Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A safety assessment model of filling mining based on comprehensive weighting-set pair analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Filling mining is the main mining method in coal mine, and its safety is the pillar of the overall safety of the mine. Filling mining can effectively protect the surface environment, better solve the problem of ground pressure, and maximize the recovery of underground resources. Therefore, this method has an irreplaceable role in deep mining of coal mines and is highly valued by the mining industry all around the world. In order to evaluate the implementation effect of filling mining, a comprehensive weighting-set pair analysis safety evaluation model is established. This model optimizes the subjectivity of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the objectivity of Entropy Weight Method (EWM) in traditional methods. Besides, we add experts’ weight to Entropy Weight Method. The combination of the two methods makes the index weight more reasonable and effective, and can more fully reflect the difference and correlation of index. Firstly, the accident causation analysis and taxonomy (ACAT) is used to find out the accident causation factors of filling mining, and then, the AHP and EWM are used to determine the weight of each evaluation index from different perspectives. Then, the evaluation group is established to score the importance of each expert, so as to reduce the subjectivity of expert scoring. Finally, according to the principle of set pair analysis, the safety evaluation model of filling mining is applied to Yuxing Coal Mine in Inner Mongolia. The evaluation result shows that the safety grade of this mine is grade 1 “safety.” This paper provides a new way and direction for the comprehensive evaluation of similar mining methods, the establishment of index system, the acquisition of index weights, and the evaluation of safety level, which has promotion and application value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  • Ataei M, Mikaeil R, Hoseinie SH, Hosseini SM (2012) Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process approach for ranking the sawability of carbonate rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 50:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Guo H, Lin H (2021) Evolutionary model of coal mine safety system based on multi-agent modeling. Process Saf Environ 147:1193–1200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Wang K, Dong X, Li H (2020) Emergency rescue capability evaluation on urban fire stations in China. Process Saf Environ 135:59–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XF, Miao YC, Chen WT (2019) Study on evaluation of mine floor water inrush danger based on fuzzy set pair analysis method. Coal Sci Technol 47:218–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong T, Yi S, Heng C (2017) Application of set pair analysis method on occupational hazard of coal mining. Saf Sci 92:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadidi LA, Khater MA (2015) Loss prevention in turnaround maintenance projects by selecting contractors based on safety criteria using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). J Loss Prevent Proc 34:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao WH (2020) Study on coalmine security assessment based on entropy weight-set pair analysis. Coal Geol China 32:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • He Q, Xu J (2020) Risk assessment model of coal mine hidden danger investigation and management based on information entropy and set pair analysis. China Energy Environ Protect 42:56–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoscan O, Cetinyokus S (2021) Determination of emergency assembly point for industrial accidents with AHP analysis. J Loss Prevent Proc 69:104386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y (2008) Analysis and evaluation of systemic security for deep exploitation filling mining in Tonglushan mine [D]. Wuhan University of Science and Technology

  • Huimin G, Lianhua C, Shugang L, Haifei L (2020) Regional risk assessment methods in relation to urban public safety. Process Saf Environ 143:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing GX, Zhang JL, Jia ZW, Qin RQ (2022) Research on coal mine permeable risk assessment based on the set pair analysis method. J Saf Environ 22:566–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Keprate A, Ratnayake RMC (2016) Enhancing offshore process safety by selecting fatigue critical piping locations for inspection using fuzzy-AHP based approach. Process Saf Environ 102:71–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Xie DX (2020) Risk prediction of gas leakage event based on combination weight and risk matrix method. Shandong Chem Ind 49:231–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Zhang L, Liang W (2017) An accident causation analysis and taxonomy (ACAT) model of complex industrial system from both system safety and control theory perspectives. Saf Sci 92:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Zhang L, Liang W (2016) Job hazard dynamic assessment for non-routine tasks in gas transmission station. J Loss Prevent Proc 44:459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Liang W, Zhang L, Tang Q (2015) Performance assessment system of health, safety and environment based on experts’ weights and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. J Loss Prevent Proc 35:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Wang K, Liu L, Xin J, Yang H, Gao C (2011) Application of the entropy weight and TOPSIS method in safety evaluation of coal mines. Proc Eng 26:2085–2091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marhavilas PK, Filippidis M, Koulinas GK, Koulouriotis DE (2020) An expanded HAZOP-study with fuzzy-AHP (XPA-HAZOP technique): application in a sour crude-oil processing plant. Saf Sci 124:104590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H, Dawal SZM, Nukman Y, Aoyama H (2014) A hybrid approach for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in machine tool selection with consideration of the interactions of attributes. Expert Syst Appl 41:3078–3090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ooi J, Promentilla MAB, Tan RR, Ng DKS, Chemmangattuvalappil NG (2017) A systematic methodology for multi-objective molecular design via analytic hierarchy process. Process Saf Environ 111:663–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi JW, Chen ZL, Sun YF, Xu C (2015) Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of backfill mining controlling surface subsidence. China Tungsten Industry (4):21–26. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-0622.2015.04.004

  • Song Z, Zhu H, Jia G, He C (2014) Comprehensive evaluation on self-ignition risks of coal stockpiles using fuzzy AHP approaches. J Loss Prevent Proc 32:78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Cao Q, Zhou L (2018) Research on the influencing factors in coal mine production safety based on the combination of DEMATEL and ISM. Saf Sci 103:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Zhang HW (2019) Application of MATLAB entropy weight set pair analysis method in groundwater quality evaluation in Xinxiang city. Water Resour South-to-North Water Diversion 48:27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • You XG, Chen MB (2021) Environmental risk assessment of oil spill accident in Daxie port area of Zhoushan Port in Ningbo based on entropy weight fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Shipp Manag 3:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan F, Xu K (2018) A set pair analysis based layer of protection analysis and its application in quantitative risk assessment. J Loss Prevent Proc 55:313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan L, Zhang L, Liang W, Li W, Du M (2017) Key factors identification and dynamic fuzzy assessment of health, safety and environment performance in petroleum enterprises. Saf Sci 94:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XR, Li YF, Gao S, Chen KL (2021) Stability evaluation method of railway rock slope based on combined weighting ⁃ set pair analysis. Railw Eng 61:93–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou HW, Zhao JW, Su T, Zhang L, Zhong JC, Liu ZL (2021) Characterization of gas flow in backfill mining-induced coal seam using a fractional derivative-based permeability model. Int J Rock Mech Min 138:104571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Li W, Miao P, Sun B, Kong F (2020) Risk grade assessment of sudden water pollution based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut R 27:469–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Li J, Yu B, Han D, Chen Y (2019a) Fast prediction of the replacement process of oil vapor in horizontal tank and its improved safety evaluation method. Process Saf Environ 122:298–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, He X, Mitri H (2019b) Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of virtual reality mine safety training system. Saf Sci 120:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YF, Zhang LY (2018) Safety evaluation of coal and gas outburst based on set-valued statistics-grey fuzzy. Coal Technol 37:176–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Xu J, Xu J, Chen D, Shi J (2017) Pier-column backfill mining technology for controlling surface subsidence. Int J Rock Mech Min 96:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51704179), the first-class discipline construction projects (01AQ03703, 01CK05902), and was supported by the SDUST Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-Founded By Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China

    Dongmei Huang, Xinzhao Wang, Xikun Chang, Shuyu Qiao, Yingying Zhu & Daqian Xing

  2. College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China

    Dongmei Huang, Xinzhao Wang, Shuyu Qiao, Yingying Zhu & Daqian Xing

  3. College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China

    Xikun Chang

Authors
  1. Dongmei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinzhao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xikun Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shuyu Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yingying Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daqian Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Dongmei Huang (first author), conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, formal analysis, and writing — original draft. Xinzhao Wang, data curation and writing — original draft. Xikun Chang, visualization and investigation. Shuyu Qiao, resources and supervision. Yingying Zhu, software and validation. Daqian Xing, visualization and writing — review and editing. Xinzhao Wang (corresponding author), conceptualization, funding acquisition, resources, supervision, and writing — review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinzhao Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Shimin Liu

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, D., Wang, X., Chang, X. et al. A safety assessment model of filling mining based on comprehensive weighting-set pair analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 60746–60759 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26717-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26717-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation