Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fiscal decentralization and economic growth revisited: an empirical analysis of poverty governance

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the panel data of 24 provinces from 2010 to 2018, the static panel model was utilized to analyze the impact of fiscal decentralization and economic growth on poverty reduction, and the Moran index was used to calculate the spatial agglomeration effect of poverty degree. Further, we employed Spatial Dobbin model to examine the spatial effect of fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and poverty reduction. Findings of our results revealed that the rapid economic growth and fiscal revenue decentralization have a substantial inhibitory effect on poverty reduction, and fiscal expenditure decentralization has an important promoting influence on poverty reduction. Our results further showed that the degree of inter provincial poverty has significant effect on regional spatial agglomeration, indicating a pattern of high-value agglomeration in the northwestern and southern border areas and low-value agglomeration in the northeastern and central regions. Finally, the results revealed that economic growth rate and fiscal decentralization have spatial spillover effects on the poverty governance. Based on our study findings, policy suggestions are suggested, such as adjustment of the structure of fiscal expenditure, building a coordination mechanism between fairness and efficiency, and encouraging the activities of agricultural production departments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam A, Delis MD, Kammas K 2014. Fiscal decentralization and public sector efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. Cesifo Working Paper, 15(1): 17-49.

  • Adelman I (1975) Development economics—a reassessment of goals. The American Economic Review 65(2):302–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Balh R, Martinez-Vazquez J, Wallace S (2002) State and local government choices in fiscal redistribution. Natl Tax J 55(2):723–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan P, Mookherjee D (2005) Decentralizing antipoverty program delivery in developing countries. Public Economics 89(4):675–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Fei (2019) Study on the impact mechanism of economic growth and income distribution on the rural poor. Agricultural economy 10:73–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Zongsheng, Shen Yangyang, Zhou Yunbo. 2013. Absolute and relative changes of rural poverty in China -- also on the setting of relative poverty line. Management world, (01): 67–75 + 77 + 76 + 187–188

  • Chu D, Zhao F (2013) Fiscal decentralization and rural poverty – an empirical test based on Chinese data. China rural economy 04:79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford G (2008) Decentralization and the limits to poverty reduction:findings from Ghan. Oxf Dev Stud 36:235–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai X, Zhuang T, He S (2020) Poverty alleviation policy, economic growth and urbanization: a study on the influencing factors of the change of China’s rural poor population. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION) 47(02):55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • David D, Kraay A (2002) Growth is good for the poor. J Econ Growth 7(3):195–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva I, Sumarto S (2014) Does economic growth really benefit the poor? Income Distribution Dynamics and pro-Poor Growth in Indonesia, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 50:227–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Enikolopov R, Zhuravskaya E (2007) Decentralization and political institutions. Public Economics 91(12):2261–2290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahad S, Wang J (2018a) Evaluation of Pakistani farmers’ willingness to pay for crop insurance using contingent valuation method: the case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.024

  • Fahad S, Wang J (2018b) Farmers’ risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan. Land Use Policy 2018(79):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahad S, Wang J (2020) Climate change, vulnerability, and its impacts in rural Pakistan: a review. Environ Sci Pollution Research 27:1334–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06878-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Huang X, Zhu K (2020) China’s innovation in Poverty Governance – an analysis based on the data of the first village secretary of China’s household finance survey. Southwest finance 09:27–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huong TLN, Yao SB, Fahad S (2017) Farmers’ perception, awareness and adaptation to climate change: evidence from northwest Vietnam. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 9(4):555–576. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2017-0032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huong NTL, Yao S, Fahad S (2019) Assessing household livelihood vulnerability to climate change: the case of Northwest Vietnam. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J F25(5):1157–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1460801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C (2002) Local Democracy, Democratic decentralization and rural development: theories, challenges and options for policy. Development Policy Review 19:521–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Jinye, Zhou Yaozhi, Ren Ting. Analysis of poverty reduction effects of economic growth and income distribution -- taking Xinjiang as an example. Economic issues, 2012 (02): 8–11

  • Liu J, Ou Y, Mao J (2018) fiscal decentralization, economic growth and government poverty reduction. China soft science 06:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R (1995) Growth and poverty: evidence for developing countries in the 1980s. Econ Lett 48:411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Dejuan Li (2006) Low level equilibrium trap theory in underdeveloped economy. China Labor Economics 3(03):97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I (2011) The Macroeconomic Effects of IMF Programs in Mena Countries. Afr J Bus Manage 5(11):4379–4387

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I (2016) The relationships among tourism development, energy demand and growth factors in developed and developing countries. Int J Sust Dev World 23(2):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I (2017) The dynamic relationship between agricultural sustainability and food energy-water poverty in a panel of selected Sub-Saharan African countries. Energy Policy 107:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng W, Liao G (2019) Spatial correlation of economic growth and spillover effect of poverty reduction in deeply poor areas – taking Tibet and Tibetan areas in four provinces as an example. Financial science 02:63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Qin M (2019) Will high-speed economic growth automatically reduce poverty—— evaluation of poverty reduction effect achieved in the 70 years since the founding of new China. Teaching and research 05:14–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman E (2007) The architecture of government: rethinking political decentralization. Publius the Journal of Federalism 38(4):328–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang P (2017) Empirical study on the correlation between economic growth, openness and income gap. Journal of Jishou University (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION) 38(03):43–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Yin H (2019) From eliminating absolute poverty to alleviating relative poverty: China’s poverty reduction process and poverty reduction strategy after 2020. Reform 12:5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Tong M, Li H, Chen F (2019) Evaluation of economic growth effect and policy effectiveness of poverty alleviation reform pilot area. China industrial economy 08:136–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Tong C (2019) Study on the measurement of poverty reduction effect of China’s economic growth and public investment. Economic longitude and latitude 36(06):32–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made significant contributions to the study conception and design. Data collection and methodology were performed by J. S. and S. F. L. G. did formal analysis and software. J. S. and L. L. wrote the original draft. Review and editing were performed by S. F. and L. L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shah Fahad.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Nicholas Apergis.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J., Geng, L., Fahad, S. et al. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth revisited: an empirical analysis of poverty governance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 28020–28030 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18470-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18470-7

Keywords

Navigation