Abstract
We examine the linkages of economic freedom (ECF), energy use, and CO2 emissions in selected South Asian countries of Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Annual data from 1995 to 2018 are analyzed by employing second-generation methodologies. Cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) is used because this method incorporates the cross-sectional dependence among the data. This work uses three models, where the dependent variables are gross domestic product (GDP), CO2 emissions, and energy use. The findings reveal that ECF and energy use contributes to more economic development. ECF is improving air quality by lowering CO2 emissions. The findings suggest that these countries need to increase the percentage of renewable energy in their energy generation mix. At the same time, there is a need to integrate ECF with environmental awareness programs. This will not only increase air quality but also increase economic growth. GDP is found to be dependent on energy use; however, increased energy use from non-renewable also contaminates the environment. Therefore, South Asian countries need to invest more in research and development projects to promote renewable energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not required.
References
Adebayo TS, Awosusi AA, Oladipupo SD et al (2021) Dominance of Fossil Fuels in Japan’s National Energy Mix and Implications for Environmental Sustainability. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:7347. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147347
Adedoyin FF, Alola AA, Bekun FV (2020) An assessment of environmental sustainability corridor: The role of economic expansion and research and development in EU countries. Sci Total Environ 713:136726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136726
Adesina KS, Mwamba JWM (2019) Does ECF Matter For CO2 Emissions? Lessons From Africa. Journal of Developing Areas 53:155–167
Agyekum EB (2020) Energy poverty in energy rich Ghana: A SWOT analytical approach for the development of Ghana’s renewable energy. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 40:100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100760
Agyekum EB, Kumar NM, Mehmood U et al (2021) Decarbonize Russia — A Best-Worst Method approach for assessing the renewable energy potentials, opportunities and challenges. Energy Rep 7:4498–4515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.039
Ahmad M, Shabir M, Naheed R, Shehzad K (2021) How do environmental innovations and energy productivity affect the environment? Analyzing the role of economic globalization. Int J Environ Sci Technol 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13762-021-03620-8
Ahmad M, Ahmed Z, Bai Y et al (2022) Financial inclusion, technological innovations, and environmental quality: Analyzing the role of green openness. Front Environ Sci 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.851263
Bai J, Ng S (2004) A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica 72:1127–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00528.x
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Leitão NC, Bekun FV (2021) Fresh Validation of the Low Carbon Development Hypothesis under the EKC Scheme in Portugal, Italy Greece and Spain. Energies 14:250. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN14010250
Campbell S (2012) Economic growth, economic freedom, and the resource curse 1(28):23–46. journal.apee.org
Cebula RJ, Mixon FG (2014) The roles of ECF and regulatory quality in creating a favorable environment for investment in energy R&D, infrastructure, and capacity. Am J Econ Sociol 73:299–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/AJES.12076
Chen P-F, Lee C-C, Chen P-F, Lee C-C (2007) Is energy consumption per capita broken stationary? New evidence from regional-based panels. Energy Policy 35:3526–3540
Chien F, Anwar A, Hsu CC, Sharif A, Razzaq A, Sinha A (2021) The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: Proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technol Soc 65:101587. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2021.101587
Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran H, Raissi M (2013) Debt, Inflation and Growth Robust Estimation of Long-Run Effects in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Papers, 2013(162). https://doi.org/10.24149/gwp162
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics 188:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
Clark JR, Lawson RA (2008) The Impact of Economic Growth, Tax Policy and ECF on Income Inequality. The Journal of Private Enterprise, 24(1), 23–31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272478107. Accessed 1 Apr 2022
Çoban S, Topcu M (2013) The nexus between financial development and energy consumption in the EU: A dynamic panel data analysis. Energy Econ 39:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.04.001
Compton RA, Giedeman DC, Hoover GA (2011) Panel evidence on ECF and growth in the United States. Eur J Polit Econ 27:423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPOLECO.2011.01.001
Fischer C (2008) Emissions pricing, spillovers, and public investment in environmentally friendly technologies. Energy Econ 30:487–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2007.06.001
Glaeser E (2011) Cities, productivity, and quality of life. Science 333:592–594
Grossman G, Krueger A (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, MA
Hafeez M, Yuan C, Khelfaoui I et al (2019) Evaluating the Energy Consumption Inequalities in the One Belt and One Road Region: Implications for the Environment. Energies 12:1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN12071358
Hafeez M, Yuan C, Shah WUH, et al (2020) Evaluating the relationship among agriculture, energy demand, finance and environmental degradation in one belt and one road economies 11:139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2020.1721974
Hashem Pesaran M, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics 142:50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Hou Y, Iqbal W, Shaikh GM, Iqbal N, Solangi YA, Fatima A (2019) Measuring Energy Efficiency and Environmental Performance: A Case of South Asia. Processes 7(6):325. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR7060325
Ikerd JE (2012) The essentials of economic sustainability. 150
Joshi P, Beck K (2018) Democracy and carbon dioxide emissions: Assessing the interactions of political and ECF and the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Res Soc Sci 39:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2017.10.020
Kao C, Chiang M-H, Chen B (1999) International R&D Spillovers: An Application of Estimation and Inference in Panel Cointegration. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 61:691–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1691
Khan Z, Ali S, Umar M, et al (2020) Consumption-based carbon emissions and International trade in G7 countries: The role of Environmental innovation and Renewable energy. Sci Total Environ 730:138945. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.138945
Kulin J, Sevä IJ (2019) The role of government in protecting the environment: Quality of government and the translation of normative views about government responsibility into spending preferences 49:110–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2019.1582964
Larsson R, Lyhagen J, Löthgren M (2001) Likelihood-based cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels. Economet J 4:109–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00059
Liddle B (2018) Consumption-Based Accounting and the Trade-Carbon Emissions Nexus in Asia: A Heterogeneous. Common Factor Panel Analysis Sustainability 10:3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103627
Mahmood H, Alkhateeb TTY, Furqan M (2020) Industrialization, urbanization and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: Asymmetry analysis. Energy Reports 6:1553–1560
Mahmood MT, Shahab S, Shahbaz M (2021) The relevance of ECF for energy, environment, and economic growth in Asia-Pacific region. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15991-z
McCoskey S, Kao C (1998) A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data. Economet Rev 17:57–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939808800403
Mehmood U (2022) Environmental degradation and financial development: do institutional quality and human capital make a difference in G11 nations? Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18825-8
Mehmood U, Askari MU, Saleem M (2021a) The assessment of environmental sustainability: The role of research and development in ASEAN countries. Integr Environ Assess Manag. https://doi.org/10.1002/IEAM.4569
Mehmood U, Mansoor A, Tariq S, Ul-Haq Z (2021b) The interactional role of globalization in tourism-CO 2 nexus in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28(21):26441–26448. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-12473-0
Mehmood U, Tariq S (2020) Globalization and CO2 emissions nexus: evidence from the EKC hypothesis in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(29):37044–37056. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-09774-1
Mehmood U, Tariq S, Haq Zul (2021c) Effects of population structure on CO2 emissions in South Asian countries: evidence from panel estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14976-2
Mehmood U, Tariq S, Ul-Haq Z, Meo MS (2021d) Does the modifying role of institutional quality remains homogeneous in GDP-CO 2 emission nexus? New evidence from ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28(8):10167–10174. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-11293-Y
Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom Theory 20:597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
Pedroni P, Pedroni, Peter (2001) Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels
Pesaran MH (2015) Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels. Economet Rev 34:1089–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
Roberts JM OR (2013) How ECF Promotes Better Health Care, Education, and Environmental Quality | The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/international-economies/report/how-economic-freedom-promotes-better-health-care-education-and. Accessed 2 Sep 2021
Rode M, Coll S (2012) ECF and growth. Which policies matter the most? Const Polit Econ 23:95–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10602-011-9116-X
Salim R, Yao Y, Chen GS (2017) Does human capital matter for energy consumption in China? Energy Economics 67:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.016
Sharma R, Sinha A, Kautish P (2020) Examining the impacts of economic and demographic aspects on the ecological footprint in South and Southeast Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09659-3
Sharma R, Sinha A, Kautish P (2021) Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. J Clean Prod 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867
Sharma R, Kautish P, Uddin GS (2020a) Do the international economic endeavors affect CO2 emissions in open economies of South Asia? An empirical examination under nonlinearity. Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal 31(1):89–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2019-0099/FULL/XML
Sharma R, Sinha A, Kautish P (2020b) Examining the impacts of economic and demographic aspects on the ecological footprint in South and Southeast Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(29):36970–36982. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-09659-3/FIGURES/1
Sharma R, Sinha A, Kautish P (2021a) Do economic endeavors complement sustainability goals in the emerging economies of South and Southeast Asia? Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal 32(3):524–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-10-2020-0218/FULL/XML
Sharma R, Sinha A, Kautish P (2021b) Does financial development reinforce environmental footprints? Evidence from emerging Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(8):9067–9083. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-11295-W/TABLES/7
Sharma R, Sinha A, Kautish P (2021c) Examining the nexus between export diversification and environmental pollution: evidence from BRICS nations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(43):61732–61747. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-14889-0/TABLES/6
Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: The stern review
Tariq S, Mehmood U, UlHaq Z, Mariam A (2022) Exploring the existence of environmental Phillips curve in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-18099-6
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Westerlund J (2005) New simple tests for panel cointegration. Economet Rev 24:297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500243019
Yao Y, Ivanovski K, Inekwe J, Smyth R (2019) Human capital and energy consumption: Evidence from OECD countries. Energy Economics 84:104534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104534
Funding
This work does not get any funding from any organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zhonghua Li and Shengde Hu wrote the manuscript. Usman Mehmood and Ephraim Bonah Agyekum conducted analysis and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Not required.
Consent to Publish
Not Applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not Applicable.
Competing Interests
Not Required.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Z., Hu, S., Mehmood, U. et al. Assessing the linkages of economic freedom and environmental quality in South Asian Countries: application of CS-ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 66405–66412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20351-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20351-6