Abstract
It is undeniable fact that financial development and technological capital are fundamental determinants that help in the achievement of green growth. This is important to explore the nexus between financial development, technological capital, and green growth in China. This study utilizes the quantile autoregressive distributed lag (QARDL) approach for exploring the effect of financial development and technological capital on green growth. The study measures financial development through financial market development and financial institutions development. The study concludes that technological progress and both measures of financial development produce a positive impact on green growth in China in most quantities in long run. The study provides various important policy suggestions that help in upgrading sustainable green growth in China.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2012) The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev 102(1):131–166
Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Hanley D, Kerr W (2016) Transition to clean technology. J Polit Econ 124(1):52–104
Ahmed F, Kousar S, Pervaiz A, Shabbir A (2022) Do institutional quality and financial development affect sustainable economic growth? Evidence from South Asian countries. Borsa Istanb Rev 22(1):189–196
Aghion P, Dechezleprêtre A, Hemous D, Martin R, Van Reenen J (2016) Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: evidence from the auto industry. J Polit Econ 124(1):1–51
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Lean HH (2015) The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat Hazards 79:621–644
Cao J, Law SH, Samad ARA, Mohamad WNW (2023) Internal mechanism analysis of the financial vanishing effect on green growth: evidence from China. Energy Econ 106579
Chao T, Yunbao X, Chengbo D, Bo L, Ullah S (2023) Financial integration and renewable energy consumption in China: do education and digital economy development matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(5):12944–12952
Chen R, Ramzan M, Hafeez M, Ullah S (2023) Green innovation-green growth nexus in BRICS: does financial globalization matter? J Innov Knowl 8(1):100286
Cho JS, Kim TH, Shin Y (2015) Quantile cointegration in the autoregressive distributed-lag modeling framework. J Econ 188(1):281–300
Du K, Li P, Yan Z (2019) Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 146:297–303
Dwivedi YK, Hughes L, Kar AK, Baabdullah AM, Grover P, Abbas R, ... Wade M (2022) Climate change and COP26: are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. Int J Inf Manag 63:102456
Hao LN, Umar M, Khan Z, Ali W (2021) Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: how critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Sci Total Environ 752:141853
Jiakui C, Abbas J, Najam H, Liu J, Abbas J (2023) Green technological innovation, green finance, and financial development and their role in green total factor productivity: empirical insights from China. J Clean Prod 382:135131
Lei W, Ozturk I, Muhammad H, Ullah S (2022) On the asymmetric effects of financial deepening on renewable and non-renewable energy consumption: insights from China. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 35(1):3961–3978
Li X, Ozturk I, Majeed MT, Hafeez M, Ullah S (2022a) Considering the asymmetric effect of financial deepening on environmental quality in BRICS economies: policy options for the green economy. J Clean Prod 331:129909
Li X, Ozturk I, Ullah S, Andlib Z, Hafeez M (2022b) Can top-pollutant economies shift some burden through insurance sector development for sustainable development? Econ Anal Policy 74:326–336
Li X, Shaikh PA, Ullah S (2022c) Exploring the potential role of higher education and ICT in China on green growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(43):64560–64567
ling Guo L, Qu Y, Tseng ML (2017) The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. J Clean Prod 162:894–902
Lutz RJ, Kakkar P (1975) The psychological situation as a determinant of consumer behavior. Adv Consum Res 2(1):439–454
Mensah CN, Long X, Dauda L, Boamah KB, Salman M, Appiah-Twum F, Tachie AK (2019) Technological innovation and green growth in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development economies. J Clean Prod 240:118204
Mohsin M, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Iqbal N, Saydaliev HB (2022) The role of technological progress and renewable energy deployment in green economic growth. Renew Energy 190:777–787
Peng X (2020) Strategic interaction of environmental regulation and green productivity growth in China: green innovation or pollution refuge? Sci Total Environ 732:139200
Rogelj J, Den Elzen M, Höhne N, Fransen T, Fekete H, Winkler H, ... Meinshausen M (2016) Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C. Nature 534(7609):631–639
Sohag K, Taşkın FD, Malik MN (2019) Green economic growth, cleaner energy and militarization: evidence from Turkey. Resour Policy 63:101407
Sohail MT, Ullah S, Majeed MT (2023) Transportation taxes and CO2 emissions nexus in BCIST economies: implication for environmental sustainability. Energy Environ 0958305X231159445
Sun H, Edziah BK, Sun C, Kporsu AK (2019) Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy 135:111002
Ullah S, Ozturk I, Majeed MT, Ahmad W (2021) Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 316:128239
Umar M, Ji X, Kirikkaleli D, Shahbaz M, Zhou X (2020) Environmental cost of natural resources utilization and economic growth: can China shift some burden through globalization for sustainable development? Sustain Dev 28(6):1678–1688
Wang X, Shao Q (2019) Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: evidence from panel threshold regression. Sci Total Environ 660:1346–1354
Wang Y, Sun X, Guo X (2019) Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors. Energy Policy 132:611–619
Wang Z, Zhu Y (2020) Do energy technology innovations contribute to CO2 emissions abatement? A spatial perspective. Sci Total Environ 726:138574
Wei X, Ren H, Ullah S, Bozkurt C (2023) Does environmental entrepreneurship play a role in sustainable green development? Evidence from emerging Asian economies. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(1):73–85
Xu L, Ullah S (2023) Evaluating the impacts of digitalization, financial efficiency, and education on renewable energy consumption: new evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–10
Yang L, Ni M (2022) Is financial development beneficial to improve the efficiency of green development? Evidence from the “Belt and Road” countries. Energy Econ 105:105734
Yang X, Yang Z, Jia Z (2021) Effects of technology spillover on CO2 emissions in China: a threshold analysis. Energy Rep 7:2233–2244
Yii KJ, Geetha C (2017) The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: evidence from granger causality test. Energy Procedia 105:3118–3124
Yin W, Kirkulak-Uludag B, Zhang S (2019) Is financial development in China green? Evidence from city level data. J Clean Prod 211:247–256
Zhao J, Shahbaz M, Dong K (2022) How does energy poverty eradication promote green growth in China? The role of technological innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 175:121384
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This idea was given by Wenjuan Zhao. Wenjuan Zhao, Jianhua Huangfu, and Miao Chang analyzed the data and wrote the complete paper, while Lei Yu and Sidra Sohail read and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
I am free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Table 6
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, W., Huangfu, J., Chang, M. et al. Financial development–green growth nexus in China: the role of technological capital. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 67676–67685 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26811-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26811-x