Skip to main content
Log in

Recent trends in the use of fly ash for the adsorption of pollutants in contaminated wastewater and soils: Effects on soil quality and plant growth

  • Green Technology and Industrial Revolution 4.0 for a Greener Future
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fly ash is one of the largest types of industrial wastes produced during the combustion of coal for energy generation. Finding efficient and sustainable solutions for its reuse has been the subject of substantial research worldwide. Here, we review the recent research data related to (i) the use of fly ash as a low-cost adsorbent for pollutants in wastewater and soils and (ii) its implications in soil–plant system. Fly ash showed prominent adsorption capacity for pollutants in water especially when it was activated or applied in composites. In addition to direct pollutant binding in soils, fly ash can enhance the soil pH indirectly increasing metals’ immobilization reducing their plant uptake. Its non-selective adsorptive nature may lead to the co-adsorption of nutrients with pollutants which merits to be considered. Owing to its considerable nutrient contents, fly ash can also improve soil fertility and plant growth. The effects of fly ash on soil physico-chemical properties, microbial population and plant growth are critically evaluated. Fly ash can also contain potentially toxic contaminants (toxic metals, hydrocarbons, etc.) which could have harmful impacts on soil health and plant growth. Identifying the levels of inherent pollutants in fly ash is crucial to evaluate its suitability as a soil amendment. Negative effects of fly ash can also be addressed by using co-amendments, biological agents, and most importantly by an adequate calibration (dose and type) of fly ash based on site-specific conditions. Research directions are identified to promote the research regarding its use in wastewater treatment and agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

reproduced with permission from Ref. (Nath et al. 2016)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Adriano DC, Weber JT (2001) Influence of Fly Ash on Soil Physical Properties and Turfgrass Establishment. J Environ Qual 30:596–601

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmaruzzaman M (2010) A review on the utilization of fly ash. Prog Energy Combust Sci 36:327–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajmal Z, Usman M, Anastopoulos I, Qadeer A, Zhu R, Wakeel A, Dong R (2020) Use of nano-/micro-magnetite for abatement of cadmium and lead contamination. J Environ Manag 264:110477

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Ayuso E, Abad-Valle P (2021) Application of different alkaline materials as polluted soil amendments: A comparative assessment of their impact on trace element mobility and microbial functions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 227:112927

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastopoulos I, Kyzas GZ (2014) Agricultural peels for dye adsorption: A review of recent literature. J Mol Liq 200:381–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Awoyemi OM, Adeleke EO, Dzantor EK (2019) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and exogenous glutathione mitigate coal fly ash (CFA)-induced phytotoxicity in CFA-contaminated soil. J Environ Manag 237:449–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz ASA, Manaf LA, Man HC, Kumar NS (2015) Equilibrium studies and dynamic behavior of cadmium adsorption by palm oil boiler mill fly ash (POFA) as a natural low-cost adsorbent. Desalin Water Treat 54:1956–1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu M, Pande M, Bhadoria PBS, Mahapatra SC (2009) Potential fly-ash utilization in agriculture: A global review. Prog Nat Sci 19:1173–1186

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belviso C, Cavalcante F, Di Gennaro S, Palma A, Ragone P, Fiore S (2015) Mobility of trace elements in fly ash and in zeolitised coal fly ash. Fuel 144:369–379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bidar G, Waterlot C, Verdin A, Proix N, Courcot D, Détriché S, Fourrier H, Richard A, Douay F (2016) Sustainability of an in situ aided phytostabilisation on highly contaminated soils using fly ashes: Effects on the vertical distribution of physicochemical parameters and trace elements. J Environ Manag 171:204–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard G, Maunaye M, Martin G (1984) Removal of heavy metals from waters by means of natural zeolites. Water Res 18:1501–1507

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brännvall E, Andreas L, Sjöblom R, Lagerkvist A (2015) Changes of Fly Ash Properties during Aging. J Environ Eng 141:04014083

    Google Scholar 

  • Buragohain P, S S, Lin P, Garg A (2018): Investigation of fly ash for sorption of copper ions in multiple contaminant system: An implication on re-use of waste material under concept of sponge city. Meas 124, 522-528

  • Burakov AE, Galunin EV, Burakova IV, Kucherova AE, Agarwal S, Tkachev AG, Gupta VK (2018) Adsorption of heavy metals on conventional and nanostructured materials for wastewater treatment purposes: A review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 148:702–712

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz NC, Rodrigues SM, Carvalho L, Duarte AC, Pereira E, Römkens PFAM, Tarelho LAC (2017) Ashes from fluidized bed combustion of residual forest biomass: recycling to soil as a viable management option. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:14770–14781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai S, Yan X, Ward CR, Hower JC, Zhao L, Wang X, Zhao L, Ren D, Finkelman RB (2018) Valuable elements in Chinese coals: a review. Int Geol Rev 60:590–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash S, Chaudhuri H, Udayabhanu G, Sarkar A (2016) Fabrication of inexpensive polyethylenimine-functionalized fly ash for highly enhanced adsorption of both cationic and anionic toxic dyes from water. Energy Fuels 30:6646–6653

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash S, Chaudhuri H, Gupta R, Nair UG, Sarkar A (2017) Fabrication and application of low-cost thiol functionalized coal fly ash for selective adsorption of heavy toxic metal ions from water. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:1461–1470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dash S, Chaudhuri H, Gupta R, Nair UG (2018) Adsorption study of modified coal fly ash with sulfonic acid as a potential adsorbent for the removal of toxic reactive dyes from aqueous solution: Kinetics and thermodynamics. J Environ Chem Eng 6:5897–5905

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Gisi S, Lofrano G, Grassi M, Notarnicola M (2016) Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review. Sustain Mater Technol 9:10–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Qi L, Zhang Y (2018) Experimental study on adsorption of hexavalent chromium with microwave-assisted alkali modified fly ash. Water Air Soil Pollut 229:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Deokar SK, Mandavgane SA, Kulkarni BD (2016a) Adsorptive removal of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid from aqueous solution using bagasse fly ash as adsorbent in batch and packed-bed techniques. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:1971–1983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deokar SK, Singh D, Modak S, Mandavgane SA, Kulkarni BD (2016b) Adsorptive removal of diuron on biomass ashes: a comparative study using rice husk ash and bagasse fly ash as adsorbents. Desalin Water Treat 57:22378–22391

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey S, Uma SL, Sharma YC (2015) Application of fly ash for adsorptive removal of malachite green from aqueous solutions. Desalin Water Treat 53:91–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Bindary A, El-Kawi MA, Hafez A, Rashed I, Aboelnaga E (2016) Removal of reactive blue 19 from aqueous solution using rice straw fly ash. J Mater Environ Sci 7:1023–1036

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sonbati A, El-Deen I, El-Bindary M (2016) Adsorption of hazardous azorhodanine dye from an aqueous solution using rice straw fly ash. J Dispersion Sci Technol 37:715–722

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Delgado Juárez M, Fabiani G, Mazzier T, Schönegger D, Pietramellara G, Gómez-Brandón M, Insam H (2020) Reclamation of Acid Soils with Biomass Ashes from Pyrolytic Wood Liquefaction. Waste Biomass Valorization 11:5067–5078

    Google Scholar 

  • Foo K, Hameed BH (2010) An overview of dye removal via activated carbon adsorption process. Desalin Water Treat 19:255–274

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freundlich H (1906) Over the adsorption in solution. J Phys Chem 57:1100–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller A, Maier J, Karampinis E, Kalivodova J, Grammelis P, Kakaras E, Scheffknecht G (2018) Fly Ash Formation and Characteristics from (co-)Combustion of an Herbaceous Biomass and a Greek Lignite (Low-Rank Coal) in a Pulverized Fuel Pilot-Scale Test Facility. Energies 11:1581

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadore V, Ahmaruzzaman M (2021) Tailored fly ash materials: A recent progress of their properties and applications for remediation of organic and inorganic contaminants from water. J Water Process Eng 41:101910

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao M, Ma Q, Lin Q, Chang J, Bao W, Ma H (2015) Combined modification of fly ash with Ca(OH)2/Na2FeO4 and its adsorption of Methyl orange. Appl Surf Sci 359:323–330

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghrair AM, Ingwersen J, Streck T (2010) Immobilization of heavy metals in soils amended by nanoparticulate zeolitic tuff: Sorption-desorption of cadmium. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 173:852–860

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GNR (2020): Global Nutrition Report. https://globalnutritionreport.org/reports/2020-global-nutrition-report/

  • Gond D, Singh S, Pal A, Tewary B (2013) Growth, yield and metal residues in Solanum melongena grown in fly ash amended soils. J Environ Biol 34:539

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hadas E, Mingelgrin U, Fine P (2021) Economic cost–benefit analysis for the agricultural use of sewage sludge treated with lime and fly ash. Int J Coal Sci Technol 8:1099–1107

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid Y, Tang L, Sohail MI, Cao X, Hussain B, Aziz MZ, Usman M, He Z-l, Yang X (2019) An explanation of soil amendments to reduce cadmium phytoavailability and transfer to food chain. Sci Total Environ 660:80–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid Y, Tang L, Hussain B, Usman M, Lin Q, Rashid MS, He Z, Yang X (2020) Organic soil additives for the remediation of cadmium contaminated soils and their impact on the soil-plant system: A review. Sci Total Environ 707:136121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haris M, Hamid Y, Usman M, Wang L, Saleem A, Su F, Guo J, Li Y (2021) Crop-residues derived biochar: Synthesis, properties, characterization and application for the removal of trace elements in soils. J Hazard Mater 416:126212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris D, Heidrich C, Feuerborn J (2020): Global aspects on coal combustion products. VGB PowerTech https://www.vgb.org/vgbmultimedia/PT202010HARRIS-p-16422.pdf (accessed on July 01, 2021)

  • He H, Dong Z, Peng Q, Wang X, Fan C, Zhang X (2017) Impacts of coal fly ash on plant growth and accumulation of essential nutrients and trace elements by alfalfa (Medicago sativa) grown in a loessial soil. J Environ Manag 197:428–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He H, Pang J, Wu G-L, Lambers H (2019): Chapter One - The application potential of coal fly ash for selenium biofortification. In: Sparks DL (Editor), Adv. Agron. Academic Press, pp. 1–54

  • Ho Y-S, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang T, Zhang S, Liu L (2019) Immobilization of trace heavy metals in the electrokinetics-processed municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes and its characterizations and mechanisms. J Environ Manag 232:207–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Zhao H, Zhang G, Li J, Yang Y, Ji P (2020) Potential of removing Cd(II) and Pb(II) from contaminated water using a newly modified fly ash. Chemosphere 242:125148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbe MA, Azizian S, Douven S (2019) Implications of Apparent Pseudo-Second-Order Adsorption Kinetics onto Cellulosic Materials: A Review. BioResources 14:7582–7626

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2021): Key World Energy Statistics 2021. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/52f66a88-0b63-4ad2-94a5-29d36e864b82/KeyWorldEnergyStatistics2021.pdf (accessed on January 14, 2022)

  • Inkham R, Kijjanapanich V, Huttagosol P, Kijjanapanich P (2019) Low-cost alkaline substances for the chemical stabilization of cadmium-contaminated soils. J Environ Manag 250:109395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby R, Peukert M, Succurro A, Koprivova A, Kopriva S (2017) The Role of Soil Microorganisms in Plant Mineral Nutrition—Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Front Plant Sci 8:1617

    Google Scholar 

  • Jambhulkar HP, Shaikh SMS, Kumar MS (2018) Fly ash toxicity, emerging issues and possible implications for its exploitation in agriculture; Indian scenario: A review. Chemosphere 213:333–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski J, Ward CR, French D, Groves S (2006) Mobility of trace elements from selected Australian fly ashes and its potential impact on aquatic ecosystems. Fuel 85:243–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaranjan MLD, van Hullebusch ED, Annachhatre AP (2014) Reuse options for coal fired power plant bottom ash and fly ash. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 13:467–486

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao D, Lesage K, Yardimci MY, Shi C, De Schutter G (2021) Possibilities of fly ash as responsive additive in magneto-rheology control of cementitious materials. Constr Build Mater 296:123656

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kankaraju D, Norfadzila D, Nori H, Wahi R (2019) Heavy metals leachability in fly ash remediated soil. J Sustain Sci Manag 14:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisku G, Shukla S, Singh DS, Murthy R (2015) Characterization and adsorptive capacity of coal fly ash from aqueous solutions of disperse blue and disperse orange dyes. Environ Earth Sci 74:1125–1135

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuśmierek K, Świątkowski A (2016) Adsorption of 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid from an Aqueous Solution on Fly Ash. Water Environ Res 88:231–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagergren S (1898) About the theory of so-called adsorption of soluble substances. Sven Vetenskapsakad Handingarl 24:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40:1361–1403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leclercq-Dransart J, Demuynck S, Bidar G, Douay F, Grumiaux F, Louvel B, Pernin C, Leprêtre A (2019) Does adding fly ash to metal-contaminated soils play a role in soil functionality regarding metal availability, litter quality, microbial activity and the community structure of Diptera larvae? Appl Soil Ecol 138:99–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Ha HS, Lee CH, Lee YB, Kim PJ (2006) Fly ash effect on improving soil properties and rice productivity in Korean paddy soils. Bioresour Technol 97:1490–1497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D-S, Lim S-S, Park H-J, Yang HI, Park S-I, Kwak J-H, Choi W-J (2019) Fly ash and zeolite decrease metal uptake but do not improve rice growth in paddy soils contaminated with Cu and Zn. Environ Int 129:551–564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lei S, Shi Y, Xue C, Wang J, Che L, Qiu Y (2020) Hybrid ash/biochar biocomposites as soil amendments for the alleviation of cadmium accumulation by Oryza sativa L. in a contaminated paddy field. Chemosphere 239:124805

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Dai M, Dai S, Dong X, Li F (2018) Methylene blue adsorption properties of mechanochemistry modified coal fly ash. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 24:2133–2141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim S-S, Lee D-S, Kwak J-H, Park H-J, Kim H-Y, Choi W-J (2016) Fly ash and zeolite amendments increase soil nutrient retention but decrease paddy rice growth in a low fertility soil. J Soils Sediments 16:756–766

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima EC, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A, Anastopoulos I (2019) Response to “Some remarks on a critical review of the estimation of the thermodynamic parameters on adsorption equilibria. Wrong use of equilibrium constant in the van’t Hoff equation for calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption - J. Mol. Liq. 273 (2019) 425–434.” J Mol Liq 280:298–300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima EC, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A, Moreno-Piraján JC, Anastopoulos I (2019) A critical review of the estimation of the thermodynamic parameters on adsorption equilibria. Wrong use of equilibrium constant in the Van’t Hoof equation for calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. J Mol Liq 273:425–434

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima EC, Sher F, Guleria A, Saeb MR, Anastopoulos I, Tran HN, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A (2021) Is one performing the treatment data of adsorption kinetics correctly? J Environ Chem Eng 9:104813

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y-N, Guo Z-H, Xiao X-Y, Wang S, Jiang Z-C, Zeng P (2017) Phytostabilisation potential of giant reed for metals contaminated soil modified with complex organic fertiliser and fly ash: A field experiment. Sci Total Environ 576:292–302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Liu Z, Xu Y, Zhou S, Wu Y, Wang J, Huang Z, Shi Y (2018) Remediating Potentially Toxic Metal and Organic Co-Contamination of Soil by Combining In Situ Solidification/Stabilization and Chemical Oxidation: Efficacy, Mechanism, and Evaluation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:2595

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahar A, Wang P, Ali A, Guo Z, Awasthi MK, Lahori AH, Wang Q, Shen F, Li R, Zhang Z (2016) Impact of CaO, fly ash, sulfur and Na2S on the (im)mobilization and phytoavailability of Cd, Cu and Pb in contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 134:116–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdieh MM, Kordzadeh-Kermani V, Ghalandari V, Askari A, Sillanpää M (2021): Adsorption isotherm models: A comprehensive and systematic review (2010−2020). Sci. Total Environ., 151334

  • Manoharan V, Yunusa IAM, Loganathan P, Lawrie R, Skilbeck CG, Burchett MD, Murray BR, Eamus D (2010) Assessments of Class F fly ashes for amelioration of soil acidity and their influence on growth and uptake of Mo and Se by canola. Fuel 89:3498–3504

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masto RE, Ansari MA, George J, Selvi VA, Ram LC (2013) Co-application of biochar and lignite fly ash on soil nutrients and biological parameters at different crop growth stages of Zea mays. Ecol Eng 58:314–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor S, Chhavi MK, Sushil KK, Ravindra K (2018) Assessment of hydrothermally modified fly ash for the treatment of methylene blue dye in the textile industry wastewater. Environ Dev Sustain 20:625–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Munir M, Liu G, Yousaf B, Ali MU, Abbas Q, Ullah H (2020) Synergistic effects of biochar and processed fly ash on bioavailability, transformation and accumulation of heavy metals by maize (Zea mays L.) in coal-mining contaminated soil. Chemosphere 240:124845

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiya TK, Das SK (2016) Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution using fly ash of different sources. Desalin Water Treat 57:5800–5809

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Maitra S, Mukherjee S, Kumar S (2016) Microstructural and morphological evolution of fly ash based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 111:758–765

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak AK, Raja R, Rao KS, Shukla AK, Mohanty S, Shahid M, Tripathi R, Panda BB, Bhattacharyya P, Kumar A, Lal B, Sethi SK, Puri C, Nayak D, Swain CK (2015) Effect of fly ash application on soil microbial response and heavy metal accumulation in soil and rice plant. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 114:257–262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orakwue EO, Asokbunyarat V, Rene ER, Lens PNL, Annachhatre A (2016) Adsorption of Iron(II) from Acid Mine Drainage Contaminated Groundwater Using Coal Fly Ash, Coal Bottom Ash, and Bentonite Clay. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:74

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey VC, Singh N (2010) Impact of fly ash incorporation in soil systems. Agr Ecosyst Environ 136:16–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippou K, Anastopoulos I, Pashalidis I, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A, Usman M, Kornaros M, Omirou M, Kalderis D, Milojković JV, Lopičić ZR, Abatal M (2021) Chapter 6 - The application of pine-based adsorbents to remove potentially toxic elements from aqueous solutions. In: Núñez-Delgado A (ed) Sorbents Materials for Controlling Environmental Pollution. Elsevier, pp 113–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu R, Cheng F, Huang H (2018) Removal of Cd2+ from aqueous solution using hydrothermally modified circulating fluidized bed fly ash resulting from coal gangue power plant. J Clean Prod 172:1918–1927

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quirantes M, Calvo F, Romero E, Nogales R (2016) Soil-nutrient availability affected by different biomass-ash applications. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 16:159–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raja R, Nayak AK, Rao KS, Puree C, Shahid M, Panda BB, Kumar A, Tripathi R, Bhattacharyya P, Baig MJ, Lal B, Mohanty S, Gautam P (2014) Effect of Fly Ash Deposition on Photosynthesis, Growth and Yield of Rice. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 93:106–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ram LC, Srivastava NK, Jha SK, Sinha AK, Masto RE, Selvi VA (2007) Management of Lignite Fly Ash for Improving Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity. Environ Manag 40:438–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Riehl A, Elsass F, Duplay J, Huber F, Trautmann M (2010) Changes in soil properties in a fluvisol (calcaric) amended with coal fly ash. Geoderma 155:67–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu G, Bag AG, Chatterjee N, Mukherjee A (2017) Potential use of flyash in agriculture: A way to improve soil health. JJ Pharmacogn Phytochem 6:873–880

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saraswat PK, Chaudhary K (2014) Effect of Fly Ash (FA) to improving soil quality and increase the efficiency of crop productivity. European J Biotechnol Biosci 2:72–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutter ME, Fuhrmann JJ (2001) Soil microbial community responses to fly ash amendment as revealed by analyses of whole soils and bacterial isolates. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1947–1958

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J (2015) Impact of emerging and low cost alternative amendments on the (im)mobilization and phytoavailability of Cd and Pb in a contaminated floodplain soil. Ecol Eng 74:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen SM, Hooda PS, Tsadilas CD (2014) Opportunities and challenges in the use of coal fly ash for soil improvements – A review. J Environ Manag 145:249–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad T, Anwar F, Hussain S, Mahmood F, Arif MS, Sahar A, Nawaz MF, Perveen N, Sanaullah M, Rehman K, Rashid MI (2019) Carbon dynamics in surface and deep soil in response to increasing litter addition rates in an agro-ecosystem. Geoderma 333:1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakeel A, Khan AA, Ahmad G (2019) The potential of thermal power plant fly ash to promote the growth of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in agricultural soils. SN Appl Sci 1:375

    Google Scholar 

  • Skousen J, Yang JE, Lee J-S, Ziemkiewicz P (2013) Review of fly ash as a soil amendment. Geosystem Eng 16:249–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sočo E, Kalembkiewicz J (2015) Removal of copper (II) and zinc (II) ions from aqueous solution by chemical treatment of coal fly ash. Croat Chem Acta 88:267–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasz K, Anna K, Ryszard C (2019) Effective adsorption of lead ions using fly ash obtained in the novel circulating fluidized bed combustion technology. Microchem J 145:1011–1025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tran HN, Lima EC, Juang R-S, Bollinger J-C, Chao H-P (2021): Thermodynamic parameters of liquid–phase adsorption process calculated from different equilibrium constants related to adsorption isotherms: A comparison study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 106674

  • Uddin MK (2017) A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade. Chem Eng J 308:438–462

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Umejuru EC, Prabakaran E, Pillay K (2020) Coal fly ash coated with carbon hybrid nanocomposite for remediation of cadmium (II) and photocatalytic application of the spent adsorbent for reuse. Results Mater 7:100117

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Ho Y-S (2020) A bibliometric study of the Fenton oxidation for soil and water remediation. J Environ Manage 270:110886

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Abdelmoula M, Hanna K, Grégoire B, Faure P, Ruby C (2012) FeII induced mineralogical transformations of ferric oxyhydroxides into magnetite of variable stoichiometry and morphology. J Solid State Chem 194:328–335

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Byrne JM, Chaudhary A, Orsetti S, Hanna K, Ruby C, Kappler A, Haderlein SB (2018) Magnetite and Green Rust: Synthesis, Properties, and Environmental Applications of Mixed-Valent Iron Minerals. Chem Rev 118:3251–3304

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Hanna K, Faure P (2018b) Remediation of oil-contaminated harbor sediments by chemical oxidation. Sci Total Environ 634:1100–1107

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Farooq M, Wakeel A, Nawaz A, Cheema SA, Rehman Hu, Ashraf I, Sanaullah M (2020) Nanotechnology in agriculture: Current status, challenges and future opportunities. Sci Total Environ 721:137778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Jellali S, Anastopoulos I, Charabi Y, Hameed BH, Hanna K (2022) Fenton oxidation for soil remediation: A critical review of observations in historically contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 424:127670

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usmani Z, Kumar V, Gupta P, Gupta G, Rani R, Chandra A (2019) Enhanced soil fertility, plant growth promotion and microbial enzymatic activities of vermicomposted fly ash. Sci Rep 9:10455

    Google Scholar 

  • Visa M, Andronic L, Duta A (2015) Fly ash-TiO2 nanocomposite material for multi-pollutants wastewater treatment. J Environ Manag 150:336–343

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeel A, Magen H (2017) Potash Use for Sustainable Crop Production in Pakistan: A Review. Int J Agric Biol 19:381–390

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yu Y, Li H, Shen C (2016) Comparison study of phosphorus adsorption on different waste solids: Fly ash, red mud and ferric–alum water treatment residues. J Environ Sci 50:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Hao L, Chen J, Zhao Q, Xu H (2018) Adsorptive removal of organics from aqueous phase by acid-activated coal fly ash: preparation, adsorption, and Fenton regenerative valorization of “spent” adsorbent. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:12481–12490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Wang J, Wang S, Yang R, Wang H (2020a) Preparation of Mg(OH)2/Calcined Fly Ash Nanocomposite for Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Acidic Solutions. Mater 13:4621

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Li R, Guo D, Guo Z, Mahar A, Du J, Zhang Z (2020b) The influences of fly ash on stabilization for Cd in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:43505–43513

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xing P, Mason PE, Chilton S, Lloyd S, Jones JM, Williams A, Nimmo W, Pourkashanian M (2016) A comparative assessment of biomass ash preparation methods using X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis. Fuel 182:161–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiyili H, Çetintaş S, Bingöl D (2017) Removal of some heavy metals onto mechanically activated fly ash: Modeling approach for optimization, isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. Process Saf Environ Prot 109:288–300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Shi X (2018) Characteristics and applications of fly ash as a sustainable construction material: A state-of-the-art review. Resour Conserv Recycl 136:95–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Ji P, Wang L, Zhao X, Hu X, Huang X, Zhao H, Liu F (2021) Effect of modified fly ash on environmental safety of two soils contaminated with cadmium and lead. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 215:112175

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao ZT, Ji XS, Sarker PK, Tang JH, Ge LQ, Xia MS, Xi YQ (2015) A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash. Earth Sci Rev 141:105–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin D, Wang X, Peng B, Tan C, Ma LQ (2017) Effect of biochar and Fe-biochar on Cd and As mobility and transfer in soil-rice system. Chemosphere 186:928–937

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Zhang Y, Zhan J, Tang C, Zhang X, Huang H, Ye D, Wang Y, Li T (2022) A composite amendment benefits rice (Oryza sativa L.) safety and production in cadmium-contaminated soils by unique characteristics after oxidation modification. Sci Total Environ 806:150484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yunusa IAM, Eamus D, DeSilva DL, Murray BR, Burchett MD, Skilbeck GC, Heidrich C (2006) Fly-ash: An exploitable resource for management of Australian agricultural soils. Fuel 85:2337–2344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Huang X, Liu F, Hu X, Zhao X, Wang L, Gao P, Ji P (2020) A two-year field study of using a new material for remediation of cadmium contaminated paddy soil. Environ Pollut 263:114614

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

M. Usman gratefully acknowledges the collaborative grant from OmanTel and Sultan Qaboos University, Oman (EG/SQU-OT/21/05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M. Usman: Conceptualization, Writing—Original draft preparation, Writing—Review & Editing. I. Anastopoulos: Writing—Original draft preparation, Writing—Review & Editing. Y. Hamid: Writing- Original draft preparation, Writing—Review & Editing. A. Wakeel: Writing—Original draft preparation, Writing—Review & Editing. All the authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Muhammad Usman or Abdul Wakeel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Tito Roberto Cadaval Jr.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Usman, M., Anastopoulos, I., Hamid, Y. et al. Recent trends in the use of fly ash for the adsorption of pollutants in contaminated wastewater and soils: Effects on soil quality and plant growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 124427–124446 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19192-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19192-0

Keywords

Navigation