Abstract
This study investigates the effect of financial development and economic growth on ecological footprint by including non-renewable energy consumption and trade openness as additional determinants. For this purpose, annual data of 10 countries with the highest ecological footprint (China, the USA, India, Japan, Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Korea, Turkey, and the UK) for the period 1992–2017 is used. The Westerlund and Edgerton (2007) Panel LM bootstrap test results reveal that there is cointegration between the variables. Additionally, the results obtained from the Common Correlated Effects (CCE) coefficient estimator show that financial development, economic growth, and non-renewable energy consumption negatively affect environmental quality by increasing ecological footprint. On other hand, the effect of trade openness on ecological footprint is found to be statistically insignificant. In addition, according to the panel causality test results, a unidirectional causality from financial development to ecological footprint is found while bidirectional causality between economic growth and ecological footprint exists. Therefore, it would be beneficial for policymakers in such countries to direct financial resources to green energy production and consumption and to encourage projects and practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that has been used is confidential.
References
Abbasi F, Riaz K (2016) CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90:102–114
Acar S, Altıntaş N, Haziyev V (2023) The effect of financial development and economic growth on ecological footprint in Azerbaijan: an ARDL bound test approach with structural breaks. Environ Ecol Stat 30:41–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-022-00551-6
Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Cary M (2021) Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol. Indic. 121:107060
Akinsola GD, Awosusi AA, Kirikkaleli D, Umarbeyli S, Adeshola I, Adebayo TS (2022) Ecological footprint, public-private partnership investment in energy and financial development in Brazil: a gradual shift causality approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29:10077–10090
AL-Barakani A, Bin L, Zhang X, Saeed M, Qahtan ASA, Ghallab HMH (2022) Spatial analysis of financial development’s effect on the ecological footprint of belt and road initiative countries: mitigation options through renewable energy consumption and institutional quality. J. Clean. Prod 366:132696
Al-Mulali U, Wai CW, Ting LS, Mohammed AH (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol. Indic. 48:315–323
Ansari MA, Haider S, Kumar P, Kumar S, Akram V (2022) Main determinants for ecological footprint: an econometric perspective from G20 countries. Energy, Ecol. Environ. 7(3):250–267
Apergis N, Payne JE (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Econ. 34:733–738
Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26:6199–6208
Baltagi BH, Baltagi BH (2008) Econometric analysis of panel data, vol 4. Wiley, Chichester
Blomquist J, Westerlund J (2013) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation. Econ. Lett. 121(3):374–378
Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ. Model. 40:33–41
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47(1):239–253
Chien F, Anwar A, Hsu CC, Sharif A, Razzaq A, Sinha A (2021) The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technol. Soc. 65:101587
Destek MA, Okumus I (2017) Disaggregated energy consumption and economic growth in G-7 countries. Energy Source., Part B: Econ., Plann. Policy 12(9):808–814
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci. Total Environ. 650:2483–2489
Dhakal S (2009) Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications. Energy Policy 37(11):4208–4219
Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics 49:431–455
Dogan E, Shah SF (2022) Analyzing the role of renewable energy and energy ıntensity in the ecological footprint of the United Arab Emirates. Sustainability 14:227
Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ. Model. 29(4):1450–1460
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement.
Islam F, Shahbaz M, Ahmed AU, Alam MM (2013) Financial development and energy consumption nexus in Malaysia: a multivariate time series analysis. Econ Model 30:435–441
Jahanger A, Usman M, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022) The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: the moderating role of technological innovations. Resour. Policy 76:102569
Jalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ. 33:284–291
Javid M, Sharif F (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 54:406–414
Khan MK, Abbas F, Godil DI, Sharif A, Ahmed Z, Anser MK (2021) Moving towards sustainability: how do natural resources, financial development, and economic growth interact with the ecological footprint in Malaysia? A dynamic ARDL approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28(39):55579–55591
Khan S, Khan MK, Muhammad B (2020) Impact of financial development and energy consumption on environmental degradation in 184 countries using a dynamic panel model. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28:9542–9557
Kihombo S, Ahmed Z, Chen S, Adebayo TS, Kirikkaleli D (2021) Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28:61235–61245
Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 45(1):1–28
Lin B, Moubarak M (2014) Renewable energy consumption - economic growth nexus for China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 40:111–117
Majeed MT, Mazhar M (2019) Financial development and ecological footprint: a global panel data analysis. Pakistan J. Commerce Soc. Sci. (PJCSS) 13(2):487–514
Masih AMM, Masih R (1996) Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniques. Energy Economics 18:165–183
McCoskey S, Kao C (1998) A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data. Econ. Rev. 17(1):57–84
Ngoc BH, Awan A (2022) Does financial development reinforce ecological footprint in Singapore? Evidence from ARDL and Bayesian analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29:24219–24233
Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267
Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development.
Pata UK (2018) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J. Clean. Prod. 187:770–779
Pesaran H (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (working paper in Economics, vol No. 0435). University of Cambridge, USA
Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J. Appl. Economet. 22(2):265–312
Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J. Econ 142:50–93
Phillips PC, Sul D (2003) Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Econ. J. 6(1):217–259
Robertson D, Symons J (2000) Factor residuals in SUR regressions: estimating panels allowing for cross sectional correlation, vol No. 473. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Sadorsky P (2010) The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 38:2528–2535
Sadorsky P (2011) Financial development and energy consumption in Central and Eastern European frontier economies. Energy Policy 39:999–1006
Salahuddin M, Gow J, Ozturk I (2015) Is the long-run relationship between economic growth, electricity consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and financial development in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries robust? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 51:317–326
Saqib N (2022) Green energy, non-renewable energy, financial development and economic growth with carbon footprint: heterogeneous panel evidence from cross-country. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska istraživanja 35(1):6945–6964
Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emission? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 27:147–162
Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence, vol 904. World Bank Publications
Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitao NC (2013a) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 25:109–121
Shahbaz M, Lean HH (2012) Does financial development increase energy consumption? The role of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia. Energy Policy 40:473–479
Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013b) Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ. Model. 35:145–152
Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M (2013c) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459
Shahbaz M, Van Hoang TH, Mahalik MK, Roubaud D (2017) Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Econ 63:199–212
Shahzad SJH, Kumar RR, Zakaria M, Hurr M (2017) Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 70:185–192
Shoaib HM, Rafique MZ, Nadeem AM, Huang S (2020) Impact of financial development on CO2 emissions: a comparative analysis of developing countries (D8) and developed countries (G8). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(11):12461–12475
Swamy PA (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. J. Econ. Soc., Econometrica 38(2):311–323
Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy policy 37:246–253
Tamazian A, Rao BB (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ. 32:137–145
Usman M, Makhdum MSA, Kousar R (2021) Does fnancial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustain. Cities Soc. 65:102590
Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2007) A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Econ. Lett. 97(3):185–190
Yang J, Zhang Y, Meng Y (2015) Study on the impact of economic growth and financial development on the environment in China. J. Sys. Sci. Inform. 3(4):334–347
Zeraibi A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Murshed M (2021) The influences of renewable electricity generation, technological innovation, financial development, and economic growth on ecological footprints in ASEAN-5 countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28(37):51003–51021
Zhang YJ (2011) The impact of financial development on carbon emissions_an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 39:2197–2203
Zia S, Rahman MU, Noor MH, Khan MK, Bibi M, Godil DI et al (2021) Striving towards environmental sustainability: how natural resources, human capital, financial development, and economic growth interact with ecological footprint in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28(37):52499–52513
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Muhammad Shahbaz: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, and writing original draft. Mesut Dogan: supervision, writing—review and editing, and visualization. Hilmi Tunahan Akkus: writing—review and editing. Samet Gursoy: writing—review.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shahbaz, M., Dogan, M., Akkus, H.T. et al. The effect of financial development and economic growth on ecological footprint: evidence from top 10 emitter countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 73518–73533 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27573-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27573-2