Abstract
We aim to analyze the existence of a novel agricultural production–augmented environmental Kuznets curve (EKC-AP) theory for energy transition, urban agglomeration, and financial depth. To conduct this research, we use a global panel of selected 54 countries belonging to low, medium, and high levels of economic development from 1971 to 2017. Since our data are distributed into three development levels, it is highly likely to face cross-sectional dependence across the countries within and between the development levels, which may provide biased empirical results. To outpace such possibility, we employ advanced econometric strategies, which are robust to cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity issues. We found that agricultural production, energy transition, urban agglomeration, financial depth, and ecological degradation experience a long-term cointegrating equilibrium association. We also confirm that exists an EKC-AP linkage of agricultural production with ecological degradation in highly developed economies, while those at the low and medium levels of development reveal a positive exponential and monotonic impact, respectively, of agricultural production on ecological degradation. The energy transition is found to promote ecological sustainability in developed countries through technique impact, while it deteriorates the ecological quality in countries at the medium development level. Moreover, urban agglomeration adversely impacts the ecological quality in the economies at low and medium development levels, whereas it improves the ecological sustainability in developed economies. Besides, financial depth proves harmful to ecological sustainability, with less subtle effects in developed economies. Based on our findings, for countries at low and medium levels of development, we propose advancing farming techniques using ecologically friendly technologies, promoting green energy transition, expanding the share of the services sector, and providing green financial systems to support green investment projects to achieve the Sustainable Development agenda of the United Nations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source: Author’s drawing based on PMG estimations
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
References
Abul SJ, Satrovic E (2021) Revisiting the environmental impacts of railway transport: does EKC exist in South-Eastern Europe? Polish J Environ Stud 31:1–11. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/141329
Afshan S, Ozturk I, Yaqoob T (2022) Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: evidence from MM-QR method. Renew Energy 196:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.125
Ahmad M, Khan Z, Khalid M, Jabeen G (2021a) Do rural-urban migration and industrial agglomeration mitigate the environmental degradation across China’ s regional development levels? Sustain Prod Consum 27:679–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.038
Ahmad M, Rehman A, Shah SAA et al (2021) Stylized heterogeneous dynamic links among healthcare expenditures, land urbanization, and CO2 emissions across economic development levels. Sci Total Environ 753:142228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142228
Ahmad M, Satrovic E (2023) Relating fiscal decentralization and financial inclusion to environmental sustainability : criticality of natural resources. J Environ Manage 325:116633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116633
Ahmad M, Wu Y (2022a) Household-based factors affecting uptake of biogas plants in Bangladesh: implications for sustainable development. Renew Energy 194:858–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.135
Ahmad M, Wu Y (2022) Natural resources, technological progress, and ecological efficiency: does financial deepening matter for G-20 economies ? Resour Policy 77:102770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102770
Ahmad M, Zhu X, Wu Y (2022) The criticality of international tourism and technological innovation for carbon neutrality across regional development levels Technol Forecast. Soc Change 182:121848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121848
Ahmed N, Qamar S, Jabeen G et al (2022) Systematic analysis of factors affecting biogas technology acceptance: insights from the diffusion of innovation. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 52:102122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102122
Alvarado R, Ortiz C, Bravo D, Chamba J (2020) Urban concentration, non-renewable energy consumption, and output: do levels of economic development matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:2760–2772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07158-8
Ashraf A, Nguyen CP, Doytch N (2022) The impact of financial development on ecological footprints of nations. J Environ Manage 322:116062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116062
Chen Y, Wang Z, Zhong Z (2019) CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renew Energy 131:208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.047
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom 188:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
Damrah S, Satrovic E, Shawtari FA (2022) How does fi nancial inclusion affect environmental degradation in the six oil exporting countries ? The moderating role of information and communication technology. Front Environ Sci 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1013326
Danish, Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
Deng F, Li H, Yang M et al (2021) On the nonlinear relationship between energy consumption and economic and social development: evidence from Henan Province, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:33192–33207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12623-4
Dogan E, Seker F (2020) Determinants of CO 2 emissions in the European Union : the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078
Dong K, Dong X, Jiang Q (2020) How renewable energy consumption lower global CO2 emissions? Evidence from countries with different income levels. World Econ 43:1665–1698. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12898
Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction : representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276
FAO-UN (2020) Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. In: For. Prod. Trade. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO. Accessed 12 Sep 2022
Feng L, Chen B, Hayat T et al (2017) The driving force of water footprint under the rapid urbanization process: a structural decomposition analysis for Zhangye city in China. J Clean Prod 163:S322–S328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.047
Feng S, Chong Y, Yu H et al (2022) Digital financial development and ecological footprint: evidence from green-biased technology innovation and environmental inclusion J Clean. Prod 380:135069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135069
Ge J, Sutherland LA, Polhill JG et al (2017) Exploring factors affecting on-farm renewable energy adoption in Scotland using large-scale microdata. Energy Policy 107:548–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.025
Godil DI, Sharif A, Ali MI et al (2021) The role of financial development, R&D expenditure, globalization and institutional quality in energy consumption in India: new evidence from the QARDL approach. J Environ Manage 285:112208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112208
Grossman G, Krueger A (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Natl Bur Econ Res. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
Hao X, Wen S, Xue Y et al (2023) How to improve environment, resources and economic efficiency in the digital era? Resour Policy 80:103198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103198
Hevia-Koch P, Ladenburg J (2019) Where should wind energy be located? A review of preferences and visualisation approaches for wind turbine locations. Energy Res Soc Sci 53:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.010
Hou Z, Roseta-Palma C, Ramalho JJ dos S (2021) Does directed technological change favor energy? Firm-level evidence from Portugal. Energy Econ 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105248
Im SK, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115:53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
Jabeen G, Ahmad M, Zhang Q (2021) Perceived critical factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase renewable generation technologies : rural-urban heterogeneity. Energy 218:119494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119494
Jabeen G, Ahmad M, Zhang Q (2022) Towards sustainable environment: why green energy technology diffusion is sluggish in South Africa? Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23642-0
Jabeen G, Ahmad M, Zhang Q (2023) Combined role of economic openness, financial deepening, biological capacity, and human capital in achieving ecological sustainability. Ecol Inform 73:101932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101932
Jabeen G, Ahmad M, Zhang Q (2021b) Factors influencing consumers’ willingness to buy green energy technologies in a green perceived value framework. Energy Sour B Econ Plan Policy 16:669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2021.1952494
Jabeen G, Yan Q, Ahmad M et al (2020) Household-based critical in fl uence factors of biogas generation technology utilization : a case of Punjab province of Pakistan. Renew Energy 154:650–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.049
Jian X, Afshan S (2022) Dynamic effect of green financing and green technology innovation on carbon neutrality in G10 countries: fresh insights from CS-ARDL approach. Econ Res Istraz 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2130389
Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econom 90:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
Kassouri Y (2021) Monitoring the spatial spillover effects of urbanization on water, built-up land and ecological footprints in sub-Saharan Africa. J Environ Manage 300:113690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113690
Khan I, Hou F, Le HP (2021) The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci Total Environ 754:142222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142222
Khan I, Hou F, Le HP, Ali SA (2021) Do natural resources, urbanization, and value-adding manufacturing affect environmental quality? Evidence from the top ten manufacturing countries. Resour Policy 72:102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102109
Khan I, Zakari A, Ahmad M et al (2022a) Linking energy transitions, energy consumption, and environmental sustainability in OECD countries. Gondwana Res 103:445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.10.026
Khan I, Zakari A, Zhang J et al (2022) A study of trilemma energy balance, clean energy transitions, and economic expansion in the midst of environmental sustainability: new insights from three trilemma leadership. Energy 248:123619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123619
Khan SAR, Sharif A, Golpîra H, Kumar A (2019) A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: from environmental policy and sustainable development. Sustain Dev 27:1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1958
Kovács Z, Farkas JZ, Szigeti C, Harangozó G (2022) Assessing the sustainability of urbanization at the sub-national level: the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity accounts of the Budapest Metropolitan Region. Hungary. Sustain Cities Soc 84:104022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104022
Li HS, Geng YC, Shinwari R et al (2021) Does renewable energy electricity and economic complexity index help to achieve carbon neutrality target of top exporting countries? J Environ Manage 299:113386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113386
Liu H, Islam MA, Khan MA et al (2020) Does financial deepening attract foreign direct investment? Fresh evidence from panel threshold analysis. Res Int Bus Financ 53:101198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101198
Liu H, Zhang J, Huang H, et al (2022) Environmental good exports and green total factor productivity: lessons from China. Sustain Dev 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2476
Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U (2015) Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecol Indic 57:324–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.018
Paramati SR, Mo D, Huang R (2021) The role of financial deepening and green technology on carbon emissions: evidence from major OECD economies. Financ Res Lett 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101794
Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom Theory 20:597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
Pesaran HM, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142:50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econom Rev 34:1089–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22:265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae
Pham NM, Huynh TLD, Nasir MA (2020) Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: a Malthusian view. J Environ Manage 260:110143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110143
Qamar S, Ahmad M, Oryani B, Zhang Q (2022) Solar energy technology adoption and diffusion by micro, small, and medium enterprises : sustainable energy for climate change mitigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19406-5
Sarker SA, Wang S, Adnan KMM, Sattar MN (2020) Economic feasibility and determinants of biogas technology adoption: evidence from Bangladesh. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 123:109766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109766
Satrovic E, Abul SJ, Al-Kandari A (2022) Modeling the dynamic linkages between agriculture, electricity consumption, income and pollutant emissions for Southeastern Europe. Polish J Environ Stud 31:4259–4267. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/147825
Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G et al (2020) Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 57:102138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138
Sharif A, Raza SA, Ozturk I, Afshan S (2019) The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renew Energy 133:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.052
Steinbuks J, Hertel TW (2016) Confronting the food – energy – environment trilemma : global land use in the long run. Environ Resour Econ 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9848-y
Sun YY, Higham J (2021) Overcoming information asymmetry in tourism carbon management: the application of a new reporting architecture to Aotearoa New Zealand. Tour Manag 83:104231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104231
Ulucak R, Danish, Ozcan B (2020) Relationship between energy consumption and environmental sustainability in OECD countries: the role of natural resources rents. Resour Policy 69:101803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101803
Verbič M, Satrovic E, Muslija A (2021) Environmental Kuznets curve in Southeastern Europe: the role of urbanization and energy consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14732-6
Wan Q, Miao X, Afshan S (2022) Dynamic effects of natural resource abundance, green financing, and government environmental concerns toward the sustainable environment in China. Resour Policy 79:102954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102954
Wang Z, Chen H, Teng YP (2023) Role of greener energies, high tech-industries and financial expansion for ecological footprints: implications from sustainable development perspective. Renew Energy 202:1424–1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.039
World Bank (2019) World Development Indicators (WDI) | Data catalog. In Data Cat. United Nations World Data bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators. Accessed 1 Oct 2022
Wu H, Sun M, Zhang W, et al (2022) Can urbanization move ahead with energy conservation and emission reduction? New evidence from China. Energy Environ 0958305X221138822. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221138822
Xu X, Mu M, Wang Q (2017) Recalculating CO2 emissions from the perspective of value-added trade: an input-output analysis of China’s trade data. Energy Policy 107:158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.026
Xue Y, Jiang C, Guo Y et al (2022) Corporate social responsibility and high-quality development: do green innovation, environmental investment and corporate governance matter? Emerg Mark Financ Trade 58:3191–3214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2022.2034616
Funding
This study is funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2020YFB1707801). This work is also partially funded by the Zhejiang soft science research base “digital economy and open economy integration innovation research base.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Muhammad Qaiser Shahzad Khan: conceptualization, writing—original draft, variable construction, formal analysis. Qingyou Yan: supervision, writing—review and editing. Rafael Alvarado: overall quality improvement, writing—review and editing. Munir Ahmad: writing—review and editing, visualization, variable construction, and formal analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, M.Q.S., Yan, Q., Alvarado, R. et al. A novel EKC perspective: do agricultural production, energy transition, and urban agglomeration achieve ecological sustainability?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 48471–48483 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25741-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25741-y