Abstract
Research scholars have diverted their attention towards the effect of biomass energy use on ecological footprints. Although recent research has investigated this association, the link between ecological footprints and biomass energy consumption has not provided consistent results. Therefore, this research attempts to fill the gap by examining the ecological footprints-biomass energy consumption nexus in the context of environmental Kuznets curve over the period of 1990–2016 in South Asian Association for Regional Corporation (SAARC) countries. Moreover, this work incorporates globalization, natural resources, and economic growth (GDP) for empirical analysis. In doing empirical analysis, we applied some econometric analysis to deal with the issue of cross-sectional dependence in the data. The outcomes of fully modified ordinary least squares and dynamic ordinary least squares estimations show that biomass energy consumption increases ecological footprints in SAARC countries. Moreover, globalization and GDP are also increasing ecological footprints. Environmental Kuznets curve cannot be validated in estimated countries. The Dumitrescu-Hurlin causality test confirms one-way causality from biomass energy usage to ecological footprints. On the base of empirical results, several policy implications are suggested for SAARC countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not required
References
Adewuyi AO, Awodumi OB (2017) Biomass energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: fresh evidence from West Africa using a simultaneous equation model. Energy 119:453–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.059
Ahmad N, Du L, Lu J et al (2017) Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: is there any environmental Kuznets curve? Energy 123:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.106
Ahmed A, Uddin GS, Sohag K (2016) Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from selected European countries. Biomass Bioenergy 90:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.04.004
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Solarin SA (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in seven regions: the role of renewable energy. Ecol Indic 67:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.059
Aydin M (2019) The effect of economic growth on obesity for the most obese countries: new evidence from the obesity Kuznets curve. Eur J Health Econ 20:1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01099-2
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Driha OM, Bekun FV, Osundina OA (2019) Do agricultural activities induce carbon emissions? The BRICS experience. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:25218–25234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05737-3
Bildirici M, Özaksoy F (2018) An analysis of biomass consumption and economic growth in transition countries 31:386–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1427610
Bilgili F, Ozturk I (2015) Biomass energy and economic growth nexus in G7 countries: evidence from dynamic panel data. Renew Sust Energ Rev 49:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.098
Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü, Kuşkaya S (2017) Can biomass energy be an efficient policy tool for sustainable development? Renew Sust Energ Rev 71:830–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.109
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Charfeddine L, Kahia M (2019) Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renew Energy 139:198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010
Danish, Wang Z (2019) Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 670:1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.268
Danish, Ulucak R, Khan SU-D(2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078
Dogan E, Ulucak R, Kocak E, Isik C (2020) The use of ecological footprint in estimating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Sci Total Environ 723:138063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063
Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Hashem Pesaran M, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142:50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2929–2938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115:53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
IRENA (2019) Renewable energy market analysis: GCC 2019. /publications/2019/Jan/Renewable-Energy-Market-Analysis-GCC-2019
Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration. Oxf Bull Econ Statistics
Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econom 90:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
Katircioglu ST (2014) International tourism, energy consumption, and environmental pollution: the case of Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 36:180–187
Kongbuamai N, Bui Q, Yousaf HMAU, Liu Y (2020) The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2716(27):19251–19264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08582-x
Levin A, Lin C-F, James Chu C-S(2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
Liu X, Zhang S, Bae J (2017) The nexus of renewable energy-agriculture-environment in BRICS. Appl Energy 204:489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.077
Mehmood U (2020) Globalization-driven CO2 emissions in Singapore: an application of ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:11317–11322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11368-w
Mehmood U (2021a)Renewable-nonrenewable energy: institutional quality and environment nexus in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:26529–26536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12554-0
Mehmood U, Mansoor A, Tariq S, Ul-Haq Z (2021) The interactional role of globalization in tourism-CO2 nexus in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:26441–26448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12473-0
Mehmood U (2021) Transport energy consumption and Carbon emissions: The role of urbanization towards environment in SAARC region. Integr Environ Assess Manag ieam.4463. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4463
Mehmood U (2021d) Contribution of renewable energy towards environmental quality: the role of education to achieve sustainable development goals in G11 countries. Renew Energy 178:600–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.118
Mehmood U, Mansoor A (2021) CO2 emissions and the role of urbanization in East Asian and Pacific countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14838-x
Mehmood U, Tariq S (2020) Globalization and CO2 emissions nexus: evidence from the EKC hypothesis in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09774-1
Mehmood U, Tariq S, Ul-Haq Z, Meo MS (2020) Does the modifying role of institutional quality remains homogeneous in GDP-CO2 emission nexus? New evidence from ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11293-y
Mehmood U, Azhar A, Qayyum F, Nawaz H, Tariq S, Haq Z (2021) Air pollution and hospitalization in megacities: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14158-0
Nathaniel S, Anyanwu O, Shah M (2020) Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2713(27):14601–14613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08017-7
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A, Sumayya (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518
Shahbaz M, Rasool G, Ahmed K, Mahalik MK (2016) Considering the effect of biomass energy consumption on economic growth: fresh evidence from BRICS region. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1442–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.037
Shahbaz M, Balsalobre D, Shahzad SJH (2018) The influencing factors of CO 2 emissions and the role of biomass energy consumption: statistical experience from G-7 countries. Environ Model Assess 242(24):143–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9620-8
Sharif A, Afshan S, Qureshi MA (2019) Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:11191–11211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04351-7
Sikka M, Thornton T, Worl R (2013) Sustainable biomass energy and indigenous cultural models of well-being in an Alaska forest ecosystem. Ecol Soc Publ. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05763-180338
Sinha A, Shahbaz M, Balsalobre D (2017) Exploring the relationship between energy usage segregation and environmental degradation in N-11 countries. J Clean Prod 168:1217–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.071
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Gan GGG, Shahbaz M (2018) The impact of biomass energy consumption on pollution: evidence from 80 developed and developing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2523(25):22641–22657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2392-5
Tariq S, Nawaz H, Mehmood U (2021) Journal Pre of Turkish National Committee for Air Pollution Research and Control
Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
Wang Z, Bui Q, Zhang B, Pham TLH (2020a) Biomass energy production and its impacts on the ecological footprint : an investigation of the G7 countries. Sci Total Environ 743:140741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140741
Wang Z, Bui Q, Zhang B (2020b) The relationship between biomass energy consumption and human development: empirical evidence from BRICS countries. Energy 194:116906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116906
Weldu YW (2017) Life cycle human health and ecosystem quality implication of biomass-based strategies to climate change mitigation. Renew Energy 108:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.046
Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2007) A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Econ Lett 97:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.003
Yilanci V, Korkut Pata U (2020) Convergence of per capita ecological footprint among the ASEAN-5 countries: evidence from a non-linear panel unit root test. Ecol Indic 113:106178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106178
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Res Policy 63:101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Usman Mehmood conducted analysis and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not required
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehmood, U. Biomass energy consumption and its impacts on ecological footprints: analyzing the role of globalization and natural resources in the framework of EKC in SAARC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 17513–17519 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16586-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16586-4