Abstract
The role of energy and natural resources rent has been studied in the literature but very few research works investigated the impacts of economic policy uncertainty and energy structure on ecological footprints (EFs) in the group of ten G-10 countries. Therefore, this research is designed to probe the impacts of economic policy uncertainty (EP), natural resources rent, energy structure, economic growth, and total factor productivity on EF. The annual data for 1995–2018 is analyzed by adopting second-generation methods. The empirical results from the CS-ARDL unveiled that EP is significantly and positively related to EF, indicating that EP is not environmentally friendly in these nations. A 1% increase in EP contributes to EF by 0.025% in the long run. In addition, the results show that natural resource rents and energy structure positively contribute to mitigating EF by 0.012% and 0.095% respectively, while economic growth increases EF by 0.237%. Based on the empirical results, this work suggests addressing the economic policy uncertainty and economic progress to lower ecological deprivation can be a viable solution to attain sustainable development goals. This work recommends adopting feasible economic policies with sound efforts. For this purpose, the economic sector has to be strong enough with sustainable production. They should ensure the supply of continuous renewable energy to the economic sector.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- EPU:
-
Economic policy uncertainty
- EF:
-
Ecological footprints
- NR:
-
Natural resource rents
- ES:
-
Energy structure
- CS-ARDL:
-
Cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lags
- ED:
-
Environmental degradation
- RE:
-
Renewable energy
- CIPS:
-
Cross-sectional augmented unit root test
- CADF:
-
Cross-sectional augmented dickey fuller unit root test
- CUP-FM:
-
Continuously updated full modified
- CUP-BC:
-
Continuously updated bias-corrected
- DARDL:
-
Dynamic autoregressive distributed lag
- VECM:
-
Vector error correction
- DOLS:
-
Dynamic ordinary least square
- FMOLS:
-
Fully modified ordinary least square
- CCEMG:
-
Common correlated effect mean group
References
Abbasi KR, Adedoyin FF (2021) Do energy use and economic policy uncertainty affect CO2 emissions in China? Empirical evidence from the dynamic ARDL simulation approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:23323–23335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12217-6
Abbasi KR, Adedoyin FF, Radulescu M et al (2022a) The role of forest and agriculture towards environmental fortification: designing a sustainable policy framework for top forested countries. Environ Dev Sustain 24:8639–8666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01803-4
Abbasi KR, Hussain K, Radulescu M, Ozturk I (2022b) Asymmetric impact of renewable and non-renewable energy on the industrial sector in Pakistan: fresh evidence from Bayesian and non-linear ARDL. Renew Energy 187:944–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.012
Adedoyin FF, Nathaniel S, Adeleye N (2021) An investigation into the anthropogenic nexus among consumption of energy, tourism, and economic growth: do economic policy uncertainties matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:2835–2847. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-10638-X/TABLES/7
Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A et al (2020) The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: an advanced panel data estimation. Resour Policy 69:101817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817
Ahmad M, Ahmed Z, Yang X et al (2022a) Financial development and environmental degradation: do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? Gondwana Res 105:299–310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.851263
Ahmad Mahmood, Ahmed Zahoor, Bai Yang, Qiao Guitao, Popp József, Oláh Judit (2022b) Financial inclusion, technological innovations, and environmental quality: analyzing the role of green openness. Front Environ Sci 10:1–12
Ahmed EM (2012) Green TFP intensity impact on sustainable East Asian Productivity Growth. Econ Anal Policy 42:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(12)50005-6
Ahmed EM (2020) Modelling green productivity spillover effects on sustainability. World J Sci Technol Sustain Dev 17:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjstsd-01-2020-0009
Ahmed Z, Cary M, Ali S et al (2021a) Moving toward a green revolution in Japan : symmetric and asymmetric relationships among clean energy technology development investments , economic growth, and CO2 emissions. Energy Environ:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211041780
Ahmed Z, Cary M, Shahbaz M, Vo XV (2021b) Asymmetric nexus between economic policy uncertainty, renewable energy technology budgets, and environmental sustainability: Evidence from the United States. J Clean Prod 313:127723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127723
Ahmed Z, Nathaniel SP, Shahbaz M (2021c) The criticality of information and communication technology and human capital in environmental sustainability: Evidence from Latin American and Caribbean countries. J Clean Prod 286:125529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125529
Ali S, Dogan E, Chen F, Khan Z (2021) International trade and environmental performance in top ten-emitters countries: the role of eco-innovation and renewable energy consumption. Sustain Dev 29:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.2153
Al-Mulali U, Saboori B, Ozturk I (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 76:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.019
Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139
Altıntaş H, Kassouri Y (2020) Is the environmental Kuznets curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions? Ecol. Indic. 113:106187
Amin A, Dogan E (2021) The role of economic policy uncertainty in the energy-environment nexus for China: evidence from the novel dynamic simulations method. J Environ Manage 292:112865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112865
Baker SR, Bloom N, Davis SJ (2016) Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Q J Econ 131:1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
Bilal KI, Tan D et al (2022) Alternate energy sources and environmental quality: the impact of inflation dynamics. Gondwana Res 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.12.011
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom 188:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
Chu LK, Le NTM (2022) Environmental quality and the role of economic policy uncertainty, economic complexity, renewable energy, and energy intensity: the case of G7 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15666-9
Coxhead I (2007) A NEW RESOURCE Curse? Impacts of China’s boom on comparative advantage and resource dependence in Southeast Asia. World Dev 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.10.012
Danish, Baloch MA, Suad S (2018) Modeling the impact of transport energy consumption on CO 2 emission in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2510(25):9461–9473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1230-0
Danish, Ulucak R (2020) The pathway toward pollution mitigation: does institutional quality make a difference? Bus Strateg Environ bse:2597. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2597
Danish UR (2020) How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. Sci Total Environ 712:136504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136504
Danish UR (2021) Renewable energy, technological innovation and the environment: a novel dynamic auto-regressive distributive lag simulation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 150:111433. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111433
Danish HST, Baloch MA et al (2019) Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516
Danish UR, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
Dogan E, Shah SF (2022) Analyzing the role of renewable energy and energy intensity in the ecological footprint of the united arab emirates. Sustain 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010227
Dwumfour RA, Ntow-Gyamfi M (2018) Natural resources, financial development and institutional quality in Africa: is there a resource curse? Resour Policy 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.08.012
Eberhardt M, Teal F (2020) The magnitude of the task ahead: macro implications of heterogeneous technology. Rev Income Wealth 66:334–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/ROIW.12415
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
Haldar A, Sethi N (2022) Environmental effects of information and communication technology - exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade and financial development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111754
Hasanov FJ, Khan Z, Hussain M, Tufail M (2021) Theoretical framework for the carbon emissions effects of technological progress and renewable energy consumption. Sustain Dev 29:810–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2175
Hashem Pesaran M, Yamagata T, Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142:50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Hassan ST, Danish KSUD et al (2020) Role of institutions in correcting environmental pollution: an empirical investigation. Sustain Cities Soc 53:101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101901
Hussain M, Arshad Z, Bashir A (2022) Do economic policy uncertainty and environment-related technologies help in limiting ecological footprint? Environ Sci Pollut Res 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19000-9
Hussain M, Dogan E (2021) The role of institutional quality and environment-related technologies in environmental degradation for BRICS. J Clean Prod 304:127059
Hussain M, Mahmood N, Chen F et al (2021) Comparative re-estimation of environmental degradation and population density in china: evidence from the maki’s regime shift approach. Rev Econ Mund. https://doi.org/10.33776/REM.V0I58.4667
Hussain M, Mir GM, Usman M et al (2020) Analysing the role of environment-related technologies and carbon emissions in emerging economies: a step towards sustainable development. Environ Technol (United Kingdom):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1788171
Khan Z, Hussain M, Shahbaz M et al (2020) Natural resource abundance, technological innovation, and human capital nexus with financial development: a case study of China. Resour Policy 65:101585
Li X, Hu Z, Zhang Q (2021) Environmental regulation, economic policy uncertainty, and green technology innovation. Clean Technol Environ Policy 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02219-4
Mahmood N, Wang Z, Yasmin N et al (2019) How to bend down the environmental Kuznets curve: the significance of biomass energy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:21598–21608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05442-1
Mehmood U (2022) Environmental degradation and financial development: do institutional quality and human capital make a difference in G11 nations? Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18825-8
Nakhli MS, Shahbaz M, Ben Jebli M, Wang S (2022) Nexus between economic policy uncertainty, renewable & non-renewable energy and carbon emissions: contextual evidence in carbon neutrality dream of USA. Renew Energy 185:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.046
Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econom Rev 34:1089–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
Phuc Canh N, Trung Thong N (2020) Nexus between financialisation and natural resources rents: empirical evidence in a global sample. Resour Policy 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101590
Raza K, Hussain K, Redulescu M, Ozturk I (2021) Does natural resources depletion and economic growth achieve the carbon neutrality target of the UK ? A way forward towards sustainable development. Resour Policy 74:102–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102341
Tiba S, Omri A (2017) Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:1129–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.113
Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
Wang J, Dong K (2019) What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 656:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.354
Wen Q, Zhang T (2022) Economic policy uncertainty and industrial pollution: the role of environmental supervision by local governments. China Econ Rev 71:101723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101723
Westerlund J (2005) New simple tests for panel cointegration. Econom Rev 24:297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500243019
Xue C, Shahbaz M, Ahmed Z et al (2022) Clean energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: what is the role of economic policy uncertainty? Renew Energy 184:899–907
Yang Y, Liu J, Lin Y, Li Q (2019) The impact of urbanization on China’s residential energy consumption. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 49:170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.09.002
Yu J, Shi X, Guo D, Yang L (2021) Economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and firm carbon emissions: evidence using a China provincial EPU index. Energy Econ 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105071
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR et al (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resour Policy 63:101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428
Zhao X, Ma X, Chen B et al (2022) Challenges toward carbon neutrality in China: Strategies and countermeasures. Resour Conserv Recycl 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105959
Zhou X, Jia M, Altuntaş M et al (2022) Transition to renewable energy and environmental technologies: the role of economic policy uncertainty in top five polluted economies. J Environ Manage 313:115019. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2022.115019
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed in this study are accessible from the corresponding author on demand.
Funding
This study is supported by Shandong Social Science Planning Fund Program: Estimation and convergence of agricultural productivity in Shandong Province (Project No. 08CJGZ18).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
You Shouchang conducted the analyses and wrote the manuscript. Li Zhonghua contributed to the analysis and write the manuscript, and Wang Jintian guided and supervised the whole research work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not required
Consent to participate
All authors participated in this research.
Consent to publish
Not applicable
Competing Interests
Not required
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shouchang, Y., Zhonghua, L. & Jintian, W. Exploring the impacts of economic policy uncertainty, natural resources, and energy structure on ecological footprints: evidence from G-10 nations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 45701–45710 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25392-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25392-z