Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy, exergy, emergy, and economic evaluation of a novel two-stage solar Rankine power plant

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a solar-powered organic Rankine cycle-integrated cooling and electricity co-generation system. This system consists of a steam cycle, an organic Rankine cycle, the parabolic trough solar collectors’ field, and a gas turbine cycle as well as a cooling heat exchanger for the co-production of power and cooling. The steam generator in this cycle is a dual pressure system that works with the thermal energy received from the solar collectors. The proposed process is analyzed thermodynamically and economically using the novel emergoeconomic approach. Then, to find the optimum operating parameters of the power plant, multi-objective optimization is performed by implementing the novel water cycle algorithm. The objectives of this optimization process are to maximize the system’s efficiency and to minimize the monetary emergy rate of the products. This study shows an increase of 8% in the exergy efficiency (from 40.2 to 48.2%) after the optimization. The production cost decreased by 6.1% from 18.8 to 17.6 USD/GJ, and the emergoeconomic rate decreased by 18.9% from 27.1 to 22 sej/s. Furthermore, the power production in the proposed cycle compared to the base cycle increased by 111.7 MW in the gas cycle and 39.4 MW in the steam cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

\(\beta\) :

Scale factor

\(\lambda\) :

Latent heat of evaporation (kJ/kg)

\(\eta\) :

Efficiency

\(A\) :

Heat transfer area (\({m}^{2}\))

\(\dot{E}\) :

Exergy flow rate (kJ/s)

\(h\) :

Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)

\(m\) :

Specific monetary emergy (sej/kJ)

\(\dot{M}\) :

Monetary emergy rate (sej/s)

\(\dot{Q}\) :

Heat transfer rate (kW)

\(s\) :

Specific entropy (kJ/kg K)

\(T\) :

Temperature (\(^\circ \mathrm{C}\))

\(\dot{U}\) :

Component monetary emergy rate (sej/s)

\(\dot{W}\) :

Power (kw)

\({r}_{p}\) :

Pressure ratio of air compressor

\({A}_{STC}\) :

Area of solar collectors

\({f}_{m}\) :

The factor of emergoeconomic analysis

\(\psi\) :

Exergetic efficiency

C:

Cold stream

CH:

Chemical

D:

Destruction

Exh:

Exhaust

F:

Fuel

H:

Hot stream

P:

Product

PH:

Physical

AC:

Air compressor

CC:

Combustion chamber

EC:

Economizer

EV:

Evaporator

GT:

Gas turbine

HEX:

Heat exchanger

HPEC:

High-pressure economizer

HPEV:

High-pressure evaporator

HPP:

High-pressure pump

HPSH:

High-pressure superheater

HRSG:

Heat recovery steam generator

LHV:

Lower heating value

LNG:

Liquified natural Gas

ORC:

Organic Rankine cycle

PTC:

Parabolic trough collectors

SEJ:

Solar energy joule

Tr:

Transformity

References

  • Abdelhay A, Fath HS, Nada SA (2020) Solar driven polygeneration system for power, desalination and cooling. Energy 198:117341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Açıkkalp E, Aras H, Hepbasli A (2014) Advanced exergoeconomic analysis of a trigeneration system using a diesel-gas engine. Appl Therm Eng 67:388–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghbashlo M, Rosen MA (2018) Consolidating exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses using the emergy concept for better understanding energy conversion systems. J Clean Prod 172:696–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaelahi M, Jafari H (2021) Multi-objective optimisation of solar-driven combined stirling engine/LNG burned micro gas turbine based on exergy and energy analysis. Int J Exergy 35:342–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaelahi M, Sayyaadi H (2016) Analytical closed-form model for predicting the power and efficiency of Stirling engines based on a comprehensive numerical model and the genetic programming. Energy 98:324–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaelahi M, Rafat E, Mofidipour E (2019) Emergy-based economic and environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a two-cascade solar gas turbine power plant. Sustain Prod Consum 20:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaelahi M, Mofidipour E, Rafat E (2020) Combined Energy-Exergy-Control (CEEC) analysis and multi-objective optimization of parabolic trough solar collector powered steam power plant. Energy 201:117641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaelahi M, Sadri S, Rafat E (2021) Exergy cost accounting and thermoeconomic diagnosis for Double-Solar-Gas-Turbine system (DSGT). Energy Sources, Part A Recover Util Environ Eff 43:413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni S, Facchini A, Susani L, Tiezzi E (2007) Emergy as a function of exergy. Energy 32:1158–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behar O, Khellaf A, Mohammedi K (2015) A novel parabolic trough solar collector model–validation with experimental data and comparison to Engineering Equation Solver (EES). Energy Convers Manag 106:268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonyadi N, Johnson E, Baker D (2018) Technoeconomic and exergy analysis of a solar geothermal hybrid electric power plant using a novel combined cycle. Energy Convers Manag 156:542–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyaghchi FA, Heidarnejad P (2015) Thermoeconomic assessment and multi objective optimization of a solar micro CCHP based on organic Rankine cycle for domestic application. Energy Convers Manag 97:224–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Ulgiati S (2002) Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems. J Clean Prod 10:321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caglayan H, Caliskan H (2019) Thermodynamic based economic and environmental analyses of an industrial cogeneration system. Appl Therm Eng 158:113792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakici DM, Erdogan A, Colpan CO (2017) Thermodynamic performance assessment of an integrated geothermal powered supercritical regenerative organic Rankine cycle and parabolic trough solar collectors. Energy 120:306–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, Dhahad HA, Togun H, Anqi AE, Farouk N, Farhang B (2021) Proposal and thermo-economic optimization of using LNG cold exergy for compressor inlet cooling in an integrated biomass fueled triple combined power cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:15351–15366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cengel YA, Boles MA (2002) Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. Sea 1000:8862

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer İ, Midilli A, Kucuk H (2014) Progress in sustainable energy technologies: Generating renewable energy, vol 1. Springer

  • Dincer I, Rosen MA, Ahmadi P (2017) Optimization of energy systems. John Wiley & Sons

  • Duan L, Qu W, Jia S, Feng T (2017) Study on the integration characteristics of a novel integrated solar combined cycle system. Energy 130:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaebi H, Saidi MH, Ahmadi P (2012) Exergoeconomic optimization of a trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose based on TRR method and using evolutionary algorithm. Appl Therm Eng 36:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaliq A, Mokheimer EMA, Yaqub M (2019) Thermodynamic investigations on a novel solar powered trigeneration energy system. Energy Convers Manag 188:398–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzaretto A, Tsatsaronis G (2006) SPECO: a systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy 31:1257–1289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Liu Y, Zhang G, Yang Y (2020) Thermodynamic analysis of a novel combined cooling and power system utilizing liquefied natural gas (LNG) cryogenic energy and low-temperature waste heat. Energy 199:117479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mofidipour E, Babaelahi M (2020) New procedure in solar system dynamic simulation, thermodynamic analysis, and multi-objective optimization of a post-combustion carbon dioxide capture coal-fired power plant. Energy Convers Manag 224:113321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakopoulou F, Tsatsaronis G, Morosuk T (2015) Advanced exergoeconomic analysis of a power plant with CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 75:2253–2260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quezada-García S, Sánchez-Mora H, Polo-Labarrios MA, Cázares-Ramírez RI (2019) Modeling and simulation to determine the thermal efficiency of a parabolic solar trough collector system. Case Stud Therm Eng 16:100523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafat E, Babaelahi M (2020) Recovering waste heat of a solar hybrid power plant using a Kalina cycle and desalination unit: A sustainability (emergo-economic and emergo-environmenal) approach. Energy Convers Manag 224:113394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafat E, Babaelahi M, Arabkoohsar A (2021) Design and analysis of a hybrid solar power plant for co-production of electricity and water: a case study in Iran. J Therm Anal Calorim 147(2):1469–1486

  • Rashidi H, Khorshidi J (2018) Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a solar based multigeneration system using multiobjective differential evolution algorithm. J Clean Prod 170:978–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren F, Wang J, Zhu S, Chen Y (2019) Multi-objective optimization of combined cooling, heating and power system integrated with solar and geothermal energies. Energy Convers Manag 197:111866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reza B, Sadiq R, Hewage K (2014) Emergy-based life cycle assessment (Em-LCA) for sustainability appraisal of infrastructure systems: a case study on paved roads. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen M (2018) Environmental sustainability tools in the biofuel industry. Biofuel Res J 5(1):751–752. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2018.5.1.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandá A, Moya SL, Valenzuela L (2019) Modelling and simulation tools for direct steam generation in parabolic-trough solar collectors: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 113:109226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sha S, Hurme M (2012) Emergy evaluation of combined heat and power plant processes. Appl Therm Eng 43:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SharafEldean MA, Fath HE (2013) Exergy and thermo-economic analysis of solar thermal cycles powered multi-stage flash desalination process. Desalin Water Treat 51:7361–7378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SharafEldean MA, Soliman AM (2015) Study of using solar thermal power for the margarine melting heat process. J Sol Energy Eng 137:21004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva HCN, Dutra JCC, Costa JAP, Ochoa AAV, Dos Santos CAC, Araújo MMD (2019) Modeling and simulation of cogeneration systems for buildings on a university campus in Northeast Brazil–A case study. Energy Convers Manag 186:334–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelling J, Laumert B, Fransson T (2014) Advanced hybrid solar tower combined-cycle power plants. Energy Procedia 49:1207–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzivanidis C, Bellos E, Antonopoulos KA (2016) Energetic and financial investigation of a stand-alone solar-thermal Organic Rankine Cycle power plant. Energy Convers Manag 126:421–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz F, Ozturk M, Selbas R (2019) Development and techno-economic assessment of a new biomass-assisted integrated plant for multigeneration. Energy Convers Manag 202:112154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Wang Z, Xu C, Jiang H (2012) Embodied energy and emergy analyses of a concentrating solar power (CSP) system. Energy Policy 42:232–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Guan X, Ding Y, Liu C (2018) Emergy analysis of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for waste heat power generation. J Clean Prod 183:1207–1215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X, Shi R, Wang Y, You S, Zhang H, Xia J et al (2019) Mathematical modeling and performance analysis of an integrated solar heating and cooling system driven by parabolic trough collector and double-effect absorption chiller. Energy Build 202:109400

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Mojtaba Babaelahi, Rasol Hoseini, and Ehsan Rafat. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Mojtaba Babaelahi and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mojtaba Babaelahi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

The thermodynamic model of the system has been achieved by considering a control volume around each component. The balance of energy in the control volume can be described as follows (Cengel and Boles 2002):

$${\dot{Q}}_{net,in}-{\dot{W}}_{net,out}=\sum_{out}\dot{m}h-\sum_{in}mh+{\left({m}_{2}{u}_{2}-{m}_{1}{u}_{1}\right)}_{system}$$
(11)

In this equation, the specific enthalpy and the internal energy are represented by h and u, mass flow rate and mass of the control volume are represented by \(\dot{m}\) and m, and the net output work rate and heat transfer rate are shown as Ẇ and \(\dot{Q}\). Due to their small values, the potential and kinetic terms are neglected to simplify the equation.

The mass balance of each component is considered using the following equation:

$${m}_{2}-{m}_{1}= \sum {\dot{m}}_{in}+\sum {\dot{m}}_{out}$$
(12)

By implementing the above equations, the required correlations for evaluating thermodynamic characteristics in the conventional components can be summarized in Table 10.

Table 10 Energy balance equations of the components used in the cogeneration plant

To model the solar unit, the outlet temperature of the collector, working pressure of the solar cycle, and solar heat exchanger effectiveness are assumed. The enthalpy of the theminol oil, which is used as the heat transfer fluid in the solar cycle, is calculated using the following equation (Abdelhay et al. 2020).

$${h}_{i}\text{=3.172}\times 1{0}^{-7}\times {{\text{T}}_{i}}^{3}\text{+10.99}\times 1{0}^{-4}\times {{\text{T}}_{i}}^{2}\text{+1.571}\times {\text{T}}_{i}\text{-23.85}$$
(13)

In this equation, T is the temperature in Celsius, and h is enthalpy in kJ/kg. The outlet temperature of the solar heat exchanger is calculated as below (Abdelhay et al. 2020):

$${\text{T}}_{23}{= \text{T} }_{24}-{\varepsilon }_{SHX}\times {\text{(T}}_{24}{\text{-T}}_{8}\text{)}$$
(14)

\({\varepsilon }_{SHX}\) is the effectiveness of the solar heat exchanger. The following equations can also be used to calculate the heat transfer rate and the useful heat absorbed by the solar collectors.

$${Q}_{SHX}={\dot{m}}_{\text{therminol}}\times ({h}_{1}-{h}_{8})$$
(15)
$${Q}_{STC}={\dot{m}}_{stc}\times ({h}_{24}-{h}_{23})$$
(16)

The following equation is used for calculating the needed area of solar collectors. In this equation, \({\eta }_{STC}\) is the collectors’ efficiency and can be calculated from the below formula (Sharaf Eldean and Soliman 2015).

$${A}_{STC}=\frac{{Q}_{STC}}{{\eta }_{STC}\times G/1000}$$
(17)
$$\begin{array}{c}{\eta }_{STC}=0.75-4.5\times {10}^{-5}\times ({T}_{STC,out}-{T}_{0})-0.039\times \frac{{T}_{STC,out}-{T}_{0}}{G}-\\ {0.0003\times \left(\frac{{\mathrm{T}}_{STC, out}-{T}_{0}}{G}\right)}^{2}\end{array}$$
(18)

In the above equations, G is the solar radiation in W/m2, T0 is the ambient temperature in C, ASTC is the area of solar collectors in m2, ηSTC is the collectors’ efficiency, and TSTC,out is the outlet temperature in C.

Appendix B

Table 11 shows the validation results between the proposed mathematical model in MATLAB and the commercial software Thermoflex. It can be seen that the mathematical model shows excellent agreement with the results from the software program.

Table 11 Model validation results

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, R., Babaelahi, M. & Rafat, E. Energy, exergy, emergy, and economic evaluation of a novel two-stage solar Rankine power plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 79140–79155 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20799-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20799-6

Keywords

Navigation