Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“Dark under the lamp”: ecological equity of urban agglomeration from the perspective of natural capital in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although equity is an important aspect of sustainable development, equity research has mainly focused on income and economics while paying insufficient attention to ecological equity. Therefore, aiming to improve our understanding of equity and promote environmental protection, this study introduced natural capital to measure regional ecological equity and analyze its driving factors. Based on ecological footprint (EF) and ecosystem service value (ESV), we constructed evaluation indexes and drew an “ecological Lorentz curve bundle” to analyze ecological equity in the Jing–Jin–Ji urban agglomeration (JUA) from 2009 to 2020. The results showed that economic development in JUA resulted in the severe depletion of natural capital, especially biological and energy resources, and the supply and demand of natural capital was in a low-level equilibrium state. Based on JUA’s population base, natural capital utilization in the region had exceeded ecological equity, and the Gini coefficient of EF based on population was close to the international warning value of 0.4. Although economic development in JUA has promoted economic equity, it has also led to environmental inequity. Large cities such as Beijing and Tianjin, as well as industrial cities such as Tangshan and Handan, have had the greatest effects on ecological equity. Moreover, the excessive consumption of natural capital stock and energy-dependent industrial structures threaten ecological equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. “Dark under the lamp” refers to the phenomenon of large gap in regional development. The “lamp” refers to the economically developed metropolis, while the “dark” refers to the less developed surrounding areas.

References

  • Ariken M, Zhang F, Weng Chan N (2021) Coupling coordination analysis and spatio-temporal heterogeneity between urbanization and eco-environment along the Silk Road Economic Belt in China. Ecological Indicators 121:107014

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai B, Shao Z, Fang S, Huang X, Huq ME, Tang Y, Li Y, Zhuang Q (2021a) Finer-scale spatiotemporal coupling coordination model between socioeconomic activity and eco-environment: a case study of Beijing. China Ecol Indic 131:108165

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Li X, Liu L, Chen Y, Wang X, Lu S (2021b) Coupling and coordinated development of new urbanization and agro-ecological environment in China. Sci Total Environ 776:145837

  • Chang Z, Qiao J, Zhao J, Dong Z, Wang J (2020) Review on the key issues of basis and criteria of ecological compensation in China. Ecol Sci 39:248–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Lu H, Li J, Qiao Y, Yan P, Ren L, Xia J (2021) Fairness analysis and compensation strategy in the Triangle of Central China driven by water-carbon-ecological footprints. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:58502–58522

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Ge Y, Yang G, Wu Z, Du Y, Mao F, Liu S, Xu R, Qu Z, Xu B, Chang J (2022) Inequalities of urban green space area and ecosystem services along urban center-edge gradients. Landscape and Urban Planning 217:104266

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-South trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109:755–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (2020) Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability. Ecosyst Serv 43:101096

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui N, Sheng S (2021) Quantitative research on cultivated land ecological compensation standard based on equity. Bull Soil Water Conserv 41:138–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1996) Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development. Beacon Press

  • Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman A, Jackson T (2008) Measuring resource inequalities: the concepts and methodology for an area-based Gini coefficient. Ecol Econ 65:242–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Peng J, Gao Y, Zhao H (2016) Sustainability evaluation of natural capital utilization based on a three-dimensional ecological footprint model: a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan region. Prog Geogr 35:1186–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan J, Kang M, Jiang Y (2012) Improvement of ecological footprint model based on freshwater resource account and pollution accounts. J Nat Resour 27:953–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan J, Wen Y (2018) Transfer and determinants of pollution-intensive industries in megagglomerations: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. J Southwest Minzu Univ 39:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang K, Heijungs R, de Snoo GR (2014) Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family. Ecol Ind 36:508–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu FY, Alharthi M, Bhatti Z, Sun L, Rasul F, Hanif I, Iqbal W (2021) The dynamic role of energy security, energy equity and environmental sustainability in the dilemma of emission reduction and economic growth. J Environ Manag 280:111828

  • Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing B, Giljum S (2012) Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “footprint family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Ind 16:100–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Z, Zheng Q, Tan X, Lei J, Zhang Y (2010) Calculation and application of equivalence factor and yield factor of ecological footprint based on national hectare. J Anhui Agric Sci 38:7868–7871

    Google Scholar 

  • Giljum S, Hinterberger F, Lutter S (2008) Measuring natural resource use: context, indicators and EU policy processes. Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI)Background paper, p 14

  • Gutiérrez MJ, Inguanzo B (2019) Contributing to fisheries sustainability: inequality analysis in the high seas catches of countries. Sustainability 11(11):3133

  • Hong S, Guo Q, Li D (2020) Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecological supply and demand based on ecological footprint theory. Resources Science 42:980–990

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Li L, Xu L (2021) Regional ecosystem compensation based on spilled ecosystem service value assessment. Acta Ecol Sin 41:6994–7001

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson A, Milman AD, Kammen DM (2005) Letting the (energy) Gini out of the bottle: Lorenz curves of cumulative electricity consumption and Gini coefficients as metrics of energy distribution and equity. Energy Policy 33:1825–1832

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Cole M, Sun J, Wang S (2022) Innovation, carbon emissions and the pollution haven hypothesis: climate capitalism and global re-interpretations. J Environ Manage 307:114465–114465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li C (2021) Study on environmental equity in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 621:012142

  • Li P, Zhang R, Xu L (2021a) Three-dimensional ecological footprint based on ecosystem service value and their drivers: a case study of Urumqi. Ecol Indic 131:108117

  • Li W, Wang Y, Xie S, Cheng X (2021b) Coupling coordination analysis and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between urbanization and ecosystem health in Chongqing municipality, China. Sci Total Environ 791:148311

  • Liu M, Zhang D, Min Q, Xie G, Su N (2014) The calculation of productivity factor for ecological footprints in China: a methodological note. Ecol Ind 38:124–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Li W, Zahng D, Su N (2015) The calculation of equivalence factor for ecological footprints in China: a methodological note. Front Environ Sci Eng 9:1015–1024

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Dong SC, Li FJ, Cheng H, Yang Y, Xia B, Iop (2019) Research on supply and demand balance of water resources in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, International Scientific and Practical Conference on Geographical Foundations and Ecological Principles of the Regional Policy of Nature Management. IOP Conference Series-Earth and Environmental Science, Irkutsk, RUSSIA

  • Loft L, Gehrig S, Dung Ngoc L, Rommel J (2019) Effectiveness and equity of payments for ecosystem services: real-effort experiments with Vietnamese land users. Land Use Policy 86:218–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Malakar K, Mishra T, Patwardhan A (2018) Inequality in water supply in India: an assessment using the Gini and Theil indices. Environ Dev Sustain 20:841–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadybal SM, Collins TW, Grineski SE (2020) Light pollution inequities in the continental United States: a distributive environmental justice analysis. Environ Res 189:109959

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narloch U, Pascual U, Drucker AG (2013) How to achieve fairness in payments for ecosystem services? Insights from agrobiodiversity conservation auctions. Land Use Policy 35:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Niccolucci V, Bastianoni S, Tiezzi EBP, Wackernagel M, Marchettini N (2009) How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation. Ecol Model 220:2819–2823

    Google Scholar 

  • Niccolucci V, Galli A, Reed A, Neri E, Wackernagel M, Bastianoni S (2011) Towards a 3D national ecological footprint geography. Ecol Model 222:2939–2944

    Google Scholar 

  • Niccolucci V, Tiezzi E, Pulselli F, Capineri C (2012) Biocapacity vs ecological footprint of world regions: a geopolitical interpretation. Ecol Ind 16:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyelele C, Kroll CN (2020) The equity of urban forest ecosystem services and benefits in the Bronx, NY. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 53

  • Rees W, Wackernagel M (1996) Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable—and why they are a key to sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16:223–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeson AF, Measham TG, Hosking K (2012) Mining activity, income inequality and gender in regional Australia*. Aust J Agric Res Econ 56:302–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbaghi MA (2020) Inequality of rural income distribution in Iran: an exploratory analysis of spatial data. Cuadernos De Desarrollo Rural 17

  • Sauter C, Grether J-M, Mathys NA (2016) Geographical spread of global emissions: within-country inequalities are large and increasing. Energy Policy 89:138–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer Y, Tivadar M (2019) Measuring environmental inequalities: insights from the residential segregation literature. Ecol Econ 164:106329

  • Shahzad U, Fareed Z, Shahzad F, Shahzad K (2021) Investigating the nexus between economic complexity, energy consumption and ecological footprint for the United States: new insights from quantile methods. J Clean Prod 279:123806

  • Shen J, Wang S, Liu W, Chu J (2019) Does migration of pollution-intensive industries impact environmental efficiency? Evidence supporting “Pollution Haven Hypothesis.” J Environ Manage 242:142–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu H, Xiong P (2018) The Gini coefficient structure and its application for the evaluation of regional balance development in China. J Clean Prod 199:668–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA, Bello MO (2018) Persistence of policy shocks to an environmental degradation index: the case of ecological footprint in 128 developed and developing countries. Ecol Ind 89:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Souche S, Mercier A, Ovtracht N (2016) The impacts of urban pricing on social and spatial inequalities: the case study of Lyon (France). Urban Studies 53:373–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeglehner G, Narodoslawsky M (2008) Implementing ecological footprinting in decision-making processes. Land Use Policy 25:421–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun T, Zhang H, Wang Y, Meng X, Wang C (2010) The application of environmental Gini coefficient (EGC) in allocating wastewater discharge permit: the case study of watershed total mass control in Tianjin, China. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:601–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Zhu B, Zhang S, Zeng H, Li K, Wang B, Dong Z, Zhou C (2022) New indices system for quantifying the nexus between economic-social development, natural resources consumption, and environmental pollution in China during 1978–2018. Sci Total Environ 804:150180

  • Sun Y, Wang N (2021) Development and correlations of the industrial ecology in China’s Loess Plateau: a study based on the coupling coordination model and spatial network effect. Ecol Ind 132:108332

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Zhou D, Jiang G (2020) Conflict or coordination? Multiscale assessment of the spatio-temporal coupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services: the case of the Jingjinji Region, China. Ecol Indic 117:106543

  • Uddin GA, Salahuddin M, Alam K, Gow J (2017) Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecol Ind 77:166–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M, Leimona B (2010) Principles for fairness and efficiency in enhancing environmental services in Asia: payments, compensation, or co-investment? Ecology and Society 15

  • Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1997) Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecol Econ 20:3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Yount JD (1998) The ecological footprint: an indicator of progress toward regional sustainability. Environ Monit Assess 51:511–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Sun Z, Sun R, Chen J, Zhang W, Zhang X, Wang X (2019) Spatial-temporal dynamic evolution of ecosystem service value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecol Environ Sci 28:1285–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Lu Y, Zhou J, Li Y, Cao D (2006) Analysis of China resource-environment Gini coefficient based on GDP. China Environ Sci 26:111–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Li C, Liu Q, Niu B, Peng S, Deng L, Kang P, Zhang X (2019) Pollution haven hypothesis of domestic trade in China: a perspective of SO2 emissions. Sci Total Environ 663:198–205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Li W, Han L (2019) Study on the change in energy production structure under the energy coordinated development strategy of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China. Acta Ecol Sin 39:1203–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins SL, Gerrish E (2018) The relationship between urban forests and race: a meta-analysis. J Environ Manage 209:152–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Xu Z (2010) Spatial distribution of the environmental resource consumption in the Heihe River Basin of Northwestern China. Reg Environ Change 10:55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Li W (2019) Research on regional carbon ecological compensation in China from the perspective of equity. China Soft Sci 340:184–192

  • Wu W, Gao P, Xu Q, Zheng T, Zhang J, Wang J, Liu N, Bi J, Zhou Y, Jiang H (2019) How to allocate discharge permits more fairly in China?-a new perspective from watershed and regional allocation comparison on socio-natural equality. Sci Total Environ 684:390–401

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie G-d, Zhen L, Lu C-x, Xiao Y, Chen C (2008) Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. J Nat Resour 23:911–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Zhao Y, Xing H, Fu Y, Liu G, Kang X, Mai X (2020a) Understanding the changes in spatial fairness of urban greenery using time-series remote sensing images: a case study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay. Sci Total Environ 715:136763

  • Yang Y, Lu H, Liang D, Chen Y, Tian P, Xia J (2020) Balance analysis and ecological compensation of urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River based on the three-dimensional ecological footprint model. Acta Ecol Sin 40:9011–9022

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Yang H, Cheng Y (2021) Why is it crucial to evaluate the fairness of natural capital consumption in urban agglomerations in terms of ecosystem services and economic contribution? Sustain Cities Soc 65:102644

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao L, He L, Chen X (2020) Trade-off between equity and efficiency for allocating wastewater emission permits in watersheds considering transaction. J Environ Manag 270:110898

  • Zhang W, Hao J (2020) Measurement of China’s energy footprint and analysis of regional differences. Statistics & Decision 36:93–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Wang S, Zhou C (2016) Understanding the relation between urbanization and the eco-environment in China’s Yangtze River Delta using an improved EKC model and coupling analysis. Sci Total Environ 571:862–875

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Wu K, Cheng F, Zhang H (2021) Study on balance sheet compilation based on cultivated land pressure index: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Sci Technol Manag Land Res 38:40–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong M-c, Yan W-j (2012) Research frame and survey of environmental equity issue. China Popul Resour Environ 22:1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is part of the project “Research on The Theory and Method of Natural Resource Assets Accounting in China” (No.19JZD013), which was supported by Key Project of Philosophy and Social Science of Ministry of Education of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China

    Hui Zhang, Yating Dai & Dao-lin Zhu

  2. Center for Land Policy and Law, Beijing, 100193, China

    Dao-lin Zhu

Authors
  1. Hui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yating Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dao-lin Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HZ was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, original draft writing, review, editing, and visualization. YD was responsible for methodology, formal analysis, and original draft writing. DZ was responsible for review and editing, project administration, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dao-lin Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 74 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Dai, Y. & Zhu, Dl. “Dark under the lamp”: ecological equity of urban agglomeration from the perspective of natural capital in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 52390–52409 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25927-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25927-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation