation with the evolution of government intervention. The innovation incentive effect of digital financial inclusion will be marginal decreasing with the increase of government intervention. Further considering the heterogeneity of urban geographic location and environmental regulation, it is found that digital financial inclusion promotes green technology innovation more in eastern and high-environmental regulation cities. Based on the above research conclusions, this paper argues that while developing digital inclusion finance, government support policies should be adjusted promptly to constantly stimulate the “Metcalfe’s law” effect of digital inclusive finance enabling green technology innovation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data involved in this study are all from public data.
References
Acharya V, Xu Z (2017) Financial dependence and innovation: the case of public versus private firms. J Financ Econ 124:223–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.02.010
Alcaide-Marzal J, Tortajada-Esparza E (2007) Innovation assessment in traditional industries. A proposal of aesthetic innovation indicators. Scientometrics 72:33–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1708-x
Altunbas Y, Evans L, Molyneux P (2001) Bank ownership and efficiency. J Money Credit Bank 33(4):926–954. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673929
Amghizar I, Dedeyne JN, Brown DJ, Marin GB, Van Geem KM (2020) Sustainable innovations in steam cracking: CO2 neutral olefin production. React Chem Eng 5:239–257. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RE00398C
Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A, Martinez Peria MS (2007) Reaching out: access to and use of banking services across countries. J Financ Econ 85:234–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.07.002
Bergek A, Berggren C (2014) The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: a review of energy and automotive industry studies. Ecol Econ 106:112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.016
Bow Y, Liu Z (2021) Financial structure and green technological progress: theoretical model, impact effect and mechanism of action. Econ Surv 38:151–160. https://doi.org/10.15931/j.cnki.1006-1096.2021.05.006
Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA (2003) Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J Environ Econ Manag 45:278–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00058-X
Du K, Li J (2019) Towards a green world: How do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy 131:240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.033
Duarte J, Siegel S, Young L (2012) Trust and credit: the role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Rev Financ Stud 25:2455–2484. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs071
Edler J, Fagerberg J (2017) Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Rev Econ Pol 33:2–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
Gomber P, Kauffman RJ, Parker C, Weber BW (2018) On the fintech revolution: interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. J Manag Inf Syst 35:220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766
Guo F, Wang J, Wang F, Kong T, Zhang X (2020) Measuring the development of digital inclusive finance in China: indexing and spatial characteristics. Econ 19:1401–1418. https://doi.org/10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2020.03.12
Hall BH, Lerner J (2010) The financing of R&D and innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 1:609–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2
Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. J Econ 93:345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1
He Z, Chen H, Hu J, Zhang Y (2022) The impact of digital inclusive finance on provincial green development efficiency: empirical evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:90404–90418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22071-3
Huang X (2011) Analysis of the intrinsic motives of financial agglomeration. Ind Technol Econ 03:129–136
Jaeger-Erben M, Rückert-John J, Schäfer M (2015) Sustainable consumption through social innovation: a typology of innovations for sustainable consumption practices. J Clean Prod 108:784–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.042
Jafari-Sadeghi V, Sukumar A, Pagán-Castaño E, Dana LP (2021) What drives women towards domestic vs international business venturing? An empirical analysis in emerging markets. J Bus Res 134:647–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.055
Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Rev Econ Stat 79:610–619. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397557196
Jiang F, Wang Z, Bai J (2013) Dual effects of environmental regulations on technological innovation—an empirical study based on dynamic panel data of Jiangsu manufacturing industry. China Ind Econ (7):44–55. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2013.07.004
Jin F, Qi Z, Liang Y (2021) Big data, financial agglomeration and green technology innovation. Rev Econ Manage 37:97–112. https://doi.org/10.13962/j.cnki.371486/f.2021.04.008
Kahn KB (2018) Understanding innovation. Bus Horiz 61:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.011
Klette TJ, Møen J, Griliches Z (2000) Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studie. Res Policy 29:471–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00086-4
Laeven L, Levine R, Michalopoulos S (2015) Financial innovation and endogenous growth. J Finan Intermediation 24:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2014.04.001
Lanjouw JO, Mody A (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Res Policy 25:549–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00853-5
Li X, Ran G (2021) How does digital financial development affect the quality of technological innovation? Mod Econ Inq:69–77. https://doi.org/10.13891/j.cnki.mer.2021.09.008
Li X, Zhang Y, Wang X (2022) Credit allocation, environmental regulation and green technology innovation. Shanghai Economic Research 2022:95–103. https://doi.org/10.19626/j.cnki.cn31-1163/f.2022.01.004
Li Y, Sun G, Gao Q, Cheng C (2023) Digital financial inclusion, financial efficiency and green innovation. Sustainability 15:1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031879
Liu W, Zhou W, Zhong S (2014) Government intervention, capitalization process and the quality of economic growth in financial development. Econ 03:64–73
Mensah CN, Long X, Dauda L, Boamah KB, Salman M, Appiah-Twum F, Tachie AK (2019) Technological innovation and green growth in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development economies. J Clean Prod 240:118204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118204
Pi T (2010) The level of rule of law, government behavior and regional financial development in economic transition new evidence from China. Econ Rev 1:36–49. https://doi.org/10.19361/j.er.2010.01.005
Popp D (2012) The role of technological change in green growth. Bur. Econ. Res, Nat. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18506
Porter M (1996) America’s green strategy. Business and the environment: a reader 33:1072
Sarma M (2008) Index of financial inclusion. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations Working Paper. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/176233
Sarma M, Pais J (2011) Financial inclusion and development. J Int Dev 23:613–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1698
Shanmugam KR, Das A (2004) Efficiency of Indian commercial banks during the reform period. Appl Financ Econ 14:681–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960310042000233458
Song M, Fisher R, Kwoh Y (2019) Technological challenges of green innovation and sustainable resource management with large scale data. Technol Forecast Soc Change 144:361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.055
Sun H, Edziah BK, Sun C, Kporsu AK (2019) Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy 135:111002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111002
Sun Y, Tang X (2022) The impact of digital inclusive finance on sustainable economic growth in China. Financ Res Lett 50:103234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103234
Wagner M (2007) On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Res Policy 36:1587–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004
Wang Q, Yang J, Chiu YH, Lin TY (2020) The impact of digital finance on financial efficiency. Managerial Dec Econ 41:1225–1236. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3168
Wang W, Guang B (2022) Digital inclusive finance, government intervention and county economic growth - an empirical analysis based on threshold panel regression. Econ Theory Econ Manage 42:41–53
Wang W, Zhang Q, Ecer F (2022) Does green finance reform promote corporate green innovation? evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Math Probl Eng 2022:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7503917
Wang Y, An B (2019) Heterogeneous effects of financial development and government intervention on firms’ R&D investment. J Manag Eng 33(02):10–17. https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2019.02.002
Xue L, Zhang X (2022) Can Digital financial inclusion promote green innovation in heavily polluting companies? Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:7323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127323
Yao L, Yang X (2022) Can digital finance boost SME innovation by easing financing constraints?: Evidence from Chinese GEM-listed companies. PLoS One 17:e0264647. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264647
Ye X, Wu F, Lian S (2019) Financial development, local government behavior and regional technological innovation. Econ Syst Reform:129–134
Zhang R, Wu K, Cao Y, Sun H (2022a) Digital inclusive finance and consumption-based embodied carbon emissions: a dual perspective of consumption and industry upgrading. J Environ Manag 325:116632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116632
Zhang Z, Shang Y, Zhang G, Shao S, Fang J, Li P, Song S (2023a) The pollution control effect of the atmospheric environmental policy in autumn and winter: Evidence from the daily data of Chinese cities. J Environ Manag 343:118164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118164
Zhang Z, Zhang G, Li L (2022b) The spatial impact of atmospheric environmental policy on public health based on the mediation effect of air pollution in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21501-6
Zhang Z, Zhang J, Feng Y (2021) Assessment of the carbon emission reduction effect of the air pollution prevention and control action plan in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:13307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413307
Zhang Z, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Feng Y (2023b) How does urbanization affect public health? New evidence from 175 countries worldwide. Front Public Health 10:1096964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1096964
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12271231); Liaoning Provincial Social Science Planning Fund Project (L21BJY014); and Liaoning Provincial Federation Social Science Economic and Social Development Research Project (2023lslybkt-057).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Min Wang and Xiao Qi. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Wenhua Song, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A
Appendix A
The eastern cities are located in Hebei, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, Guangxi, and Hainan; the central cities are located in Shanxi, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, and Shaanxi; the western region is located in Inner Mongolia, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, M., Song, W. & Qi, X. Digital inclusive finance, government intervention, and urban green technology innovation. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29395-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29395-8