Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of tea waste derived humic-like substances with lignite-derived humic substances on chemical composition, spectroscopic properties and biological activity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emerging demand for humic substances escalated the short supply of coal-related resources from which humic substances are extracted in large quantities for various applications. Production of humic-like substances from lignocellulosic waste materials similar in structural and functional properties to humic substances has gained interest recently. Tea waste is a by-product from tea manufacturing factories enriched in lignocellulose is used to extract two types of humic fractions. One fraction has purified humic-like acid (HLA), and the other has unpurified humic and fulvic acids called as humic-like substances (HLS). Elemental composition, spectroscopic (13C CPMAS NMR and FTIR) properties, and biological activity of tea waste derived humic-like substances (TWDHLS) were compared with commercially available humic acid (CHA) extracted from lignite. Elemental analysis and FTIR characterization showed slight differences between HLA and HLS, while NMR results revealed that both have similar carbon distribution and are abundant in cellulosic polysaccharides and lignin derivatives. The presence of more stable compounds in TWDHLS contribute to its recalcitrant nature. NMR spectra of CHA significantly varied with TWDHLS and were rich in aliphatic compounds. The biological activity of TWDHLS and CHA was studied at five different concentrations (0, 20, 40, 80, and 160 mg L−1). The results show that soil application TWDHLS at 80 mg L−1 concentration showed better results on the growth of tea nursery plants similar to CHA, contrasting to the variation in their structural properties. Our findings revealed that TWDHLS could be used not only as a potential plant biostimulant but also as a better substitute for humic substances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data sets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

References

Download references

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support gratefully from the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia Grant (FRGS) 5524987 and Sri Lanka Council for the Agricultural Research Policy (SLCARP) for a PhD scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sriharan Raguraj: methodology, sample analysis, and writing original draft. Susilawati Kasim: conceptualization, supervision, writing review, and editing. Noraini Md Jaafar: data curation, investigation, and supervision. Muhamad Hazim Nazli: investigation and supervision. Rathnasekara Kuruppu Arachchige Amali: methodology and investigation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susilawati Kasim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests

Consent for publication

There is no conflict of interest that exists in this manuscript, and it is approved by all authors.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Guilherme L. Dotto

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 23 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raguraj, S., Kasim, S., Jaafar, N.M. et al. A comparative study of tea waste derived humic-like substances with lignite-derived humic substances on chemical composition, spectroscopic properties and biological activity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 60631–60640 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20060-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20060-0

Keywords

Navigation