Abstract
Photovoltaic (PV) system is widely recognized as one of the cleanest technologies for electricity production, which transforms solar energy into electrical energy. However, there are considerable amounts of emissions during its life cycle. In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to evaluate the environmental and human health impacts of PV electricity production in Canada. The PV potential varies considerably among the provinces, with higher values in Manitoba (MB), Saskatchewan (SK), Alberta (AB), and southern Ontario (ON). A grid-connected slanted-roof mono-crystalline silicon (mono-Si) PV system with a capacity of 3 kWp (the peak power of the system in kilowatts) in Toronto, Ontario, was considered as the case study system. Ten impact categories were considered including (1) acidification, (2) carcinogenic, (3) ecotoxicity, (4) eutrophication, (5) fossil fuel depletion, (6) global warming, (7) non-carcinogenic, (8) ozone depletion, (9) respiratory effects, and (10) smog. Among the four components of the PV system, i.e., mono-Si panel, mounting system, inverter, and electric installation, the mono-Si panel production was the highest contributor in seven out of ten impact categories, including acidification (68%), eutrophication (60%), fossil fuel depletion (81%), global warming (77%), ozone depletion (88%), respiratory effects (74%), and smog (70%). For the other three processes, the electric installation contributed most to ecotoxicity at 58%, followed by the mounting system in the carcinogenic category (29%), and the inverter in the non-carcinogenic category (31%). By normalizing the impacts based on the reference scores in Canada, it was found that the ecotoxicity and carcinogenic categories had dominant contributions to the overall impact by 53% and 42%, respectively. The global warming potential impact was estimated as 79 gr CO2 eq /kWh, which is close to the mean value of 79.5 gr CO2 eq /kWh, reported in the literature. The sensitivity analysis indicated that a 10% increase in the panel and mounting system area will increase the ozone depletion and carcinogenic categories by 8.1% and 2.8%, respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- AC:
-
Alternating current
- CdTe:
-
Cadmium telluride
- CFC:
-
Chlorofluorocarbon
- CIS:
-
Copper (C), indium (I), and selenium (S)
- CTUe:
-
Comparative toxic unit for human
- CTUh:
-
Comparative toxic unit for human
- DC:
-
Direct current
- GHG:
-
Greenhouse gas
- ISO:
-
International organization for standardization
- LCA:
-
Life cycle assessment
- LCI:
-
Life cycle inventory
- LCIA:
-
Life cycle impact assessment
- NF:
-
Normalization factor
- PV:
-
Photovoltaic
- Si:
-
Silicon
- SO2 :
-
Sulfur dioxide
- TRACI:
-
Tool for reduction and assessment of chemicals and other environmental impacts
References
Alsema E, Wild-Scholten M (2005) The real environmental impacts of crystalline silicon PV modules: an analysis based on up-to-date manufacturers data. Presented at the 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference. https://publications.ecn.nl/M/2005/ECN-RX--05-015. Accessed Sep 2022
Alsema EA, Wild-Scholten M (2011) Environmental impact of crystalline silicon photovoltaic module production. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 895.https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0895-G03-05
Bayod-Rújula ÁA, Lorente-Lafuente AM, Cirez-Oto F (2011) Environmental assessment of grid connected photovoltaic plants with 2-axis tracking versus fixed modules systems. Energy 36:3148–3158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.004
Bayod-Rújula AA (2019) Chapter 8 - Solar photovoltaics (PV). In: CALISE, F., D’ACCADIA, M. D., SANTARELLI, M., LANZINI, A. & FERRERO, D. (eds.) Solar Hydrogen Production. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814853-2.00008-4
Benda V (2018) 9 - Crystalline Silicon solar cell and module technology. In: LETCHER, T. M. & FTHENAKIS, V. M. (eds.) A Comprehensive Guide to Solar Energy Systems. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811479-7.00009-9
Beylot A, Payet J, Puech C, Adra N, Jacquin P, Blanc I, Beloin-Saint-Pierre D (2014) Environmental impacts of large-scale grid-connected ground-mounted PV installations. Renewable Energy 61:2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.04.051
Carnevale E, Lombardi L, Zanchi L (2014) Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy systems: Comparison of photovoltaic and water thermal heater at domestic scale. Energy 77:434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.028
CER (2022) "Market Snapshot: Which cities have the highest solar potential in Canada?". Canada Energy Regulator. www.cer-rec.gc.ca [Accessed Sep 2022]
Chen W, Hong J, Yuan X, Liu J (2016) Environmental impact assessment of monocrystalline silicon solar photovoltaic cell production: a case study in China. J Clean Prod 112:1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.024
Constantino G, Freitas M, Fidelis N, Pereira MG (2018) Adoption of photovoltaic systems along a sure path: a life-cycle assessment (LCA) study applied to the analysis of GHG emission impacts. Energies 11:2806. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102806
Cubi E, Zibin NF, Thompson SJ, Bergerson J (2016) Sustainability of rooftop technologies in cold climates: comparative life cycle assessment of white roofs, green roofs, and Photovoltaic panels. J Ind Ecol 20:249–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12269
Desideri U, Proietti S, Zepparelli F, Sdringola P, Bini S (2012) Life Cycle Assessment of a ground-mounted 1778kWp photovoltaic plant and comparison with traditional energy production systems. Appl Energy 97:930–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.055
Desideri U, Zepparelli F, Morettini V, Garroni E (2013) Comparative analysis of concentrating solar power and photovoltaic technologies: Technical and environmental evaluations. Appl Energy 102:765–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.033
Dominguez-Ramos A, Held M, Aldaco R, Fischer M, Irabien A (2010) Prospective CO2 emissions from energy supplying systems: photovoltaic systems and conventional grid within Spanish frame conditions. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0192-3
Dones R, Frischknecht R (1998) Life-cycle assessment of photovoltaic systems: results of swiss studies on energy chains. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 6:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(199803/04)6:2%3C117::AID-PIP209%3E3.0.CO;2-M
Ecoinvent (2021) System Models in ecoinvent 3. https://www.ecoinvent.org/database/system-models-in-ecoinvent-3/ [Accessed Feb 16 2021]
Esri (2020) ArcGIS Pro (Version 2.5). Esri Inc. www.esri.com [Accessed Sep 2022]
EuropeanCommission (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: general guide for life cycle assessment: detailed guidance, Luxembourg, Joint Research Centre. Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/38479
Fthenakis V, Alsema E (2006) Photovoltaics energy payback times, greenhouse gas emissions and external costs: 2004–early 2005 status. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 14:275–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.706
Fthenakis VM, Kim HC (2011) Photovoltaics: life-cycle analyses. Sol Energy 85:1609–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.10.002
Fu Y, Liu X, Yuan Z (2015) Life-cycle assessment of multi-crystalline photovoltaic (PV) systems in China. J Clean Prod 86:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.057
García-Valverde R, Miguel C, Martínez-Béjar R, Urbina A (2009) Life cycle assessment study of a 4.2 kWp stand-alone photovoltaic system. Sol Energy 83:1434–1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.03.012
Graebig M, Bringezu S, Fenner R (2010) Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of maize–biogas and photovoltaics on a land use basis. Sol Energy 84:1255–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.04.002
Hauschild M, Rosenbaum R, Olsen S (2017). Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3
Hou G, Sun H, Jiang Z, Pan Z, Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Yao Q (2016) Life cycle assessment of grid-connected photovoltaic power generation from crystalline silicon solar modules in China. Appl Energy 164:882–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.023
IEA (2021) Renewables Information: Overview, IEA, Paris. License: CC BY 4.0. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-information-overview. Accessed Aug 2022
IESO (2021) Ontario’s electricity grid. Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO). www.ieso.ca [Accessed Sep 2022]
ISO14040 (2006) Environmental management — life cycle assessment — principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardization, Switzerland. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html [Accessed Sep 2022]
ISO14044 (2006) Environmental management — life cycle assessment — requirements and guidelines. International Organisation for Standardization, Switzerland. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html [Accessed Sep 2022]
Ito M, Komoto K, Kurokawa K (2010) Life-cycle analyses of very-large scale PV systems using six types of PV modules. Curr Appl Phys 10:S271–S273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2009.11.028
Ito M, Kudo M, Nagura M, Kurokawa K (2011) A comparative study on life cycle analysis of 20 different PV modules installed at the Hokuto mega-solar plant. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 19:878–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.1070
Jia X, Lv F, Li P, Wang W (2020) Life-cycle assessment of p-type multi-Si back surface field (BSF) solar module in China of 2019. Sol Energy 196:207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.018
Jungbluth N (2005) Life cycle assessment of crystalline photovoltaics in the Swiss ecoinvent database. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 13:429–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.614
Jungbluth N, Dones R, Frischknecht R (2007) Life Cycle assessment of photovoltaics; Update of the ecoinvent Database. MRS Proc 1041.https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1041-R01-03
Kabakian V, McManus MC, Harajli H (2015) Attributional life cycle assessment of mounted 1.8kWp monocrystalline photovoltaic system with batteries and comparison with fossil energy production system. Appl Energy 154:428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.125
Kalyani NT, Dhoble SJ, Vengadaesvaran B, Arof AK (2021) Chapter 20 - Sustainability, recycling, and lifetime issues of energy materials. In: DHOBLE, S. J., KALYANI, N. T., VENGADAESVARAN, B. & KARIEM AROF, A. (eds.) Energy Materials. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823710-6.00015-7
Kannan R, Leong KC, Osman R, Ho HK, Tso CP (2006) Life cycle assessment study of solar PV systems: An example of a 2.7 kWp distributed solar PV system in Singapore. Sol Energy 80:555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2005.04.008
Kato K, Murata A, Sakuta K (1998) Energy pay-back time and life-cycle CO2 emission of residential PV power system with silicon PV module. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 6:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(199803/04)6:2%3C105::AID-PIP212%3E3.0.CO;2-C
Li T, Hu R, Chen Z, Li Q, Huang S, Zhu Z, Zhou L-F (2018) Fine particulate matter (PM2.5): The culprit for chronic lung diseases in China. Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine 4:176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2018.07.002
Martin J (2012) 3kWp solar panel systems: price, power output, and return on investment. SolarSelections. http://www.solarselections.co.uk/ [Accessed Dec 04 2021]
Mehedi TH, Gemechu E, Kumar A (2022) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems. Applied Energy 314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118918
Mohr N, Meijer A, Huijbregts M, Reijnders L (2013) Environmental life cycle assessment of roof-integrated flexible amorphous silicon/nanocrystalline silicon solar cell laminate. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 21:802–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2157
Muneer T, Younes S, Lambert N, Kubie J (2006) Life cycle assessment of a medium-sized photovoltaic facility at a high latitude location. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part a: Journal of Power and Energy 220:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1243/09576509JPE253
Nguyen DH (2021) Toxic Chemicals in Solar Panels. https://sciencing.com/toxic-chemicals-solar-panels-18393.html [Accessed Sep 2022]
NRCAN (2020a) Database: photovoltaic potential and solar resource maps of Canada. Natural Resources Canada. www.open.canada.ca/data [Accessed Sep 2022]
NRCAN (2020b) Photovoltaic potential and solar resource maps of Canada. Natural Resources Canada. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/ [Accessed Sep 2022]
Nugent D, Sovacool BK (2014) Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar PV and wind energy: A critical meta-survey. Energy Policy 65:229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.048
Openlca (2022) Version 1.11. https://www.openlca.org/ [Accessed Aug 2022]
Pacca S, D. Sivaraman, and G. Keoleian (2006) Life cycle assessment of the 33 kW photovoltaic system on the Dana Building at the University of Michigan: thin film laminates, multi-crystalline modules, and balance of system components. University of Michigan: Ann Arbor: 1–106. URL: https://css.umich.edu/publications/,
Pehnt M (2006) Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies. Renewable Energy 31:55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.03.002
Peng J, Lu L, Yang H (2013) Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 19:255–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.035
Plante RH (2014) Chapter five - solar photovoltaic systems. In: PLANTE, R. H. (ed.) Solar Energy, Photovoltaics, and Domestic Hot Water. Boston: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420155-2.00005-0
Rabaia MKH, Abdelkareem MA, Sayed ET, Elsaid K, Chae K-J, Wilberforce T, Olabi AG (2021) Environmental impacts of solar energy systems: a review. Sci Total Environ 754:141989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141989
Ryberg M, Vieira MDM, Zgola M, Bare J, Rosenbaum RK (2014) Updated US and Canadian normalization factors for TRACI 2.1. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:329–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0629-z
Sabour MR, Alam E, Mostafa Hatami A (2020a) Environmental and economic assessment of Enhanced Landfill Mining in Tehran. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09458-w
Sabour MR, Jafari MA, Hosseini Gohar SM (2020b) Si-based solar cells’ conversion efficiency related publications bibliometric review during 2000–2017. SILICON 12:2705–2720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00366-4
Santoyo-Castelazo E, Solano-Olivares K, Martínez E, García EO, Santoyo E (2021) Life cycle assessment for a grid-connected multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic system of 3 kWp: A case study for Mexico. J Clean Prod 316:128314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128314
Shaji E, Santosh M, Sarath KV, Prakash P, Deepchand V, Divya BV (2021) Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a global synopsis with focus on the Indian Peninsula. Geosci Front 12:101079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.015
Stoppato A (2008) Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation. Energy 33:224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.11.012
Sumper A, Robledo-García M, Villafáfila-Robles R, Bergas-Jané J, Andrés-Peiró J (2011) Life-cycle assessment of a photovoltaic system in Catalonia (Spain). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:3888–3896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.023
Suri M, Betak J, Rosina K, Chrkavy D, Suriova N, Cebecauer T, Caltik M, Erdelyi B (2020) Global photovoltaic power potential by country (English). Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP). URL: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/466331592817725242/pdf/Global-Photovoltaic-Power-Potential-by-Country.pdf. Accessed Sep 2022
Tsang MP, Sonnemann GW, Bassani DM (2016) A comparative human health, ecotoxicity, and product environmental assessment on the production of organic and silicon solar cells. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 24:645–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2704
USEPA (2021) Tool for reduction and assessment of chemicals and other environmental impacts (TRACI). https://www.epa.gov/. Accessed Sep 2022
Vellini M, Gambini M, Prattella V (2017) Environmental impacts of PV technology throughout the life cycle: Importance of the end-of-life management for Si-panels and CdTe-panels. Energy 138:1099–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.031
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
Wild-Scholten MJ (2013) Energy payback time and carbon footprint of commercial photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 119:296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2013.08.037
Xie M, Ruan J, Bai W, Qiao Q, Bai L, Zhang J, Li H, Lv F, Fu H (2018) Pollutant payback time and environmental impact of Chinese multi-crystalline photovoltaic production based on life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 184:648–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.290
Yu Z, Ma W, Xie K, Lv G, Chen Z, Wu J, Yu J (2017) Life cycle assessment of grid-connected power generation from metallurgical route multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic system in China. Appl Energy 185:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.051
Zahedi R, Ranjbaran P, Gharehpetian GB, Mohammadi F, Ahmadiahangar R (2021) Cleaning of floating photovoltaic systems: a critical review on approaches from technical and economic perspectives. Energies 14.https://doi.org/10.3390/en14072018
Zhai P, Williams ED (2010) Dynamic Hybrid life cycle assessment of energy and carbon of multicrystalline silicon photovoltaic systems. Environ Sci Technol 44:7950–7955. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1026695
Zhong ZW, Song B, Loh PE (2011) LCAs of a polycrystalline photovoltaic module and a wind turbine. Renewable Energy 36:2227–2237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.021
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Carina Xue Luo at the University of Windsor for generating Fig. 1 and academic writing advisors at the University of Windsor for their editorial assistance. This project was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the University of Windsor’s Ignite Program.
Funding
This project was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the University of Windsor’s Ignite Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, software, and writing – original draft: Ehsan Alam; writing – review and editing: Xiaohong Xu.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Loubet
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alam, E., Xu, X. Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity production by mono-crystalline solar systems: a case study in Canada. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 27422–27440 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24077-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24077-3