Abstract
Achieving sustainable environmental growth and preventing further environmental degradation are challenging goals for policymakers. This study looks at environmental laws and green finance’s role in fostering a more sustainable environment. The literature still needs to empirically or theoretically investigate how environmental laws and green financing affect carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, particularly when combined with moderating factors such as social and economic globalization. As a result, this study investigates how environmental laws and green funding can help the N-11 nations cut their CO2 emissions. Our research uses empirical data from a group of the N-11 nations that span the years 2000 to 2019. To handle issues with panel data analysis, such as cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity, we use advanced panel approaches (CIPS and CADF unit root and cointegration test and cross-sectional augmented ARDL). This research demonstrates that green financing (GFI) and environmental laws (ENV) have a negative but significant effect on CO2 emissions. While social globalization moderates the causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP while negatively and significantly causing GFI and ENV with CO2 emissions among the N-11 countries, economic growth has had a positive and significant effect on CO2 emissions in the N-11 countries. According to our research, nations could achieve the SDG-7 and SDG-13 goals if they adopted green financial and environmental policies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not required.
References
Akadiri SS, Uzuner G, Akadiri AC, Lasisi TT (2021) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the case of tourism island states: the moderating role of globalization. Int J Financ Econ 26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1938
Ali Chandio A, Sethi N, Prasad Dash D, Usman M (2022) Towards sustainable food production: what role ICT and technological development can play for cereal production in Asian–7 countries? Comput Electron Agric 202:107368. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPAG.2022.107368
Ayad H, Sari-Hassoun SE, Usman M, Ahmad P (2023) The impact of economic uncertainty, economic growth and energy consumption on environmental degradation in MENA countries: fresh insights from multiple thresholds NARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:1806–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-022-22256-W/METRICS
Banerjee A, Carrion-i-Silvestre JL (2017) Testing for panel cointegration using common correlated effects estimators. J Time Ser Anal 38(4):610–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12234
Batrancea I, Batrancea L, Rathnaswamy MM, et al (2020) Greening the financial system in USA, Canada and Brazil: a panel data analysis. Mathematics 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122217
Borsatto JMLS, Amui LBL (2019) Green innovation: unfolding the relation with environmental regulations and competitiveness. Resour Conserv Recycl 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.005
Cai X, Zhu B, Zhang H, et al (2020) Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sci Total Environ 746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140810
Carfora A, Pansini RV, Romano AA, Scandurra G (2018) Renewable energy development and green public policies complementarities: The case of developed and developing countries. Renew Energy 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.008
Chien FS, Kamran HW, Albashar G, Iqbal W (2021) Dynamic planning, conversion, and management strategy of different renewable energy sources: A sustainable solution for severe energy crises in emerging economies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46(11):7745–7758. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2020.12.004
Choi I (2006) Combination unit root tests for cross-sectionally correlated panels. In: Econometric theory and practice: frontiers of analysis and applied research. Cambridge University Press, pp 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164863.014
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom 188:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
Danish, Ozcan B, Ulucak R (2021) An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in India: bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses. Nucl Eng Technol 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.12.008
Danish, Ulucak R (2020) How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. Sci Total Environ 712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136504
Debrah C, Chan APC, Darko A (2022) Green finance gap in green buildings: a scoping review and future research needs. Build Environ 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108443
Destek MA (2020) Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04698-x
Diaz SMD, Souza PSL, Souza SRS (2021) Structural testing for communication events into loops of message‐passing parallel programs. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 33(18). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6082
Ding Q, Khattak SI, Ahmad M (2021) Towards sustainable production and consumption: assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 Nations. Sustain Prod Consum 27:254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2020.11.004
Du K, Li J (2019) Towards a green world: how do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.033
Eberhardt M, Teal F (2010) Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire: changing places. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.4000/POLDEV.136. http://journals.openedition.org/poldev. Accessed on Feb 2022
Farooq S, Ozturk I, Majeed MT, Akram R (2022) Globalization and CO2 emissions in the presence of EKC: a global panel data analysis. Gondwana Res 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.02.002
Ghazouani T (2021) Impact of FDI inflow, crude oil prices, and economic growth on CO2 emission in Tunisia: Symmetric and asymmetric analysis through ARDL and NARDL approach. Environ Econ 12. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.01
Green F, Stern N (2017) China’s changing economy: implications for its carbon dioxide emissions. Clim Pol. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1156515
Guo H, Yang Z, Huang R, Guo A (2020) The digitalization and public crisis responses of small and medium enterprises: implications from a COVID-19 survey. Front Bus Res China 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-020-00087-1
Hasan MA (2019) Does globalization accelerate economic growth? South Asian experience using panel data. J Econ Struct 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-019-0159-x
Haseeb A, Xia E, Danish, et al (2018) Financial development, globalization, and CO2 emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:31283–31296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7
Hashem Pesaran M, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142:50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Huang Y, Xue L, Khan Z (2021) What abates carbon emissions in China: Examining the impact of renewable energy and green investment. Sustain Dev 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2177
Jahanger A (2022) Impact of globalization on CO2 emissions based on EKC hypothesis in developing world: the moderating role of human capital. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17062-9
Jahanger A, Usman M, Ahmad P (2022a) Investigating the effects of natural resources and institutional quality on CO2 emissions during globalization mode in developing countries. Int J Environ Sci Technol 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13762-022-04638-2/TABLES/2
Jahanger A, Usman M, Murshed M et al (2022) The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: the moderating role of technological innovations. Resour Policy 76:102569. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2022.102569
Jian L, Sohail MT, Ullah S, Majeed MT (2021) Examining the role of non-economic factors in energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China: policy options for the green economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(47). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15359-3
Khan MK, Teng JZ, Khan MI, Khan MO (2019) Impact of globalization, economic factors and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Pakistan. Sci Total Environ 688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.065
Khan I, Zakari A, Dagar V, Singh S (2022) World energy trilemma and transformative energy developments as determinants of economic growth amid environmental sustainability. Energy Econ 108:105884. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2022.105884
Lanre Ibrahim R, Bello Ajide K, Usman M, Kousar R (2022) Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment? Renew Energy 200:244–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2022.09.134
Lee WJ, Kim DM, Lee UY, Cho JH, Kim MS, Hong JH, Hwang YIl (2019) A preliminary study of the reliability of anatomical facial landmarks used in facial comparison. J Forensic Sci 64(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13873
Leitão NC, Koengkan M, Fuinhas JA (2022) The role of intra-industry trade, foreign direct investment, and renewable energy on portuguese carbon dioxide emissions. Sustain 14:15131. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU142215131
Levin A, Lin C-F, James Chu C-S (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
Li G, Wang X, Su S, Su Y (2019) How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness. Technol Soc 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.012
Li Y, Zhang C, Li S, Usman A (2022a) Energy efficiency and green innovation and its asymmetric impact on CO2 emission in China: a new perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19161-7
Li Z, Hu S, Mehmood U, Agyekum EB (2022b) Assessing the linkages of economic freedom and environmental quality in South Asian countries: application of CS-ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20351-6
Li Z, Liao G, Wang Z, Huang Z (2018) Green loan and subsidy for promoting clean production innovation. J Clean Prod 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.066
Li ZZ, Li RYM, Malik MY et al (2021) Determinants of carbon emission in China: how good is green investment? Sustain Prod Consum 27:392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2020.11.008
Liddle B, Messinis G (2018) Revisiting carbon Kuznets curves with endogenous breaks modeling: evidence of decoupling and saturation (but few inverted-Us) for individual OECD countries. Empir Econ 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1209-y
Liu M, Ren X, Cheng C, Wang Z (2020) The role of globalization in CO2 emissions: a semi-parametric panel data analysis for G7. Sci Total Environ 718:137379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137379
Luo Q, Miao C, Sun L, et al (2019) Efficiency evaluation of green technology innovation of China’s strategic emerging industries: an empirical analysis based on Malmquist-data envelopment analysis index. J Clean Prod 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117782
Makhdum MSA, Usman M, Kousar R et al (2022) How do institutional quality, natural resources, renewable energy, and financial development reduce ecological footprint without hindering economic growth trajectory? Evidence from China. Sustain 14:13910. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU142113910
Mehmood U (2022) Determining the factors of ecological footprints in South Asian countries: exploring the role of renewable energy and forest area. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:56128–56135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19822-7
Mehmood U (2020) Globalization-driven CO2 emissions in Singapore: an application of ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11368-w
Mehmood U, Tariq S, Haq ZU, et al (2022) The role of tourism and renewable energy towards EKC in South Asian countries: fresh insights from the ARDL approach. http://www.editorialmanager.com/cogentsocsci 8:2073669. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2073669
Meirun T, Mihardjo LW, Haseeb M, et al (2021) The dynamics effect of green technology innovation on economic growth and CO2 emission in Singapore: new evidence from bootstrap ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10760-w
Mohammed MA, Mohd Yunus NZ, Hezmi MA, Abang Hasbollah DZ, Rashid AS (2021) Ground improvement and its role in carbon dioxide reduction: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12392-0
Mongo M, Belaïd F, Ramdani B (2021) The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Europe. Environ Sci Policy 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.004
Nawaz MA, Seshadri U, Kumar P, et al (2021) Nexus between green finance and climate change mitigation in N-11 and BRICS countries: empirical estimation through difference in differences (DID) approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10920-y
Osman I, Ma’in M, Muda R, Husni NSA, Hassan SFSAF (2019) Determinants of behavioural intention towards green investments: the perspectives of Muslims *Ismah Osman (Corresponding author). Int J Islam Bus 4(1)
Padhan H, Padhang PC, Tiwari AK, et al (2020) Renewable energy consumption and robust globalization(s) in OECD countries: do oil, carbon emissions and economic activity matter? Energy Strateg Rev 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100535
Pan X, Uddin MK, Saima U, Jiao Z, Han C (2019) How do industrialization and trade openness influence energy intensity? Evidence from a path model in case of Bangladesh. Energy Policy 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110916
Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econom Rev 34:1089–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0262.2006.00692
Pesaran MH, Tosetti E (2011) Large panels with common factors and spatial correlation. J Econom 161:182–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.12.003
Raza MY, Lin B (2020) Decoupling and mitigation potential analysis of CO2 emissions from Pakistan’s transport sector. Sci Total Environ 730:139000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139000
Razzaq A, Wang Y, Chupradit S et al (2021) Asymmetric inter-linkages between green technology innovation and consumption-based carbon emissions in BRICS countries using quantile-on-quantile framework. Technol Soc 66:101656. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2021.101656
Sampath K, Natarajan P (2020) Traditional procurement vs public, private partnership model – a solution based approach for Indian sub continent. Annamalai Int J Bus Stud Res 12. https://doi.org/10.51705/aijbsr.2020.v12i01.003
Saqib N (2022a) Green energy, nonrenewable energy, financial development and economic growth with carbon footprint: heterogeneous panel evidence from cross-country. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2054454. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=rero20&page=instructions. Accessed Jan 2023
Saqib N (2022b) Nexus between the renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption and carbon footprints: evidence from Asian emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:58326–58340. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-022-19948-8/TABLES/7
Saqib N (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: empirical evidence from gulf cooperation council countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 8. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7269
Saqib N, Duran IA, Hashmi N (2022) Impact of financial deepening, energy consumption and total natural resource rent on CO2 emission in the GCC countries: evidence from advanced panel data simulation. Int J Energy Econ Policy 12. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.12907
Saqib N, Ozturk I, Usman M et al (2023) Pollution haven or halo? How European countries leverage FDI, energy, and human capital to alleviate their ecological footprint. Gondwana Res 116:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GR.2022.12.018
Shan S, Genç SY, Kamran HW, Dinca G (2021) Role of green technology innovation and renewable energy in carbon neutrality: a sustainable investigation from Turkey. J Environ Manage 294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113004
Sharif A, Saqib N, Dong K, Khan SAR (2022) Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: The moderating role of social globalisation. Sustain Dev 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2360
Shao X, Zhong Y, Liu W, Li RYM (2021) Modeling the effect of green technology innovation and renewable energy on carbon neutrality in N-11 countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. J Environ Manage 296:113189. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.113189
Shen J, Li S, Liang Z, et al (2020) Exploring the heterogeneity and nonlinearity of trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services bundles in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecosyst Serv 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101103
Sheraz M, Deyi X, Sinha A, et al (2022) The dynamic nexus among financial development, renewable energy and carbon emissions: moderating roles of globalization and institutional quality across BRI countries. J Clean Prod 343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130995
Telatar OM, Birinci N (2022) The effects of environmental tax on ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions: a nonlinear cointegration analysis on Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18740-y
Tolliver C, Fujii H, Keeley AR, Managi S (2021) Green innovation and finance in Asia. Asian Econ Policy Rev 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12320
Usman M, Radulescu M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Rehman A (2022) Investigation on the causality relationship between environmental innovation and energy consumption: empirical evidence from EU countries. 101177/0958305X221120931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221120931
Wang ML, Wang W, Du SY et al (2020) Causal relationships between carbon dioxide emissions and economic factors: evidence from China. Sustain Dev 28:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1966
Westerlund J (2005) New simple tests for panel cointegration. Econ Rev 24(3):297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500243019
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Wu PC, Liu HY, Liu SY, Hsiao JM (2021) Can financial technology development change the causality between tourism and economic growth? Curr Issues Tour 24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1828307
Xu Z, Baloch MA, Danish, et al (2018a) Nexus between financial development and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2876-3
Xu Z, Baloch MA, Danish, et al (2018) Nexus between financial development and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(28):28378–28390. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-018-2876-3
Yang Q, Huo J, Saqib N, Mahmood H (2022) Modelling the effect of renewable energy and public-private partnership in testing EKC hypothesis: evidence from methods moment of quantile regression. Renew Energy 192:485–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2022.03.123
Yao Y, Ivanovski K, Inekwe J, Smyth R (2019) Human capital and energy consumption: evidence from OECD countries. Energy Econ 84:104534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104534
Yousaf Z (2021) Go for green: green innovation through green dynamic capabilities: accessing the mediating role of green practices and green value co-creation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14343-1
Yue XG, Liao Y, Zheng S, et al (2021) The role of green innovation and tourism towards carbon neutrality in Thailand: evidence from bootstrap ADRL approach. J Environ Manage 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112778
Zhang W, Li G, Uddin MK, Guo S (2020) Environmental regulation, Foreign investment behavior, and carbon emissions for 30 provinces in China. J Clean Prod 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119208
Acknowledgements
The views expressed here are our own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Deutsche Bundesbank or the Eurosystem.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mengjie Shi conducted the analysis and wrote the paper. Zhenzhen Jia conceptualized the work and analyzed the data. Usman Mehmood reviewed and supervised the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not required.
Consent to participate
All authors participated in this research.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, M., Jia, Z. & Mehmood, U. Exploring the roles of green finance and environmental regulations on CO2es: defining the roles of social and economic globalization in the next eleven nations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 62967–62980 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26327-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26327-4