Abstract
The objective of this research was to evaluate anaerobic co-digestion of guinea pig manure (GP) with Andean agricultural residues such as amaranth (AM), quinoa (QU) and wheat (TR) in batch biodigesters under mesophilic conditions (37 0C) for 40 days. As microbial inoculum, sewage treatment sludge was used in two inoculum/substrate ratios (ISR of 1 and 2). In terms of methane production, the best results occurred in treatments containing AM and QU as co-substrate and an ISR of 2. Thus, the highest methane production yield in the GP:AM biodigesters (25:75) and GP:QU (25:75) with 341.86 mlCH4/g VS added and 341.05 mlCH4/g VS added, respectively. On the other hand, the results showed that methane production with an ISR of 2 generated higher yields for guinea pig waste and the methane fraction of the biogas generated was in a range from 57 to 69%. Methane production kinetics from these raw materials was studied using five kinetic models: modified Gompertz, logistic equation, transfer, cone and Richards. The cone model adjusted best to the experimental values with those observed with r2 of 0.999 and RMSE of 1.16 mlCH4/g VS added. Finally, the highest biodegradability (experimental yield/theoretical yield) was obtained in the GP-AM biodigesters (25:75) with 67.92%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexis P-OB, Patricia T-L, Fernando M-RL, Marcela C-CL, Carlos V-F, Alexander T-LW, Abdón O-AJ (2015) Efecto de la relación sustrato-inóculo sobre el potencial bioquímico de metano de biorresiduos de origen municipal. Ing Investig y Tecnol 16:515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riit.2015.09.004
Altaş L (2009) Inhibitory effect of heavy metals on methane-producing anaerobic granular sludge. J Hazard Mater 162:1551–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.048
Alvarez R, Lidén G (2008) Anaerobic co-digestion of aquatic flora and quinoa with manures from Bolivian Altiplano. Waste Manag 28:1933–1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.11.002
Alvarez R, Lidén G (2009) Low temperature anaerobic digestion of mixtures of llama, cow and sheep manure for improved methane production. Biomass Bioenergy 33:527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.012
Alvarez R, Villca S, Lidén G (2006) Biogas production from llama and cow manure at high altitude. Biomass Bioenergy 30:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.10.001
Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ, Saikawa A, Kan T, Qi G, Pan Z, Yamashiro T, Iwasaki M, Ihara I, Nishida T, Umetsu K (2018) Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, meat and bone meal and crude glycerol: Process performance and digestate valorization. Renew Energy 128:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.056
APHA (2018) 2540 SOLIDS. In: Standard Methods For the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association
Astals S, Batstone DJ, Mata-Alvarez J, Jensen PD (2014) Identification of synergistic impacts during anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes. Bioresour Technol 169:421–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.024
Azevedo-Ramos C, Moutinho P (2018) No man’s land in the Brazilian Amazon: Could undesignated public forests slow Amazon deforestation? Land Use Policy 73:125–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.005
Baquerizo Crespo RJ, Díaz J, Pereda Reyes I (2016) El modelo de Buswell. Aplicación y comparación. Principales factores que influyen en su aplicación. Virtual Pro
Barreros Chiluisa EI (2017) Efecto de la relación carbono/nitrógeno en el tiempo de descomposición del abono de cuy (Cavia porcellus), enriquecido. Dissertation, Technical University of Ambato
Boronat Gil MI (2013) Propuesta de un matadero de alpacas y planta de elaboración de charqui mediante el uso de las tecnologías apropiadas para el distrito de Cotaruse (departamento de Apurimac, Perú). Dissertation, Valladolid University
Bortolini J, Tavares MHF, Freitag DT, Kuczman O (2020) Removal of solids and chemical oxygen demand in poultry litter anaerobic digestion with different inocula. Rev Ambient Água 15. https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2469
Bouallagui H, Touhami Y, Cheikh RB, Hamdi M (2005) Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes. Process Biochem 40:989–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.03.007
Boulanger A, Pinet E, Mansour AA, Bouix M, Bouchez T (2011) Effect of inoculum to substrate ratio on municipal solid waste methanization potential. In: Sardinia 2011-Thirteenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium. p 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.024, 32, 2258, 2265
Boulanger A, Pinet E, Bouix M, Bouchez T, Mansour AA (2012) Effect of inoculum to substrate ratio (I/S) on municipal solid waste anaerobic degradation kinetics and potential. Waste Manag 32:2258–2265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.024
Brown D, Shi J, Li Y (2012) Comparison of solid-state to liquid anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic feedstocks for biogas production. Bioresour Technol 124:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.051
Caillet H, Lebon E, Akinlabi E, Madyira D, Adelard L (2019) Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on methane production in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests of sugarcane distillery waste water. Procedia Manuf 35:259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.037
Castro-Molano L d P, Escalante Hernández H, Lambis Benítez LE, Marín Batista JD (2018) Synergistic effects in anaerobic codigestion of chicken manure with industrial wastes. DYNA 85:135–141. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v85n206.68167
Cecchi F, Mata-Alvarez J, Marcomini A, Pavan P (1991) First order and step-diffusional kinetic models in simulating the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of complex substrates. Bioresour Technol 36:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(91)90233-A
Cedano-Castro JI, Jiménez R, Huamán A, Fuerst-Waltl B, Wurzinger M, Gutiérrez G (2020) Estimation of genetic parameters for four Peruvian guinea pig lines. Trop Anim Health Prod 53:34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02473-6
Chen Y, Zhu R, Jiang Q, Sun T, Li M, Shi J, Chai H, Gu L, Ai H, He Q (2019) Effects of green waste participation on the co-digestion of residual sludge and kitchen waste: A preliminary study. Sci Total Environ 671:838–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.339
Córdoba V, Fernández M, Santalla E (2018) The effect of substrate/inoculum ratio on the kinetics of methane production in swine wastewater anaerobic digestion. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:21308–21317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0039-6
da Borso F, Chiumenti A, Fait G, Mainardis M, Goi D (2021) Biomethane potential of sludges from a brackish water fish hatchery. Appl Sci 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020552
da Silva KCD, de Amorim MCC, Galvão RS, Gonçalves YB d O, Silva PT d S e, ESC B (2020) Effect of the inoculum/substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of grape marc. Rev Ambient Água 15. https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2541
Deepanraj B, Sivasubramanian V, Jayaraj S (2015) Experimental and kinetic study on anaerobic digestion of food waste: The effect of total solids and pH. J Renew Sustain Energy 7:63104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935559
Ebner JH, Labatut RA, Lodge JS, Williamson AA, Trabold TA (2016) Anaerobic co-digestion of commercial food waste and dairy manure: Characterizing biochemical parameters and synergistic effects. Waste Manag 52:286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.046
El-Mashad HM (2013) Kinetics of methane production from the codigestion of switchgrass and Spirulina platensis algae. Bioresour Technol 132:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.183
Eskicioglu C, Ghorbani M (2011) Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of bioethanol plant whole stillage in batch mode. Process Biochem 46:1682–1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2011.04.013
Fang M, Wu S, Zhang W, Li W, Pang C, Dong R (2014) Influence of inoculum-substrate ratio on food waste mesothermal anaerobic digestion. J China Agric Univ 19:186–192
Ferrer I, Garfí M, Uggetti E, Ferrer-Martí L, Calderon A, Velo E (2011) Biogas production in low-cost household digesters at the Peruvian Andes. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1668–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.036
García ME (2019) Death of a Guinea Pig: Grief and the Limits of Multispecies Ethnography in Peru. Environ Humanit 11:351–372. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-7754512
Garfí M, Ferrer-Martí L, Perez I, Flotats X, Ferrer I (2011a) Codigestion of cow and guinea pig manure in low-cost tubular digesters at high altitude. Ecol Eng 37:2066–2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.018
Garfí M, Ferrer-Martí L, Villegas V, Ferrer I (2011b) Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of guinea pig manure in low-cost tubular digesters at high altitude. Bioresour Technol 102:6356–6359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.004
Garfí M, Martí-Herrero J, Garwood A, Ferrer I (2016) Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:599–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.071
Garfí M, Castro L, Montero N, Escalante H, Ferrer I (2019) Evaluating environmental benefits of low-cost biogas digesters in small-scale farms in Colombia: A life cycle assessment. Bioresour Technol 274:541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.007
Góngora JC (2003) Beneficios y costos de políticas públicas ambientales en la gestión de residuos sólidos: Chile y países seleccionados. United Nations Publications
Gonzalez-Salazar MA, Morini M, Pinelli M, Spina PR, Venturini M, Finkenrath M, Poganietz W-R (2014) Methodology for estimating biomass energy potential and its application to Colombia. Appl Energy 136:781–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.004
Groot JCJ, Cone JW, Williams BA, Debersaques FMA, Lantinga EA (1996) Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 64:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(96)01012-7
Haag NL, Nägele H-J, Fritz T, Oechsner H (2015) Effects of ensiling treatments on lactic acid production and supplementary methane formation of maize and amaranth–An advanced green biorefining approach. Bioresour Technol 178:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.048
He K, Lei Y, Pan X, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Chen D (2010) Co-benefits from energy policies in China. Energy 35:4265–4272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.021
Heidrich ES, Curtis TP, Dolfing J (2011) Determination of the Internal Chemical Energy of Wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 45:827–832. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103058w
Himanshu H, Murphy JD, Grant J, O’Kiely P (2018) Antagonistic effects on biogas and methane output when co-digesting cattle and pig slurries with grass silage in in vitro batch anaerobic digestion. Biomass Bioenergy 109:190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.027
Holliger C, Alves M, Andrade D, Angelidaki I, Astals S, Baier U, Bougrier C, Buffière P, Carballa M, De Wilde V (2016) Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. Water Sci Technol 74:2515–2522. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.336
Jeung JH, Chung WJ, Chang SW (2019) Evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion to enhance the efficiency of livestock manure anaerobic digestion. Sustain:11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247170
Khoufi S, Louhichi A, Sayadi S (2015) Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater and liquid poultry manure in batch condition and semi-continuous jet-loop reactor. Bioresour Technol 182:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.092
Kouakou NDV, Grongnet J-F, Assidjo NE, Thys E, Marnet P-G, Catheline D, Legrand P, Kouba M (2013) Effect of a supplementation of Euphorbia heterophylla on nutritional meat quality of Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus L.). Meat Sci 93:821–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.11.036
Li Y, Park SY, Zhu J (2011) Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:821–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042
Li L, Kong X, Yang F, Li D, Yuan Z, Sun Y (2012) Biogas production potential and kinetics of microwave and conventional thermal pretreatment of grass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 166:1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-011-9503-9
Li Y, Feng L, Zhang R, He Y, Liu X, Xiao X, Ma X, Chen C, Liu G (2013a) Influence of inoculum source and pre-incubation on bio-methane potential of chicken manure and corn stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 171:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0335-7
Li Y, Zhang R, Chen C, Liu G, He Y, Liu X (2013b) Biogas production from co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure under anaerobic wet, hemi-solid-, and solid-state conditions. Bioresour Technol 149:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.091
Li Y, Li Y, Zhang D, Li G, Lu J, Li S (2016) Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of tomato residues with dairy manure and corn stover for biogas production. Bioresour Technol 217:50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.111
Li L, He Q, Zhao X, Wu D, Wang X, Peng X (2018) Anaerobic digestion of food waste: Correlation of kinetic parameters with operational conditions and process performance. Biochem Eng J 130:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2017.11.003
Liew LN, Shi J, Li Y (2011) Enhancing the solid-state anaerobic digestion of fallen leaves through simultaneous alkaline treatment. Bioresour Technol 102:8828–8834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.005
Lima DRS, Adarme OFH, Baêta BEL, Gurgel LVA, de Aquino SF (2018) Influence of different thermal pretreatments and inoculum selection on the biomethanation of sugarcane bagasse by solid-state anaerobic digestion: A kinetic analysis. Ind Crop Prod 111:684–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.11.048
Lin L, Yang L, Li Y (2015) Effect of feedstock components on thermophilic solid-state anaerobic digestion of yard trimmings. Energy Fuel 29:3699–3706. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00301
Lin L, Xu F, Ge X, Li Y (2019) Chapter Four - Biological treatment of organic materials for energy and nutrients production—Anaerobic digestion and composting. In: Li Y, Ge XBT-A in B (eds). Elsevier, pp 121–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aibe.2019.04.002
Liu C, Wang J, Ji X, Qian H, Huang L, Lu X (2016) The biomethane producing potential in China: A theoretical and practical estimation. Chin J Chem Eng 24:920–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2015.12.025
Lu X, Zhen G, Liu Y, Hojo T, Estrada AL, Li Y-Y (2014) Long-term effect of the antibiotic cefalexin on methane production during waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 169:644–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.056
Ma G, Ndegwa P, Harrison JH, Chen Y (2020) Methane yields during anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstocks: A meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 728:138224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138224
Maletić S, Murenji S, Agbaba J, Rončević S, Kragulj Isakovski M, Molnar Jazić J, Dalmacija B (2018) Potential for anaerobic treatment of polluted sediment. J Environ Manag 214:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.029
Masse DI, Croteau F, Patni NK, Masse L (2003) Methane emissions from dairy cow and swine manure slurries stored at 10 °C and 15 °C. Can Biosyst Eng 45:1–6
Mata-Alvarez J, Macé S, Llabrés P (2000) Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 74:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7
Melby CL, Orozco F, Averett J, Muñoz F, Romero MJ, Barahona A (2020) Agricultural Food Production Diversity and Dietary Diversity among Female Small Holder Farmers in a Region of the Ecuadorian Andes Experiencing Nutrition Transition. Nutrients 12:2454. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082454
Meneses-Quelal WO, Velázquez-Martí B (2020) Pretreatment of Animal Manure Biomass to Improve Biogas Production: A Review. Energies 13:3573. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143573
Meneses-Quelal WO, Velázquez-Martí B, Gaibor-Chávez J, Niño-Ruiz Z (2021) Biochemical potential of methane (BMP) of camelid waste and the Andean region agricultural crops. Renew Energy 168:406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.071
Moset V, Al-zohairi N, Møller HB (2015) The impact of inoculum source, inoculum to substrate ratio and sample preservation on methane potential from different substrates. Biomass Bioenergy 83:474–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.018
Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:578–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003
Nielfa A, Cano R, Fdz-Polanco M (2015) Theoretical methane production generated by the co-digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste and biological sludge. Biotechnol Reports 5:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2014.10.005
Omambia AN, Shemsanga C, Hernandez IAS (2017) Climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in East Africa (EA) and South America (SA). Handb Clim Chang Mitig Adapt Springer Int Publ Switz:749–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14409-2_17
Pagés-Díaz J, Pereda-Reyes I, Taherzadeh MJ, Sárvári-Horváth I, Lundin M (2014) Anaerobic co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse wastes with agro-residues: Synergistic and antagonistic interactions determined in batch digestion assays. Chem Eng J 245:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.008
Parra-Orobio BA, Donoso-Bravo A, Ruiz-Sánchez JC, Valencia-Molina KJ, Torres-Lozada P (2018) Effect of inoculum on the anaerobic digestion of food waste accounting for the concentration of trace elements. Waste Manag 71:342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.040
Pearse LF, Hettiaratchi JP, Kumar S (2018) Towards developing a representative biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay for landfilled municipal solid waste – A review. Bioresour Technol 254:312–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.069
Pellera F-M, Gidarakos E (2016) Effect of substrate to inoculum ratio and inoculum type on the biochemical methane potential of solid agroindustrial waste. J Environ Chem Eng 4:3217–3229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.05.026
Pérez I, Garfí M, Cadena E, Ferrer I (2014) Technical, economic and environmental assessment of household biogas digesters for rural communities. Renew Energy 62:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.017
Pitt RE, Cross TL, Pell AN, Schofield P, Doane PH (1999) Use of in vitro gas production models in ruminal kinetics. Math Biosci 159:145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(99)00020-6
Polizzi C, Alatriste-Mondragón F, Munz G (2017) Modeling the disintegration process in anaerobic digestion of tannery sludge and fleshing. Front Environ Sci 5:37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00037
Quintero M, Castro L, Ortiz C, Guzmán C, Escalante H (2012) Enhancement of starting up anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic substrate: fique’s bagasse as an example. Bioresour Technol 108:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.052
Rahman MA, Møller HB, Saha CK, Alam MM, Wahid R, Feng L (2017) Optimal ratio for anaerobic co-digestion of poultry droppings and lignocellulosic-rich substrates for enhanced biogas production. Energy Sustain Dev 39:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.04.004
Raposo F, Banks CJ, Siegert I, Heaven S, Borja R (2006) Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests. Process Biochem 41:1444–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.01.012
Raposo F, Borja R, Martín MA, Martín A, de la Rubia MA, Rincón B (2009) Influence of inoculum–substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: Process stability and kinetic evaluation. Chem Eng J 149:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.001
Raposo F, Fernández-Cegrí V, De la Rubia MA, Borja R, Béline F, Cavinato C, Demirer G, Fernández B, Fernández-Polanco M, Frigon JC et al (2011) Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of solid organic substrates: evaluation of anaerobic biodegradability using data from an international interlaboratory study. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:1088–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2622
Rivera-Parra JL, Peña-Loyola PJ (2020) Potential high-quality growing tea regions in Ecuador: an alternative cash crop for Ecuadorian small landholders. J Sci Food Agric 100:1827–1831. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10225
Roberts KP, Heaven S, Banks CJ (2016) Comparative testing of energy yields from micro-algal biomass cultures processed via anaerobic digestion. Renew Energy 87:744–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.009
Romano RT, Zhang R (2008) Co-digestion of onion juice and wastewater sludge using an anaerobic mixed biofilm reactor. Bioresour Technol 99:631–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.043
Sánchez-García M, Alburquerque JA, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, Cayuela ML (2015) Biochar accelerates organic matter degradation and enhances N mineralisation during composting of poultry manure without a relevant impact on gas emissions. Bioresour Technol 192:272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.003
Sánchez-Macías D, Barba-Maggi L, Morales-delaNuez A, Palmay-Paredes J (2018) Guinea pig for meat production: A systematic review of factors affecting the production, carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci 143:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.05.004
Seppälä M, Laine A, Rintala J (2013) Screening of novel plants for biogas production in northern conditions. Bioresour Technol 139:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.014
Sheinbaum-Pardo C, Ruiz BJ (2012) Energy context in Latin America. Energy 40:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.041
Shen J, Zheng Q, Zhang R, Chen C, Liu G (2019) Co-pretreatment of wheat straw by potassium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide: Methane production, economics, and energy potential analysis. J Environ Manag 236:720–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.046
Shrestha S, Fonoll X, Khanal SK, Raskin L (2017) Biological strategies for enhanced hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass during anaerobic digestion: Current status and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol 245:1245–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.089
Sun J, Li Z, Zhou X, Wang X, Liu T, Cheng S (2019) Investigation on methane yield of wheat husk anaerobic digestion and its enhancement effect by liquid digestate pretreatment. Anaerobe 59:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.05.009
Ugwu SN, Enweremadu CC (2019) Biodegradability and kinetic studies on biomethane production from okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) waste. South African J Sci 115:1–5. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/5595
VDI (2006) 4630: Fermentation of organic materials-Characterisation of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests. Verein Dtsch Ingenieure (VDI), Ed VDI Handb Energietechnik Berlin Beuth Verlag GmbH 44–59
Velázquez-Martí B, Meneses O, Gaibor J, Niño Z (2018) Review of mathematical models for the anaerobic digestion process. Anaerobic Digestion, J. Rajesh Banu, IntechOpen. doi:https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.80815
Vivekanand V, Mulat DG, Eijsink VGH, Horn SJ (2018) Synergistic effects of anaerobic co-digestion of whey, manure and fish ensilage. Bioresour Technol 249:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.169
Wang K, Yun S, Xing T, Li B, Abbas Y, Liu X (2021) Binary and ternary trace elements to enhance anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: Focusing on kinetic models for biogas production and digestate utilization. Bioresour Technol 323:124571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124571
Ware A, Power N (2017) Modelling methane production kinetics of complex poultry slaughterhouse wastes using sigmoidal growth functions. Renew Energy 104:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.11.045
Wei S, Zhang H, Cai X, Xu J, Fang J, Liu H (2014) Psychrophilic anaerobic co-digestion of highland barley straw with two animal manures at high altitude for enhancing biogas production. Energy Convers Manag 88:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.018
Wu X, Yao W, Zhu J, Miller C (2010) Biogas and CH4 productivity by co-digesting swine manure with three crop residues as an external carbon source. Bioresour Technol 101:4042–4047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.052
Yilmaz F, Ünşar EK, Perendeci NA, Sahinkaya E (2021) Energy generation from multifarious wastes of alcohol distillery raki production process: Kinetic modeling of methane production. J Environ Chem Eng 9:104838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104838
Zahan Z, Georgiou S, Muster TH, Othman MZ (2018) Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of chicken litter with agricultural and food wastes: A case study on the effect of carbon/nitrogen ratio, substrates mixing ratio and organic loading. Bioresour Technol 270:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.010
Zhang W, Wei Q, Wu S, Qi D, Li W, Zuo Z, Dong R (2014) Batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with dewatered sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions. Appl Energy 128:175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.071
Zhang W, Lang Q, Fang M, Li X, Bah H, Dong H, Dong R (2017) Combined effect of crude fat content and initial substrate concentration on batch anaerobic digestion characteristics of food waste. Bioresour Technol 232:304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.039
Zhao X, Li L, Wu D, Xiao T, Ma Y, Peng X (2019) Modified anaerobic digestion model no. 1 for modeling methane production from food waste in batch and semi-continuous anaerobic digestions. Bioresour Technol 271:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.091
Zhen G, Lu X, Li Y-Y, Zhao Y (2014) Combined electrical-alkali pretreatment to increase the anaerobic hydrolysis rate of waste activated sludge during anaerobic digestion. Appl Energy 128:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.062
Zhen G, Lu X, Kobayashi T, Li Y-Y, Xu K, Zhao Y (2015) Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and Egeria densa: Performance assessment and kinetic analysis. Appl Energy 148:78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.038
Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Nakamoto T, Li Y, Yang Y, Utsumi M, Sugiura N (2011) Influence of substrate-to-inoculum ratio on the batch anaerobic digestion of bean curd refuse-okara under mesophilic conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3251–3256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.002
Zhu J, Li Y, Cui F (2009) Experimental study on solid state anaerobic digestion of organic waste for methane production. In: 2009 annual ASABE meeting
Zou H, Chen Y, Shi J, Zhao T, Yu Q, Yu S, Shi D, Chai H, Gu L, He Q, Ai H (2018) Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of residual sludge with different lignocellulosic wastes in the batch digester. Bioresour Technol 268:371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.129
Acknowledgements
This work has been carried out within the framework of the project "Analysis of the implementation of biomass exploitation chains in rural communities in the province of Bolívar (Ecuador)" of the ADSIEO-COOPERATION program of the Polytechnic University of Valencia (UPV). The Ecuadorian Energy Exploitation Research Network of Biomass (ECUMASA) and the IBEROMASA Network of the Ibero-American Program of Science and Technology for Development (CYTED) have participated in this program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Contribution of each co-author is described below:
OWMQ: performed the conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation and writing-original draft preparation.
BVM: performed the conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, writing review and editing and funding acquisition.
JGC: performed the formal analysis and funding acquisition.
ZNR: performed the methodology, validation, writing review and editing and funding acquisition.
AFG: performed the writing review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ta Yeong Wu
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meneses Quelal, W.O., Velázquez-Martí, B., Gaibor Chávez, J. et al. Evaluation of methane production from the anaerobic co-digestion of manure of guinea pig with lignocellulosic Andean residues. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 2227–2243 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15610-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15610-x