Abstract
The research intends to enlarge the environmental economics literature by displaying the probable mechanisms between green innovation, higher education, and sustainable development. In the context of a new era, sustainability faces challenging obstacles. Many studies have looked at fundamental factors affecting CO2 emissions, while the impact of green innovation and higher education is essential but mostly ignored. This study looked at 60 Belt and Road Initiative (B.R.I.) economies to see how factors, including green innovation, economic complexity index, I.C.T., and higher education, affect carbon emissions in the presence of sustainable development using annual data from 2000–2020. In order to calculate the persistence of the connection between the factors, this research uses the CS-ARDL. The results’ robustness and reliability were examined using PMG estimation. The results indicate that the economic complexity index and urbanization positively impact carbon emission (CO2). Higher education (E.D.U.) has a significant positive impact in the short run and a negative effect in the long run-on carbon emissions. Similarly, information and communication technology (I.C.T.) and green innovation have a negative impact on carbon emission (CO2). Moreover, the results indicate that the moderate effect of green innovation with economic complexity index, information and communication technology, and higher education has a negative impact on carbon emission. The estimated coefficients also provide significant policy implications for the chosen and the other developing markets in designing an adequate route ahead to a sustainable environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data can be available on request.
Abbreviations
- CO 2 :
-
Carbon emissions
- B.R.I :
-
Belt & Road Initiative economies
- I.C.T :
-
Information and communication technology
- E.D.U :
-
Education
- CS-ARDL :
-
Cross-sectional autoregressive distributive lag model
- PMG :
-
Pooled mean group
- E.C.I :
-
Economic complexity index
- G.I :
-
Green innovations
- C.S.D :
-
Cross-sectional dependency
- CADF :
-
Covariate-augmented Dickey-Fuller
- CIPS :
-
Cross-sectionally augmented Im, Pesaran and Shin
References
Abdo AB, Li B, Qahtan ASA, Abdulsalam A, Aloqab A, Obadi W (2022) The influence of FDI on GHG emissions in BRI countries using spatial econometric analysis strategy: the significance of biomass energy consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:54571–54595. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-022-19384-8/TABLES/7
Achi A, Adeola O, Achi FC (2022) CSR and green process innovation as antecedents of micro, small, and medium enterprise performance: moderating role of perceived environmental volatility. J Bus Res 139:771–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.016
Addo R, Koers G, Timpson WM (2022) Teaching sustainable development goals and social development: a case study teaching method 41:1478–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2022.211216841
Ahmad M, Ahmed Z, Bai Y, Qiao G, Popp J, Oláh J (2022) Financial inclusion, technological innovations, and environmental quality: analyzing the role of green openness. Front Environ Sci 10:80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.851263
Ai Z (2022) Relationship quality, absorptive capacity and innovation performance of industry university research cooperative enterprises. J Comput Methods Sci Eng 22:447–456. https://doi.org/10.3233/JCM-215749
Asbahi AAMHA, Gang FZ, Iqbal W, Abass Q, Mohsin M, Iram R (2019) Novel approach of principal component analysis method to assess the national energy performance via Energy Trilemma Index. Energy Rep 5:704–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.06.009
Awosusi AA, Adebayo TS, Kirikkaleli D, Altuntaş M (2022) Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2059032
Chen Q, Ning B, Pan Y, Xiao J (2021) Green finance and outward foreign direct investment: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of green insurance in China. Asia Pac J Manag 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09750-w
Chen X, Chen W, Lu K (2023) Does an imbalance in the population gender ratio affect FinTech innovation? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 188:122164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122164
Cheng C, Yang X, Jiang F, Yang Z (2023) How to synergize different institutional logics of firms in cross-border acquisitions: a matching theory perspective. Manag Int Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-023-00502-8
Chien F, Ananzeh M, Mirza F, Bakar A, Vu HM, Ngo TQ (2021) The effects of green growth, environmental-related tax, and eco-innovation towards carbon neutrality target in the US economy. J Environ Manag 299:113633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113633
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom 188:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECONOM.2015.03.007
D’Amato A, Mazzanti M, Nicolli F (2021) Green technologies and environmental policies for sustainable development: testing direct and indirect impacts. J Clean Prod 309:127060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127060
Dauda L, Long X, Mensah CN, Salman M, Boamah KB, Ampon-Wireko S, Kofi Dogbe CS (2021) Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. J Clean Prod 281:125143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143
Dong F, Li Y, Qin C, Sun J (2021) How industrial convergence affects regional green development efficiency: a spatial conditional process analysis. J Environ Manag 300:113738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113738
Du K, Cheng Y, Yao X (2021) Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: the road to the green transformation of Chinese cities. Energy Econ 98:105247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105247
Du L, Razzaq A, Waqas M (2022) The impact of COVID - 19 on small - and medium - sized enterprises ( SMEs ): empirical evidence for green economic implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22221-7
Eliades F, Doula MK, Papamichael I, Vardopoulos I, Voukkali I, Zorpas AA (2022) Carving out a niche in the sustainability confluence for environmental education centers in Cyprus and Greece. Sustain 14:8368. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14148368
Ermenc KS, Niemczyk EK (2022) Education for sustainable development. Sodob Pedagog Contemp Educ Stud 73:146–149. https://doi.org/10.21300/21.4.2020.2
Falcone PM (2020) Environmental regulation and green investments: the role of green finance. Int J Green Econ 14:159–173. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijge.2020.109735
Fan F, Lian H, Liu X, Wang X (2021) Can environmental regulation promote urban green innovation Efficiency? An empirical study based on Chinese cities. J Clean Prod 287:125060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125060
Fang Z, Bai H, Bilan Y (2020) Evaluation research of green innovation efficiency in China’s heavy polluting industries. Sustain 12:146. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010146
Fang Z, Razzaq A, Mohsin M, Irfan M (2022) Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China. Technol Soc 68:101844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101844
Feng H, Liu Z, Wu J, Iqbal W, Ahmad W, Marie M (2022a) Nexus between government spending’s and green economic performance: role of green finance and structure effect. Environ Technol Innov 27:102461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102461
Feng S, Zhang R, Li G (2022b) Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 61:70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.02.008
Frees EW (1995) Assessing cross-sectional correlation in panel data. J Econom 69:393–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01658-M
Fülöp MT, Breaz TO, He X, Ionescu CA, Cordoş GS, Stanescu SG (2022) The role of universities’ sustainability, teachers’ wellbeing, and attitudes toward e-learning during COVID-19. Front Public Healt 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2022.981593
Gao X, Wang S, Ahmad F, Chandio AA, Ahmad M, Xue D (2021a) The nexus between misallocation of land resources and green technological innovation: a novel investigation of Chinese cities. Clean Technol Environ Policy 23:2101–2115. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10098-021-02107-X/TABLES/9
Guo Q, Zhong J (2022) The effect of urban innovation performance of smart city construction policies: Evaluate by using a multiple period difference-in-differences model. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 184:122003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122003
Guo B, Wang Y, Zhang H, Liang C, Feng Y et al (2023) Impact of the digital economy on high-quality urban economic development: Evidence from Chinese cities. Econ Model 120:106194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106194
Gupta H, Barua MK (2018) A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci Total Environ 633:122–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.173
Gupta H, Kumar A, Wasan P (2021) Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: an integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations. J Clean Prod 295:126253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253
Hafner S, Jones A, Anger-Kraavi A, Pohl J (2020) Closing the green finance gap – a systems perspective. Environ Innov Soc Transitions 34:26–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.007
Hai Ming L, Gang L, Hua H, Waqas M (2022) Modeling the influencing factors of electronic word-of-mouth about CSR on social networking sites. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20476-8
He Q, Xia P, Hu C, Li B (2022) Public information, actual intervention and inflation expectations. Transform Bus Econ 21(3C):644–666
Huang P (2022) The effect of regional policy on corporate innovation performance based on propensity score matching method. J Comput Methods Sci Eng 22:821–831. https://doi.org/10.3233/JCM-225990
Han B (2021) Research on the influence of technological innovation on carbon productivity and countermeasures in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:16880–16894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11890-x
He Q, Wu Z, Li S, Li H, Wang Y (2022) Two decades of the evolution of China’s green building policy: insights from text mining. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2022.2142498
Hermundsdottir F, Haneberg DH, Aspelund A (2022) Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on environmental innovations in manufacturing firms. Technol Soc 68:101918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101918
Hou Y, Iqbal W, Shaikh GM, Iqbal N, Solangi YA, Fatima A (2019) Measuring energy efficiency and environmental performance: a case of South Asia. Processes 7:325. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7060325
Hsu C-C, Quang-Thanh N, Chien F, Li L, Mohsin M (2021) Evaluating green innovation and performance of financial development: mediating concerns of environmental regulation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:57386–57397. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-14499-W/TABLES/5
Hu F, Qiu L, Xi X et al (2022) Has COVID-19 changed China’s digital trade?—Implications for health economics. Front Public Heal 10:831549. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2022.831549
Huang Y, Ahmad M, Ali S, Kirikkaleli D (2022) Does eco-innovation promote cleaner energy? Analyzing the role of energy price and human capital. Energy 239:122268. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2021.122268
Irani F, Kiliç H, Adeshola I (2022) Impact of green human resource management practices on the environmental performance of green hotels. J Hosp Mark Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.2022554
Tong D, Chu J, Han Q, Liu X (2022) How land finance drives urban expansion under fiscal pressure: evidence from Chinese Cities. Land 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020253
Jain R, Ping Hung Li E, Lee JTH (2022) The role of the Indian political regime in higher education reforms for innovation drive: key comparisons with China. J Asian Afr Stud. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096221097666/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_00219096221097666-FIG2.JPEG
Ji X, Umar M, Ali S, Ali W, Tang K, Khan Z (2021) Does fiscal decentralization and eco-innovation promote sustainable environment? A case study of selected fiscally decentralized countries. Sustain Dev 29:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2132
Jiang Z, Lyu P, Ye L, Zhou YW (2020) Green innovation transformation, economic sustainability and energy consumption during China’s new normal stage. J Clean Prod 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123044
Karlsson S, Mazur S, Nguyen H (2023) Vector autoregression models with skewness and heavy tails. J Econ Dyn Control 146:104580. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEDC.2022.104580
Katircioǧlu ST (2014) Testing the tourism-induced EKC hypothesis: the case of Singapore. Econ Model 41:383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.05.028
Khan SAR, Ibrahim RL, Al-Amin AQ, Yu Z (2022) An ideology of sustainability under technological revolution: striving towards sustainable development. Sustain 14:4415. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14084415
Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS (2022) Political risk and environmental quality in Brazil: role of green finance and green innovation. Int J Financ Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJFE.2732
Lee CL, Gumulya N, Bangura M (2022) The role of mandatory building efficiency disclosure on green building price premium: evidence from Australia. Build 12:297. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS12030297
Li Wei, Elheddad M, Doytch N (2021a) The impact of innovation on environmental quality: evidence for the non-linear relationship of patents and CO2 emissions in China. J Environ Manage 292:112781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112781
Li W, Yi P, Zhang D (2021b) Investigation of sustainability and key factors of Shenyang city in China using GRA and SRA methods. Sustain Cities Soc 68:102796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102796
Li X, Wang J, Yang C (2023a) Risk prediction in financial management of listed companies based on optimized BP neural network under digital economy. Neural Comput Applic 35(3):2045–2058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07377-0
Li X, Zhang X, Jia T (2023b) Humanization of nature: testing the influences of urban park characteristics and psychological factors on collegers’ perceived restoration. Urban For Urban Green 79:127806. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2022.127806
Li M, Yao-Ping Peng M, Nazar R, Ngozi Adeleye B, Shang M, Waqas M (2022) How does energy efficiency mitigate carbon emissions without reducing economic growth in post COVID-19 era. Front Energy Res 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.832189
Liu Y, Dong F (2021) How technological innovation impacts urban green economy efficiency in emerging economies: a case study of 278 Chinese cities. Resour Conserv Recycl 169:105534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105534
Liu Y, Zhu J, Li EY, Meng Z, Song Y (2020) Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: the case of Yangtze river economic belt in China. Technol Forecast Soc Change 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119993
Liu L, Li Z, Fu X et al (2022a) Impact of Power on Uneven Development: Evaluating Built-Up Area Changes in Chengdu Based on NPP-VIIRS Images (2015–2019). Land 11(4):489. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND11040489
Liu X, Kong M, Tong D et al (2022b) Property rights and adjustment for sustainable development during post-productivist transitions in China. Land Use Policy 122:106379. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2022.106379
Liu X, Tong D, Huang J et al (2022c) What matters in the e-commerce era? Modelling and mapping shop rents in Guangzhou, China. Land Use Policy 123:106430. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2022.106430
Liu H, Tang YM, Iqbal W, Raza H (2022d) Assessing the role of energy finance, green policies, and investment towards green economic recovery. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:21275–21288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17160-8
Luo Q, Miao C, Sun L, Meng X, Duan M (2019) Efficiency evaluation of green technology innovation of China’s strategic emerging industries: an empirical analysis based on Malmquist-data envelopment analysis index. J Clean Prod 238:117782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117782
Luo Y, Salman M, Lu Z (2021) Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China. Sci Total Environ 759:143744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143744
Lv C, Shao C, Lee CC (2021) Green technology innovation and financial development: do environmental regulation and innovation output matter? Energy Econ 98:105237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105237
Ma D, Zhu Q (2022) Innovation in emerging economies: research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development. J Bus Res 145:801–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2022.03.041
Majeed A, Ye C, Chenyun Y, Wei X, Muniba (2022) Roles of natural resources, globalization, and technological innovations in mitigation of environmental degradation in BRI economies. PLoS One 17:e0265755. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0265755
Mirčetić V, Ivanović T, Knežević S, Arsić VB, Obradović T, Karabašević D, Vukotić S, Brzaković T, Adamović M, Milojević S, Milašinović M, Mitrović A, Špiler M (2022) The innovative human resource management framework: impact of green competencies on organisational performance. Sustain 14:2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052713
Mura M, Longo M, Micheli P, Bolzani D (2018) The evolution of sustainability measurement research. Int J Manag Rev 20:661–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12179
Musibau HO, Adedoyin FF, Shittu WO (2021) A quantile analysis of energy efficiency, green investment, and energy innovation in most industrialized nations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:19473–19484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12002-5
Nasir MH, Wen J, Nassani AA, Haffar M, Igharo AE, Musibau HO, Waqas M (2022) Energy security and energy poverty in emerging economies: a step towards sustainable energy efficiency. Front Energy Res 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.834614
Oyebanji MO, Kirikkaleli D (2022) Green technology, green electricity, and environmental sustainability in Western European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-022-24793-W/FIGURES/1
Peng X (2020) Strategic interaction of environmental regulation and green productivity growth in China: green innovation or pollution refuge? Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139200
Peng B, Zheng C, Wei G, Elahi E (2020) The cultivation mechanism of green technology innovation in manufacturing industry: from the perspective of ecological niche. J Clean Prod 252:119711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119711
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empir Econ 60:13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22:265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Qin L, Kirikkaleli D, Hou Y, Miao X, Tufail M (2021) Carbon neutrality target for G7 economies: examining the role of environmental policy, green innovation and composite risk index. J Environ Manag 295:113119. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.113119
Qu C, Shao J, Cheng Z (2020) Can embedding in global value chain drive green growth in China’s manufacturing industry? J Clean Prod 268:121962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121962
Raza Z (2020) Effects of regulation-driven green innovations on short sea shippinǵs environmental and economic performance. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 84:102340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102340
Sellitto MA, Camfield CG, Buzuku S (2020) Green innovation and competitive advantages in a furniture industrial cluster: a survey and structural model. Sustain Prod Consum 23:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.04.007
Shan S, Genç SY, Kamran HW, Dinca G (2021) Role of green technology innovation and renewable energy in carbon neutrality: a sustainable investigation from Turkey. J Environ Manag 294:113004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113004
Shao X, Zhong Y, Liu W, Li RYM (2021) Modeling the effect of green technology innovation and renewable energy on carbon neutrality in N-11 countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. J Environ Manag 296:113189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113189
Shen N, Wang Y, Peng H, Hou Z (2020) Renewable energy green innovation, fossil energy consumption, and air pollution-spatial empirical analysis based on China. Sustain 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12166397
Sun Y, Razzaq A (2022) Composite fiscal decentralisation and green innovation: imperative strategy for institutional reforms and sustainable development in OECD countries. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2292
Sun Y, Razzaq A, Sun H, Irfan M (2022) The asymmetric influence of renewable energy and green innovation on carbon neutrality in China: analysis from non-linear ARDL model. Renew Energy 193:334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.159
Tang YM, Chau KY, Fatima A, Waqas M (2022a) Industry 4.0 technology and circular economy practices: business management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19081-6
Tang YM, Lau Y, yip, Chau KY (2022b) Towards a sustainable online peer learning model based on student’s perspectives. Educ Inf Technol 27:12449–12468. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-022-11136-Y/FIGURES/5
Vrontis D, Thrassou A, Efthymiou L, Uzunboylu N, Weber Y, Shams SMR, Tsoukatos E (2022) Editorial introduction: business under crisis—avenues for innovation, entrepreneurship and sustainability. Palgrave Stud Cross-Disciplinary Bus Res Assoc EuroMed Acad Bus 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76583-5_1
Wang J, Wang W, Ran Q, Irfan M, Ren S, Yang X, Wu H, Ahmad M (2022) Analysis of the mechanism of the impact of internet development on green economic growth: evidence from 269 prefecture cities in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:9990–10004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16381-1
Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2007) A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Econ Lett 97:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.003
Wu B, Liu Z, Gu Q, Tsai F (2023) Underdog mentality, identity discrimination and access to peer-to-peer lending market: Exploring effects of digital authentication. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 83:101714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101714
Xiong Z, Weng X, Wei Y (2022) SandplayAR: evaluation of psychometric game for people with generalized anxiety disorder. Arts Psychother 80:101934. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AIP.2022.101934
Yan X, Zhang Y (2021) The effects of green innovation and environmental management on the environmental performance and value of a firm: an empirical study of energy-intensive listed companies in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:35870–35879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12761-9
Yu CH, Wu X, Zhang D, Chen S, Zhao J (2021) Demand for green finance: resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Mansoor S, Sinha A, Qin Q (2022) ICT and education as determinants of environmental quality: the role of financial development in selected Asian countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change 177:121547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121547
Zhao X, Ma X, Shang Y, Yang Z, Shahzad U (2022) Green economic growth and its inherent driving factors in Chinese cities: based on the Metafrontier-global-SBM super-efficiency DEA model. Gondwana Res 106:315–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GR.2022.01.013
Zhou G, Zhu J, Luo S (2022) The impact of fintech innovation on green growth in China: mediating effect of green finance. Ecol Econ 193:107308. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2021.107308
Acknowledgements
2018 Tianjin Education Commission Major Project:“Belt and Road” A Study on the Output Mode of Training Dual Teachers and Applied Talents in Vocational Education. Project Code:2018JWZD10 ( as a form of research result).
Funding
This study was supported by the 2018 Tianjin Education Commission Major Project: “Belt and Road” A Study on the Output Mode of Training Dual Teachers and Applied Talents in Vocational Education. Project Code:2018JWZD10 ( as a form of research result).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Biao Li: conceptualization, data curation, methodology; Jilin Chang: writing—original draft; Jianxun Guo: data curation, visualization; Chen Zhou: supervision, editing; Xiaofei Ren: writing—review and editing; Jing Liu: software, visualization, editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We declare that we have no human participants, human data, or human tissues.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, B., Chang, J., Guo, J. et al. Do green innovation, I.C.T., and economic complexity matter for sustainable development of B.R.I. economies: moderating role of higher education. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 57833–57849 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26405-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26405-7