Abstract
While local protectionism and market segmentation owing to fiscal decentralization are not conducive to broad economic development, they may be rational choices on a local scale. Based on a spatial Durbin model, we analyzed the relationship between environmental regulations and market segmentation in China using interprovincial panel data for 2004–2018. The results indicated that the “beggar-thy-neighbor” phenomenon persists in China; environmental regulations have a U-shaped impact on market segmentation, i.e., in most regions, environmental regulation can break down market segmentation. Regions with greater decentralization are better able to promote local market integration through environmental regulation, suggesting that local governments are better able to compensate for market failures when vested with greater power. Hence, we propose that the central government should improve performance evaluation indicators for local governments and grant them greater autonomy; additionally, local governments should increase the intensity of environmental regulations as appropriate, thereby promoting both environmental protection and the unification of domestic markets.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Bator FM (1958) The anatomy of market failure. Q J Econ 72:351–379
Candau F, Dienesch E (2017) Pollution haven and corruption paradise. J Environ Econ Manag 85:171–192
Chang IS, Wang W, Wu J, Sun Y, Hu R (2018) Environmental impact assessment follow-up for projects in China: institution and practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev 73:7–19
Chen X, Chang CP (2020) Fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation, and pollution: a spatial investigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:31946–31968
Clinch JP, Healy JD (2000) Domestic energy efficiency in Ireland: correcting market failure. Energy Policy 28:1–8
Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1998) The value of ecosystem services: putting the issues in perspective. Ecol Econ 25:67–72
Cui L, Song M, Zhu L (2019) Economic evaluation of the trilateral FTA among China, Japan, and South Korea with big data analytics. Comput Ind Eng 128:1040–1051
Du W, Li M (2020) Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on pollution abatement and collaborative emissions reduction: micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Environ Impact Assess Rev 82:106382
Duan HB, Zhang GP, Wang SY, Fan Y (2019) Robust climate change research: a review on multi-model analysis. Environ Res Lett 14:23
Elhorst JP, Freret S (2009) Evidence of political yardstick competition in France using a two-regime spatial Durbin model with fixed effects. J Reg Sci 49:931–951
Fan Z, Zhang J (2010) Fiscal decentralization, intergovernmental transfer and market integration. Econ Res J 45:53–64 (in Chinese)
Fan X, Song D, Zhao X (2017) Does infrastructure construction break up domestic market segmentation? Econ Res J 52:20–34 (in Chinese)
Feng Y, Wang X, Du W, Wu H, Wang J (2019) Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 235:210–224
Feng T, Du H, Lin Z, Zuo J (2020) Spatial spillover effects of environmental regulations on air pollution: evidence from urban agglomerations in China. J Environ Manag 272:110998
Givens JE, Jorgenson AK (2011) The effects of affluence, economic development, and environmental degradation on environmental concern: a multilevel analysis. Organ Environ 24:74–91
Gui Q, Chen M, Lu M, Chen Z (2006) China’s domestic market tends to divide or consolidate: an analysis based on the relative prices. J World Econ 2:20–30 (in Chinese)
Hao Y, Wu Y, Wu H, Ren S (2020) How do FDI and technical innovation affect environmental quality? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:7835–7850
Izquierdo SS, Izquierdo LR (2007) The impact of quality uncertainty without asymmetric information on market efficiency. J Bus Res 60:858–867
Jin F, Lee K, Kim YK (2008) Changing engines of growth in China: from exports, FDI and marketization to innovation and exports. China World Econ 16:31–49
Ke S (2015) Domestic market integration and regional economic growth—China’s recent experience from 1995–2011. World Dev 66:588–597
Lai A, Yang Z, Cui L (2021) Market segmentation impact on industrial transformation: evidence for environmental protection in China. J Clean Prod 297:126607
Lee M (2006) Environmental economics: A market failure approach to the commerce clause. Yale Law J 116:456–492
Li H, Lu J (2020) Can regional integration control transboundary water pollution? A test from the Yangtze River economic belt. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:28288–28305
Li J, Qiu LD, Sun Q (2003) Interregional protection: implications of fiscal decentralization and trade liberalization. China Econ Rev 14:227–245
Li M, Du W, Tang S (2021) Assessing the impact of environmental regulation and environmental co-governance on pollution transfer: micro-evidence from China. Environ Impact Assess Rev 86:106467
Lin JY, Liu Z (2000) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in China. Econ Dev Cult Chang 49:1–21
Liu X, Li Z (2008) Empirical study on fiscal decentralization and regional market segmentation. J Financ Econ 2:88–98 (in Chinese)
Lu M, Chen Z (2009) Fragmented growth: why economic opening may worsen domestic market segmentation? Econ Res J 44:42–52 (in Chinese)
Lu M, Chen Z, Yan J (2004) Increasing return, development strategy and regional economic segmentation. Econ Res J 1:54–63 (in Chinese)
Mao YM (2018) Decentralization, national context and environmental policy performance: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:28471–28488
Mbanyele W, Wang F (2021) Environmental regulation and technological innovation: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res
NBSC (2005a) China Statistical Yearbook on Environment. China Statistics Press, Beijing
NBSC (2005b) China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing
Pan X, Ai B, Li C, Pan X, Yan Y (2019) Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 144:428–435
Parsley DC, Wei SJ (1996) Convergence to the law of one price without trade barriers or currency fluctuations. Q J Econ 111:1211–1236
Poncet S (2003) Measuring Chinese domestic and international integration. China Econ Rev 14:1–21
Reinhardt F (1999) Market failure and the environmental policies of firms: economic rationales for “beyond compliance” behavior. J Ind Ecol 3:9–21
Shao Q, Wang X, Zhou Q, Balogh L (2019a) Pollution haven hypothesis revisited: a comparison of the BRICS and MINT countries based on VECM approach. J Clean Prod 227:724–738
Shao S, Chen Y, Li K, Yang L (2019b) Market segmentation and urban CO2 emissions in China: evidence from the Yangtze River Delta region. J Environ Manag 248:109324
Song KY, Bian YC, Zhu C, Nan YQ (2020a) Impacts of dual decentralization on green total factor productivity: evidence from China’s economic transition. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:14070–14084
Song Y, Yang T, Li Z, Zhang X, Zhang M (2020b) Research on the direct and indirect effects of environmental regulation on environmental pollution: empirical evidence from 253 prefecture-level cities in China. J Clean Prod 269:122425
Stern DI (2004) The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Dev 32:1419–1439
Sun XX, Loh L, Chen ZW (2020) Effect of market fragmentation on ecological efficiency: evidence from environmental pollution in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:4944–4957
Testa F, Iraldo F, Frey M (2011) The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: the case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions. J Environ Manag 92:2136–2144
Treisman D (2006) Fiscal decentralization, governance, and economic performance: a reconsideration. Econ Polit 18:219–235
Wang Y, Shen N (2016) Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: the case of China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:758–766
Wang B, Wu Y, Yan P (2010) Environmental efficiency and environmental total factor productivity growth in China’s regional economies. Econ Res J 45:95–109 (in Chinese)
Wang A, Hu S, Lin B (2021) Can environmental regulation solve pollution problems? Theoretical model and empirical research based on the skill premium. Energy Econ 94:105068
Welsch H (2007) Environmental welfare analysis: a life satisfaction approach. Ecol Econ 62:544–551
Wu H, Xu L, Ren S, Hao Y, Yan G (2020) How do energy consumption and environmental regulation affect carbon emissions in China? New evidence from a dynamic threshold panel model. Res Policy 67:101678
Xiwei Z, Jin X, Luo D (2005) Market segmentation and the expansion of China’s Export. Econ Res J 12:68–76 (in Chinese)
Young A (2000) The razor's edge: Distortions and incremental reform in the People’s Republic of China. Q J Econ 115:1091–1135
Zhang C, Lu Y, Guo L, Yu T (2011) The intensity of environmental regulation and technological progress of production. Econ Res J 2:3–124 (in Chinese)
Zhang H, Zhu Z, Fan Y (2018) The impact of environmental regulation on the coordinated development of environment and economy in China. Nat Hazards 91:473–489
Zhang K, Shao S, Fan S (2020) Market integration and environmental quality: evidence from the Yangtze river delta region of China. J Environ Manag 261:110208
Zhang Q, Chen W, Feng Y (2021) The effectiveness of China’s environmental information disclosure at the corporate level: empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Resour Conserv Recycl 164:105158
Acknowledgements
We thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, and we would also like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant no. 71974001], the Major Research Projects of Natural Science in Universities of Anhui Province of China [grant no. KJ2017ZD35], and the Top Talent Project in Anhui Province [grant no. gxyqZD2020087].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Aolin Lai, formal analysis, investigation, software, and writing (original draft); Zhihui Yang, conceptualization, writing (review and editing), supervision, resources, project administration, and funding acquisition; Lianbiao Cui, methodology, investigation, validation, and writing (review and editing).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.
Consent for publication
The authors agree to publish this article in the Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lai, ., Yang, Z. & Cui, L. Can environmental regulations break down domestic market segmentation? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 10157–10172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16387-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16387-9