Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exergy and energy analysis of a tubular solar still with and without fins: a comparative theoretical and experimental approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the major challenges faced by human society is the freshwater crisis and shortage of conventional energy. Solar still is considered as one of the promising sources for the production of freshwater from saline water by desalination method. This paper represents the theoretical and experimental study of tubular solar still with and without fins. In this experimental study, the readings were recorded from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM. The results of this experiment show that the efficiency of tubular solar still (TSS) with fins and without fins is found as 23.39 and 13.76% respectively. The rate of irreversibility from the basin of TSS with flat is higher than TSS with finned absorber and also the rate of irreversibility from water is significantly reduced by TSS with the finned absorber. The exergy analysis showed the maximum exergy efficiency of about 11.8% from the TSS with fins and about 10.6% from the TSS with a flat absorber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TSS:

Tubular solar still

DBSS:

Double basin solar still

SB-SS:

Single basin solar still

DC:

Direct current

EHTC:

Evaporative heat transfer coefficient

CHTC:

Convective heat transfer coefficient

ETC:

Evacuated tube collector

HDH:

Humidification–dehumidification

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamic simulation

CSS:

Concentrated solar still

PCM:

Phase change material

T :

Ambient temperature (K)

T sun :

Temperature of sun (K)

A :

Area (m2)

U b :

Overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

I (t):

Solar intensity (W/m2)

I r,g :

Rate of irreversibility from glass

h fg :

Latent heat of vaporization (kJ/kg)

E in :

Exergy input (W/m2)

E out :

Exergy output (W/m2)

E evap :

Exergy associated with the heat transfer through evaporation

E sun :

Solar exergy

τ :

Transmissivity

α :

Absorptivity

η :

Efficiency

a:

Ambient

w:

Water

b:

Basin

g:

Glass

References

  • Abdelgaied M, Kabeel AE, Sathyamurthy R (2020) Improving the performance of solar powered membrane distillation systems using the thermal energy storage mediums and the evaporative cooler. Renew Energy 157:1046–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Arabi M, Zurigat Y (2005) Year-round comparative study of three types of solar desalination units. Desalination 172(2):137–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan A, Fukuhara T (2010) Mass and heat transfer model of tubular solar still. Sol Energy 84(7):1147–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaian WM, Elnegiry EA, Hamed AM (2016) Experimental investigation on the performance of solar still augmented with pin-finned wick. Desalination 379:10–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai M, Velmurugan V (2015) Performance analysis of fin type solar still integrated with fin type mini solar pond. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 9:30–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunkumar T, Jayaprakash R, Ahsan A, Denkenberger D, Okundamiya MS (2013) Effect of water and air flow on concentric tubular solar water desalting system. Appl Energy 103:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunkumar T, Velraj R, Denkenberger DC, Sathyamurthy R, Kumar KV, Ahsan A (2016) Productivity enhancements of compound parabolic concentrator tubular solar stills. Renew Energy 88:391–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attia MEH, Driss Z, Abdelgaied M, Manokar AM, Sathyamurthy R, Hussein AK (2021) Performance evaluation of modified solar still using aluminum foil sheet as absorber cover–a comparative study. J Test Eval 49(5)

  • Attia MEH, Driss Z, Manokar AM, Sathyamurthy R (2020) Effect of aluminum balls on the productivity of solar distillate. Journal of Energy Storage 30:101466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balachandran GB, David PW, Rajendran G, Ali MNA, Radhakrishnan V, Balamurugan R, Athikesavan M, Sathyamurthy R (2021) Investigation of performance enhancement of solar still incorporated with Gallus gallus domesticus cascara as sensible heat storage material. Environ Sci Poll Res 28:611–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar N, Rai AK (2018) Thermal investigation of a tubular solar still. Technology 9(1):356–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Elashmawy M (2017) An experimental investigation of a parabolic concentrator solar tracking system integrated with a tubular solar still. Desalination 411:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elashmawy M (2019) Effect of surface cooling and tube thickness on the performance of a high temperature standalone tubular solar still. Appl Therm Eng 156:276–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sebaii AA, El-Naggar M (2017) Year round performance and cost analysis of a finned single basin solar still. Appl Therm Eng 110:787–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sebaii AA, Ramadan MRI, Aboul-Enein S, El-Naggar M (2015) Effect of fin configuration parameters on single basin solar still performance. Desalination 365:15–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Essa FA, Elsheikh AH, Algazzar AA, Sathyamurthy R, Ali MKA, Abd Elaziz M, Salman KH (2020) Eco-friendly coffee-based colloid for performance augmentation of solar stills. Process Saf Environ Prot 136:259–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fath HE, El-Samanoudy M, Fahmy K, Hassabou A (2003) Thermal-economic analysis and comparison between pyramid-shaped and single-slope solar still configurations. Desalination 159(1):69–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hepbasli A (2008) A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12(3):593–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jani HK, Modi KV (2018) Experimental performance evaluation of single basin dual slope solar still with circular and square cross-sectional hollow fins. Sol Energy 179(December):186–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeel AE, Sharshir SW, Abdelaziz GB, Halim MA, Swidan A (2019) Improving performance of tubular solar still by controlling the water depth and cover cooling. J Clean Prod 233:848–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SA, Kumar PSM, Sathyamurthy R, Manokar AM (2020) A study of life cycle conversion efficiency and CO2 role in the pyramid shape solar stills–Comparative analysis. Groundw Sustain Dev 11:100413

  • Manokar AM, Winston DP (2017) Experimental analysis of single basin single slope finned acrylic solar still. Mater Today Proc 4(8):7234–7239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu Manokar A, Prince Winston D (2017) Comparative study of finned acrylic solar still and galvanised iron solar still. Mater Today Proc 4(8):8323–8327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu Manokar A, Vimala M, Prince Winston D, Rajendran DR, Sathyamurthy R, Kabeel AE (2020a) Year around distilled water production, energy, and economic analysis of solar stills—a comparative study. Heat Transfer 49(6):3651–3662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu Manokar A, Vimala M, Prince Winston D, Rajendran DR, Sathyamurthy R, Kabeel AE (2020b) A comparative study of 3E (energy, exergy, and economy) analysis of various solar stills. Heat Transfer 49(8):4394–4409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omara ZM, Hamed MH, Kabeel AE (2011) Performance of finned and corrugated absorbers solar stills under Egyptian conditions. Desalination 277(1–3):281–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panchal HN (2015) Enhancement of distillate output of double basin solar still with vacuum tubes. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences 27(2):170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panchal HN, Thakkar H (2016) Theoretical and experimental validation of evacuated tubes directly coupled with solar still. Therm Eng 63(11):825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panchal H, Mohan I (2017) Various methods applied to solar still for enhancement of distillate output. Desalination 415:76–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panomwan Na Ayuthaya R, Namprakai P, Ampun W (2013) The thermal performance of an ethanol solar still with fin plate to increase productivity. Renew Energy 54:227–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petela R (2003) Exergy of undiluted thermal radiation. Sol Energy 74(6):469–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabhi K, Nciri R, Nasri F, Ali C, Ben Bacha H (2017) Experimental performance analysis of a modified single-basin single-slope solar still with pin fins absorber and condenser. Desalination 416(April):86–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahbar N, Esfahani JA, Fotouhi-Bafghi E (2015) Estimation of convective heat transfer coefficient and water-productivity in a tubular solar still–CFD simulation and theoretical analysis. Sol Energy 113:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaseenivasan T, Srithar K (2016) Performance investigation on solar still with circular and square fins in basin with CO2 mitigation and economic analysis. Desalination 380(January):66–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarhaddi F, Tabrizi FF, Zoori HA, Mousavi SAHS (2017) Comparative study of two weir type cascade solar stills with and without PCM storage using energy and exergy analysis. Energy Convers Manag 133:97–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugan S, Palani S, Janarthanan B (2018) Productivity enhancement of solar still by PCM and nanoparticles miscellaneous basin absorbing materials. Desalination 433:186–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharshir SW, Eltawil MA, Algazzar AM, Sathyamurthy R, Kandeal AW (2020). Performance enhancement of stepped double slope solar still by using nanoparticles and linen wicks: energy, exergy and economic analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering, 115278

  • Sharshir SW, Peng G, Yang N, El-Samadony MOA, Kabeel AE (2016) A continuous desalination system using humidification–dehumidification and a solar still with an evacuated solar water heater. Appl Therm Eng 104:734–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla SK, Sorayan VPS (2005) Thermal modeling of solar stills: an experimental validation. Renew Energy 30(5):683–699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PK, Agrawal SK (2013) Winter and summer performance of single sloped basin type solar still integrated with extended porous fins. Desalination 319:73–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taamneh Y, Taamneh MM (2012) Performance of pyramid-shaped solar still: experimental study. Desalination 291:65–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velmurugan V, Deenadayalan CK, Vinod H, Srithar K (2008a) Desalination of effluent using fin type solar still. Energy 33(11):1719–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velmurugan V, Gopalakrishnan M, Raghu R, Srithar K (2008) Single basin solar still with fin for enhancing productivity. Energy Convers Manag 49(10):2602–2608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie G, Sun L, Mo Z, Liu H, Du M (2016) Conceptual design and experimental investigation involving a modular desalination system composed of arrayed tubular solar stills. Appl Energy 179:972–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef MS, Hassan H, Kodama S, Sekiguchi H (2019) An experimental study on the performance of single slope solar still integrated with a PCM-based pin-finned heat sink. Energy Procedia 156(September):100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurigat YH, Abu-Arabi MK (2004) Modelling and performance analysis of a regenerative solar desalination unit. Appl Therm Eng 24(7):1061–1072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Arasur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

    Ravishankar Sathyamurthy, Ramani Bharathwaaj & Sathiyaseelan Vasanthaseelan

  2. Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

    Ravishankar Sathyamurthy & Abd Elnaby Kabeel

  3. Faculty of Engineering, Delta University for Science and Technology, Gamasa, Egypt

    Abd Elnaby Kabeel

  4. Faculty of Engineering, Kuwait College of Science and Technology, Doha District, Kuwait, Kuwait

    Ali Chamkha

  5. Center of Excellence in Desalination Technology, King Abdulaziz University, PO Box 80200, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia

    Ali Chamkha

  6. Department of Mechanical Engineering, B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 600048, India

    Hemanth Arun Kumar, Hariprasath Venkateswaran & Athikesavan Muthu Manokar

Authors
  1. Ravishankar Sathyamurthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abd Elnaby Kabeel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Chamkha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hemanth Arun Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hariprasath Venkateswaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Athikesavan Muthu Manokar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ramani Bharathwaaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sathiyaseelan Vasanthaseelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, resources, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing, and supervision and investigation were carried out by Ravishankar Sathyamurthy, Abd Elnaby Kabeel, and Ali Chamkha.

Writing—original draft preparation and review and editing were carried out by Hemanth Arun Kumar, Hariprasath Venkateswaran, Athikesavan Muthu Manokar, Ramani Bharathwaaj, and Sathiyaseelan Vasanthaseelan.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravishankar Sathyamurthy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sathyamurthy, R., Kabeel, A.E., Chamkha, A. et al. Exergy and energy analysis of a tubular solar still with and without fins: a comparative theoretical and experimental approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 6612–6621 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16065-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16065-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation